Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-q6k6v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-10T05:28:43.028Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Dealing with Caesar: Finding Politics between 42 and 27 BC*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 January 2015

Kathryn Welch
Kathryn Welch*
Affiliation:
The University of Sydney, kathryn.welch@svdnev.edu.au
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The idea that ‘the republic died at Philippi’ was an essential element in the discourse of the principate because it denied legitimacy to the resistance that followed. Yet, until 36, the republicans' control of the seas under Sextus Pompeius' leadership allowed the continuation of military resistance which all too often was embarrassingly successful. Restoring Sextus Pompeius to his rightful place in the alliance against the triumvirate allows us to rethink the narrative of the war as well the ways his supporters contributed to the politics of the novus status even after his defeat.

Type
Research Article
Information
Antichthon , Volume 46 , 2012 , pp. 126 - 149
Copyright
Copyright © Australasian Society for Classical Studies 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

This paper represents a revised version of a presentation delivered at the 2009 Symposium Cumanum by invitation of Professor Patricia Johnston. I would like to thank the conference organisers and the Vergilian Society for their wonderful hospitality. Thanks are also due to audiences at University College Dublin and St Andrews University where I read the paper in late 2009. Antichthon's anonymous reviewers offered extensive and helpful comments. As my research assistant during 2006, Patrick Tansey prepared the material on the Misenum designations and offered many other useful insights. Roger Pitcher, Anne Rogerson and Kit Morrell read drafts and made pertinent criticisms, as did all my research students. My expression of gratitude in no way commits them to agreement with my arguments and any errors are my own. Dates are BC unless stated. Greek texts are adapted from TLG, Latin from BTL.

References

Badiin, E. (1982) ‘Crisis Theories and the Beginning of the Principate’, in Wirth, G. (ed) Romanitas – Christianitas: Untersuchungen zur Geschichte und Literatur der römischen Kaiserzeit. Berlin, 18–41.Google Scholar
Botteri, P. (2003). ‘L'integrazione Mommseniana a Res Gestae divi Augusti 34.1: potitusrerum omniume il testo greco’, ZPE 144, 261–7.Google Scholar
Bruhns, H. (1978). Caesar und die römische Oberschicht in den Jahren 49-44 v. Chr: Untersuchungen zur Herrschaftsetablierung im Bürger-krieg. Göttingen.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brunt, P.A. (1988). The Fall of the Roman Republic and Related Essays. Oxford.Google Scholar
Carter, J. (1996). Appian: The Civil Wars. London.Google Scholar
Cooley, A. (2004). ‘Sixty Years after Syme’, CR 54, 173–4.Google Scholar
Cresci Marrone, G. (1998). Temi augustei (Atti dell'Incontro di Studio, Venezia 5 giugno 1996). Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Drum, M. (2008). ‘Cicero's Tenth and Eleventh Philippics: The Republicans Advance in the East’, in Stevenson, and Wilson, (2008), 82–94.Google Scholar
Eder, W. (1990). ‘Augustus and the Power of Tradition: The Augustan Principate as Binding Link between Republic and Empire’, in Raaflaub, and Toher, (1990), 54–70.Google Scholar
Ferrero, G. (1907). Grandezza e decadenza di Roma. Milan.Google Scholar
Gabba, E. (1971). ‘The Perusine War and Triumviral Italy’, HSCP 75, 139–60.Google Scholar
Galinsky, K. (1996). Augustan Culture: An Interpretive Introduction. Princeton.Google Scholar
Galsterer, H. (1990). ‘A Man, a Book and a Method: Sir Ronald Syme's Roman Revolution after Fifty Years’, in Raaflaub, and Toher, (1990), 1–20.Google Scholar
Giovannini, A. (ed.) (2000). La révolution romaine après Ronald Syme. Bilans et perspectives. Geneva.Google Scholar
Gowing, A.M. (1992). The Triumviral Narratives of Appian and Cassius Dio. Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Hadas, M. (1930). Sextus Pompey. New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hellegouarc'h, J. (1963). Le vocabulaire latin des relations et des partis politiques sous la république. Paris.Google Scholar
Heuss, A., et al. (1982). La rivoluzione romana: inchiesta fra gli antichisti. Napoli.Google Scholar
Hinard, F. (1985). Les proscriptions de la Rome républicaine. Rome.Google Scholar
Holmes, T. Rice (1928). Architect of the Roman Empire. Oxford.Google Scholar
Judge, E. (2008). The First Christians in the Roman World: Augustan and New Testament Papers. Tübingen.Google Scholar
Kearsley, R. (2009). ‘Octavian and Augury: The Years 30-27 B.C.’, CQ 59, 147-66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kromayer, J. (1897). ‘Die Entwicklung der römischen Flotte vom Seeräuberkriege des Pompeius bis zur Schlacht von Actium’, Philologus 56, 426-91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lacey, W.K. (1996). Augustus and the Principate: The Evolution of the System. Leeds.Google Scholar
Laffi, U. (1993). ‘Poteri triumvirali e organi repubblicani’, in Gara, A. and Foraboschi, D. (eds), Il triumvirato costituente alla fine della repubblica romana. Scritti in onore di Mario Attilio Levi. Como, 37–65.Google Scholar
Linderski, J. (1990). ‘Mommsen and Syme: Law and Power in the Principate of Augustus’, in Raaflaub, and Toher, (1990), 42–53.Google Scholar
Meier, Ch. (1990). ‘C. Caesar Divi Filius and the Formation of the Alternative in Rome’, in Raaflaub, and Toher, (1990), 54–70.Google Scholar
Millar, F. (1981). ‘Style Abides’, JRS 71, 144-52.Google Scholar
Millar, F. (2000). ‘The First Revolution: Imperator Caesar, 36-28 BC’, in Giovannini, (2000), 1–30.Google Scholar
Millar, F. (2002). Rome, the Greek World and the East: The Roman Republic and the Augustan Revolution. Chapel Hill.Google Scholar
Momigliano, A. (1966). Terzo contributo alla storia degli studi classici e del mondo antico. Rome.Google Scholar
Rosenstein, N., and Morstein-Marx, R. (eds) (2006). A Companion to the Roman Republic. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osgood, J. (2006). Caesar's Legacy: Civil War and the Emergence of the Roman Empire. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Pelling, C.B.R. (1988). Plutarch: Life of Antony. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Pelling, C.B.R. (1996). ‘The Triumviral Period’, in Bowman, A.et al., CAH vol. 10, 2nd edition. Cambridge, 1–69.Google Scholar
Perrin, B. (1920). Plutarch: Life of Antony. Harvard.Google Scholar
Pettinger, A. (forthcoming). The Republic in Danger: Drusus Libo and the Succession of Tiberius. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Powell, A. (2002). ‘An Island amid the Flame': The Strategy and Imagery of Sextus Pompeius’, in Powell, and Welch, (2002), 103-33.Google Scholar
Powell, A. (2008). Virgil the Partisan. Swansea.Google Scholar
Powell, A., and Welch, K. (eds) (2002). Sextus Pompeius. Swansea.Google Scholar
Raaflaub, K., and Toher, M. (eds) (1990). Between Republic and Empire: Interpretations of Augustus and his Principate. Berkeley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramsey, J.T. (2001). ‘Did Julius Caesar Temporarily Banish Mark Antony from his Inner Circle?’, CQ 54, 161–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramsey, J.T. (2005). ‘Mark Antony's Judiciary Reform and its Revival under the Triumvirs’, JRS 95, 20–37.Google Scholar
Rawson, E. (1986). ‘Cassius and Brutus: The Memory of the Liberators’, in Moxon, L.S., Smart, J.D. and Woodman, A.J. (eds), Past Perspectives: Studies in Greek and Roman Historical Writings. Cambridge, 101-19.Google Scholar
Reinhold, M. (1938). ‘Review: Walter, Brutus et la fin de la république’, CW 32, 63-4.Google Scholar
Rich, J.W., and Williams, J.H.C. (1999). ‘Leges et iura p. R. restituii: a New Aureus of Octavian and the Settlement of 28/27 BC, Numismatic Chronicle 159, 169–213 and pls 20-1.Google Scholar
Rich, J.W. (forthcoming). ‘Making the Emergency Permanent: auctoritas, potestasmd the Evolution of the Principate of Augustus’, MEFRA.Google Scholar
Ridley, R.T. (2003). The Emperor's Retrospect: Augustus' Res Gestae in Epigraphy, Historiography and Commentary. Leuven.Google Scholar
Ridley, R.T. (2010). ‘Eulogy of the Lost Republic or Acceptance of the New Monarchy? Livy's Ab urbe condita’, Antichthon 44, 68–95.Google Scholar
Sattler, P. (1960). Augustus und der Senat. Göttingen.Google Scholar
Scheid, J. (2007). Res Gestae Divi Augusti. Michigan.Google Scholar
Stevenson, T., and Wilson, M.T. (eds) (2008). Cicero's Philippics: History, Rhetoric, Ideology. Auckland.Google Scholar
Stone, A.M. (2008). ‘Greek Ethics and Roman Statesmen’, in Stevenson, and Wilson, (2008), 214-39.Google Scholar
Syme, R. (1939). The Roman Revolution. Oxford.Google Scholar
Syme, R. (1986). The Augustan Aristocracy. Oxford.Google Scholar
Tansey, P. (2007). ‘Messalla Corvinus and the Bellum Siculum’, Latomus 67, 882-90.Google Scholar
Vio, V. (1998). ‘Il “partito” dei proscritti nello scontro politico del secondo triumvirato’, in Marrone, Cresci (1998), 21–36.Google Scholar
Watson, L. (2002), ‘Horace and the Pirates’, in Powell, and Welch, (2002), 213-28.Google Scholar
Welch, K. (2002). ‘Both Sides of the Coin: Sextus Pompeius and the So-Called Pompeiani’ and ‘Sextus Pompeius and the res publica 42-39 BC’, in Powell, and Welch, (2002), 1–64.Google Scholar
Welch, K. (2006). ‘Maiestas Regia and the Donations of Alexandria in 34 BC’, Mediterranean Archaeology 19/20, 181-92.Google Scholar
Welch, K. (2009). ‘Alternative Memoirs: Tales from the ‘Other Side’ of the Civil War’, in Smith, C.J. and Powell, A. (eds), The Lost Memoirs of Augustus. Swansea, 195–224.Google Scholar
Welch, K. (forthcoming). Magnus Pius: Sextus Pompeius and the Transformation of the Roman Republic. Swansea.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, H. (1913). Appian's Roman History. Vol 4: The Civil Wars. Harvard.Google Scholar
Woodman, A.J. (1983). Vellerns Paterculus: The Caesarian and Augustan Narrative. Cambridge.Google Scholar