Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-qxdb6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T16:15:32.354Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Evidence for the Dating of Greek Settlements in Cyrenaica

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 October 2013

John Boardman
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The British School's excavations in collaboration with the Libyan Department of Antiquities at Tocra (ancient Taucheira) have demonstrated that this colony was founded very soon after the traditional date for the foundation of Cyrene itself (631 B.C.). In connexion with the excavations the present writer and Mr. John Hayes, who is publishing the pottery from Tocra, took the opportunity to collect evidence of the earliest Greek finds on other sites in Cyrenaica to see whether earlier foundation dates than those generally proposed were possible for these also.

Type
Research Article
Information
Annual of the British School at Athens , Volume 61 , November 1966 , pp. 149 - 156
Copyright
Copyright © The Council, British School at Athens 1966

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Report by Carter, T. H. in Expedition v (1963) 24–27.Google Scholar Cf. also Evans, , Palace of Minos ii. 37, n. 2Google Scholar, for Seal Island, which he noted as still a favourite resort for Greek sponge-fishers; Rowe, , Bull. John Rylands Lib. 1954, 488 (map)Google Scholar; Bates, , The Eastern Libyans 5, 229, n. 8.Google Scholar

2 Cf. Chamoux, Cyrène sous la monarchie des Battiades 118 ff. for references.

3 Carter, 24 f. I am indebted to Mrs. Carter for notes on what was found and photographs of the sherds collected.

4 Cf. JHS lxxxv (1965) 6 f.

5 Cf. Fortetsa 158 f., or BSA xlix (1954) pl. 26. 58, 61–63.

6 AM lxxiv (1959) Beil. 33, 38.

7 e.g. AM xxviii (1903) Beil. 26. J2, and for the shape perhaps Beil. 31. J26. On the patterns see Strøm, , Acta Arch. xxxiii (1962) 233 f. and pl. 1c.Google Scholar

8 That it was current still in the 630s, as these finds show, may contribute to a down-dating of the series and remove some of the objections based on its apparent incompatibility with other and earlier Theran styles.

9 AM lxxiv (1959), Beil. 46–48.

10 Stucchi, Agore di Cirene i, pl. 10. 14, 15 and p. 40, fig. 17.

11 Ibid., pl. 10. 2.

12 For publications of other early pottery from Cyrene see Oliverio, , Documenti ii. 2, pl. 112, fig. 106Google Scholar, a Rhodian crater rim with graffito (Jeffery, , Local Scripts 320, 324)Google Scholar; Pernier, Il Tempio e l'Altare 98, fig. 91, Corinthian; Afr. It. iv, pls. 1–3. It is not easy to believe the alleged provenience (Cyrene) for the Laconian Late Geometric skyphos in Berlin, , AM lii (1927) 53, fig. 31.Google Scholar

13 Libya Antiqua i (1964) 127 ff. It is restored as a lebes, but no lip is preserved, nor are the fragments painted within, so it is possibly from an amphora.

14 As on the London ram plate (64. 10–17. 5; Schiering, Werkstätten pl. 8. i); JHS lx (1940) pl. 2d (Al Mina; late seventh century); Louvre A 305 (Zervos, Rhodes 50, fig. 86); and later on the Perseus plate in Berlin, , BSA xxxiv (1933–4) pl. 19.Google Scholar

15 Schiering, 51; cf. Kardhara, Rhodiake Angeiographia figs. 38, 263, 283, 286, pl. 14a.

16 For early Ptolemais see Rowe, Hist. of Anc. Cyr. (Suppl. to Ann. de Service, Cahier 12, 1948) 54 f.; Kraeling, Ptolemais 3 ff.

17 The pithos from Barke (Rowe, pl. 12. 2), with its crude copy of Panathenaic runners, cannot be taken seriously.

18 Kardara, 276 ff.

19 Fifteen seen in all. The flat undersides have groups of 2, 3, or 4 grooves, except for the earlier London A 747 (Kardara 84), the ‘Nisyros School’ London 60. 4–4. 3 (Kardara 288), and the later ‘Chalazes Group’ (Kardara 291, nos. 2, 3), which are plain and flat. Others have a shallow centre hollow. The underside of the big sphinx plate in London (Kardara 236) has a shallow step in the profile, down towards the centre, while the ‘Nisyros School’ Louvre A 308 and London 64. 10–7·6 (Kardara 287, 289) have two steps, out towards the rim, and are plain beneath. There are no true foot-rings, as on most Corinthian plates (Callipolitis-Feytmans, , BCH lxxxvi (1962) 117 ff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar) and the Tocra plates.

20 Kardara 278, fig. 270; JHS 1(1930) 84, fig. 3.

21 Kardara 281, fig. 279; also the big half rosette with double outline and pointed bases to the black hearts of the leaves. Schiering, Beil. 2 (Euphorbos Group).

22 Kardara 279, fig. 271 and both the Oxford plates. The feature is incised in Corinthian Transitional and E.C., cf. NC pls. 11 bis, 26. 7.

23 BCH lxxxv (1961) 98 ff.

24 Ibid. 107, fig. 7.

25 Kraiker, Aigina pl. 47; Kubier, Altatt. Malerei pl. 74.

26 Jeffery, , Local Scripts 308 β. 4.Google Scholar

27 Discussed by Brown in The Etruscan Lion 125 ff.

28 Clara Rhodos iv. 198 f., figs. 208, 209; CVA Rodi i, pl. 16. 4 (all these illustrations effectively hide the lion's head). The accompanying pottery is Attic, no later than the third quarter of the sixth century. Cf. Brown 127.

29 Diehl, , AA 1964 599, fig. 49Google Scholar, as East Greek. On these vases see Shefton in Perachora ii 384 (pieces from Perachora, Olympia, Sparta). Cf. the apparently Attic clay imitation of a similar lion-head attachment on a different shape, Akr. Vasen i, pl. 112. 2682.

30 The Pennsylvania party also made soundings in 1962; Expedition v (1963) 20; COWA ii, Area 9, 1962, p. 11. On its probable foundation from Cyrene, see Fraser, , Bull. Soc. Roy. Alex, xxxix (1951) 137 f.Google Scholar