Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-x4r87 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T06:57:56.829Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Sociocultural Theory and Second Language Acquisition

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 November 2008

James P. Lantolf  and
Aneta Pavlenko
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Although the sociocultural theory (henceforth SCT) of mental activity, rooted in the work of L. S. Vygotsky and his colleagues, has certainly come to the fore in developmental and educational research (cf. Forman, et al. 1993, Lave and Wenger 1991, Moll 1990, Newman, et al. 1989), it is still very much the “new kid on the block” as far as SLA research is concerned. Recently, however, SCT has begun to enjoy increased attention among L2 researchers, as is amply attested in the bibliography of this paper. This research has focused on three general areas: activity theory and the relevance of motives and goals for L2 learning; the role of private speech in L2 learning; and learning in the zone of proximal development. These areas serve as the organizing basis for the survey that follows. The overview begins, however, with a brief, but necessary, overview of the theory itself.

Type
Language Acquisition and Attrition
Information
Annual Review of Applied Linguistics , Volume 15 , March 1995 , pp. 108 - 124
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY

Adair-Hauck, B. and Donato, R. 1992. Discourse perspectives on formal instruction. Language Awareness. 1.73–90.Google Scholar
Adair-Hauck, B. and Donato, R. 1994. Foreign language explanations within the Zone of Proximal Development. Canadian Modern Language Review. 50.532–553.Google Scholar
Artigal, J. M. 1992. Some considerations on why a new language is acquired by being used. International Journal of Applied Linguistics. 2.221–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brooks, F. and Donato, R. 1994. Vygotskian approaches to understanding foreign language learner discourse during communicative tasks. Hispania.77.262–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foley, J. 1991a. A psycholinguistic framework for task-based approaches to language teaching. Applied Linguistics. 12.62–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lantolf, J. P. and Ahmed, M. K. 1989. Psycholinguistic perspectives on interlanguage variation: A Vygotskyan analysis. In Gass, S. M. et al. (eds.) Variation in second language acquisition: Psycholinguistic issues.Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters. 93–108.Google Scholar
Lantolf, J. P. and Appel, G. (eds.) 1994. Vygotskian approaches to second language research. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Schinke-Llano, L. 1993. On the value of a Vygotskian framework for SLA theory and research. Language Learning. 43.121–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

UNANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY

Ahmed, M. K. 1994. Speaking as cognitive regulation: A Vygotskian perspectiveon dialogic communication. In Lantolf, J. P. and Appel, G. (eds.) Vygotskian approaches to second language research. Norwood, NJ: Ablex. 157–172.Google Scholar
Aljaafreh, A. and Lantolf, J. P.. 1994. Negative feedback as regulation and second language learning in the Zone of Proximal Development. The Modern Language Journal. 78.4.465–483. [Special issue on sociocultural theory and L2 learning].Google Scholar
Appel, G. and Lantolf, J. P.. 1994. Speaking as mediation: A study of L1 and L2 text recall tasks. The Modern Language Journal. 78.4.437–452. [Special issue on sociocultural theory and L2 learning.]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Artigal, J. M. 1993. The L2 kindergarten teacher as a territory maker. In Alatis, J. E. (ed.) Strategic interaction and language acquisition: Theory, practice, and research. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press. 452–468. [Georgetown University Round Table on Languages and Linguistics 1993.]Google Scholar
Berk, L. E. and Diaz, R. M. (eds.) 1992. Private speech: From social interaction to self-regulation. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Coughlan, P. and Duff, P. A.. 1994. Same task, different activities: Analysis of a SLA task from an Activity Theory perspective. In Lantolf, J. P. and Appel, G. (eds.) Vygotskian approaches to second language research. Norwood, NJ: Ablex. 173–194.Google Scholar
Dicamilla, F. and Lantolf, J. P.. In press. The linguistic analysis of private writing. Language Sciences.Google Scholar
Donato, R. 1988. Beyond group: A psycholinguistic rationale for collectivity in second language learning. Newark, DE: University of Delaware. Ph.D. diss.Google Scholar
Donato, R. 1994. Collective Scaffolding in second language learning. In Lantolf, J. P. and Appel, G. (eds.) Vygotskian approaches to second language research. Norwood, NJ: Ablex. 33–56.Google Scholar
Donato, R. and Lantolf, J. P.. 1990. The dialogic origins of L2 monitoring. Pragmatics and Language Learning. 1.83–98.Google Scholar
Donato, R. and McCormick, D.. 1994. A sociocultural perspective on language learning strategies: The role of mediation. The Modern Language Journal. 78.4.453–464. [Special issue on sociocultural theory and L2 learning.]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foley, J. 1990. Task-based approaches to language learning from the learner's point of view. Language and Education. 4.81–102.Google Scholar
Foley, J. 1991b. Vygotsky, Bernstein and Halliday: Towards a unified theory of L1 and L2 learning. Language, Culture and Curriculum. 4.17–42.Google Scholar
Forman, E. A., Minick, N. and Stone, C. A. (eds.) 1993. Contexts for learning: Sociocultural dynamics in children's development. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frawley, W. 1992. The cross-language study of private speech. Paper presented at the Conference for Socio-Cultural Research, Symposium on Private Speech and Self-regulation. Madrid, 08, 1992.Google Scholar
Frawley, W. 1993. The computer's guide to persons. In Alatis, J. E. (ed.) Strategic interaction and language acquisition: Theory, practice, and research. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press. 322–329. [Georgetown University Round Table on Languages and Linguistics 1993.]Google Scholar
Frawley, W. and Lantolf, J. P.. 1984. Speaking and self-order: A critique of orthodox L2 research. Studies in Second Language Acquisition. 6.143–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frawley, W. 1985. Second language discourse: A Vygotskyan perspective. Applied Linguistics. 6.19–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frawley, W. 1986. Private speech and self-regulation: A commentary on Frauenglass and Diaz. Developmental Psychology. 22.706–708.Google Scholar
Gillette, B. 1994. The role of learner goals in L2 success. In Lantolf, J. P. and Appel, G. (eds.) Vygotskian approaches to second language research. Norwood, NJ: Ablex. 195–214.Google Scholar
de Guerrero, M. C. M. 1994. Form and functions of inner speech in adult second language learning. In Lantolf, J. P. and Appel, G. (eds.) Vygotskian approaches to second language research. Norwood, NJ: Ablex. 83–116.Google Scholar
de Guerrero, M. C. M. and Villamil, O. S.. 1994. Social-cognitive dimensions of interaction in L2 peer revision. The Modern Language Journal. 78.4.484–496. [Special issue on sociocultural theory and L2 learning.]Google Scholar
Harré, R. and Gillett, G.. 1994.The discursive mind. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
John-steiner, V. 1985. The road to competence in an alien land: A Vygotskian perspective on bilingualism. In Wertsch, J. V. (ed.) Culture, communication and cognition: Vygotskian Perspectives. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. 348–372.Google Scholar
Kozulin, A. 1990. Vygotsky's psychology. A biography of ideas. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Lantolf, J. P. 1993. Sociocultural Theory And The Second-language Classroom: The lesson Of strategic interaction. In Alatis, J. E. (ed.) Strategic interaction and language acquisition: Theory, practice and research. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press. 220–233. [Georgetown University Round Table on Languages and Linguistics 1993.]Google Scholar
Lantolf, J. P. and Frawley, W.. 1984. Second language performance and Vygotsyan psycholinguistics: Implications for L2 instruction. In Manning, A., Martin, P. and McCalla, K. (eds.) The tenth LACUS Forum, 1983. Columbia, SC: Hornbeam Press. 425–440.Google Scholar
Lantolf, J. P. and Frawley, W.. 1985. On communication strategies: A functional perspective. Rassegna italiana di linguistica applicata. 17.2/3.143–157.Google Scholar
Lantolf, J. P. and Frawley, W.. 1988. Proficiency: Understanding the construct. Studies in Second Language Acquisition. 10.181–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lantolf, J. P., denTuinder, J. and Labarca, A.. 1985. Strategies for accessing bilingual dictionaries: A question of regulation. Hispania. 68.858–864.Google Scholar
Lave, J. and Wenger, E.. 1991. Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leont'ev, A. A. 1981. Psychology and the language learning process. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Luria, A. R. 1961. The role of speech in the regulation of normal and abnormal behavior. New York: Liveright.Google Scholar
Luria, A. R. 1973. The working brain: An introduction to neuropsychology. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Luria, A. R. 1976. Cognitive development: Its cultural and social foundation. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Luria, A. R. 1979. The making of mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Luria, A. R. 1982. Language and cognition. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
McCafferty, S. G. 1992. The use of private speech by adult second language learners: A cross-cultural study. The Modern Language Journal. 76.179–189.Google Scholar
McCafferty, S. G. 1994a. Adult second language learners' use of private speech: A review of studies. The Modern Language Journal. 78.4.421–436. [Special issue on sociocultural theory and L2 learning.]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCafferty, S. G. 1994b. The use of private speech by adult ESL learners at different levels of proficiency. In Lantolf, J. P. and Appel, G. (eds.) Vygotskian approaches to second language research. Norwood, NJ: Ablex. 117–134.Google Scholar
Moll, L. (ed.) 1990. Vygotsky and education: Instructional implications and applications of sociohistorical psychology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newman, D., Griffin, P. and Cole, M.. 1989. The construction zone: Working for cognitive change in school. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Newman, F. and Holzman, L.. 1993. Lev Vygotsky. Revolutionary scientist. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Platt, E. and Brooks, F. P.. 1994. The acquisition-rich environment revisited. The Modern Language Journal. 78.4.497–511. [Special issue on sociocultural theory and L2 learning.]Google Scholar
Polkinghorne, D. E. 1988. Narrative knowing and the human sciences. Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Roebuck, R. 1994. Private writing and orientation in L2 text recall. Paper presented at the American Association for Applied Linguistics Conference. Baltimore, MD, 03, 1994.Google Scholar
Rogoff, B. and Wertsch, J. V. (eds.) 1984. Children's learning in the “zone of proximal development.” San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Sampson, G. P. 1982. Converging evidence for a dialectical model of function and form in second language learning. Applied Linguistics. 3.1–28.Google Scholar
Saville-Troike, M. 1988. Private speech: Evidence for second language learning strategies during the “silent” period. Journal of Child Language. 15.567–590.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schinke-Llano, L. 1994. Linguistic accommodation with LEP and LD children. In Lantolf, J. P. & Appel, G. (eds.) Vygotskian approaches to second language research. Norwood, NJ: Ablex. 57–68.Google Scholar
Sokolov, A. N. 1972. Inner speech and thought. New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ushakova, T. N. 1994. Inner speech and second language acquisition: An experimental—theoretical approach. In Lantolf, J. P. and Appel, G. (eds.) Vygotskian approaches to second language research. Norwood, NJ: Ablex. 135–156.Google Scholar
Valsiner, J. 1994. Irreversibility of time and the construction of historical developmental psychology. Mind, Culture, and Activity. 1.25–42.Google Scholar
Van der Veer, R. and Valsiner, J.. 1991. Understanding Vygotsky. A quest for synthesis. London: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Verity, D. P. 1992. Strategic mediation in the rehearsal process: A psycholinguistic study of directing. Newark, DE: University of Delaware. Ph.D. diss.Google Scholar
Volosinov, V. N. 1973. Marxism and the philosophy of language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Vygotsky, L. S. 1978. Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Vygotsky, L. S. 1981. The genesis of higher mental functions. In Wertsch, J. V. (ed.) The concept of activity in Soviet psychology. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe. 144–188.Google Scholar
Vygotsky, L. S. 1987. Problems of general psychology. Including the volume Thinking and speech. Volume 1 of the collected works of L. S. Vygotsky. [ed. by Rieber, Robert W. and Carton, Aaron S.]. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
Vygotsky, L. S. 1993. The fundamentals of defectology (Abnormal psychology and learning disabilities). Volume 2 of the collected works of L. S. Vygotsky. [ed. by Rieber, Robert W. and Carton, Aaron S.]. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
Vygotsky, L. S. and Luria, A. R.. 1993. Studies in the history of behavior: Ape, primative, and child. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Washburn, G. 1994. Working in the ZPD: Fossilized and nonfossilized normative speakers. In Lantolf, J. P. and Appel, G. (eds.) Vygotskian approaches to second language research. Norwood, NJ: Ablex. 69–82.Google Scholar
Wertsch, J. V. 1985a. Vygotsky and the social formation of mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Wertsch, J. V. 1991. Voices of the mind: A sociocultural approach to mediated action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Wertsch, J. V. (ed.) 1985b. Culture, communication and cognition: Vygotskian perspectives. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wold, A. H. (ed.) 1992. The dialogical alternative: Towards a theory of language and mind. Oslo: Scandinavian University Press.Google Scholar