Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-m9kch Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-12T04:26:43.927Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Relationships between milk mid-IR predicted gastro-enteric methane production and the technical and financial performance of commercial dairy herds

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 December 2017

P. Delhez*
Affiliation:
National Fund for Scientific Research, Egmont 5, B-1000 Brussels, Belgium Dep. AGROBIOCHEM & Terra Teaching and Research Centre, Gembloux Agro-Bio Tech, University of Liège, Passage des Déportés 2, B-5030 Gembloux, Belgium
B. Wyzen
Affiliation:
Walloon Breeding Association, Champs Elysées 4, B-5590 Ciney, Belgium
A.-C. Dalcq
Affiliation:
Dep. AGROBIOCHEM & Terra Teaching and Research Centre, Gembloux Agro-Bio Tech, University of Liège, Passage des Déportés 2, B-5030 Gembloux, Belgium
F. G. Colinet
Affiliation:
Dep. AGROBIOCHEM & Terra Teaching and Research Centre, Gembloux Agro-Bio Tech, University of Liège, Passage des Déportés 2, B-5030 Gembloux, Belgium
E. Reding
Affiliation:
Walloon Breeding Association, Champs Elysées 4, B-5590 Ciney, Belgium
A. Vanlierde
Affiliation:
Dep. Valorisation of Agricultural Products, Walloon Agricultural Research Centre, Chaussée de Namur 24, B-5030 Gembloux, Belgium
F. Dehareng
Affiliation:
Dep. Valorisation of Agricultural Products, Walloon Agricultural Research Centre, Chaussée de Namur 24, B-5030 Gembloux, Belgium
N. Gengler
Affiliation:
Dep. AGROBIOCHEM & Terra Teaching and Research Centre, Gembloux Agro-Bio Tech, University of Liège, Passage des Déportés 2, B-5030 Gembloux, Belgium
H. Soyeurt
Affiliation:
Dep. AGROBIOCHEM & Terra Teaching and Research Centre, Gembloux Agro-Bio Tech, University of Liège, Passage des Déportés 2, B-5030 Gembloux, Belgium
Get access

Abstract

Considering economic and environmental issues is important in ensuring the sustainability of dairy farms. The objective of this study was to investigate univariate relationships between lactating dairy cow gastro-enteric methane (CH4) production predicted from milk mid-IR (MIR) spectra and technico-economic variables by the use of large scale and on-farm data. A total of 525 697 individual CH4 predictions from milk MIR spectra (MIR-CH4 (g/day)) of milk samples collected on 206 farms during the Walloon milk recording scheme were used to create a MIR-CH4 prediction for each herd and year (HYMIR-CH4). These predictions were merged with dairy herd accounting data. This allowed a simultaneous study of HYMIR-CH4 and 42 technical and economic variables for 1024 herd and year records from 2007 to 2014. Pearson correlation coefficients (r) were used to assess significant relationships (P<0.05). Low HYMIR-CH4 was significantly associated with, amongst others, lower fat and protein corrected milk (FPCM) yield (r=0.18), lower milk fat and protein content (r=0.38 and 0.33, respectively), lower quantity of milk produced from forages (r=0.12) and suboptimal reproduction and health performance (e.g. longer calving interval (r=−0.21) and higher culling rate (r=−0.15)). Concerning economic results, low HYMIR-CH4 was significantly associated with lower gross margin per cow (r=0.19) and per litre FPCM (r=0.09). To conclude, this study suggested that low lactating dairy cow gastro-enteric CH4 production tended to be associated with more extensive or suboptimal management practices, which could lead to lower profitability. The observed low correlations suggest complex interactions between variables due to the use of on-farm data with large variability in technical and management practices.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© The Animal Consortium 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adamczyk, K, Makulska, J, Jagusiak, W and Węglarz, A 2017. Associations between strain, herd size, age at first calving, culling reason and lifetime performance characteristics in Holstein-Friesian cows. Animal 11, 327334.Google Scholar
Bell, MJ, Potterton, SL, Craigon, J, Saunders, N, Wilcox, RH, Hunter, M, Goodman, JR and Garnsworthy, PC 2014. Variation in enteric methane emissions among cows on commercial dairy farms. Animal 8, 15401546.Google Scholar
Beukes, PC, Gregorini, P, Romera, AJ, Levy, G and Waghorn, GC 2009. Modelling the efficacy and profitability of mitigation strategies for greenhouse gas emissions on pastoral dairy farms in New Zealand. Proceeding of the18th World IMACS/MODSIM Congress, Cairns, Australia, pp. 635–641.Google Scholar
Brask, M, Lund, P, Weisbjerg, MR, Hellwing, ALF, Poulsen, M, Larsen, MK and Hvelplund, T 2013. Methane production and digestion of different physical forms of rapeseed as fat supplements in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 96, 23562365.Google Scholar
Chilliard, Y, Martin, C, Rouel, J and Doreau, M 2009. Milk fatty acids in dairy cows fed whole crude linseed, extruded linseed, or linseed oil, and their relationship with methane output. Journal of Dairy Science 92, 51995211.Google Scholar
Dehareng, F, Delfosse, C, Froidmont, E, Soyeurt, H, Martin, C, Gengler, N, Vanlierde, A and Dardenne, P 2012. Potential use of milk mid-infrared spectra to predict individual methane emission of dairy cows. Animal 6, 16941701.Google Scholar
Drogoul, C, Gadoud, R, Joseph, MM, Jussiau, R, Lisberney, MJ, Mangeol, B, Montmeas, L and Tarrit, T 2004. Nutrition et alimentation des animaux d’élevage, Tome 2. Educagri éditions, Dijon, France.Google Scholar
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) 2013. Greenhouse gas emissions from ruminant supply chains, a global life cycle assessment. FAO, Rome, Italy.Google Scholar
Garnsworthy, PC, Craigon, J, Hernandez-Medrano, JH and Saunders, N 2012. On-farm methane measurements during milking correlate with total methane production by individual dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 9, 31663180.Google Scholar
Garnsworthy, PC, Craigon, J, Hernandez-Medrano, JH and Saunders, N 2012b. Variation among individual dairy cows in methane measurements made on farm during milking. Journal of Dairy Science 95, 31813189.Google Scholar
Gerber, P, Vellinga, T, Opio, C and Steinfeld, H 2011. Productivity gains and greenhouse gas emissions intensity in dairy systems. Livestock Science 139, 100108.Google Scholar
Gerber, PJ, Henderson, B and Makkar, HPS 2013. Animal production and health. Mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions in livestock production. A review of technical options for non-CO2 emissions. FAO, Rome, Italy.Google Scholar
Hart, KJ, Huntington, JA, Wilkinson, RG, Bartram, CG and Sinclair, LA 2015. The influence of grass silage-to-maize silage ratio and concentrate composition on methane emissions, performance and milk composition of dairy cows. Animal 9, 983991.Google Scholar
Hatew, B, Bannink, A, Van Laar, H, De Jonge, LH and Dijkstra, J 2016. Increasing harvest maturity of whole-plant corn silage reduces methane emission of lactating dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 99, 115.Google Scholar
Hristov, AN, Oh, J, Giallongo, F, Frederick, T, Harper, MT, Weeks, H, Branco, AF, Price, WJ, Moate, PJ, Deighton, MH, Williams, SRO, Kindermann, M and Duval, S 2016. Short communication: Comparison of the GreenFeed system with the sulfur hexafluoride tracer technique for measuring enteric methane emissions from dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 99, 54615465.Google Scholar
Hristov, AN, Oh, J, Lee, C, Meinen, R, Montes, F, Ott, T, Firkins, J, Rotz, A, Dell, C, Adesogan, A, Yang, W, Tricarico, J, Kebreab, E, Waghorn, G, Dijkstra, J and Oosting, S 2013. Mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions in livestock production – a review of technical options for non-CO2 emissions. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy.Google Scholar
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change 2014. Climate change 2014: synthesis report. Contribution of working groups I, II and III to the fifth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. IPCC, Geneva, Switzerland.Google Scholar
Johnson, KA and Johnson, DE 1995. Methane emissions from cattle. Journal of Animal Science 73, 24832492.Google Scholar
Kandel, PB, Vanrobays, ML, Vanlierde, A, Dehareng, F, Froidmon, E, Gengler, N and Soyeurt, S 2017. Genetic parameters of mid-infrared methane predictions and their relationships with milk production traits in Holstein cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 100, 55785591.Google Scholar
Knapp, JR, Laur, GL, Vadas, PA, Weiss, WP and Tricarico, JM 2014. Invited review: enteric methane in dairy cattle production: Quantifying the opportunities and impact of reducing emissions. Journal of Dairy Science 97, 32313261.Google Scholar
Kristensen, T, Jensen, C, Østergaard, S, Weisbjerg, MR, Aaes, O and Nielsen, NI 2015. Feeding, production, and efficiency of Holstein-Friesian, Jersey, and mixed-breed lactating dairy cows in commercial Danish herds. Journal of Dairy Science 98, 263274.Google Scholar
Lucy, MC 2001. Reproductive loss in high-producing dairy cattle: where will it end? Journal of Dairy Science 8, 2771293.Google Scholar
Moraes, LE, Fadel, JG, Castillo, AR, Casper, DP, Tricarico, JM and Kebreab, E 2015. Modeling the trade-off between diet costs and methane emissions: a goal programming approach. Journal of Dairy Science 98, 55575571.Google Scholar
Moss, A, Jouany, JP and Newbold, J 2000. Methane production by ruminants: its contribution to global warming. Annales de zootechnie, INRA/EDP Sciences 49, 231253.Google Scholar
Muetzel, S 2011. Effect of level of feed intake on methane production per kg of dry matter intake. Technical Paper, Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, Wellington, New-Zealand, pp. 1–16.Google Scholar
National Research Council 2001. Nutrient requirements of dairy cattle, 7th revised edition. National Academic Press, Washington, WA, USA.Google Scholar
O’Brien, D, Hennessy, T, Moran, B and Shalloo, L 2015. Relating the carbon footprint of milk from Irish dairy farms to economic performance. Journal of Dairy Science 98, 73947407.Google Scholar
Pickering, NK, Oddy, VH, Basarab, J, Cammack, K, Hayes, B, Hegarty, RS, Lassen, J, McEwan, JC, Miller, S, Pinares-Patiño, CS and de Haas, Y 2015. Animal board invited review: genetic possibilities to reduce enteric methane emissions from ruminants. Animal 9, 14311440.Google Scholar
Soyeurt, H, Dardenne, P, Gillon, A, Croquet, C, Vanderick, S, Mayeres, P, Bertozzi, C and Gengler, N 2006. Variation in fatty acid contents of milk and milk fat within and across breeds. Journal of Dairy Science 89, 48584865.Google Scholar
Thomassen, MA, Dolman, MA, Van Calker, KJ and de Boer, IJM 2009. Relating life cycle assessment indicators to gross value added for Dutch dairy farms. Ecological Economics 68, 22782284.Google Scholar
Van Middelaar, CE, Dijkstra, J, Berentsen, PBM and De Boer, IJM 2014. Cost-effectiveness of feeding strategies to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from dairy farming. Journal of Dairy Science 97, 24272439.Google Scholar
Vanlierde, A, Vanrobays, ML, Dehareng, F, Froidmont, E, Soyeurt, H, McParland, S, Lewis, E, Deighto, MH, Grandl, F, Kreuzer, M, Gredler, B, Dardenne, P and Gengler, N 2015. Hot topic: innovative lactation-stage-dependent prediction of methane emissions from milk mid-infrared spectra. Journal of Dairy Science 98, 57405747.Google Scholar
Vanlierde, A, Vanrobays, ML, Gengler, N, Dardenne, P, Froidmont, E, Soyeurt, H, McParland, S, Lewis, E, Deighton, MH, Mathot, M and Dehareng, F 2016. Milk mid-infrared spectra enable prediction of lactation-stage- dependent methane emissions of dairy cattle within routine population-scale milk recording schemes. Animal Production Science 56, 258264.Google Scholar
Warner, D, Podesta, SC, Hatew, B, Klop, G, Van Laar, H, Bannink, A and Dijkstra, J 2015. Effect of nitrogen fertilization rate and regrowth interval of grass herbage on methane emission of zero-grazing lactating dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 98, 33833393.Google Scholar
Whitfield, RG, Gerger, ME and Sharp, RL 1987. Near-infrared spectrum qualification via Mahalanobis distance determination. Applied Spectroscopy 41, 12041213.Google Scholar
Windig, JJ, Calus, MPL and Veerkamp, RF 2005. Influence of herd environment on health and fertility and their relationship with milk production. Journal of Dairy Science 88, 335347.Google Scholar