Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-t5pn6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T16:28:34.575Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An Antiochene bowl in Cambridge1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 September 2013

Peter J. Callaghan
Peter J. Callaghan
Affiliation:
Summerland Point, NSW
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A complete mouldmade ‘Megarian’ bowl, now in the Museum of Classical Archaeology at Cambridge, is here published and attributed to a Syrian or Levantine manufacturer. The Dionysiac iconography, beading, fabric, and paint suggest an Antiochene provenance, and an early or mid-second-century BC date is proposed.

Type
Articles
Information
Annual of the British School at Athens , Volume 91 , November 1996 , pp. 369 - 375
Copyright
Copyright © The Council, British School at Athens 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

2 Agora, xxii. 2–3, discusses the problems of nomenclature and decides that ‘mould-made bowls’ is a better term. For the sake of clarity and brevity, however, the traditional terminology has, for the most part, been retained in this paper. See also Hayes, J. W., Greek and Italian Black-gloss Wares and Related Wares in the Royal Ontario Museum (Toronto, 1984), 102—3.Google Scholar

3 The bowl came from the Morton Collection and was purchased from Charles Ede Ltd.

4 Antioch, iv. 1, 29; Crowfoot, G. M., in Samaria–Sebaste, iii. 273.Google Scholar

5 Bruneau, P., Les Mosaïques (Délos, xxix; Paris, 1972), 291, fig. 249.Google Scholar

6 For this ambience on other bowls cf. Agora, xxii, nos. 99, 211–12, 260; Délos, xxxi, pl. 6; pl. 15, no. 3474; pl. 21, no. 3331; pl. 29, nos. 3204, 3206.

7 Thompson, D. B., Ptolemaic Oinochoai and Portraits in Faience (Oxford, 1973), pls ii, xi, xvii, xxxi, xxxii, xxxvi.Google Scholar

8 Délos, xxxi, pl. 3, no. 1343; pl. 115, nos, 1356, 2058; pl. 116, no. 1343; pl. 117, no. 1958.

9 Ibid. pl. 3, nos. 1328, 1343, 2266; pl. 127, nos. 1117, 2038.

10 Antioch, iv. 1, fig. 15, nos. 4–6.

11 Ibid. fig. 9, nos. 40–1.

12 Ibid.passim.

13 Ibid. 29.

14 An Antiochene bowl in the Louvre has clay described as reddish (‘rougeâtre’): Byvanck-Quarles van Ufford, L., ‘Un bol mégarien de fabrication antiochéenne’, BA Besch. 29 (1954), 34.Google Scholar For a complete bowl in the Musée National Libanais, Beirut: Parlasca, K., ‘Das Verhältnis der megarischen Becher zum alexandrinischen Kunsthandwerk’, JdI 70 (1955), 153–4, fig. 12.Google Scholar

15 Samaria-Sebaste, iii. 219; Antioch, iv. 1, 17. For the choice of colour in hellenistic pottery, and in particular on mouldmade relief bowls: Vickers, M., Impey, O., and Allan, J., From Silver to Ceramic: The Potter's Debt to Metalwork in the Graeco-Roman, Oriental and Islamic Worlds (Oxford, 1986), text to pl. 27Google Scholar; Vickers, M. and Gill, D., Artful Crafts: Ancient Greek Silverware and Pottery (Oxford, 1994)Google Scholar.

16 Agora, xxii. 6–13.

17 Thompson, H. A., ‘Two centuries of hellenistic pottery’, Hesp. 3 (1934), 311–476, esp. 457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

18 Edwards, G. R., ‘Hellenistic pottery’, Small Objects from the Pnyx, ii (Hesp. supp. 10; 1956), 90Google Scholar; id., Corinthian Hellenistic Pottery (Corinth, vii. 3; Princeton, 1975), 152.

19 Agora, xxii. 9–11.

20 For hellenistic silver plate from Egypt see Pfrommer, M., Studien zu alexandrinischer und grossgriechischer Toreutik frühhellenistischer Zeit (Berlin, 1987)Google Scholar; cf. Gill, D. W. J., CR 39 (1989), 114–16.Google Scholar

21 Agora, xxii. 11–13.

22 Sinn, U., in Milojčić, V. and Theocharis, D., Demetrias, i (Bonn, 1976), 114–21.Google Scholar

23 Délos, xxxi. 7.

24 Ziegenaus, O. and de Luca, G., Das Asklepieion, i (Altertümer von Pergamon, xi. 1; Berlin, 1968), 123–5, pl. 43, no. 158 (Bauphase 8)Google Scholar; 125–7, 130–1, pl. 45, nos. 192–200 (Bauphase 9), i.e. 200–191 BC. None of these is of the Delian class.

25 Agora, xxii. 10.

26 Antioch, iv. 1, 15–16.

27 Samaria–Sebaste, iii. 219.

28 Ibid. 218.

29 Ibid. 274. The presence of the Delian class bowls makes a date before 166 BC highly unlikely.

30 Goldman, H., The Hellenistic and Roman Periods (Excavations at Gözlü Küle, Tarsus, i; Princeton, 1950), 8–14, 163.Google Scholar

31 Christensen, A. Papanicolaou and Johansen, C. Friis, Les Poteries hellénistiques et les ferres sigillées orientales (Hama, iii. 2; Copenhagen, 1971), 24.Google Scholar

32 For the widespread popularity of Dionysos among the Hellenistic royal houses, cf. Smith, R. R. R., Hellenistic Royal Portraits (Oxford, 1988), 37–8.Google Scholar

33 Agora, xxii. 22.

34 Ibid. 23–4.

35 Ibid, pls 18–20, 23–4, 41, 75–7, 81–2.

36 Délos, xxxi, pl. 3, nos. 1980, 1343, pl. 4, nos. 1340, 1958.

37 Ibid. pl. 22, no. 6201.

38 Agora, xxii, pl. 85 has Amazons and kantharoi juxtaposed.

39 For Homeric bowls, cf. Pollitt, J. J., Art in the Hellenistic Age (Cambridge, 1986), 200–2.Google Scholar

40 e.g. the friezes of the great altar of Zeus at Pergamon and the temple of Artemis Leukophryene at Magnesia.

41 Agora, xxii. 21.

42 Ibid.