^{page 1 note 1} For numbers in brackets refer to Figs. 1–4. For full plan of excavated area see BSA xxxiii, 26, fig. 3.

^{page 1 note 2} Fig. 3 shows the section farther west.

^{page 1 note 3} A few Protogeometric sherds, however, of the same class as those found in the Cairn area occurred on virgin soil. Two resembled BSA xxxiii, pl. 4, nos. 47–49.

^{page 1 note 4} Cf. BSA xxxiii, 26, fig. 3.

^{page 1 note 5} Described in BSA xxxiii, pp. 22–35.

^{page 3 note 1} Cf. BSA xxxiii, 26, fig. 3.

^{page 7 note 1} Below, p. 91, no. 556.

^{page 7 note 2} Below, p. 88, no. 536.

^{page 9 note 1} See also Heurtley and Lorimer in BSA xxxiii, 22 ff. and xxxiv, unnumbered page inserted at beginning of text.

I owe thanks to Mr. Heurtley for inviting me to study this material, and for information about the excavation which was invaluable to me, as I was not myself present. I also have to thank him for a few of the photographs reproduced here.

The preponderance of imports from Corinth and the domination of the local style by Corinthian influence mean that I am primarily indebted to the works of Johansen and Payne. I also learnt much more than I can acknowledge from personal contact with Payne. He did not see the majority of the Ithacn material, but I showed him the photographs and drawings of my first year's work on it, and profited by his comments and suggestions. Where I remember that I owe a, particular idea to him I say so, but that bears little relation to my debt, which extends far beyond the material for this particular study. I was also present with him on the first year of his excavations at Perachora, and had his permission to examine the finds of that and the later years, which was very useful to me. To Miss Benton, who was in charge of the excavation of the cave at Polis in the North of Ithaca, I owe thanks for showing me the material of that excavation and for help with photography and section drawing, besides many valuable discussions. I have also shown some of my photographs to Prof. Wace, Prof. Beazley, Prof. Jacobsthal, Dr. Kunze and others, and have learnt from all. Where I am indebted elsewhere to published works or private suggestions, I have, I hope, acknowledged it in the text.

I have to thank the Council of Trinity College, Cambridge, for a most generous grant from the Rouse Ball Research Fund, without which it would have been impossible to illustrate this article adequately.

^{page 9 note 2} See below, p. 23, no. 55.

^{page 10 note 1} NC ch. IV and elsewhere.

^{page 10 note 2} Below, pl. 39, no, 534.

^{page 10 note 3} All dimensions are given in metres.

^{page 12 note 1} What looks in the photograph like a ‘bridge’ to the handle is a shoulder.

^{page 12 note 2} Perachora i, 55 ff.

^{page 12 note 3} Johansen, , VS pl. XIX, 1.Google Scholar

^{page 12 note 4} See below, pp. 54 f.

^{page 14 note 1} Cf. Perachora i, pl. 26. 15 (14 in the text p. 95).

^{page 14 note 2} VS pl. XXIX, 2.

^{page 14 note 3} VS 149 f.

^{page 14 note 4} VS pl. xx, 3; PV pl. 9.1–2.

^{page 15 note 1} VS pl. XXVII, i; PV pl. 20. 1 and 5.

^{page 15 note 2} Il. xvi, 328 ff. Usually called ‘King of Lycia’ (e.g. Aelian, , N.A. ix, 23Google Scholar), but sometimes of Caria (Xenomedes ap. Schol. Townl. Hom. ad. loc., who substitutes him for Iobatas as Bellerophon's father-in-law; cf. Schol. Townl. ad. Il. vi, 170, πενθερῷ· Ἰοβάτῃ ἢ Ἀμισοδώρῳ). According to Plutarch (De Mul. Virt. 9), he was called Isaras by the Lycians, and came from the Lycian colony of Zeleia, with a pirate fleet under the command one Chimarros, who sailed in a ship with a lion carved on the prow and a snake on the stern, and more in the same strain. There are other euhemeristic accounts of Amisodaros, e.g., in Palaiphatos (περὶ άπίστων XXVIII [XXIX]), who says that he lived on a volcano near the river Xanthos and the forest of Telmissis. In the Iliad (l.c.) his sons Atymnios and Maris are described as coming with Sarpedon to Troy, where they were killed by the sons of Nestor.

^{page 17 note 1} Cf. also VS 92, fig. 53, and NSc 1929, 42, fig. 5.

^{page 17 note 2} Cf. the fine example from Cumae, , MA xxii, pl. 50. 1Google Scholar; VS pl. IX, 7; AJA 1941, 36, fig. 8.

^{page 17 note 3} VS pl. XXXVII, 5.

^{page 17 note 4} Cf. the scene on the shield of Herakles, Hesiod Aspis 201 ff.:

^{page 17 note 5} Cf. the contemporary kotyle from Delphi, F. de D. v, 144, fig. 590; NC Cat. no. 958, where the normal Doric form—is represented apparently in a chariot.

^{page 17 note 6} NC pl. 33. 5.

^{page 18 note 1} Graef pl. 25. 425; NC no. 1056.

^{page 18 note 2} NC 260; cf. 257, fig. 112B.

^{page 18 note 3} Perachora i, 62, pls. 15. 4 (14. 4 in text), and 123·7; 11·5.

^{page 19 note 1} AM lviii, 115, fig. 58c and 116, fig. 60.

^{page 19 note 2} NC Cat. nos. 716 ff.

^{page 19 note 3} ZV 837, AA 1892, 162, no. 24 (fig.).

^{page 19 note 4} Perachora i, 61, pls.13. 8 and 9; 123. 1 and 2.

^{page 19 note 5} See below.

^{page 20 note 1} See below, nos. 77 ff.

^{page 21 note 1} Examples: Perachora i, pl. 11. 1 and 2; 12.4.

^{page 22 note 1} For sixth-century and later pieces see Greifenhagen in AA 1936, 402 f., no. 50, fig. 57. Dunbabin tells me that there are handle-plated kyathoi of the seventh century from Perachora, to be published in Perachora ii.

^{page 22 note 2} Cf. Marmariane, , BSA xxxi, 46Google Scholar, n. 2.

^{page 22 note 3} PV pl. 9. 7.

^{page 22 note 4} VS pl. 29. 2.

^{page 22 note 5} JHS 1930, pl. X, 4 and p. 239, fig. 1.

^{page 22 note 6} See below, p. 58.

^{page 22 note 7} PV pl. 26. 1 and 5.

^{page 22 note 8} See NC p. 342, XI.

^{page 22 note 9} Robinson, , AJA 1906, 423 ff.Google Scholar; Maximova, 140 f. and no. 149, pl. XLII; NC. 180 with fig. and refs. Add one from Rhodes, , Clara Rhodos vi–vii, 87f.Google Scholar, fig. 92 ff.; one in New York, and one from Perachora, Perachora i, 235, no. 199, pl. 104.

^{page 23 note 1} E.g., an unpublished vase in the British Museum, 38.6–8.20, and cf. Maximova, pl. XLV, 168, 167. A replica of the latter in London is cited as the same object, p. 191. There is a draped female figure of the same class in New York.

^{page 23 note 2} VS, 68.

^{page 24 note 1} See below, p. 52.

^{page 24 note 2} VS, 8.

^{page 25 note 1} NC Cat. nos. 52A, 115, 116.

^{page 25 note 2} Rare Middle or Late Corinthian examples, NC Cat. nos. 1104, 5.

^{page 25 note 3} Contrast NC pls. 8. 3 and 10. 2 with 11. 1, 2, 4 and 5. Cf., however, the crane on a fragment in Leiden (see below on no. 149).

^{page 27 note 1} cf. VS pl. III, I.

^{page 27 note 2} See below, p. 53.

^{page 27 note 3} See below, nos. 77 ff.

^{page 27 note 4} Cf. 79 below.

^{page 27 note 5} E.g., AH ii, 136, fig. 67, and British Museum 1912, 6–26, 212; also from the Argive Heraion. See also below on 572.

^{page 27 note 6} See below, nos. 77 ff.

^{page 28 note 1} See Payne in NC pp. 295 f.

^{page 28 note 2} Add a rather odd example of the same date, Clara Rhodos.vi–vii, 43, fig. 35.

^{page 28 note 3} VS pl. XI, 2.

^{page 28 note 4} VS pl. 1, 3; NC 3, fig. ie; PV pl. 1. 2.

^{page 29 note 1} VS pl. X, 2.

^{page 29 note 2} E.g., our kotyle-pyxis 72 (early) and VS pls. IX, 7; XI, 3; XII; XIII, 3.

^{page 29 note 3} NC 7; CVA Oxfordii, IIa, pl. 1. 7.

^{page 29 note 4} BSA xxxi, 61.

^{page 29 note 5} BSA xxix, 237, figs. 8 and 9.

^{page 29 note 6} BSA, xxix, 236, fig. 7.

^{page 29 note 7} Ibid., pl. 19.

^{page 29 note 8} CVA ii, IId, pl. 1. 3.

^{page 29 note 9} VS 82, fig. 51.

^{page 29 note 10} Perachora i, pls. 23. 6; 25. 5; 26. 11 (10 on p. 95; the last finer); 30. 2 and 10.

^{page 30 note 1} Johansen, VS 6.

^{page 30 note 2} Ibid., pl. XII, 4.

^{page 30 note 3} See Payne in Perachora i, 54.

^{page 30 note 4} VS pl. XVIII, 3 and 4.

^{page 30 note 5} NC Cat. no. 55.

^{page 30 note 6} Perachora i, 93, pl. 23. 1; ‘first half of the seventh century.’

^{page 30 note 7} NC Cat. nos. 671 ff., 921 ff., 1330 ff., 1506 ff.

^{page 32 note 1} VS pl. XXI, 3; the Subgeometric 1 of the same plate is also related.

^{page 32 note 2} VS pl. XIII, 2 and 3.

^{page 33 note 1} Perachora i, 64.

^{page 33 note 2} Fölzer, Die Hydria pl. 3, nr. 48; VS pl. XIII, 4; Perachora i, pl. 31, 2. Duribabin tells me that there are a few others, dating from c. 700 to well down in the seventh century, to be published in Perachora ii.

^{page 33 note 3} Also on a neck-amphora with horizontal handles from Perachora, Perachora i, 64, pl. 124. 7.

^{page 33 note 4} J. M. Cook points out to me that a dumpy hydria form, typologically earlier than the slender type, occurs in Attic Late Geometric, e.g. Neugebauer, Antiken in deutschen Privatbesitz, pl. 59, no. 141.

^{page 34 note 1} Payne in NC pp. 2–3 and 32.

^{page 34 note 2} AJA 1905, pls. 12, 13; NC3 fig. 1a; PV pl. 1. 1; Corinth VII i, pls. 2–5 and 9–11, with remarks on p. 21 (Weinberg); see also AJA 1941, 30 ff.

^{page 34 note 3} VS pl. I, 3; NC 3 fig. 1e; PV pl. 2.

^{page 34 note 4} E.g., PV pl. 4. 1 and pl. 7.

^{page 34 note 5} PV pl. 12.

^{page 34 note 6} NC 13 fig. 6.

^{page 34 note 7} NC 32 and fig. 10.

^{page 34 note 8} VS p. 69.

^{page 36 note 1} AJA 1930, 415 fig. 9; cf. also an oinochoe from Perachora, Perachora i, pl. 124. 6, pp. 54, 63.

^{page 36 note 2} PV pl. 7. 1 and 2.

^{page 36 note 3} PV pl. 12.

^{page 36 note 4} NC 13, fig. 6.

^{page 38 note 1} VS pl. I, 3; PV pl. 2; NC fig. 1e.

^{page 38 note 2} VS pl. XIX, 4 and 5; a piece contemporary with 143 is 167.

^{page 38 note 2a} BSA xxxv, 108, fig. 14 (Benton).

^{page 38 note 3} VS pl. V, 6; PVpl. 9. 3.

^{page 38 note 4} JHS 1932, 241 fig. 5 right.

^{page 38 note 5} PV pl. 11. 6.

^{page 38 note 6} See below, p. 59.

^{page 38 note 7} See below, p. 59.

^{page 38 note 8} Brants, 12, VIII, 8–9.

^{page 38 note 9} Cf. especially the lions; the human figures on the Leiden fragments are very clumsy, but that may be intentional if the scene is a geranomachy, though pygmies are not generally shown as deformed before the fifth century.

^{page 40 note 1} NC Cat. nos. 13, 30A (pl. 10, 2).

^{page 40 note 2} Cf. NC pl. 11. where it occurs six times on four vases.

^{page 40 note 3} NC pl. 21. 7.

^{page 40 note 4} Clara Rhodos iv, 336 f. and pl. VI. Cf. also CVA San Francisco i, p. 18 (H. R. W. Smith).

^{page 40 note 5} NC Cat. no. 835, fig. 140 bis.

^{page 40 note 6} CVA pl. 90. 3–4; NC Cat. nos. 1054 f.

^{page 40 note 7} Alabastron, Bonn 860, AA 1936, 351, fig. 7, related style, but perhaps earlier; fr. from Polis, , BSA xxxix, 23Google Scholar, fig. 12; it was also imitated in Rhodian: CR St. Pet. 1870–71, pl. IV; see JHS 1940, 12.

^{page 42 note 1} VS pl. XII, 3; cf. Hartley in BSA xxxi, 85.

^{page 43 note 1} Pp. 57, 59; there is a fine broad-bottomed oinochoe with wide neck, and perhaps slightly later, but by the same hand, from Corinth (Corinth VII, i, pl. 19. 141, and AJA 1941, 41 fig. 21. Cf. also a-domed pyxis-lid from Perachora, , Perachora i, 95Google Scholar, pl. 27. 1 and 3 (1 and 2 in the ref. on p. 95).

^{page 43 note 2} BSA xxix, pls. XII and XI, 10–11.

^{page 43 note 3} Ann. x–xii, 338 ff. fig. 443 and pl. XXIII.

^{page 43 note 3} P. 34. AJA 1905, pls. XI–XVI; the vase in question is A3, pl. XII; see also Corinth VII, i, pl. 10, 64.

^{page 44 note 1} Cf. NSc 1930, 132, fig. 17.

^{page 44 note 2} E.g., Ann. x–xii, 136, fig. 123.

^{page 44 note 3} PV pl. 6. 4.

^{page 44 note 4} E.g., BSA xxix, pl. IX, 8 (round-mouthed) and 15 (large), and X, 5.

^{page 44 note 5} AJA 1926, 448, fig. 3 (mid sixth century); AJA 1934. 523, fig. 1 and 524, fig. 2.

^{page 44 note 6} VS pl. XXIV, 3.

^{page 44 note 7} PV pl. 9. 6–7.

^{page 45 note 1} VS 101 f., nos. 68, 71, 72 and 73.

^{page 45 note 2} NC Cat. nos. 14–18.

^{page 45 note 3} NC Cat. no. 14; cf. no. 17.

^{page 45 note 4} NC Cat. nos. 25–27.

^{page 45 note 5} PV pl. 30. 4.

^{page 45 note 6} A tenth and major work by this painter has recently been published: an olpe from Corinth (Corinth VII, i, pls. 20, 21, no. 142). On three friezes there are sixteen felines (twelve lions, two panthers and two doubtful), eight boars, two hounds, one owl, one bull and one goat.

^{page 45 note 7} AH ii, pl. 59. 31; PV pl. 30. 3. Payne in a note in his copy of NC added this fragment to the painter's works, as well as a fragmentary aryballos from Corinth, B80, and two from Perachora. Dunbabin adds an aryballos from Taranto, , NSc 1940, 493Google Scholar, figs. 60–1.

^{page 46 note 1} NC 299.

^{page 47 note 1} Such as AM lviii, 130 fig. 78.

^{page 47 note 2} Cf. NC Cat. no. 116.

^{page 47 note 3} VS pl. V; PV pls. 5–6.

^{page 47 note 4} VS pl. V, 4; NC pl. 1. 3; PV pl. 5. 2.

^{page 47 note 5} Poulsen, Or. und Frühgr. Kunst, 122 fig. 131 and 129 fig. 142.

^{page 47 note 6} MA iv, e.g., 262 fig. 124; here the fillet is much larger than in our piece, but it is decorated like ours with check, a feature which recurs on the example in Necrocorinlhia cited above.

^{page 47 note 7} BCH 1936, 258 fig. 22.

^{page 47 note 8} VS pl. V, 6; PV pl. 9. 4.

^{page 47 note 9} Richter, Handbook, 61 fig. 36, the stand not shown; incorrectly described as Protoattic.

^{page 47 note 10} VS pl. XXIV, 3.

^{page 49 note 1} Cf., however, Belloc, The Modern Traveller, fig. on P. 75.

^{page 49 note 2} VS pl. XXII, 2 and 146, fig. 109; PV pl. 11. 1–5.

^{page 49 note 3} Dunbabin drew my attention to this piece, which is to be published in Perachora ii. There is another possible stand on another, earlier, fragmentary kotyle from Perachora, but too little of the design survives for certainty.

^{page 49 note 3} VS pl. XXXIV, 1.

^{page 50 note 1} Pp. 56 f.

^{page 51 note 1} VS pl. XVI, i.

^{page 51 note 2} Cf. VS pls. XXI, 5 and XXIV, 1.

^{page 51 note 3} VS pl. V, 6; PV pl. 9.3.

^{page 51 note 4} VS 100 nos. 59–64; NC Cat. nos. 1–8.

^{page 51 note 5} VS, I.c., no. 60, pl. XXXVI, 4.

^{page 51 note 6} See below.

^{page 52 note 1} Perachora i, 62, pls. 123. 15 and B, 1.

^{page 53 note 1} See VS, p. 22; Ure, Aryballoi and Figurines from Rhitsona, p. 18.

^{page 53 note 2} Cf. BSA xxix, pl. X, 2. Dunbabin tells me that he believes 279 to be Late Corinthian II, the shape being akin to that of L.C. II oinochoai from Perachora of a type not illustrated in NC.

^{page 53 note 3} See introduction.

^{page 53 note 4} AJA 1905, p. 411 ff.; NC p. 2 ff.; Weinberg Corinth VII, i.

^{page 53 note 5} AJA 1905, pl. 11; Corinth VII, i, pl. 11. 58.

^{page 54 note 1} There is a very similar vase from Corinth, (Corinth VII, i, pl. 12.Google Scholar 74 and AJA 1941, 31 fig. 1b).

^{page 55 note 1} For similar phenomena cf. Perachora i, 54 f.

^{page 55 note 2} Johansen, VS pls. IX, 1 and X, 1 (a replica of our 23). Weinberg (AJA 1941, 35 and Corinth VII, i, 86) appears to consider the common tall kotyle to be an independent invention contemporary with the rarer broad type. The evidence of our finds is against this.

^{page 55 note 3} See catalogue, p. 28.

^{page 55 note 4} Cf. the vases illustrated in VS pl. V and PV pls. 5–6.

^{page 55 note 5} Cf. VS pl. VI, PV pl. 7.

^{page 56 note 1} VS pl. V, 7.

^{page 57 note 1} The so-called Subgeometric of the seventh century could equally be called sub-black-figure; it is simply black-figure without incision.

^{page 57 note 2} Fikellura is a black-figure style, though it uses reserved lines, as Clazomenian sometimes uses white lines, instead of incision.

^{page 57 note 3} PV pl. 3.

^{page 57 note 4} Hampe Fr. Gr. Sag. pl. 40.

^{page 57 note 5} PV pl. 5–2.

^{page 57 note 6} PV pl. 5. 3.

^{page 57 note 7} PV pl. 9. 3 and 4.

^{page 57 note 8} VS 61, fig. 42.

^{page 57 note 9} Hogarth, 230 fig. 57.

^{page 57 note 10} JHS 1932, 241 fig. 5 right.

^{page 58 note 1} JHS 1930, pl. X, 2.

^{page 58 note 2} VS pl. XXVI, 5; NC pl. 1. 4.

^{page 58 note 3} NC 10, fig. 5, pl. 4. 6.

^{page 58 note 4} PV pl. 30. 1.

^{page 58 note 5} Best seen in NC 95, fig. 29a.

^{page 59 note 1} It is also there used for clothes etc. more freely than in Protocorinthian.

^{page 59 note 2} VS pl. 21. 2.

^{page 59 note 3} PV pl. 9. 6–7.

^{page 59 note 4} VS pl. XXVI, 5; NC pl. 1.4.

^{page 59 note 5} E.g., the Aigina fragments, NC pls. 6 and 4. 4; PV pls. 18 and 19. 3.

^{page 59 note 6} Cf. the lions'; faces on 148 with those on NC pls. 4. 11 and 18, and contrast those of 146, 147.

^{page 60 note 1} See below, pp. 63 ff.

^{page 60 note 2} See further, p. 65, below.

^{page 63 note 1} Cf. BSA xxv, pl. XI k; also a Cretan Geometric piece from Arkades, Ann. x–xii, 137, fig. 125.

^{page 63 note 2} Pp. 108, 110.

^{page 65 note 1} See p. 104, below.

^{page 65 note 2} See below, p. 107.

^{page 65 note 3} Cf. Blakeway, , BSA xxxiii, 202 ff.Google Scholaret passim.

^{page 65 note 4} E.g., Délos xv Ae 87, pl. XXXII; Clara Rhodos iii, 98 fig. 91.

^{page 65 note 5} Cf. BSA xxix, 244 no. 60, fig. 121 and pl. XIV.

^{page 65 note 6} J. M. Cook points out to me that it is found in Protoattic, e.g. A A 1934, 211, fig. 9.

^{page 65 note 7} Cf., e.g., the Samian kantharos AM lviii, Beil. XXIX, 2.

^{page 67 note 1} Above, p. 21.

^{page 67 note 2} BSA xxix, 259 no. 140, pl. 10, 8.

^{page 67 note 3} See p. 105, below.

^{page 67 note 4} Corinth VII, i, pl. 16. 106; Perachora i, 60, pl. 12. 4. Cf. also the oinochoe 489.

^{page 69 note 1} Cf. 571. J. M. Cook compares sherds from Melos in the British School at Athens.

^{page 69 note 2} P. 105.

^{page 70 note 1} E.g., Cat. no. 4; and cf. the later krater in kotyle form, NC pl. 2.

^{page 70 note 2} Cf. 64 ff.

^{page 70 note 3} P. 108.

^{page 72 note 1} P. 112.

^{page 72 note 2} Cf. also the oinochoe 491.

^{page 72 note 3} See p. 109.

^{page 72 note 4} Cf. BSA xxix, 234 note 1.

^{page 72 note 5} L.c. pl. VII, 1 and 3.

^{page 72 note 6} Tiryns i, pl. XX, 4.

^{page 72 note 7} P. 109.

^{page 74 note 1} BSA xxix, pl. VIII, 5 and 8.

^{page 74 note 2} BSA xxxix, 9 and pl. 4.

^{page 74 note 3} See below, p. 112.

^{page 75 note 1} See pp. 105, 109, below.

^{page 75 note 2} See Cat., nos. 218, 219 and 588, 589.

^{page 76 note 1} See below, pp. 78 ff. and 87.

^{page 77 note 1} See p. 106.

^{page 77 note 2} BSA xxix, 250 fig. 16 bis.

^{page 77 note 3} See p. 106.

^{page 78 note 1} Seta, Della in EA 1937, 629 ff.Google Scholar, pl. I and fig. i. He dates the whole group to the eighth century, but some must and all may be seventh.

^{page 78 note 2} More of this vase has been found in Miss Benton's excavations, and it will be illustrated and discussed in her publication.

^{page 78 note 3} Cat. 157–62.

^{page 79 note 1} Cf. the aryballos 551.

^{page 80 note 1} Pp. 105 f.

^{page 80 note 2} E.g., MA xxii, pl. XL, 7, from Cumae; also certain unpublished vases from Knossos. Cf. also the vase from Cumae, I.c. pl. XXXV, 2, doubtfully classed by Blakeway as Cycladic, (BSA xxxiii, 202Google Scholar; both this and the Cretan vase reproduced there, pl. 34. nos. 89, 90). Cf. also a Rhodian Subgeometric piece from Ialysos (Clara Rhodos iii, 95 fig. 86 right; see below, p. 100).

^{page 80 note 3} See Cat. nos. 166–75.

^{page 80 note 4} See below, p. 106.

^{page 80 note 5} Cat. 174, 175.

^{page 80 note 6} Pp. 106, 112.

^{page 80 note 7} E.g., 171 (slightly earlier); this piece may have brought the idea to Ithaca.

^{page 81 note 1} Cf. the late Protocorinthian vase 213.

^{page 81 note 2} Cf. the kantharos on a Samian kantharos (AM lviii Beil. XXIX, i. An amphora from Thera, on the other hand, shows a picture of an oinochoe or aryballos (AM xxviii Beil. V, 2), as does a Lakonian stand (BSA xxxiv, 118, pl. 25 f); an oinochoe from the Agora at Athens one of a storage amphora (Hesperia vii, 417 fig. 5, with remarks by R. S. Young); and a pyxis-lid from Perachora a row of conical oinochoai (Perachora i, pl. 26. 1).

^{page 81 note 3} Miss L. H. Jeffrey's suggestion. Miss Jeffrey has examined the Ithaca material from an epigraphic standpoint, but I was only able to discuss it with her when my article was in page proof. The remarks on the alphabet are mainly hers.

^{page 81 note 4} Miss Jeffrey reads the first letter as or ḥ.

^{page 82 note 1} Il. xv, 331.

^{page 82 note 2} 1. 209, 332.

^{page 82 note 3} Roehl, IGA 342.

^{page 82 note 4} See below, p. 89; and cf. Theocritus 3, 3: Miss Jeffrey suggests

^{page 82 note 5} For the omission of an elided letter Miss Jeffrey compares in early dedications.

^{page 82 note 6} Cf. BSA xxix, pls. XVIII, XIX.

^{page 82 note 7} Pp. 112 f.

^{page 83 note 1} See also below, p. 107.

^{page 83 note 2} Pp. 106, 112 f.

^{page 83 note 3} E.g., BSA xxix, pl. VIII, 11.

^{page 83 note 4} See Cat. 138 ff.

^{page 83 note 5} Cat. 139.

^{page 83 note 6} See further below, p. 85.

^{page 84 note 1} Cf. a Rhodian Subgeometric pithos in the British Museum (BCH 1912, 503, fig. 10), and a Corinthian pyxis in Nauplia, where no doubt the bird is thought of as sitting on a tree which has been omitted altogether.

^{page 84 note 2} See below.

^{page 85 note 1} BSA xxix, 288.

^{page 85 note 2} E.g., Acropolis 606 (Graef i, pl. 32), bottom of dinos: lions and horses; and a Little Master cup in Marseilles with Athena heads (Beazley in JHS 1932, 175).

^{page 85 note 3} E.g., Ann. x–xii, 88, 89 fig. 63 and 135 fig. 122.

^{page 86 note 1} E.g., JHS 1933, 293 fig. 17.

^{page 88 note 1} 26 ff., fig. 13.

^{page 88 note 2} BSA xi, 307, fig. 23.

^{page 88 note 3} E.g., Gardiner, Athletics of the Ancient World, fig. 65.

^{page 88 note 4} On torch-holders see Benton, in BSA xxxix, 20Google Scholar, no. 18 and n. 1; Miss Benton kindly drew my attention to the Palaikastro examples.

^{page 88 note 5} Cf. the pricket candlesticks from Palaikastro, BSA ix, 326; also the cup-and-saucer type, represented both in clay (Myres, JHS xvii, 159; Cyprus Mus. Cat. 66 nos. 963 f.; all Cypriot) and bronze (Richter, Bronzes in the Metropolitan Museum, 205 f., nos. 564 f.). Myres in the Cyprus Mus. Cat. cites a bronze example from Moeringen, and there is a clay piece from Athens in the British Museum, which when found was apparently in use as the lid of a large Geometric oinochoe.

^{page 89 note 1} REA xlvii, 1945, 103 ff. Miss Jeffery drew my attention to this article.

^{page 89 note 2} P. 82, above.

^{page 89 note 3} JHS 1934, 167 ff.

^{page 89 note 4} VS 171, fig. 113.

^{page 89 note 5} Perachora i, 240, no. 222, pl. 89.

^{page 89 note 6} Perachora i, 65, pl. 14. 4.

^{page 89 note 7} P. III.

^{page 89 note 8} See below, p. 106.

^{page 90 note 1} Rev. Arch. 1900, 143 fig. 28.

^{page 90 note 2} Cf. a Lakonian, , vase BSA xxxiv, 105Google Scholar, 120 fig. 10a (Lane).

^{page 90 note 3} E.g., BSA xxix, pl. VIII, 9.

^{page 90 note 4} E.g., PV pl. 5. 5.

^{page 90 note 5} E.g., NC 270 fig. 113 bis.

^{page 91 note 1} See VS, 28.

^{page 91 note 2} P. 112.

^{page 91 note 3} Ann. x–xii, 240 fig. 281, pl. XIX.

^{page 91 note 4} See below, p. III.

^{page 91 note 5} See Cat. 597.

^{page 91 note 6} P. III.

^{page 91 note 7} E.g., 440, 441, 541, 544, 545.

^{page 91 note 8} See below, p. 124.

^{page 91 note 9} CVA ii, IIA pl. III, 5 and 6, and p. 56, fig. 1. Cf. also the askoi Ann. x–xii, 200 fig. 221, 277 fig. 351, and 353 fig. 461.

^{page 92 note 1} W. Lamb, Greek and Roman Bronzes, 61 fig. 3, after AM 1906, pl. XXIII.

^{page 92 note 2} See Perachora i, 62 f.

^{page 92 note 3} See below, p. 112.

^{page 92 note 4} P. 52.

^{page 92 note 5} Cf. also BSA xxix, 279 fig. 34, nos. 37, 42; and the design on the base of an ivory animal seal from Sparta, AO pl. 157. 4.

^{page 92 note 6} Perachora i, 63, pl. 123. 16.

^{page 93 note 1} Perachora i, 63, pl. 14. 7.

^{page 95 note 1} E.g., Olympian, 79, nos. 570–2, pls. XXIX, XXX.

^{page 95 note 2} Cf. AM liv, 157, fig. 10; Délos xv, Bb 51, 59, pls. 39,41.

^{page 95 note 3} Délos xv, pls. 37 ff.

^{page 95 note 4} Cf. Délos xv, Ae 71, pl. XXXI, Bb 38, pl. XXXIX.

^{page 97 note 1} See above, pp. 54 f.

^{page 97 note 2} JHS 1926, 211; see also my remarks, JHS 1940, 6.

^{page 97 note 3} VS pl. XX, 3; PK pl. 9. 1–2.

^{page 97 note 4} JHS 1930, pl. X, 4.

^{page 97 note 5} NC pl. 4. 8.

^{page 97 note 6} Cf. especially Délos xvii, D 30, pl. XXXII.

^{page 97 note 7} Cat. 73 ff. The globular pyxis is primarily an eighth-century shape, but lasts into the seventh.

^{page 99 note 1} JHS 1940, 14 ff.

^{page 99 note 2} Délos xv, Skyphoi géometriques rhodiem 6–15, pls. 46–47.

^{page 99 note 3} See JHS 1940, I.c.

^{page 99 note 4} CVA ii, IID.pl. 1. 18.

^{page 99 note 5} Délos x, pl. XX, 119, 120.

^{page 99 note 6} CVA l.c.; see also EGP p. 5, IIB.

^{page 100 note 1} Délos xv, pl. XXXII, Ae 90,.91.

^{page 100 note 2} Aegina 455, no. 240, pls. CXX, 103, and CXXVII, 22.

^{page 100 note 3} Kinch Vroulia, 154, IX, pl. 26.

^{page 100 note 4} Catalogue 218 f., 416 ff.

^{page 100 note 5} See above, p. 8o, n. 2.

^{page 100 note 6} JHS 1940,13 f.

^{page 100 note 7} See Clara Rhodos iv, 54 ff.

^{page 100 note 8} E.g., JHS 1926, pl. IX, 2, p. 209, fig. 2; 1940, pl. 2. a–c, f, g.

^{page 100 note 9} Clara Rhodos iv, 352 f.

^{page 100 note 10} See JHS 1940, 16,21.

^{page 100 note 11} See JHS 1940, 13 ff.

^{page 100 note 12} Krater from Samos, , AM lviii, 86Google Scholar, fig. 32; cup from Cyprus in the British Museum, Kinch, Vroulia, 214, fig. 102.

^{page 100 note 13} E.g., Blinkenberg, Lindos i, Les petits Objets, pl. 35. 83–4; cf. also the earlier Ithacan pyxis 392.

^{page 101 note 1} E.g., Boehlau, Aus Ionischen und Italischen Nekrepolen, pl. VII, 3–7.

^{page 101 note 2} Ann. x–xii, 164 f. fig. 176 and p. 172 fig. 192; analogous shapes pp. 141, 142 and 192.

^{page 101 note 3} The shape recurs in East Greek, e.g., Kinch, Vroulia, 215, fig. 103, but with rays at the base, no step-pattern and no incision.

^{page 101 note 4} The piece Ann. x–xii, 164 has three handles; that p. 172 and ours two.

^{page 101 note 5} For the significance of this connection see p. 124.

^{page 103 note 1} Cf. H. R. W. Smith, The Origin of Chalcidian Ware, 101, n. 35; Karo, , EA 1937, 316 ff.Google Scholar; Jacobsthal, , GGA 1933, 4Google Scholar; Atkinson, K. M. T., BSR xiv, 117Google Scholar; JHS 1944, 80.

^{page 103 note 2} This was pointed out to me by Dunbabin.

^{page 103 note 3} Délos xv, pl. 51. 13.

^{page 104 note 1} P. 58 f.

^{page 104 note 2} BSA xxxiii, 42–3, figs. 13–15; pl. 4. 40–3.

^{page 104 note 3} Late example JHS li, 172.

^{page 104 note 4} Cf. an Italian jug from Pantalica, , MA ix, pl. X, 5.Google Scholar

^{page 104 note 5} E.g., BSA xxxiii, 42, figs. 13–14.

^{page 104 note 6} Cf., however, also the motive on a piece from Cephallenia, , Rev. Arch, xxxvii, 1900, 138Google Scholar, fig. 12.

^{page 104 note 7} E.g., VS, pl. IX, 1–2.

^{page 105 note 1} BSA xxv, pls. V, VIII c and d, X b.

^{page 105 note 2} BSA xxxiii, 40–41, figs. 10–12.

^{page 105 note 3} Cf. BSA xxix, pl. VI, 8.

^{page 105 note 4} BSA xxxiii, 51, fig. 29.

^{page 105 note 5} Ibid., 50, fig. 27.

^{page 105 note 6} BSA xxv, pl. XI a–e.

^{page 105 note 7} AM lii, pl. XV, 30–33.

^{page 106 note 1} J. M. Cook points out to me that it is normal in Attic eighth-century Geometric for jugs of the type, AJA 1940, pl. 26, 1.

^{page 106 note 2} Rev. Arch. xxxvii, 1900, 143 fig. 28.

^{page 106 note 3} See above, pp. 81 f. and 89.

^{page 107 note 1} On both these groups see further below, pp. 112 f., and in the catalogue, pp. 83 ff.

^{page 108 note 1} For influences other than local and Corinthian on this series see below.

^{page 108 note 2} All these groups are discussed in greater detail below.

^{page 109 note 1} See p. 105.

^{page 109 note 2} See above, p. 65.

^{page 109 note 3} See below.

^{page 109 note 4} See catalogue and illustrations.

^{page 110 note 1} See p. 28.

^{page 110 note 2} See below, p. 111.

^{page 111 note 1} PV pl. 9. 1–2.

^{page 111 note 2} E.g., Perachora i, pl. 26. 2 and 3.

^{page 111 note 3} PV pl. 9. 7.

^{page 111 note 4} AM 1897, 309. Cf. also the Protoattic example CVA Berlin i, pl. 19 (AJA 1939, 715, R. S. Young).

^{page 111 note 5} See p. 71.

^{page 112 note 1} See catalogue, p. 91.

^{page 112 note 2} On the fragments of another plastic vase see above, p. 92.

^{page 112 note 3} PV pl. 1. 2.

^{page 112 note 4} Cat. 78 ff.

^{page 112 note 5} On the question of dating this earliest ‘Sub-geometric black-figure’, and its relation to linear Sub-geometric and early orientalising, see above, pp. 55 ff.

^{page 112 note 6} Pp. 83 ff.

^{page 112 note 7} See above, pp. 51 ff.

^{page 113 note 1} See p. 8a above.

^{page 113 note 2} See Jenkins, in BSA xxxii, a8 ff.Google Scholar, and cf. his pl. 13; for the tripe-like appliqué hair, cf. the later head, l.c., pl. 14. 4.

^{page 113 note 3} See Jenkins, in Perachora i, 217 ff.Google Scholar

^{page 114 note 1} This appears better in the illustration in JHS 1932, 247, fig. 11.

^{page 114 note 2} An ithyphallic Zeus would be unusual, but cf. a fresco by Giulio Romano in the Palazzo del T at Bologna, with Jupiter approaching a woman (Professor Beazley's reference).

^{page 114 note 3} Hogarth, Ephesus 230, fig. 57.

^{page 114 note 4} JHS 1933, 295, fig. 18.

^{page 114 note 5} AM lviii,98f., figs. 40f., Beil. XXVIII8, XXIX 1.

^{page 114 note 6} Hampe, Frühe Griechische Sagenbilder, pl. 6.

^{page 114 note 7} Mr. I. E. S. Edwards of the Department of Egyptian and Assyrian Antiquities in the British Museum kindly examined a photograph of the object for me.

^{page 115 note 1} Artemis Orthia pl. CCV, 10.

^{page 115 note 2} Artemis Orthia pl. CLXIX, 3.

^{page 115 note 3} Winter, , Typen III i222Google Scholar, 2, 224, 1 and 225, 3; Clara Rhodos iv, 263 fig. 287, and 265 fig. 289; also Italian plastic vases, Maximova, no. 154, pl. XLI.

^{page 115 note 4} AO pl. CXV.

^{page 115 note 5} AO pl. CXLVIII, 12 and 13, CXLIX, 1 and 2.

^{page 115 note 6} AO pls. CXLVIII and CXLIX.

^{page 115 note 7} AO pl. CLV, 2 and 4.

^{page 115 note 8} AO pl. CXL.

^{page 115 note 9} AO pls. CXXXIX f., CXLIII ff.

^{page 115 note 10} AO pls. CXL ff.

^{page 115 note 11} Payne, PK pl. 9. 4 and p. 21; R. S. Young, AJA 1942, 26, fig. 4, no. 19. 11 and text thereto.

^{page 116 note 1} Cf. AO pl. CXLII.

^{page 116 note 2} AO pl. CXLI.

^{page 116 note 3} MA xxv, 499, fig. 90.

^{page 116 note 4} MA xxv, 591, fig. 181.

^{page 116 note 5} AO pls. XCI ff.

^{page 116 note 6} AO pl. CLXX, 12 and 13.

^{page 116 note 7} AO pl. XCII, 1.

^{page 116 note 8} Cf. AO pl. CXXXVI, 4.

^{page 116 note 9} Cf. AO pl. CLXX, 14.

^{page 117 note 1} Hampe, Frühe Griechische Sagenbilder, pls. 4, 5, 11 and 14.

^{page 117 note 1a} Dunbabin tells me that amber animals like those on ivory seals were ako found at Perachora.

^{page 118 note 1} Cf. the example from Selinus, NSc 1894, 218 fig. 18 and MA xxxii, 349 fig. 146, attached to a bronze disc 13 cm. in diameter, perhaps the centre of a shield.

^{page 118 note 2} Blinkenberg 57, fig. 29, Type I, 14 (a)

^{page 118 note 3} Montelius, Civilisation primitive en Italici, B pl. 54. 4.

^{page 118 note 4} Ibid. pl. 88. 1.

^{page 118 note 5} Cf. also Sundwall, Älteren Italischen Fibeln, Class J, 1, pp. 253 ff.

^{page 119 note 1} Cf. Perachora i, pl. 74 f.

^{page 119 note 2} AH ii, pl. LXXVIII.

^{page 119 note 3} See Perachora i, 71 f.

^{page 119 note 4} Perachora i, pl. 83. 14, and p. 183, where it is remarked that similar balls are very common not only in Greece, but in the Hallstatt cemeteries of Bosnia.

^{page 119 note 5} Wiener Beiträge zur Kunst und Kultur Asiens ix, 1935. 45 n. 5.

^{page 120 note 1} Montelius, , CPI i, B pl. 19. 10.Google Scholar

^{page 120 note 2} AO pl. LXXX, Q and p. 199.

^{page 120 note 3} Anna Roes, Greek Geometric Art, 100, fig. 81.

^{page 121 note 1} AM lv, 125, fig. 1.

^{page 121 note 2} Rostovtzeff, Iranians and Greeks in South Russia, pl. XVI, 2.

^{page 121 note 3} BSA xxxiii, 22–27, 37–65 (Heurtley), 27–36 (Lorimer). Miss Lorimer places it all in the Proto-geometric period, see BSA xxxiv, leaf inserted before p. 1.

^{page 121 note 4} Op. cit., 64.

^{page 122 note 1} BSA xxxix, 16 f. Cf. BSA xxxv, 52.

^{page 122 note 2} Above, pp. 53 f.

^{page 122 note 3} See above, p. 109.

^{page 122 note 4} BSA xxxiii, 27.

^{page 122 note 5} See above, p. 109.

^{page 122 note 6} BSA xxxiii, 170 ff.

^{page 123 note 1} Cf. Blakeway, I.e. 183, n. 4.

^{page 123 note 2} Cf. NC 38.

^{page 124 note 1} See above, pp. 117 f.