Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-m8qmq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T20:23:07.925Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Consulship of 367 bc and the Evolution of Roman Military Authority*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 October 2017

Jeremy Armstrong
Jeremy Armstrong*
Affiliation:
University of Aucklandjs.armstrong@auckland.ac.nz
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A tension exists within the literary sources for early Rome, between the supposedly static nature of military authority, embodied by the grant of imperium which was allegedly shared both by archaic reges and republican magistrates, and the evidence for change within Rome’s military hierarchy, with the early republican army being commanded by a succession of different magistrates including the archaic praetores, the so-called ‘consular tribunes,’ and the finally the consuls and praetors of the mid-fourth century BC. The differences between the magistracies and the motivations driving the evolution of the system have caused confusion for both ancient and modern writers alike, with the usual debate being focused on the number of officials involved under each system and Rome’s expanding military and bureaucratic needs. The present study will argue that, far more than just varying in number, when viewed against the wider backdrop of Roman society during the period, the sources hint that the archaic praetores and consular tribunes might have exercised slightly different types of military authority – possibly distinguished by the designations imperium and potestas – which were unified under the office of the consulship of 367 BC.1 The changes in Rome’s military hierarchy during the fifth and fourth centuries BC may therefore not only indicate an expansion of Rome’s military command, as is usually argued, but also an evolution of military authority within Rome associated with the movement of power from the comitia curiata to the comitia centuriata.

Type
Research Article
Information
Antichthon , Volume 51: Thematic Issue: Politics and Power in Early Rome 509-264 BC , 2017 , pp. 124 - 148
Copyright
© The Australasian Society for Classical Studies 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

I would like to thank James Richardson, Fred Drogula, and the anonymous reviewer for their comments and suggestions on an earlier version of this article. Any errors and omissions, however, are obviously my own.

References

Armstrong, J. (2013), ‘Claiming victory: Triumphs in early Rome’, in J. Armstrong and A. Spalinger (eds), Rituals of Triumph in the Ancient Mediterranean World. 7-21. Leiden.Google Scholar
Armstrong, J. (2016a), War and Society in Early Rome: From Warlords to Generals. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Armstrong, J. (2016b), ‘The Ties that Bind: Military Cohesion in Archaic Rome’, in J. Armstrong (ed.), Circum Mare: Themes in Ancient Warfare. 101-119. Leiden.Google Scholar
Badian, E. (1990), ‘Kommentar’, in W. Eder (ed.), Staat und Staatlichkeit in der frühen römischen Republik. 458-472. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Beck, H. (2011), ‘Consular Power and the Roman Constitution’, in H. Beck, A. Duplá, M. Jehne, and F. Pina Polo (eds), Consuls and the Res Publica: Hold High Office in the Roman Republic. 77-96. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Beloch, K. J. (1926), Römische Geschichte bis zum Beginn der punischen Kriege. Berlin.Google Scholar
Billows, R. (1989), ‘Legal Fiction and Political Reform at Rome in the Early Second Century B.C.’, Phoenix 43, 112-133.Google Scholar
Boddington, A. (1959), ‘The Original Nature of the Consular Tribunate’, Historia 8, 356-364.Google Scholar
Botsford, G. (1908), ‘The Lex Curiata’, Political Science Quarterly 23, 498-517.Google Scholar
Botsford, G. (2001), The Roman Assemblies: From Their Origin to the End of the Republic , reprint of 1909 edn. New York.Google Scholar
Brennan, T. C. (1996), ‘Triumphus in Monte Albano’, in R. Wallace and E. Harris (eds), Transition to Empire: Essays in Greco-Roman History 360-146 BC. 315-337. London.Google Scholar
Brennan, T. C. (2000), The Praetorship in the Roman Republic, 2 vols. Oxford.Google Scholar
Cornell, T. J. (1989), ‘The Recovery of Rome’, in F. W. Walbank, A. E. Astin, M. W. Frederiksen, R. M. Ogilvie, and A. Drummond (eds), The Cambridge Ancient History Volume 7, Part 2: The Rise of Rome to 220 BC, 2nd edn. 309-350. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Cornell, T. J. (1995), The Beginnings of Rome: Italy and Rome from the Bronze Age to the Punic Wars (c. 1000-264 BC). London.Google Scholar
Cornell, T. J. (ed.) (2013), The Fragments of the Roman Historians, 3 vols. Oxford.Google Scholar
D’Arms, E. F. (1943), ‘The classes of the ‘Servian’ Constitution’, AJPh 64, 424-426.Google Scholar
De Martino, F. (1972), ‘Intorno all’origine della repubblica romana e delle magistrature’, ANRW I.1, 217-249.Google Scholar
De Sanctis, G. (1960), Storia dei Romani II: La conquista del primato in Italia. Turin.Google Scholar
Drogula, F. (2007), ‘ Imperium, Potestas, and the Pomerium in the Roman Republic’, Historia 56, 419-452.Google Scholar
Drogula, F. (2015), Commanders and Command in the Roman Republic and Early Empire. Chapel Hill.Google Scholar
Dutoit, E. (1946), ‘Les petites causes dans l’histoire romaine de Tite-Live’, Lettres d’Humanité 5, 186-205.Google Scholar
Ferenczy, E. (1976), From the Patrician State to the Patricio-Plebeian State , translated by G. Dedinszky. Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Flach, D. (1994), Die Gesetze der frühen römischen Republik. Darmstadt.Google Scholar
Forsythe, G. (2005), A Critical History of Early Rome: From Prehistory to the First Punic War. Berkeley.Google Scholar
Fritz, K. von (1950), ‘The Reorganisation of the Roman Government in 366 B.C. and the So-Called Licinio-Sextian Laws’, Historia 1, 3-44.Google Scholar
Fulminante, F. (2014), The Urbanization of Rome and Latium Vetus: From the Bronze Age to the Archaic Era. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Gabba, E. (1977), ‘Esercito e fiscalità a Roma in età repubblicana’, in F. Chastagnol et al. (eds), Armées et fiscalité dans le monde antique. 13-33. Paris.Google Scholar
Gaertner, J. (2008), ‘Livy’s Camillus and the Political Discourse of the Late Republic’, JRS 98, 27-52.Google Scholar
Harris, W. V. (1990), ‘Roman Warfare in the Economic and Social Context of the 4th Century BC’, in W. Eder (ed.), Staat und Staatlichkeit in der frühen Römischen Republik. 494-510. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Holloway, R. (2014), ‘A Cover-up in Early Roman History: Fabia Minor and the Sextian-Licinian Reforms’, CJ 109, 139-146.Google Scholar
Hopkins, J. N. (2016), The Genesis of Roman Architecture. New Haven.Google Scholar
Humm, M. (2001), ‘Servius Tullius et la censure: élaboration d’un modèle institutionnel’, in M. Coudry and T. Späth (eds), L’invention des grands hommes de la Rome antique. Die Konstruktion der großen Männer Altroms (Actes du Colloque du Collegium Beatus Rhenanus, Augst, 16-18 septembre 1999). 221-247. Paris.Google Scholar
Kraus, C. (1991), ‘“Initium Turbandi Omnia a Femina Ortum Est”: Fabia Minor and the Election of 367 B.C.’, Phoenix 45, 314-325.Google Scholar
Kunkel, W. and Wittmann, R. (1995), Staatsordnung und Staatspraxis der römischen Republik. Munich.Google Scholar
Magdelain, A. (1968), Recherches sur l’Imperium: la loi curiate et les auspices d’investiture. Paris.Google Scholar
Meyer, E. (1961), Römischer Staat und Staatsgedanke, 2nd edn. Zurich.Google Scholar
Momigliano, A. (1963), ‘An Interim Report on the Origins of Rome’, JRS 53, 93-121.Google Scholar
Momigliano, A. (2005), ‘The Rise of the Plebs’, in K. Raaflaub (ed.), Social Struggles in Archaic Rome, 2nd edn. 168-184. Malden, MA.Google Scholar
Mommsen, Th. (1887-8), Römisches Staatsrecht, 3rd edn, 3 vols. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Niese, B. (1888), ‘Das sogenannte Licinisch-Sextische Ackergesetz’, Hermes 23, 410-429.Google Scholar
Nisbet, R. (1968), Tradition and Revolt. New Brunswick.Google Scholar
Oakley, S. P. (1997), A Commentary on Livy VI-X, vol. 1. Oxford.Google Scholar
Oakley, S. P. (1998), A Commentary on Livy VI-X, vol. 2. Oxford.Google Scholar
Pais, E. (1899), Storia di Roma, vol. 2. Turin.Google Scholar
Pellam, G. (2014), ‘A Peculiar Episode from the ‘Struggle of the Orders’? Livy and the Licinio-Sextian Rogations’, CQ 64, 280-292.Google Scholar
Pinsent, J. (1975), Military Tribunes and Plebeian Consuls: The Fasti from 444 V. to 342 V. Wiesbaden.Google Scholar
Rathbone, D. (2003), ‘The Control and Exploitation of ager publicus in Italy under the Roman Republic’, in J.-J. Aubert (ed.), Crises and the Roman Empire. 155-166. Leiden.Google Scholar
Rawlings, L. (1998), ‘Condottieri and Clansmen: Early Italian Raiding, Warfare and the State’, in K. Hopwood (ed.), Organized Crime in Antiquity. 97-127. London.Google Scholar
Rich, J. (2008), ‘ Lex Licinia, Lex Sempronia: B. G. Niebuhr and the Limitation of Landholding in the Late Republic’, in L. de Ligt and S. J. Northwood (eds), People, Land, and Politics: Demographic Developments and the Transformation of Roman Italy, 300 BC-AD 14. 519-572. Leiden.Google Scholar
Richard, J.-C. (1989), ‘Denys d’Halicarnasse et le dies Cremerensis ’, MEFRA 101, 159-173.Google Scholar
Richard, J.-C. (1990), ‘Réflexions sur le tribunat consulaire’, MEFRA 102, 767-799.Google Scholar
Richardson, J. H. (2008), ‘Ancient Political Thought and the Development of the Consulship’, Latomus 67, 627-633.Google Scholar
Ridley, R. (1986), ‘The ‘Consular Tribunate’: The Testimony of Livy’, Klio 68, 444-465.Google Scholar
Roselaar, S. T. (2010), Public Land in the Roman Republic: A Social and Economic History of Ager Publicus in Italy, 396-89 BC. Oxford.Google Scholar
Smith, C. J. (2006), The Roman Clan: The Gens from Ancient Ideology to Modern Anthropology. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Taylor, L. R. (2013), The Voting Districts of the Roman Republic: The Thirty-five Urban and Rural Tribes, reprinted with updated material by J. Linderski. Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Terrenato, N. (2001), ‘The Auditorium Site in Rome and the Origins of the Villa’, JRA 14, 5-32.Google Scholar
Toynbee, A. J. (1965), Hannibal’s Legacy: The Hannibalic War’s Effects upon Roman Life, 2 vols. Oxford.Google Scholar
Vervaet, F. (2014), The High Command in the Roman Republic: the Principle of the summum imperium auspiciumque from 509 to 19 BCE. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Vernsel, H. S. (1970), Triumphus: An Inquiry into the Origin, Development and Meaning of the Roman Triumph. Leiden.Google Scholar
Wiseman, T. P. (1995), Remus: A Roman Myth. Cambridge.Google Scholar