We aimed to assess risk of COVID-19 infection & seroprotection status in healthcare workers (HCWs) in both hospital and community settings following an intensive vaccination drive in India.

Tertiary Care Hospital

We surveyed COVID-19 exposure risk, personal protective equipment (PPE) compliance, vaccination status, mental health & COVID-19 infection rate across different HCW cadres. Elecsys® test for COVID-19 spike (Anti-SARS-CoV-2S; ACOVs) and nucleocapsid (Anti-SARS-CoV-2; ACOV) responses following vaccination and/or COVID-19 infection were measured in a stratified sample of 386 HCW.

We enrolled 945 HCWs (60.6% male, age 35.9 ± 9.8 years, 352 nurses, 211 doctors, 248 paramedics & 134 support staff). Hospital PPE compliance was 90.8%. Vaccination coverage was 891/945 (94.3%). ACOVs neutralizing antibody was reactive in 381/386 (98.7%). ACOVs titer (U/ml) was higher in the post-COVID-19 infection group (N =269; 242.1 ± 35.7 U/ml) than in the post-vaccine or never infected subgroup (N = 115, 204.1 ± 81.3 U/ml). RT PCR + COVID-19 infections were documented in 224/945 (23.7%) and 6 HCWs had disease of moderate severity, with no deaths. However, 232/386 (60.1%) of HCWs tested positive for nucleocapsid ACOV antibody, suggesting undocumented or subclinical COVID-19 infection. On multivariate logistic regression, only female gender [aOR 1.79, 95% CI 1.07–3.0, P = .025] and COVID-19 family contact [aOR 5.1, 95% CI 3.84–9.5, P < .001] were predictors of risk of developing COVID-19 infection, independent of association with patient-related exposure.

Our HCWs were PPE compliant and vaccine motivated, with immunization coverage of 94.3% and seroprotection rate of 98.7%. There was no relationship between HCW COVID-19 infection to exposure characteristics in the hospital. Vaccination reduced disease severity and prevented death in HCW.

The aim of this study was to determine if oral beta-lactam therapy is non-inferior to alternative therapy at discharge following inpatient treatment with an IV cephalosporin for acute pyelonephritis.

Institutional Review Board (IRB)-approved, multicenter, retrospective, non-inferiority cohort (15% non-inferiority margin).

Six hospitals within two healthcare systems.

Hospitalized patients admitted to the medical floor with acute pyelonephritis without urologic abnormalities who received cefazolin or ceftriaxone followed by step-down therapy.

Patients were discharged with either an oral beta-lactam or an oral alternative agent (ie, fluoroquinolone or trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole) to complete therapy. The primary objective was treatment failure defined as a composite of hospital readmission or an ED visit for a urinary cause within 30 days of discharge of the index hospitalization. Data were extracted manually from the electronic medical record.

A total of 211 patients were included; 122 received an oral beta-lactam and 89 received an oral alternative agent at discharge. There was no difference in 30-day treatment failure between the two groups (4.9% vs 5.6% for oral beta-lactams vs oral alternatives, respectively. Absolute difference = 0.7%; 95% CI -5.4% to 6.8%; P = .82). The median length of hospital stay, number of patients treated with intravenous ceftriaxone, duration of IV therapy, and median duration of oral therapy were no different between groups.

In non-ICU patients admitted for pyelonephritis without urologic abnormalities, oral beta-lactams were non-inferior to oral alternatives for step-down therapy. In finding non-inferiority between the regimens, we show the feasibility of administering oral beta-lactams to complete therapy for acute pyelonephritis.

The acceptability of an electronic HH monitoring system (EHHMS) was evaluated among hospital staff members.

An electronic HH monitoring system was implemented in June 2020 at a large, academic medical center. An interdisciplinary team developed a cross-sectional survey to gather staff perceptions of the EHHMS.

The survey was conducted at a public, tertiary acute care hospital.

The survey included current employees and staff. 1,273 participants responded. The mean age was 44.9 years (SD = 13.5). Most of the samples were female (71%) and non-Hispanic white (83%).

A survey was conducted between June and July 2021. Responses were analyzed using Stata statistical software. Multiple logistic regression models were constructed to examine factors associated with negative perceptions of the EHHMS and its radiofrequency identification (RFID) badge. Supporting qualitative analyses were performed using Atlas.ti version 9.

Three-quarters (75%) of respondents reported neutral to negative perceptions of the EHHMS and its associated badge. Respondents reported limited influence on HH practices. Age, campus location, length of employment, job role, and opinion on data sharing were associated with negative perceptions of the EHHMS and RFID badge. Position in a direct patient care role was associated with negative perceptions of the RFID badge.

Perceptions of the EHHMS aligned with previous research. Identified associations provide opportunities for targeted education, outreach, and intervention to increase acceptability and uptake. Lack of acceptance is explained by poorly perceived ease of use and usefulness, as well as challenges in implementation.