Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Domains of generality

  • Andrew Buskell (a1) and Marta Halina (a2)

Abstract

We argue that general intelligence, as presented in the target article, generates multiple distinct and non-equivalent characterisations. Clarifying this central concept is necessary for assessing Burkart et al.'s proposal that the cultural intelligence hypothesis is the best explanation for the evolution of general intelligence. We assess this claim by considering two characterisations of general intelligence presented in the article.

Copyright

References

Hide All
Godfrey-Smith, P. (1996) Complexity and the function of mind in nature. Cambridge University Press.
Godfrey-Smith, P. (2013) Cephalopods and the evolution of the mind. Pacific Conservation Biology 19(1): 49.
Logan, C. J. (2016a) Behavioral flexibility and problem solving in an invasive bird. PeerJ 4:130, e1975. doi: 10.7717/peerj.1975.
Logan, C. J. (2016b) How far will a behaviourally flexible invasive bird go to innovate? Royal Society Open Science 3(6):110.
Logan, C. J., Jelbert, S. A., Breen, A. J., Gray, R. D. & Taylor, A. H. (2014) Modifications to the Aesop's fable paradigm change New Caledonian crow performances. PLoS One 9(7):19, e103049. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0103049.
Mather, J. A. & Kuba, M. J. (2013) The cephalopod specialties: Complex nervous system, learning, and cognition. Canadian Journal of Zoology 91:431–49.
Roth, G. (2013) The long evolution of brains and minds. Dordrecht.
Sterelny, K. (2003) Thought in a hostile world: The evolution of human cognition. Blackwell.

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed