^{page 156 note †} B. C. H., xix., p. 478.

^{page 156 note ‡} Defrasse and Lechat, Epidaure, p. 87. ᾿Εφ. ᾿Αρχ., 1895, Pl. 8.

^{page 156 note §} Furtwängler, Masterpieces, p. 438.

^{page 157 note *} Monuments et mémoires de la fondation Piot, ii., p. 56.

^{page 157 note †} B. C. H., xx., p. 451 (Pottier). Revue des Études Grecaues, 1896, p. 278 (Lechat).

^{page 157 note ‡} Height 0·155 m., length 0·255 m., thickness 0·03 m. The drawing was made by Mr. F. Anderson from this impression.

^{page 158 note *} Joubin, , Catalogue des Sculptures du Musée Impérial Ottoman (Constantinople, 1893)Google Scholar: “Male figure walking to the left, resting on a staff, dressed in a long floating Ionian chiton, the folds of which fall gracefully. Fine Hellenistic work.” The reproduction on Plate XII, a, has been made from a very good photograph, taken at my request by the orders of H. E. Hamdy Bey. Dimensions: height, 0·31 m.; thickness, 0·04 m.

^{page 159 note *} Rev. Arch., 1868, ii., p. 237; Mélanges, p. 256.

^{page 159 note †} The photographs here reproduced were made by order of the Museum authorities. The result would have been more satisfactory had the moss encrusting the reliefs been cleaned off. The white blotches are caused by it.

^{page 160 note *} Gori, , Mus. Flor., ii., Pl. 71.Google Scholar Reinach, Pierres gravées, Pl. 65.

^{page 160 note †} Cat. of Greek Coins, Thessaly, &c, Pl. XX.

^{page 161 note *} Herod., vi. 6i; Laudatio Helenae, 63. Cf. Curtius, , Peloponnesos, ii., p. 316Google Scholar; Wide, Lakonische Culte, p. 340; Rev. Arch., 1897, i., p. 9.

^{page 161 note †} Stephan. Byz,, s. v. Θεραπνη

^{page 161 note ‡} Annali, 1861, pp. 38—40, Tav. d' Agg. D.; Ath. Mitth., i., pp. 201–3. I conclude it is owing to an oversight that Engelmann (Roscher's Lexicon, i., p. 1972) states that one of these reliefs was found at Gythion. Only one list of members is complete. The present description is based on M, Foucart's masterly study (Inscrip. du Péloponnèse, No. 163A).

^{page 162 note *} Furtwaengler, Masterpieces, p. 408. For the Artemis of Ephesus, cf. Cat. of Gr. Coins, Ionia, Pl. 13. For the altar, cf. Schreiber, Reliefbilder, Pl. LXVI. For the lyre of Apollo, cf. Schreiber, Pl. XXXIV.

^{page 162 note †} I published these figures in the Rev. Arch. (1897, p. 9, Pl. I., II.), and endeavoured to show the pre-Dorian origin of the religion the existence of which they prove. Two collections exist—one in the National Museum at Athens and one in Munich.

^{page 162 note ‡} Zeitsch. für Num., iii. 27, Pl. I. (von Duhn).

^{page 162 note §} Hill, Catal. of Gr. Coins, Lycia, p. lvii. M. Radet does not touch on these Lacedaemonian settlements in his remarkable essay (Rev. Arch., 1893, i., p. 185).

^{page 163 note *} Reisen in Lykien, ii., pp. 168—171.

^{page 163 note †} Cat. of Gr. Coins, Lycia, p. 270.

^{page 163 note ‡} Op. cit., p. 211, PI. XXXIX. 9.

^{page 163 note §} Op. cit., p. 40, Pl. IX. 12.

^{page 163 note ║} B. C. H., xiv., p. 176.

^{page 163 note ¶} Urlichs, Beiträge zur Kunslgesckichte, Pl. XVI. = Roscher, i., 1591

^{page 164 note *} Head, Attica, p. 66, Pl. XI. 7; cf. Reinach, Théodore, Revue des Etudes Grecques, i., p. 172.Google Scholar

^{page 164 note †} Weil, , Die Familie des C. Julius Eurycles (Ath. Mitth., vi., p. 10)Google Scholar; B. C. H., xxi., p. 209.

^{page 164 note ‡} Rev. Arch., 1873, ii. p. 40, reproduced in the Mission de Macédoine.

^{page 164 note §} Joubin, No. 123.

^{page 164 note ║} Sic. Joubin Διοσκούροις

^{page 165 note *} Described by Middleton as “a standing figure of the Oriental Artemis or Moon Goddess between Castor and Pollux.” The Lewis Collection at Corpus Christi Coll., Cambridge, p. 68, No. 97.

^{page 165 note †} V., 19, 2. Cp. Dio Chrysostom, xi., p. 325 R. For the discussion cp. Stuart Jones, H., Journal of Hellenic Studies, 1894, p. 76.Google Scholar

^{page 165 note ‡} Gaz. Arch., 1878, Pl. I.; Le Blant, Sarcophages Chrétiens d' Arles, p. 38.

^{page 165 note §} Maurice Albert, Le culte de Castor et Pollux en Italie, describes a Roman lamp with only one figure and that one bearded, but it is impossible to discuss it without a personal examination, and I am tempted to believe that the figure is not one of the Dioscuri. The author further (op. cit., Pl. III.) reproduces a lamp which exists in the Cabinet de France, which, as he states, bears bearded heads of Dioscuri (similar lamp in d' Agincourt, Sculpture antique en terre cuite, Pl. XXIV. 5); but these Dioscuri are really the Cabiri of Samothrace, who were assimilated to the Dioscuri. In proof of this assimilation, compare a lamp in the British Museum (Sloane Collection), which represents Dioscuri heads beardless, but surmounted in the same way by the four-pointed star. The vases quoted by Mr. Frazer (Paus., iii., 616) have no bearing on the question of the Dioscuri.

^{page 166 note *} Gerhard, , Etrusk. Spiegel, ii., 203Google Scholar; v., 71 –81; Albert, op. cit., p. 130.

^{page 167 note *} B. C. H., xviii., p. 436.

^{page 167 note †} Helena, v. 1664, 1665.

^{page 168 note *} Maurice Albert, op. cit. pp. 64, 65.