Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-sjtt6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-26T06:35:14.455Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A methodological proposal for conlang evaluation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 May 2024

David Peterson  and
Jessie Peterson
David Peterson*
Affiliation:
Independent scholars
*
Corresponding author: David Peterson; Email: djpquery@gmail.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Intentional language creation is a mainstay of the modern world, having gained widespread notoriety in popular television shows and films, and even finding a home in academia in the form of undergraduate courses on invented languages. In this paper, we argue that constructed languages deserve more careful consideration than they currently receive either inside or outside academia. We provide guidelines for developing evaluative criteria to be used with constructed languages of various types and ask readers, whether academics or not, to consider the role they play as audience and critics in the unfolding of a new art form: the art of language invention.

Keywords

conlanglanguage inventioninterlinguisticsevaluation
Type
Research Article
Information
Annual Review of Applied Linguistics , First View , pp. 1 - 7
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Peterson, D. J. (2015). The art of language invention: From horse-lords to Dark Elves to sand worms, the words behind world-building. Penguin.Google Scholar
Schreyer, C. (2023). Language creation and engagement: A how-to guide. In Price, H., and McIntyre, D. (Eds.), Communicating linguistics: Language community and public engagement (pp. 208–219). Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shenton, H. N., Sapir, E., & Jespersen, O. (1931). The function of an international auxiliary language. Psyche, 11(4), 4–15.Google Scholar