Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-t5pn6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-16T06:52:23.767Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Risk factors associated with lambing traits

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 August 2015

N. McHugh ,
D. P. Berry  and
T. Pabiou
N. McHugh*
Affiliation:
Teagasc, Animal & Grassland Research and Innovation Centre, Moorepark, Fermoy P61 P302, Co. Cork, Ireland
D. P. Berry
Affiliation:
Teagasc, Animal & Grassland Research and Innovation Centre, Moorepark, Fermoy P61 P302, Co. Cork, Ireland
T. Pabiou
Affiliation:
Sheep Ireland, Highfield House, Shinagh, Bandon P72 X050, Co. Cork, Ireland
*
†E-mail: noirin.mchugh@teagasc.ie
Get access

Abstract

The objective of this study was to establish the risk factors associated with both lambing difficulty and lamb mortality in the Irish sheep multibreed population. A total of 135 470 lambing events from 42 675 ewes in 839 Irish crossbred and purebred flocks were available. Risk factors associated with producer-scored ewe lambing difficulty score (scale of one (no difficulty) to four (severe difficulty)) were determined using linear mixed models. Risk factors associated with the logit of the probability of lamb mortality at birth (i.e. binary trait) were determined using generalised estimating equations. For each dependent variable, a series of simple regression models were developed as well as a multiple regression model. In the simple regression models, greater lambing difficulty was associated with quadruplet bearing, younger ewes, of terminal breed origin, lambing in February; for example, first parity ewes experienced greater (P<0.001) lambing difficulty (1.56±0.02) than older ewes. The association between lambing difficulty and all factors persisted in the multiple regression model, and the trend in fixed effects level solutions did not differ from the trend observed in the simple regression models. In the simple regression analyses, a greater odds of lamb mortality was associated with male lambs (1.31 times more likely of death than females), lambs of very light (2 to 3 kg) and very heavy (>7.0 kg) birth weights, quadruplet born lambs and lambs that experienced a more difficult lambing (predicted probability of death for lambs that required severe and veterinary assistance of 0.15 and 0.32, respectively); lambs from dual-purpose breeds and born to younger ewes were also at greater risk of mortality. In the multiple regression model, the association between ewe parity, age at first lambing, year of lambing and lamb mortality no longer persisted. The trend in solutions of the levels of each fixed effect that remained associated with lamb mortality in the multiple regression model, did not differ from the trends observed in the simple regression models although the differential in relative risk between the different lambing difficulty scores was greater in the multiple regression model. Results from this study show that many common flock- and animal-level factors are associated with both lambing difficulty and lamb mortality and management of different risk category groups (e.g. scanned litter sizes, ewe age groups) can be used to appropriately manage the flock at lambing to reduce their incidence.

Keywords

sheeprisk factorslambing traits
Type
Research Article
Information
animal , Volume 10 , Issue 1 , January 2016 , pp. 89 - 95
Copyright
© The Animal Consortium 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alexander, G, Stevens, D, Bradley, LR and Barwick, SA 1990. Maternal behaviour in Border Leicester, Glen Vale (Border Leicester derived) and Merino sheep. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 30, 27–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Binns, SH, Cox, IJ, Rizvi, S and Green, LE 2002. Risk factors for lamb mortality on UK sheep farms. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 52, 287–303.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dalton, DC, Knight, TW and Johnson, DL 1980. Lamb survival in sheep breeds on New Zealand hill country. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 23, 167–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dwyer, CM 2003. Behavioural development in the neonatal lamb: effect of maternal and birth-related factors. Theriogenology 59, 1027–1050.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dwyer, CM 2014. Maternal behaviour and lamb survival: from neuroendocrinology to practical application. Animal 8, 102–112.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dwyer, CM and Bünger, L 2012. Factors affecting dystocia and offspring vigour in different sheep genotypes. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 103, 257–264.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dwyer, CM and Lawrence, AB 2005. A review of the behavioural and physiological adaptations of hill and lowland breeds of sheep that favour lamb survival. Applied Animal Behavioural Science 92, 235–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dwyer, CM, Lawrence, AB, Brown, HE and Simm, G 1996. Effect of ewe and lamb genotype on gestation length, lambing difficulty and neonatal behaviour of lambs. Reproduction, Fertility and Development 8, 1123–1129.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Everett-Hincks, JM, Lopez-Villalobos, N, Blair, HT and Stafford, KJ 2005. The effect of ewe maternal behaviour score on lamb and litter survival. Livestock Production Science 93, 51–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, MW 2003. A review of the welfare implications of out-of-season extensive lamb production systems in New Zealand. Livestock Production Science. 85, 165–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gama, LT, Dickerson, GE, Young, LD and Leymaster, KA 1991. Effects of breed, heterosis, age of dam, litter size and birth weight on lamb mortality. Journal of Animal Science 69, 2727–2743.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Geenty, KG, Brien, FD, Hinch, GN, Dobos, RC, Refshauge, G, McCaskill, M, Ball, AJ, Behrendt, R, Gore, KP, Savage, DB, Harden, S, Hocking-Edwards, JE, Hart, K and van der Werf, JHJ 2014. Reproductive performance in the Sheep CRC Information Nucleus using artificial insemination across different sheep-production environments in southern Australia. Animal Production Science 54, 715–726.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilmour, AR, Gogel, BJ, Cullis, BR and Thompson, R 2009. ASReml User Guide Release 3.0. VSN International Ltd, Hemel Hempstead, HP1 1ES, UK. Retrieved June 30, 2011, from www.vsni.co.uk Google Scholar
Haughey, KG 1993. Perinatal lamb mortality – its investigation, causes and control. Irish Veterinary Journal 46, 9–28.Google Scholar
Macfarlane, JM, Matheson, SM and Dwyer, CM 2010. Genetic parameters for birth difficulty, lamb vigour and lamb sucking ability in Suffolk sheep. Animal Welfare 19, 99–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matheson, SM, Rooke, JA, McIlvaney, K, Jack, M, Ison, S, Bünger, L and Dwyer, CM 2011. Development and validation of on-farm behavioural scoring systems to assess birth assistance and lamb vigour. Animal 5, 776–783.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maxa, J, Sharifi, AR, Pedersen, J, Gauly, M, Simianer, H and Norberg, E 2009. Genetic parameters and factors influencing survival to twenty-four hours after birth in Danish meat sheep breeds. Journal of Animal Science 87, 1888–1895.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mee, JF, Berry, DP and Cromie, AR 2008. Prevalence of, and risk factors associated with, perinatal calf mortality in pasture-based Holstein-Friesian cows. Animal 4, 613–620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mee, JF, Berry, DP and Cromie, AR 2011. Risk factors for calving assistance and dystocia in pasture-based Holstein-Friesian heifers and cows in Ireland. Veterinary Journal 187, 189–194.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morris, CA, Hickey, SM and Clarke, JN 2000. Genetic and environmental factors affecting lamb survival at birth and through to weaning. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 43, 515–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nash, ML, Hungerford, LL, Nash, TG and Zinn, GM 1996. Risk factors for perinatal and postnatal mortality in lambs. Veterinary Record 139, 64–67.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nowak, R and Poindron, P 2006. From birth to colostrum: early steps leading to lamb survival. Reproduction Nutrition Development 46, 431–446.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Riggio, V, Finocchiaro, R and Bishop, SC 2008. Genetic parameters for early lamb survival and growth in Scottish Blackface sheep. Journal of Animal Science 86, 1758–1764.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
SAS Institute 2011. SAS/STAT Software. Release 9.3. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA.Google Scholar
Smith, GM 1977. Factors affecting birth weight, dystocia and preweaning survival in sheep. Journal of Animal Science 44, 745–753.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Southey, BR, Rodriguez-Zac, SL and Leymaster, KA 2004. Competing risk analysis of lamb mortality in a terminal sire composite population. Journal of Animal Science 82, 2892–2899.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Speijers, MHM, Carson, AF, Dawson, LER, Irwin, D and Gordon, AW 2010. Effects of sire breed on ewe dystocia, lamb survival and weaned lamb output in hill sheep systems. Animal 4, 486–496.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Swalha, RM, Conington, J, Brotherstone, S and Villaneva, B 2007. Analyses of lamb survival of Scottish Blackface Sheep. Animal 1, 151–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiener, G, Woolliams, C and MacLeod, NSM 1983. The effects of breed, breeding system and other factors on lamb mortality. I. Causes of death and effects on incidence of losses. Journal of Agricultural Science 100, 539–551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar