Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-fnpn6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-31T10:01:02.868Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Gendering Environmental Education Reform: Identifying the Constitutive Power of Environmental Discourses

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 June 2015

Deirdre Barron
Deirdre Barron*
Affiliation:
Deakin University, Victoria
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

This study was undertaken to examine the ways, and to what extent, boys and girls entering school have positioned themselves in relation to discourses about the environment and the implications this has for environmental education. I was inspired by Davies (1989) and Davies' and Banks' (1992) studies of the ways in which gender was constituted through the discursive practices of girls and boys and the ‘… political implications of the ways in which children are constrained by the dominant gender discourses …’ (Davies and Banks 1992, p. 2). I was also influenced by the current ecofeminist scholarship that looks at the political implications of the perceived right in Western cultures to dominate the non-human.

While I am anxious to avoid labelling the children as masculine and feminine based on their biological sex it is interesting to note that in my study of young children's perceptions of environment the discourses of male ‘culture’ ascendancy were more often taken up by boys, while the marginalised discourses that opposed culture as ascendant were more often taken up by girls. I am concerned with the implications of these gendered constructions of environment for girls, nature and environmental education reform.

Type
Research Article
Information
Australian Journal of Environmental Education , Volume 11 , 1995 , pp. 107 - 120
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barrett, Michéle 1991, The Politics of Truth, Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
Bird, Elizabeth 1987, ‘The Social Construction of Nature: Theoretical Approaches to the History of Environmental Problems’, Environmental review, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 255–264.Google Scholar
Bleier, Ruth 1984, Science and Gender: A critique of biology and its theories on women, Pergamon Press, Wisconsin.Google Scholar
Davies, Bronwyn 1989, Frogs and Snails and Feminist Tales: Preschool children and gender, Allen and Unwin, Sydney.Google Scholar
Davies, Bronwyn and Banks, Chas 1992, ‘The Gender Trap. A Feminist Poststructuralist Analysis of Primary School Children's Talk about Gender’, Journal of Curriculum Studies, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 1–25.Google Scholar
Davies, Bronwyn and Harré, Rom 1989, ‘Positioning: The discursive production of selves’, Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 44–63.Google Scholar
Davies, Bronwyn and Harré, Rom 1991/1992, ‘Contradictions in lived and told narratives’, Research on Language and Social Interaction, vol. 25, pp. 1–36.Google Scholar
Di Chiro, Giovanna 1987, ‘Environmental education and the question of gender: A feminist critique’, in Robottom, Ian, Environmental Education: Practice and possibility, Deakin University, Geelong.Google Scholar
Dr.Seuss, 1972, The Lorax, Collins, London.Google Scholar
Dunkely, Graham 1992, The Greening of the Red: Sustainability, Socialism and the Environmental Crisis, Pluto Press in association with the Australian Fabian Society and the Socialist Forum, Sydney.Google Scholar
Field-Belenky, Mary, McVicker-Clinchy, Blythe, Rule-Goldberger, Nancy and Matluck-Tarule, Jill 1973, Women's Ways of Knowing: The Development of Self, Voice, and Mind, Basic Books, New York.Google Scholar
Greenall, Annette 1981, ‘Environmental education: A case study in National curriculum action’, International Journal of Environmental Education and Information, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 258–294.Google Scholar
Greenall, Annette 1987, ‘A political history of environmental education in Australia: Snakes and ladders’, in Robottom, Ian, Environmental Education: Practice and possibility, Deakin University, Geelong.Google Scholar
Greenall Gough, Annette 1991, Recycling the flavour of the month: Environmental education on its third time round’, Australian Journal of Environmental Education, vol. 7, pp. 92–98.Google Scholar
Griffin, Susan 1978, Woman and Nature: The Roaring Inside Her, Harper and Rowe, New York.Google Scholar
Hamilton, Mykol 1991, ‘Masculine bias in the attribution of personhood: people=male, male=people’, Psychology of Women Quarterly, no. 15, pp. 393–402.Google Scholar
Keller, Evelyn Fox 1989, ‘The Gender/Science System: or, Is Sex to Gender as Nature Is to Science?’, in Tuana, Nancy, Feminism and Science, Indiana University Press, Indiana.Google Scholar
King, Ynestra 1990, ‘Healing the Wounds: Feminism, Ecology, and the Nature Culture Dualism’, in Diamond, I. & Orenstein, G. F., Reweaving the World: The Emergence of Ecofeminism, Sierra Club Books, San Francisco.Google Scholar
Kress, G 1985, Linguistic Processes in Sociocultural Practice, Deakin University, Geelong.Google Scholar
Luke, Allan 1988, Literacy, Textbook and Ideology, Falmer Press, London.Google Scholar
Luke, Allan 1989, ‘Open and closed texts: the semantic/ideological analysis of textbook narratives’, Journal of Pragmatics, vol. 13, pp. 53–80.Google Scholar
Merchant, Carolyn 1990, The Death of Nature: Women. Ecology and the Scientific Revolution, Harpers San Francisco, New York.Google Scholar
O'Riordan, Timothy 1989, ‘The challenge for environmentalism’, in Peet, R. & Thrift, N., New Models in Geography, Unwin Hyman, London.Google Scholar
Robottom, Ian 1987, ‘Towards inquiry-based professional development in environmental education’, in Robottom, Ian, Environmental Education: Practice and possibility, Deakin University, Geelong.Google Scholar
Spretnak, Charlene 1990, ‘Ecofeminism: Our Roots and Flowering’, in Diamond, I & Orenstein, G. F., Reweaving the World: The Emergence of Ecofeminism, Sierra Club Books, San Francisco.Google Scholar
Tesh, Sylvia Noble 1988, Hidden Arguments: Political Ideology and Disease Prevention Policy, Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick.Google Scholar
Therborn, Goran 1980, The Ideology of Power and the Power of Ideology, Verso Editions and NLB, London.Google Scholar
Walkerdine, Valerie 1987, ‘Sex, power and pedagogy’, in Arnot, Madeleine & Weiner, Gaby, Gender and the politics of Schooling, Hutchinson, London.Google Scholar