Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Review: Make ruminants green again – how can sustainable intensification and agroecology converge for a better future?

  • B. Dumont (a1), J. C. J. Groot (a2) and M. Tichit (a3)

Abstract

Livestock farming systems provide multiple benefits to humans: protein-rich diets that contribute to food security, employment and rural economies, capital stock and draught power in many developing countries and cultural landscape all around the world. Despite these positive contributions to society, livestock is also the centre of many controversies as regards to its environmental impacts, animal welfare and health outcomes related to excessive meat consumption. Here, we review the potentials of sustainable intensification (SI) and agroecology (AE) in the design of sustainable ruminant farming systems. We analyse the two frameworks in a historical perspective and show that they are underpinned by different values and worldviews about food consumption patterns, the role of technology and our relationship with nature. Proponents of SI see the increase in animal protein demand as inevitable and therefore aim at increasing production from existing farmland to limit further encroachment into remaining natural ecosystems. Sustainable intensification can thus be seen as an efficiency-oriented framework that benefits from all forms of technological development. Proponents of AE appear more open to dietary shifts towards less animal protein consumption to rebalance the whole food system. Agroecology promotes system redesign, benefits from functional diversity and aims at providing regulating and cultural services. We analyse the main criticisms of the two frameworks: Is SI sustainable? How much can AE contribute to feeding the world? Indeed, in SI, social justice has long lacked attention notably with respect to resource allocation within and between generations. It is only recently that some of its proponents have indicated that there is room to include more diversified systems and food-system transformation perspectives and to build socially fair governance systems. As no space is available for agricultural land expansion in many areas, agroecological approaches that emphasise the importance of local production should also focus more on yield increases from agricultural land. Our view is that new technologies and strict certifications offer opportunities for scaling-up agroecological systems. We stress that the key issue for making digital science part of the agroecological transition is that it remains at a low cost and is thus accessible to smallholder farmers. We conclude that SI and AE could converge for a better future by adopting transformative approaches in the search for ecologically benign, socially fair and economically viable ruminant farming systems.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Review: Make ruminants green again – how can sustainable intensification and agroecology converge for a better future?
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Review: Make ruminants green again – how can sustainable intensification and agroecology converge for a better future?
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Review: Make ruminants green again – how can sustainable intensification and agroecology converge for a better future?
      Available formats
      ×

Copyright

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Corresponding author

References

Hide All
Aleksandrowicz, L, Green, R, Joy, EJM, Smith, P and Haines, A 2016. The impacts of dietary change on greenhouse gas emissions, land use, water use, and health: A systematic review. PLoS ONE 11, e0165797.
Altieri, MA 2002. Agroecological principles and strategies for sustainable agriculture. In Agroecological innovations: increasing food production with participatory development (ed. NT Uphoff), pp. 4046. Earthscan, London, UK.
Altieri, MA, Nicholls, CI and Montalba, R 2017. Technological approaches to sustainable agriculture at a crossroads: an agroecological perspective. Sustainability 9, 349.
Animal Task Force 2013. Research & innovation for a sustainable livestock sector in Europe. An Animal Task Force white paper, April 2013. Retrieved on 27 April 2018 from http://www.animaltaskforce.eu/Portals/0/ATF/horizon2020/ATF%20white%20paper%20Research%20priorities%20for%20a%20sustainable%20livestock%20sector%20in%20Europe.pdf.
Barbieri, P, Pellerin, S and Nesme, T 2017. Comparing crop rotations between organic and traditional farming. Scientific Reports 7, 13761.
Botreau, R, Farruggia, A, Martin, B, Pomiès, D and Dumont, B 2014. Towards an agroecological assessment of dairy systems: proposal for a set of criteria suited to mountain farming. Animal 8, 13491360.
Campbell, BM, Thornton, P, Zougmoré, R, van Asten, P and Lipper, L 2014. Sustainable intensification: What is its role in climate smart agriculture? Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 8, 3943.
Cardoso, IM and Mendes, F 2014. People managing landscapes: agroecology and social processes. In Proceedings of the FAO International Symposium on Agroecology for Food Security and Nutrition, 18–19 September 2014, Rome, Italy, pp. 73–87.
Carmona-Torres, C, Parra-López, C, Groot, JCJ and Rossing, WAH 2011. Collective action for multi-scale environmental management: achieving landscape policy objectives through cooperation of local resource managers. Landscape and Urban Planning 103, 2433.
Cayre, P, Michaud, A, Theau, JP and Rigolot, C 2018. The coexistence of multiple worldviews in livestock farming drives agroecological transition. A case study in French Protected Designation of Origin (PDO) cheese mountain areas. Sustainability 10, 1097.
Chaudhary, A and Kastner, T 2016. Land use biodiversity impacts embodied in international food trade. Global Environmental Change 38, 195204.
Clark, B, Stewart, GB, Panzone, LA, Kyriazakis, I and Frewer, LJ 2017. Citizens, consumers and farm animal welfare: a meta-analysis of willingness-to-pay studies. Food Policy 68, 112127.
De Schutter, O and Vanloqueren, G 2011. The New Green Revolution: how twenty-first-century science can feed the world. The Solutions Journal 2, 3344.
Dumont, B, Fortun-Lamothe, L, Jouven, M, Thomas, M and Tichit, M 2013. Prospects from agroecology and industrial ecology for animal production in the 21st century. Animal 7, 10281043.
Dumont, B, González-García, E, Thomas, M, Fortun-Lamothe, L, Ducrot, C, Dourmad, JY and Tichit, M 2014. Forty research issues for the redesign of animal production systems in the 21st century. Animal 8, 13821393.
Dumont, B, Jouven, M, Bonaudo, T, Botreau, R and Sabatier, R 2017. A framework for the design of agroecological livestock farming systems. In Agroecological practices for sustainable agriculture – principles, applications, and making the transition (ed. A Wezel), pp. 263291. World Scientific Publishing Europe Ltd, London, UK.
Duru, M and Therond, O 2015. Livestock system sustainability and resilience in intensive production zones: which form of ecological modernization? Regional Environmental Change 15, 16511665.
Foley, JA, Ramankutty, N, Brauman, KA, Cassidy, ES, Gerber, JS, Johnston, M, Mueller, ND, O’Connell, C, Ray, DK, West, PC, Balzer, C, Bennett, EM, Carpenter, SR, Hill, J, Monfreda, C, Polasky, S, Rockström, J, Sheehan, J, Siebert, S, Tilman, D and Zaks, DPM 2011. Solutions for a cultivated planet. Nature 478, 337342.
Food and Agriculture Organisation 2010. Sustainable crop production intensification through an ecosystem approach and an enabling environment: capturing efficiency through ecosystem services and management. Committee on Agriculture. Twenty-second session, Rome, 16–19 June 2010. FAO, Rome, Italy.
Food and Agriculture Organisation 2011. Successes and failures with animal nutrition practices and technologies in developing countries. In Proceedings of the FAO Electronic Conference, 1–30 September 2010, FAO, Rome, Italy, Retrieved on 27 April 2018 from http://www.fao.org/docrep/014/i2270e/i2270e00.pdf.
Fouilleux, E, Bricas, N and Alpha, A 2017. ‘Feeding 9 billion people’: global food security debates and the productionist trap. Journal of European Public Policy 24, 16581677.
Francis, C, Lieblein, G, Gliessman, S, Breland, TA, Creamer, N, Harwood, R, Salomonsson, L, Helenius, L, Rickerl, D, Salvador, R, Wiedenhoeft, M, Simmons, S, Allen, P, Altieri, M, Flora, C and Poincelot, R 2003. Agroecology: the ecology of food systems. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture 22, 99118.
Garnett, T 2014. Three perspectives on sustainable food security: efficiency, demand restraint, food system transformation. What role for life cycle assessment? Journal of Cleaner Production 73, 1018.
Garnett, T, Appleby, MC, Balmford, A, Bateman, IJ, Benton, TG, Bloomer, P, Burlingame, B, Dawkins, M, Dolan, L, Fraser, D, Herrero, M, Hoffman, I, Smith, P, Thornton, PK, Toulmin, C, Vermeulen, SJ and Godfray, HC 2013. Sustainable intensification in agriculture: Premises and policies. Science 341, 3334.
Gerber, PJ, Steinfeld, H, Henderson, B, Mottet, A, Opio, C, Dijkman, J, Falcucci, A and Tempio, G 2013. Tackling climate change through livestock – a global assessment of emissions and mitigation opportunities. FAO, Rome, Italy. Retrieved 27 April 2018 from http://www.fao.org/3/a-i3437e.pdf.
Gordon, LJ, Bignet, V, Crona, B, Henriksson, PJG, Van Holt, T, Jonell, M, Lindahl, T, Troell, M, Barthel, S, Deutsch, L, Folke, C, Haider, LJ, Rockström, J and Queiroz, C 2017. Rewiring food systems to enhance human health and biosphere stewardship. Environmental Research Letters 12, 100201.
Groot, JCJ, Jellema, A and Rossing, WAH 2010. Designing a hedgerow network in a multifunctional agricultural landscape: Balancing trade-offs among ecological quality, landscape character and implementation costs. European Journal of Agronomy 32, 112119.
Guéneau, S 2018. Neoliberalism and the emergence of private sustainability initiatives: the case of the Brazilian cattle value chain. Business Strategy and the Environment 27, 240251.
Guthman, J 2000. Raising organic: an agro-ecological assessment of grower practices in California. Agriculture and Human Values 17, 257266.
Hill, SB 1998. Redesigning agroecosystems for environmental sustainability: a deep systems approach. Systems Research and Behavioral Science 15, 391402.
Horlings, LG and Marsden, TK 2011. Towards the real green revolution? Exploring the conceptual dimensions of a new ecological modernisation of agriculture that could ‘feed the world’. Global Environmental Change 21, 441452.
Howe, C, Suich, H, Vira, B and Mace, GM 2014. Creating win-wins from trade-offs? Ecosystem services for human well-being: a meta-analysis of ecosystem service trade-offs and synergies in the real world. Global Environmental Change 28, 263275.
Huber, K 2018. Invited review: resource allocation mismatch as pathway to disproportionate growth in farm animals – prerequisite for a disturbed health. Animal 12, 528536.
Ingrand, S 2018. Opinion paper: ‘monitoring te salutant:’ combining digital sciences and agro-ecology to design multi-performant livestock farming systems. Animal 12, 23.
Kosgey, LS, Baker, RL, Udo, HMJ and Van Arendonk, JAM 2006. Successes and failures of small ruminant breeding programmes in the tropics: a review. Small Ruminant Research 61, 1328.
Lambin, EF and Meyfroidt, P 2011. Global land use change, economic globalization, and the looming land scarcity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 108, 34653472.
Lemaire, G, Franzluebbers, A, de Faccio Carvalho, PC and Dedieu, B 2014. Integrated crop-livestock systems: strategies to achieve synergy between agricultural production and environmental quality. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 190, 48.
Loos, J, Abson, DJ, Chappell, MJ, Hanspach, J, Mikulcak, F, Tichit, M and Fischer, J 2014. Putting meaning back into ‘sustainable intensification’. Frontiers in Ecology and Environment 12, 356361.
Makkar, HPS 2018. Review: feed demand landscape and implications of food-not feed strategy for food security and climate change. Animal (doi:10.1017/S175173111700324X, Published online 4 December 2017.
Murgueitio, E, Calle, Z, Uribe, F, Calle, A and Solorio, B 2011. Native trees and shrubs for the productive rehabilitation of tropical cattle ranching lands. Forest Ecology and Management 261, 16541663.
Ollion, E, Ingrand, S, Delaby, L, Trommenschlager, JM, Colette-Leurent, S and Blanc, F 2016. Assessing the diversity of trade-offs between life functions in early lactation dairy cows. Livestock Science 183, 98107.
Paciullo, DSC, Pires, MFA, Aroeira, LJM, Morenz, MJF, Maurício, RM, Gomide, CAM and Silveira, SR 2014. Sward characteristics and performance of dairy cows in organic grass-legume pastures shaded by tropical trees. Animal 8, 12641271.
Petersen, B and Snapp, S 2015. What is sustainable intensification? Views from experts. Land Use Policy 46, 110.
Phocas, F, Belloc, C, Bidanel, J, Delaby, L, Dourmad, JY, Dumont, B, Ezanno, P, Fortun-Lamothe, L, Foucras, G, Frappat, B, González-García, E, Hazard, D, Larzul, C, Lubac, S, Mignon-Grasteau, S, Moreno, CR, Tixier-Boichard, M and Brochard, M 2016. Review: Towards the agroecological management of ruminants, pigs and poultry through the development of sustainable breeding programs: I- Selection goals and criteria. Animal 10, 17491759.
Pires, JAA, Chilliard, Y, Delavaud, C, Rouel, J, Pomies, D and Blanc, F 2015. Physiological adaptations and ovarian cyclicity of Holstein and Montbeliarde cows under two low-input production systems. Animal 9, 19861995.
Popp, A, Lotze-Campen, H and Bodirsky, B 2010. Food consumption, diet shifts and associated non-CO2 greenhouse gases from agricultural production. Global Environmental Change 20, 451462.
Pretty, JN 1997. The sustainable intensification of agriculture. Natural Resources Forum 21, 247256.
Pretty, JN, Toulmin, C and Williams, S 2011. Sustainable intensification in African agriculture. International. Journal of Agricultural Sustainability 9, 524.
Puillet, L, Martin, O, Sauvant, D and Tichit, M 2010. An individual-based model simulating goat response variability and long-term herd performance. Animal 4, 20842098.
Rao, I, Peters, M, Castro, A, Schultze-Kraft, R, White, D, Fisher, M, Miles, J, Lascano, C, Blümmel, M, Bungenstab, D, Tapasco, J, Hyman, G, Bolliger, A, Paul, B, Van der Hoek, R, Maass, B, Tiemann, T, Cuchillo, M, Douxchamps, S, Villanueva, C, Rincón, Á, Ayarza, M, Rosenstock, T, Subbarao, G, Arango, J, Cardoso, J, Worthington, M, Chirinda, N, Notenbaert, A, Jenet, A, Schmidt, A, Vivas, N, Lefroy, R, Fahrney, K, Guimarães, E, Tohme, J, Cook, S, Herrero, M, Chacón, M, Searchinger, T and Rudel, T 2015. LivestockPlus – the sustainable intensification of forage-based agricultural systems to improve livelihoods and ecosystem services in the tropics. Tropical Grasslands 3, 5982.
Rodríguez-Ortega, T, Oteros-Rozas, E, Ripoll-Bosch, R, Tichit, M, Martín-López, B and Bernués, A 2014. Applying the ecosystem services framework to pasture-based livestock farming systems in Europe. Animal 8, 13611372.
Rodríguez-Ortega, T, Bernués, A, Olaizola, AM and Brown, MT 2017. Does intensification result in higher efficiency and sustainability? An emergy analysis of Mediterranean sheep-crop farming systems. Journal of Cleaner Production 144, 171179.
Röös, E, Bajželj, B, Smith, P, Patel, M, Little, D and Garnett, T 2017. Greedy or needy? Land use and climate impacts of food in 2050 under different livestock futures. Global Environmental Change 47, 112.
Rosset, PM, Machín Sosa, B, Roque Jaime, AM and Ávila Lozano, DR 2011. The Campesino-to-Campesino agroecology movement of ANAP in Cuba: social process methodology in the construction of sustainable peasant agriculture and food sovereignty. Journal of Peasant Studies 38, 161191.
Smith, P 2013. Delivering food security without increasing pressure on land. Global Food Security 2, 1823.
Stamer, A 2015. Insect proteins-a new source for animal feed. EMBO reports 16, 676680.
Struik, PC and Kuyper, TW 2017. Sustainable intensification in agriculture: the richer shade of green. A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development 37, 39.
Sullivan, CA, Skeffington, MS, Gormally, MJ and Finn, JA 2010. The ecological status of grasslands on lowland farmlands in western Ireland and implications for grassland classification and nature value assessment. Biological Conservation 143, 15291539.
Thorlakson, T, de Zegher, JF and Lambin, EF 2018. Companies’ contribution to sustainability through global supply chains. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 115, 20722077.
Tittonell, P 2014. Ecological intensification of agriculture – sustainable by nature. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 8, 5361.
Tscharntke, T, Clough, Y, Wanger, TC, Jackson, L, Motzke, I, Perfecto, I, Vandermeer, J and Whitbread, A 2012. Global food security, biodiversity conservation and the future of agricultural intensification. Biological Conservation 151, 5359.
van Zanten, HHE, Meerburg, BG, Bikker, P, Herrero, M and de Boer, IJM 2016. Opinion paper: The role of livestock in a sustainable diet: a land-use perspective. Animal 10, 547549.
Veysset, P, Lherm, M, Bébin, D and Roulenc, M 2014. Mixed crop-livestock farming systems: a sustainable way to produce beef? Commercial farm results, questions and perspectives. Animal 8, 12181228.
Wezel, A, Bellon, S, Doré, T, Francis, C, Vallod, D and David, C 2009. Agroecology as a science, a movement and a practice. A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development 29, 503515.
zu Ermgassen, EKHJ, de Alcântara, MP, Balmford, A, Barioni, L, Beduschi Neto, F, Bettarello, MMF, de Brito, G, Carrero, GC, de AS Florence, E, Garcia, E, Gonçalves, ET, da Luz, CT, Mallman, GM, Strassburg, BBN, Valentim, JF and Latawiec, A 2018. Results from on-the-ground efforts to promote sustainable cattle ranching in the Brazilian Amazon. Sustainability 10, 1301.

Keywords

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed