Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-42gr6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T03:37:47.527Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Quality of three muscles from suckler bulls finished on concentrates and slaughtered at 16 months of age or slaughtered at 19 months of age from two production systems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 May 2020

L. Moran ,
S. S. Wilson ,
M. G. O’Sullivan ,
M. McGee ,
E. G. O’Riordan ,
F. J. Monahan ,
J. P. Kerry  and
A. P. Moloney
L. Moran
Affiliation:
Teagasc, Food Research Centre, Ashtown, Dublin 15, Ireland
S. S. Wilson
Affiliation:
School of Food and Nutritional Sciences, University College Cork, Ireland
M. G. O’Sullivan
Affiliation:
School of Food and Nutritional Sciences, University College Cork, Ireland
M. McGee
Affiliation:
Teagasc, Animal & Grassland Research and Innovation Centre, Grange, Dunsany, Co. Meath, Ireland
E. G. O’Riordan
Affiliation:
Teagasc, Animal & Grassland Research and Innovation Centre, Grange, Dunsany, Co. Meath, Ireland
F. J. Monahan
Affiliation:
School of Agriculture and Food Science, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland
J. P. Kerry
Affiliation:
School of Food and Nutritional Sciences, University College Cork, Ireland
A. P. Moloney*
Affiliation:
Teagasc, Animal & Grassland Research and Innovation Centre, Grange, Dunsany, Co. Meath, Ireland
*
†E-mail: aidan.moloney@teagasc.ie
Get access

Abstract

There is a requirement in some beef markets to slaughter bulls at under 16 months of age. This requires high levels of concentrate feeding. Increasing the slaughter age of bulls to 19 months facilitates the inclusion of a grazing period, thereby decreasing the cost of production. Recent data indicate few quality differences in longissimus thoracis (LT) muscle from conventionally reared 16-month bulls and 19-month-old bulls that had a grazing period prior to finishing on concentrates. The aim of the present study was to expand this observation to additional commercially important muscles/cuts. The production systems selected were concentrates offered ad libitum and slaughter at under 16 months of age (16-C) or at 19 months of age (19-CC) to examine the effect of age per se, and the cheaper alternative for 19-month bulls described above (19-GC). The results indicate that muscles from 19-CC were more red, had more intramuscular fat and higher cook loss than those from 16-C. No differences in muscle objective texture or sensory texture and acceptability were found between treatments. The expected differences in composition and quality between the muscles were generally consistent across the production systems examined. Therefore, for the type of animal and range of ages investigated, the effect of the production system on LT quality was generally representative of the effect on the other muscles analysed. In addition, the data do not support the under 16- month age restriction, based on meat acceptability, in commercial suckler bull production.

Keywords

beefpalatabilitygluteus mediussemitendinosuslongissimus thoracis
Type
Research Article
Information
animal , Volume 14 , Issue 10 , October 2020 , pp. 2203 - 2211
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Animal Consortium

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

a

Present address: Lactiker Research Group, Department of Pharmacy and Food Science, University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU), 01006 Vitoria-Gasteiz, Spain.

References

Agricultural and Food Research Council 1993. Energy and protein requirements of ruminants. An advisory manual prepared by the AFRC technical committee on responses to nutrients. CAB International, Wallingford, UK.Google Scholar
American Meat Science Association 2005. Research guidelines for cookery, sensory evaluation and instrumental tenderness measurements of fresh meat. National Livestock and Meat Board, Chicago, IL, USA.Google Scholar
Anon 2004. Community scale for the classification of carcasses of adult bovine animals; EC No. 1208/81 and 2930/81. The Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg City, Luxembourg.Google Scholar
Blanco, M, Jurie, C, Micol, D, Agabriel, J, Picard, B and Garcia-Launay, F 2013. Impact of animal and management factors on collagen characteristics in beef: a meta-analysis approach. Animal 7, 1208–1218.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boccard, RL, Naude, RT, Cronje, DE, Smit, MC, Venter, HJ and Rossouw, EJ 1979. The influence of age, sex and breed of cattle on their muscle characteristics. Meat Science 3, 261–280.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carabante, KM, Ardoin, R, Scaglia, G, Malekian, F, Khachaturyan, M, Janes, ME and Prinyawiwatkul, W 2018. Consumer acceptance, emotional response, and purchase intent of rib-eye steaks from grass-fed steers, and effect of health benefit information on consumer perception. Journal of Food Science 83, 2560–2570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dikeman, ME, Reddy, GB, Arthaud, VH, Tuma, HJ, Koch, RM, Mandigo, RW and Axe, JB 1986. Longissimus muscle quality, palatability and connective tissue histological characteristics of bulls and steers fed different energy levels and slaughtered at four ages. Journal of Animal Science 63, 92–101.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dunne, P, O’Mara, F, Monahan, F and Moloney, AP 2006. Changes in colour characteristics and pigmentation of subcutaneous adipose tissue and M. longissimus dorsi of heifers fed grass, grass silage or concentrate-based diets. Meat Science 74, 231–241.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Holman, BWB, Mao, Y, Coombs, CEO, van de Ven, RJ and Hopkins, DL 2016. Relationship between colorimetric (instrumental) evaluation and consumer-defined beef colour acceptability. Meat Science 121, 104–106.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Issanchou, S 1996. Consumer expectations and perceptions of meat and meat product quality. Meat Science 43, 5–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keith, FK, Miles, RS, Bechtel, PJ and Carr, TR 1985. Chemical and sensory properties of thirteen major beef muscles. Journal of Food Science 50, 869–872.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knight, TW, Cosgrove, GP, Death, AF and Anderson, CB 1999. Effect of interval from castration of bulls to slaughter on carcass characteristics and meat quality. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 42, 269–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koolmees, PA, Korteknie, F and Smulders, FJ 1986. Accuracy and utility of sarcomere length assessment by laser diffraction. Food Microstructure 5, 71–76.Google Scholar
Mathoniere, C, Mioche, L, Dransfield, E and Culioli, J 2000. Meat texture characterisation: comparison of chewing patterns, sensory and mechanical measures. Journal of Texture Studies 31, 183–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meat and Livestock Australia (MLA) 2017. Meat Standards Australia beef information kit. MLA, Sydney, Australia.Google Scholar
Mezgebo, GB, Moloney, AP, O’Riordan, EG, McGee, M, Richardson, RI and Monahan, FJ 2017a. Comparison of organoleptic quality and composition of beef from suckler bulls from different production systems. Animal 11, 538–546.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mezgebo, GB, Monahan, FJ, McGee, M, O’Riordan, EG, Marren, D, Listrat, A, Picard, B, Richardson, RI and Moloney, AP 2019. Extending the grazing period for bulls, prior to finishing on a concentrate ration: composition, collagen structure and organoleptic characteristics of beef. Foods 8, 278.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mezgebo, GB, Monahan, FJ, McGee, M, O’Riordan, EG, Richardson, IR and Moloney, AP 2017b. Effect of carcass weight/age on the compositional and sensory qualities of bull beef. Advances in Animal Biosciences 8, s6–s9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moloney, AP and O’Kiely, P 1995. Growth, digestibility and nitrogen retention in finishing steers offered concentrates ad libitum. Irish Journal of Agricultural and Food Research 34, 115–121.Google Scholar
Moran, L, O’Sullivan, MG, Kerry, JP, Picard, B, McGee, M, O’Riordan, EG and Moloney, AP 2017. Effect of a grazing period prior to finishing on a high concentrate diet on meat quality from bulls and steers. Meat Science 125, 76–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moran, L, Wilson, SS, McElhinney, CK, Monahan, FJ, McGee, M, O’Sullivan, MG, O’Riordan, EG, Kerry, JP and Moloney, AP 2019. Suckler bulls slaughtered at 15 months of age: effect of different production systems on the fatty acid profile and selected quality characteristics of Longissimus thoracis. Foods 8, 264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, B, Crosson, P, Kelly, AK and Prendiville, R 2017. An economic and greenhouse gas emissions evaluation of pasture-based dairy calf-to-beef production systems. Agricultural Systems 154, 124–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nian, Y, Allen, P, Prendiville, R and Kerry, JP 2017. Physico-chemical and sensory characteristics of young dairy bull beef derived from two breed types across five production systems employing two first season feeding regimes. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 98, 1914–1926.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
O’Riordan, EG, Crosson, P and McGee, M 2011. Finishing male cattle from the beef suckler herd. Irish Grassland Association Journal 45, 131–146.Google Scholar
O’Quinn, TG, Legako, JF, Brooks, JC, and Miller, MF 2018. Evaluation of the contribution of tenderness, juiciness, and flavor to the overall consumer beef eating experience. Translational Animal Science 2, 26–36.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oury, MP, Picard, B, Istasse, L, Micol, D and Dumont, R 2007. Mode de conduite en elevage et tendrete de la viande bovine [Effect of rearing management practices on tenderness of bovine meat]. INRA Production Animales 20, 309–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shackelford, SD, Wheeler, TL and Koohmaraie, M 1995. Relationship between shear force and trained sensory panel tenderness ratings of 10 major muscles from Bos indicus and Bos taurus cattle. Journal of Animal Science 73, 3333–3340.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stone, H, Bleibaum, RN and Thomas, HA 2012a. Affective testing. In Sensory evaluation practices (ed. Stone, H, Bleibaum, RN and Thomas, HA), pp. 291–325. Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stone, H, Bleibaum, RN and Thomas, HA 2012b. Test strategy and design of experiments. In Sensory evaluation practices (ed. Stone, H, Bleibaum, RN and Thomas, HA), pp. 117–157. Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teagasc 2015. Beef production system guidelines. Teagasc, Carlow, Ireland.Google Scholar
Torrescano, G, Sánchez-Escalante, A, Giménez, B, Roncalés, P and Beltrán, JA 2003. Shear values of raw samples of 14 bovine muscles and their relation to muscle collagen characteristics. Meat Science 64, 85–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vestergaard, M, Oksbjerg, N and Henckel, P 2000. Influence of feeding intensity, grazing and finishing feeding on muscle fibre characteristics and meat colour of semitendinosus, longissimus dorsi and supraspinatus muscles of young bulls. Meat Science 54, 177–185.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Viljoen, HF, De Kock, HL and Webb, EC 2002. Consumer acceptability of dark, firm and dry (DFD) and normal pH beef steaks. Meat Science 61, 181–185.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wulf, DM and Wise, JW 1999. Measuring muscle color on beef carcasses using the L* a* b* color space. Journal of Animal Science 77, 2418–2427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Moran et al. supplementary material

Moran et al. supplementary material 1

Download Moran et al. supplementary material(File)
File 3.1 MB
Supplementary material: File

Moran et al. supplementary material

Moran et al. supplementary material 2

Download Moran et al. supplementary material(File)
File 38.6 KB