Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c4f8m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T04:19:50.977Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Partial replacement of triticale for corn grain in starter diet and its effects on performance, structural growth and blood metabolites of Holstein calves

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 June 2016

H. R. Moeinoddini ,
M. Alikhani ,
F. Ahmadi ,
G. R. Ghorbani  and
P. Rezamand
H. R. Moeinoddini
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Sciences, Isfahan University of Technology, Isfahan 84156, Iran
M. Alikhani
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Sciences, Isfahan University of Technology, Isfahan 84156, Iran
F. Ahmadi
Affiliation:
Division of Food Biosciences, College of Medical Life Sciences, Konkuk University, Chung-Ju, Chungbuk 380-701, Korea
G. R. Ghorbani
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Sciences, Isfahan University of Technology, Isfahan 84156, Iran
P. Rezamand*
Affiliation:
Department of Animal and Veterinary Science, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID 83844, USA
*
†E-mail: rezamand@uidaho.edu
Get access

Abstract

The primary objective of this study was to examine the effects of different inclusion rates of dietary triticale replacing corn grain in starter rations of dairy calves on feed intake, average daily gain (ADG), feed efficiency, skeletal growth, fecal score, and selected blood and ruminal parameters. In all, 30 4-day-old Holstein calves (15 female and 15 male) were blocked by gender and birth weight, and then randomly allotted to three treatment groups (n=10 calves/treatment) and received either a corn-based diet without triticale (T0), or a diet containing 16% (T16) or 32% (T32) triticale (25% and 50% corn replaced by triticale, respectively) for 10 weeks. Calves were weaned on day 43 of study and remained on the study until day 70. During post-weaning period, calves fed T32 had the lowest starter intake (1.78 kg/day; P=0.02). In contrast, ADG was not affected in pre-weaning and overall periods, but calves fed T32 had a lower ADG (P=0.04) as compared with calves fed T0 in post-weaning period. No dietary effect was detected for feed efficiency. Dietary treatment did not affect heart girth and body length; however, height at wither and hip at weaning increased in calves fed triticale compared with T0. No detectable effects were observed in serum glucose and β-hydroxybutyrate. No difference was detected in blood urea nitrogen on day 35 either but on day 50 and day 70 the greatest concentration was recorded for calves fed T16. Compared with the control, ruminal ammonia concentration was increased for calves fed T32 (4.34 v. 7.50 mmol/l) and T16 (4.01 v. 8.12 mmol/l) on day 35 and day 50. No difference was detected in ruminal pH on day 35 or day 50; however, calves fed T32 had the lowest pH (6.11) at 70 days. No significant effect was detected in days scoured, respiratory score and general appearance. Under our experimental conditions, it appears that triticale at 16% dry matter (i.e. replacing corn grain up to 25%) in the starter diet does not have adverse effects on the performance and intake of calves. Therefore, substituting corn partially with triticale in calf starter diets may prove beneficial in places where corn is less abundant or its price is prohibitive. The low number of calves per treatment however may have limited the statistical power to detect significant differences among treatments, possibly affecting the results, which should be interpreted with caution.

Keywords

triticaleperformancestarterdairy calf
Type
Research Article
Information
animal , Volume 11 , Issue 1 , January 2017 , pp. 61 - 67
Copyright
© The Animal Consortium 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agricultural Statistics 2011. Corn: supply and disappearance, vol. 2001. United States Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC, USA.Google Scholar
Association of Official Analytical Chemists 1990. Official methods of analysis, 15th edition. AOAC, Arlington, VA, USA.Google Scholar
Bird, SH, Rowe, JB, Choct, M, Stachiw, S, Tyler, P and Thompson, RD 1999. In vitro fermentation of grain and enzymatic digestion of cereal starch. In Recent advances in animal nutrition in Australia vol. 12 (ed. JL Corbett), pp. 53–62. University of New England, Armidale, NSW, Australia.Google Scholar
Broderick, GA and Clayton, MK 1997. A statistical evaluation of animal and nutritional factors influencing concentrations of milk urea nitrogen. Journal of Dairy Science 80, 2964–2971.Google Scholar
Broderick, GA and Kang, JH 1980. Automated simultaneous determination of ammonia and total amino acids in ruminal fluid and in vitro media. Journal of Dairy Science 63, 64–75.Google Scholar
Castells, L, Bach, A, Araujo, G, Montoro, C and Terré, M 2012. Effect of different forage sources on performance and feeding behavior of Holstein calves. Journal of Dairy Science 95, 286–293.Google Scholar
Du Pisani, F 2009. Evaluation of structural and functional composition of South African triticale cultivars (X Triticosecale Wittmack). Master of Science in Food Science, Department of Food Science, Faculty of AgriSciences, Stellenbosch University, Matieland, South Africa. Retrieved on 1 April 2009 from http://hdl.handle.net/10019.1/2221 Google Scholar
Goonewardene, L, Basarab, J and Zobell, D 1994. Comparison of growth and feed efficiency of steers fed barley and triticale diets. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 74, 159–161.Google Scholar
Heinrichs, AJ, Jones, CM, VanRoekel, LR and Fowler, MA 2003. Calf track: a system of dairy calf workforce management, training, and evaluation and health evaluation. Journal of Dairy Science 86 (suppl. 1), 115.Google Scholar
Hill, G and Utley, P 1989. Digestibility, protein metabolism and ruminal degradation of Beagle 82 triticale and Kline barley fed in corn-based cattle diets. Journal of Animal Science 67, 1793–1804.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hosseini, SM, Ghorbani, GR, Rezamand, P and Khorvash, M 2016. Determining optimum age of Holstein dairy calves when adding chopped alfalfa hay to meal starter diets based on measures of growth and performance. Animal 10, 607–615.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hristov, A, Etter, R, Ropp, J and Grandeen, K 2004. Effect of dietary crude protein level and degradability on ruminal fermentation and nitrogen utilization in lactating dairy cows. Journal of Animal Science 82, 3219–3229.Google Scholar
Ingalls, J, Devlin, T and McKirdy, J 1970. Triticale in diets for young dairy calves. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 50, 199–204.Google Scholar
Iranian Council of Animal Care 1995. Guide to the care and use of experimental animals vol. 1. Isfahan University of Technology, Isfahan, Iran.Google Scholar
Khan, MA, Lee, HJ, Lee, WS, Kim, HS, Kim, SB, Ki, KS, Park, SJ, Ha, JK and Choi, YJ 2007. Starch source evaluation in calf starter: I. Feed consumption, body weight gain, structural growth, and blood metabolites in Holstein calves. Journal of Dairy Science 90, 5259–5268.Google Scholar
Laarman, AH, Sugino, T and Oba, M 2012. Effects of starch content of calf starter on growth and rumen pH in Holstein calves during the weaning transition. Journal of Dairy Science 95, 4478–4487.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mantle, P 1996. Detection of ergot (Claviceps purpurea) in a dairy feed component by gas chromatography and mass spectrometry. Journal of Dairy Science 79, 1988–1991.Google Scholar
McCloy, AW, Sherrod, LB, Albin, RC and Hansen, KR 1971. Nutritive value of triticale for ruminants. Journal of Animal Science 32, 534–539.Google Scholar
McDonald, P, Edwards, RA, Greenhalgh, JFD and Morgan, CA 2010. Animal nutrition, 7th edition. Prentice Hall, London, England, pp. 237–253, 303–339.Google Scholar
Mergoum, M and Macpherson, HG 2004. Triticale improvement and production. FAO Plant Production and Protection Paper 179. Publishing Management Service, Information Division, FAO, Rome, Italy. ISBN 92-5-105182-8.Google Scholar
Montoro, C, Miller-Cushon, EK, DeVries, TJ and Bach, A 2013. Effect of physical form of forage on performance, feeding behavior, and digestibility of Holstein calves. Journal of Dairy Science 96, 1117–1124.Google Scholar
Oh, Y, Kim, J, Kim, K, Choi, C, Kang, S, Nam, I, Kim, D, Song, M, Kim, C and Park, K 2008. Effects of level and degradability of dietary protein on ruminal fermentation and concentrations of soluble non-ammonia nitrogen in ruminal and omasal digesta of Hanwoo steers. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences 21, 392–403.Google Scholar
Oveysi, M, Mirhadi, MJ, Madani, H, Nourmohamadi, G, Zarghami, R and Madani, A 2010. The impact of source restriction on yield formation of corn (Zea mays L.) due to water deficiency. Plant, Soil and Environment 56, 476–481.Google Scholar
Radcliffe, B, Egan, A and Driscoll, C 1983. Nutritional evaluation of triticale grain as an animal feed. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture and Animal Husbandry 23, 419–425.Google Scholar
Reddy, S, Chen, M and Rao, D 1975. Replacement value of triticale for corn and wheat in beef finishing rations. Journal of Animal Science 40, 940–944.Google Scholar
Schumann, B, Dänicke, S, Meyer, U, Ueberschär, KH and Breves, G 2007. Effects of different levels of ergot in concentrates on the growing and slaughtering performance of bulls and on carry-over into edible tissue. Archives of Animal Nutrition 61, 357–370.Google Scholar
Sharma, HR, Ingalls, JR, McKirdy, JA and Sanford, LM 1981. Evaluation of rye grain in the diets of young Holstein calves and lactating dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 64, 441–448.Google Scholar
Shimada, A, Cline, TR and Rogler, JC 1974. Nutritive value of triticale for the nonruminant. Journal of Animal Science 38, 935–940.Google Scholar
Smith, WA, Du Plessis, GS and Griessel, A 1994. Replacing maize grain with triticale grain in lactation diets for dairy cattle and fattening diets for steers. Animal Feed Science and Technology 49, 287–295.Google Scholar
Van Barneveld, RJ 2002. Triticale: a guide to the use of triticale in livestock feeds. Grains Research Development Corporation, Kingston, Australia. 12 pp.Google Scholar
Van Soest, PV, Robertson, JB and Lewis, BA 1991. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science 74, 3583–3597.Google Scholar
Wright, KL, Otterby, DE, Linn, JG, Stern, MD, Marx, GD and Johnson, DG 1989. Evaluation of white lupines and triticale in calf starter diets. Journal of Dairy Science 72, 1002–1011.Google Scholar