Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Structural vulnerability of the French swine industry trade network to the spread of infectious diseases

  • S. Rautureau (a1), B. Dufour (a2) and B. Durand (a1)

Abstract

The networks generated by live animal movements are the principal vector for the propagation of infectious agents between farms, and their topology strongly affects how fast a disease may spread. The structural characteristics of networks may thus provide indicators of network vulnerability to the spread of infectious disease. This study applied social network analysis methods to describe the French swine trade network. Initial analysis involved calculating several parameters to characterize networks and then identifying high-risk subgroups of holdings for different time scales. Holding-specific centrality measurements (‘degree’, ‘betweenness’ and ‘ingoing infection chain’), which summarize the place and the role of holdings in the network, were compared according to the production type. In addition, network components and communities, areas where connectedness is particularly high and could influence the speed and the extent of a disease, were identified and analysed. Dealer holdings stood out because of their high centrality values suggesting that these holdings may control the flow of animals in part of the network. Herds with growing units had higher values for degree and betweenness centrality, representing central positions for both spreading and receiving disease, whereas herds with finishing units had higher values for in-degree and ingoing infection chain centrality values and appeared more vulnerable with many contacts through live animal movements and thus at potentially higher risk for introduction of contagious diseases. This reflects the dynamics of the swine trade with downward movements along the production chain. But, the significant heterogeneity of farms with several production units did not reveal any particular type of production for targeting disease surveillance or control. Besides, no giant strong connected component was observed, the network being rather organized according to communities of small or medium size (<20% of network size). Because of this fragmentation, the swine trade network appeared less structurally vulnerable than ruminant trade networks. This fragmentation is explained by the hierarchical structure, which thus limits the structural vulnerability of the global trade network. However, inside communities, the hierarchical structure of the swine production system would favour the spread of an infectious agent (especially if introduced in breeding herds).

Copyright

Corresponding author

References

Hide All
Ammendrup, S, Barcos, LO 2006. The implementation of traceability systems. Revue Scientifique et Technique 25, 763773.
Anonymous 2009. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.
Bell, DC, Atkinson, JS, Carlson, JW 1999. Centrality measures for disease transmission networks. Social Networks 21, 121.
Bigras-Poulin, M, Barfod, K, Mortensen, S, Greiner, M 2007. Relationship of trade patterns of the Danish swine industry animal movements network to potential disease spread. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 80, 143165.
Bigras-Poulin, M, Thompson, RA, Chriel, M, Mortensen, S, Greiner, M 2006. Network analysis of Danish cattle industry trade patterns as an evaluation of risk potential for disease spread. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 76, 1139.
Borgatti, SP, Everett, MG 1997. Network analysis of 2-mode data. Social Networks 19, 243269.
Christley, RM, Robinson, SE, Lysons, R, French, N 2005. Network analysis of cattle movement in Great Britain. In Proceedings of Society for Veterinary Epidemiology and Preventive Medecine, Nairn, Scotland, pp. 234–243.
Clauset, A, Newman, ME, Moore, C 2004. Finding community structure in very large networks. Physical Review E 70, 066111.
Clauset, A, Shalizi, CR, Newman, MEJ 2009. Power-law distributions in empirical data. SIAM Review 51, 661703.
Dube, C, Ribble, C, Kelton, D, McNab, B 2009. A review of network analysis terminology and its application to foot-and-mouth disease modelling and policy development. Transboundary and Emerging Diseases 56, 7385.
Fèvre, EM, Bronsvoort, BMdC, Hamilton, KA, Cleaveland, S 2006. Animal movements and the spread of infectious diseases. Trends in Microbiology 14, 125131.
Freeman, LC 1978/1979. Centrality in social networks, conceptual clarification. Social Networks 1, 215239.
Good, BH, de Montjoye, Y-A, Clauset, A 2010. Performance of modularity maximization in practical contexts. Physical Review E 81, 046106.
Karrer, B, Levina, E, Newman, ME 2008. Robustness of community structure in networks. Physical Review E 77, 046119.
Kiss, IZ, Green, DM, Kao, RR 2006a. Infectious disease control using contact tracing in random and scale-free networks. Journal of the Royal Society, Interface 3, 5562.
Kiss, IZ, Green, DM, Kao, RR 2006b. The network of sheep movements within Great Britain: network properties and their implications for infectious disease spread. Journal of the Royal Society, Interface 3, 669677.
Lentz, HH, Konschake, M, Teske, K, Kasper, M, Rother, B, Carmanns, R, Petersen, B, Conraths, FJ, Selhorst, T 2011. Trade communities and their spatial patterns in the German pork production network. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 98, 176181.
Martinez-Lopez, B, Perez, AM, Sanchez-Vizcaino, JM 2009a. Combined application of social network and cluster detection analyses for temporal-spatial characterization of animal movements in Salamanca, Spain. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 91, 2938.
Martinez-Lopez, B, Perez, AM, Sanchez-Vizcaino, JM 2009b. Social network analysis. Review of general concepts and use in preventive veterinary medicine. Transboundary and Emerging Diseases 56, 109120.
Natale, F, Giovannini, A, Savini, L, Palma, D, Possenti, L, Fiore, G, Calistri, P 2009. Network analysis of Italian cattle trade patterns and evaluation of risks for potential disease spread. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 92, 341350.
Newman, ME 2002. Assortative mixing in networks. Physical Review Letters 89, 208701.
Newman, ME 2004. Fast algorithm for detecting community structure in networks. Physical Review E 69, 066133.
Newman, ME 2005. Random graphs as models of networks. In Handbook of graphs and networks (ed. S Bornholdt and HG Schuster), pp. 3568. Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Germany.
Newman, ME 2006. Modularity and community structure in networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 103(23), pp. 8577–8582.
Nöremark, M, Hakansson, N, Lewerin, SS, Lindberg, A, Jonsson, A 2011. Network analysis of cattle and pig movements in Sweden: measures relevant for disease control and risk based surveillance. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 99, 7890.
Pastor-Satorras, R, Vespignani, A 2001. Epidemic spreading in scale-free networks. Physical Review Letters 86, 32003203.
Rautureau, S, Dufour, B, Durand, B 2011. Vulnerability of animal trade networks to the spread of infectious diseases: a methodological approach applied to evaluation and emergency control strategies in cattle, France, 2005. Transboundary and Emerging Diseases 58, 110120.
Robinson, SE, Christley, RM 2007. Exploring the role of auction markets in cattle movements within Great Britain. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 81, 2137.
Volkova, VV, Howey, R, Savill, NJ, Woolhouse, ME 2010a. Sheep movement networks and the transmission of infectious diseases. PLoS One 5, e11185.
Volkova, VV, Howey, R, Savill, NJ, Woolhouse, ME 2010b. Potential for transmission of infections in networks of cattle farms. Epidemics 2, 116122.
Wasserman, S, Faust, K 1994. Social network analysis: methods and applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
Watts, DJ, Strogatz, SH 1998. Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks. Nature 393, 440442.

Keywords

Structural vulnerability of the French swine industry trade network to the spread of infectious diseases

  • S. Rautureau (a1), B. Dufour (a2) and B. Durand (a1)

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed