Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-zzh7m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T19:23:11.437Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Concluding Thoughts

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 November 2008

Extract

The present papers provide an instructive perspective on the emergence of the discipline of “applied linguistics.” First, and foremost, there is an underlying assumption that language is an important thread which runs, albeit often implicitly, through a variety of issues which are fundamental to national development and to public life (cf., Alatis & Tucker 1979). Second, there is an assumption that educational practices can be improved and social equity can be facilitated by applying knowledge gleaned from research conducted within the domain of the language sciences. Third, there is the assumption that scholars in diverse national settings want to become involved in improving access to opportunity--social, occupational or educational--in their own home settings. Fourth, there is an assumption that collaborative research is desirable, indeed increasingly necessary; and that the “Applied” Linguist may play a prominent role in helping to eliminate artificial disciplinary boundaries among anthropologists, educators, psychologists, sociologists, and others who are eager to utilize insights and data from research in the language sciences to ameliorate social and economic problems. Fifth, there is the assumption that the authors of the papers in this volume are investigating a common set of issues which despite their own geographical diversity, ethnolinguistic diversity, and disciplinary diversity can be better understood by examining the cumulative results of crossdisciplinary and cross-cultural research.

Type
An Integrative Essay
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

UNANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY

Alatis, J. E. and Tucker, G. R. (eds.) 1979. Georgetown Universtiy round table on languages and linguistics: Language in public life. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Dutcher, N. 1981. The use of first and second languages in primary education: Selected case studies. Draft paper, Education Department of the World Bank.Google Scholar
Engle, P. L. 1975. The use of vernacular language in education. Papers in applied linguistics. Arlington, VA: Center for Applied Linguistics. [Bilingual Education Series, 3.]Google Scholar
Lambert, R. D. and Freed, B.. 1982. The loss of language skills. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Macmilla, D. L. 1980. Language policies for African primary education: Summary of the anglophone research literature. The World Bank. Mimeo.Google Scholar
Thevenin, T. 1980. Pedagogical implications of language policy in African schools: A review of the francophone literature. The World Bank. Mimeo.Google Scholar
Tucker, G. R. 1980. Bilingualism and multiculturalism: Future directions for Canadian educational policy. In Povey, J. (ed.) Language policy and language teaching: Essays in honor of clifford H. Prator. Culver City, CA: English Language Services.Google Scholar
Tucker, G. R. 1981. Social policy and second language teaching. In Gardner, R. C. and Kalin, R. (eds.) A Canadian social psychology of ethnic relations. Agincourt, Ont.: Methner. 7791.Google Scholar