Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-tn8tq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-23T05:44:48.508Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

New mastitis phenotypes suitable for genomic selection in meat sheep and their genetic relationships with udder conformation and lamb live weights

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 March 2018

A. McLaren ,
K. Kaseja ,
J. Yates ,
S. Mucha ,
N. R. Lambe  and
J. Conington
A. McLaren*
Affiliation:
Scotland’s Rural College, Future Farming Systems, Hill & Mountain Research Centre, Crianlarich FK20 8RUUK
K. Kaseja
Affiliation:
Scotland’s Rural College, Animal and Veterinary Services, Easter Bush, Midlothian EH25 9RG, UK
J. Yates
Affiliation:
The British Texel Sheep Society, Stoneleigh Park, Kenilworth, Warwickshire CV8 2LG, UK
S. Mucha
Affiliation:
Scotland’s Rural College, Animal and Veterinary Services, Easter Bush, Midlothian EH25 9RG, UK
N. R. Lambe
Affiliation:
Scotland’s Rural College, Animal and Veterinary Services, Easter Bush, Midlothian EH25 9RG, UK
J. Conington
Affiliation:
Scotland’s Rural College, Animal and Veterinary Services, Easter Bush, Midlothian EH25 9RG, UK
*
†E-mail: Ann.McLaren@sruc.ac.uk
Get access

Abstract

Mastitis can prove expensive in sheep reared for meat production due to costs associated with treatment methods, poor lamb growth and premature culling of ewes. The most commonly used method to detect mastitis, in dairy systems, is somatic cell counts. However, in many meat-producing sheep flocks ewes are not routinely handled, thus regular milk sampling is not always possible. It is, therefore, worthwhile to investigate alternative phenotypes, such as those associated with udder conformation and methods of evaluating somatic cell counts in the milk, such as the California Mastitis Test. The main objectives of this study were therefore: (a) to estimate genetic parameters of traits relating to mastitis and udder conformation in a meat sheep breed; (b) estimate the level of association between somatic cell counts and the California Mastitis Test and (c) assess the relationships between mastitis and both udder conformation and lamb live weights. Data were collected from Texel ewes based on 29 flocks, throughout the UK, during 2015 and 2016. The ewes were scored twice each year, at mid- and late-lactation. Eight different conformation traits, relating to udder and teat characteristics, and milk samples were recorded. The data set comprised of data available for 2957 ewes. The pedigree file used contained sire and dam information for 31 775 individuals. The animal models used fitted relevant fixed and random effects. Heritability estimates for traits relating to mastitis (somatic cell score and the California Mastitis Test), ranged from 0.08 to 0.11 and 0.07 to 0.11, respectively. High genetic correlations were observed between somatic cell score and the California Mastitis Test (0.76 to 0.98), indicating the California Mastitis Test to be worthwhile for assessing infection levels, particularly at mid-lactation. The strongest correlations observed between the mastitis traits and the udder conformation traits were associated with udder depth (0.61 to 0.75) also at mid-lactation. Negative phenotypic correlations were estimated between mastitis and the weight of lamb reared by the ewe (−0.15 to −0.23), suggesting that lamb weights fell as infection levels rose. Genetic correlations were not significantly different from zero. Reducing mastitis will lead to improvements in flock productivity and the health and welfare of the animals. It will also improve the efficiency of production and the resilience to disease challenge. The economic benefits, therefore, of these results combined could be substantial not only in this breed but also in the overall meat sheep industry.

Keywords

mastitissheepgenetic selectionsomatic cell countsCalifornia Mastitis Test
Type
Research Article
Information
animal , Volume 12 , Issue 12 , December 2018 , pp. 2470 - 2479
Copyright
© The Animal Consortium 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agriculture & Horticulture Development Board 2017. Agriculture & Horticulture Development Board (AHDB) Beef & Lamb weekly GB regional averages. Retrieved on 8 August 2017 from http://beefandlamb.ahdb.org.uk/markets/auction-market-reports/weekly-gb-regional-averages/.Google Scholar
Ali, AKA and Shook, GE 1980. An optimum transformation for somatic cell concentration in milk. Journal of Dairy Science 63, 487–490.Google Scholar
Arsenault, J, Dubreuil, P, Higgins, R and Belanger, D 2008. Risk factors and impacts of clinical and subclinical mastitis in commercial meat-producing sheep. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 87, 373–393.Google Scholar
Barillet, F, Rupp, R, Mignon-Grasteau, S, Astruc, J-M and Jacquin, M 2001. Genetic analysis for mastitis resistance and milk somatic cell score in French Lacaune dairy sheep. Genetic Selection Evolution 33, 397–415.Google Scholar
Bergonier, D and Berthelot, X 2003. New advances in epizootiology and control of ewe mastitis. Livestock Production Science 79, 1–16.Google Scholar
Casu, S, Sechi, S, Salaris, SL and Carta, A 2010. Phenotypic and genetic relationships between udder morphology and udder health in dairy ewes. Small Ruminant Research 88, 77–83.Google Scholar
Conington, J, Cao, G, Stott, A and Bunger, L 2008. Breeding for resistance to mastitis in United Kingdom sheep, a review and economic appraisal. Veterinary Record 162, 369–376.Google Scholar
de la Fuente, LF, Fernandez, G and San Primitivo, F 1996. A linear evaluation system for udder traits of dairy ewes. Livestock Production Science 45, 171–178.Google Scholar
de la Fuente, LF, Gonzalo, C, Sanchez, JP, Rodriguez, R, Carriedo, JA and San Primitivo, F 2011. Genetic parameters of the linear body conformation traits and genetic correlations with udder traits, milk yield and composition, and somatic cell count in dairy ewes. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 91, 585–591.Google Scholar
El-Saied, UM, Carriedo, JA, de La Fuente, LF and San Primitivo, F 1999. Genetic parameters of lactation cell counts and milk and protein yields in dairy ewes. Journal of Dairy Science 82, 639–644.Google Scholar
Fragkou, IA, Boscos, CM and Fthenakis, GC 2014. Diagnosis of clinical or subclinical mastitis in ewes. Small Ruminant Research 118, 86–92.Google Scholar
Gelasakis, AI, Mavrogianni, VS, Petridis, IG, Vasileiou, NGC and Fthenakis, GC 2015. Mastitis in sheep – The last 10 years and the future of research. Veterinary Microbiology 81, 136–146.Google Scholar
Gilmour, AR, Gogel, B, Cullis, BR and Thompson, R 2009. ASReml user guide release 3.0. VSN International Ltd, Hemel Hempstead, UK.Google Scholar
Gonzalez-Rodriguez, MC and Carmenes, P 1996. Evaluation of the California mastitis test as a discriminant method to detect subclinical mastitis in ewes. Small Ruminant Research 21, 245–250.Google Scholar
Huntley, SJ, Cooper, S, Bradley, AJ and Green, LE 2012. A cohort study of the associations between udder conformation, milk somatic cell count, and lamb weight in suckler ewes. Journal of Dairy Science 95, 5001–5010.Google Scholar
Interbull 2017. National genetic evaluation forms provided by countries. Retrieved on 18 December 2017 from http://www.interbull.org/ib/geforms.Google Scholar
Kalogridou-Vassiliadou, D, Manolkidis, K and Tsigoida, A 1992. Somatic cell counts in relation to infection status of the goat udder. Journal of Dairy Research 59, 21–28.Google Scholar
Legarra, A and Ugarte, E 2005. Genetics parameters of Udder Traits, Somatic Cell Score, and milk yield in Latxa sheep. Journal of Dairy Science 88, 2238–2245.Google Scholar
Marie-Etancelin, C, Astruc, JM, Porte, D, Larroque, H and Robert-Granie, D 2005. Multiple-trait genetic parameters and genetic evaluation of udder-type traits in Lacaune dairy ewes. Livestock Production Science 97, 211–218.Google Scholar
Manfredi, E, Piacere, A, Lahaye, P and Ducrocq, V 2001. Genetic parameters of type appraisal in Saanen and Alpine goats. Livestock Production Science 70, 183–189.Google Scholar
McDougall, S, Murdough, P, Pankey, W, Delaney, C, Barlow, J and Scruton, D 2001. Relationships among somatic cell count, California mastitis test, impedance and bacteriological status of milk in goats and sheep in early lactation. Small Ruminant Research 40, 245–254.Google Scholar
McLaren, A, Mucha, S, Mrode, R, Coffey, M and Conington, J 2016. Genetic parameters of linear conformation type traits and their relationship with milk yield throughout lactation in mixed-breed dairy goats. Journal of Dairy Science 99, 5516–5525.Google Scholar
Moroni, P, Pisoni, G, Varisco, G and Boettcher, P 2007. Effect of intramammary infection in Bergamasca meat sheep on milk parameters and lamb growth. The Journal of Dairy Research 74, 340–344.Google Scholar
Mrode, RA and Swanson, GJT 1996. Genetic and statistical properties of somatic cell count and its suitability as an indirect means of reducing the incidence of mastitis in dairy cattle. Animal Breeding Abstracts 64, 847–857.Google Scholar
Mrode, RA and Swanson, GJT 2003. Estimation of genetic parameters for somatic cell count in the first three lactations using random regression. Livestock Production Science 79, 239–247.Google Scholar
Psifidi, A, Bramis, G, Arsenos, G and Banos, G 2014. Genetic parameters and genomic markers associated with mastitis resistance in dairy sheep. In Proceedings of the 10th World Congress of Genetics Applied to Livestock Production, 17–22 August, Vancouver, Canada, p. 521.Google Scholar
Riggio, V, Pesce, LL, Morreale, S and Portolano, B 2013. Receiver-operating characteristic curves for somatic cell scores and California mastitis test in Valle del Belice dairy sheep. The Veterinary Journal 196, 528–532.Google Scholar
Riggio, V and Portolano, B 2015. Genetic selection for reduced somatic cell counts in sheep milk: A review. Small Ruminant Research 126, 33–42.Google Scholar
Ruegg, P 2005. California Mastitis Test (CMT) fact sheet 1. Retrieved on 1 February 2016 from http://milkquality.wisc.edu/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/california-mastitis-test-fact-sheet.pdf.Google Scholar
Rupp, R and Boichard, D 2003. Genetics of resistance to mastitis in dairy cattle. Veterinary Research 34, 671–688.Google Scholar
Rupp, R, Bergonier, D, Dion, S, Hygonenq, MC, Aurel, MR, Robert-Granie, C and Foucras, G 2009. Response to somatic cell count-based selection for mastitis resistance in a divergent selection experiment in sheep. Journal of Dairy Science 92, 1203–1219.Google Scholar
Rupp, R, Lagriffoul, G, Astruc, JM and Barillet, F 2003. Genetic parameters for milk somatic cell scores and relationships with production traits in French lacaune dairy sheep. Journal of Dairy Science 86, 1476–1481.Google Scholar
Rupp, R, Mucha, S, Larroque, H, McEwan, J and Conington, J 2016. Genomic application in sheep and goat breeding. Animal Frontiers 6, 39–44.Google Scholar
Rupp, RA and Foucras, GI 2010. Genetics of mastitis in dairy ruminants. In Breeding for disease resistance in farm animals, 3rd edition (ed. SC Bishop, RFE Axford, FW Nicholas and JB Owens), pp. 183–212. CAB International, Wallingford, UK.Google Scholar
Tolone, M, Riggio, V and Portolano, B 2013. Estimation of genetic and phenotypic parameters for bacteriological status of the udder, somatic cell score, and milk yield in dairy sheep using a threshold animal model. Livestock Science 151, 134–139.Google Scholar
Waage, S and Vatn, S 2008. Individual animal risk factors for clinical mastitis in meat sheep in Norway. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 87, 229–243.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

McLaren et al. supplementary material

Tables S1-S2

Download McLaren et al. supplementary material(File)
File 18.7 KB