Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-jbqgn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-18T23:39:30.988Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Minimizing cows’ stress when calves were early weaned using the two-step method with nose flaps

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 April 2016

R. Ungerfeld ,
G. Quintans  and
M. J. Hötzel
R. Ungerfeld*
Affiliation:
Departamento de Fisiología, Facultad de Veterinaria, Montevideo, 11600 Uruguay
G. Quintans
Affiliation:
Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria, Treinta y Tres, 33000 Uruguay
M. J. Hötzel
Affiliation:
Laboratório de Etologia Aplicada, Departamento de Zootecnia e Desenvolvimento Rural, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, SC, 88062-000 Brazil
*
†E-mail: rungerfeld@gmail.com
Get access

Abstract

Early weaning may be used in beef cattle production to improve reproduction rates in range conditions. However, weaning causes a stress response in cows, which may be especially strong in early weaning management, as the bond between the cow and the calf is still strong. We hypothesized that weaning calves in two steps, with the aid of anti-sucking devices (nose flaps) would reduce the behavioural stress response in the cows separated from their calves 2 months after parturition. We compared the behaviour frequency and weight change in cows that were weaned abruptly, by separation of the calf on day 0 of the study, or in two steps, consisting of the use of anti-sucking nose flaps for 5 days before permanent separation; a third group was not weaned to serve as control. Thirty-six crossbred multiparous Aberdeen Angus×Hereford cows and their calves (n=12/treatment) were managed in three paddocks with similar pasture availability, with four dyads from each treatment per paddock. Cows’ behaviour was observed by direct visual instantaneous sampling, at 10 min intervals from days −3 to 11. Weaning the calves in two steps clearly attenuated the behavioural stress response observed in abruptly weaned cows, which included reductions in grazing and lying, and increases in pacing, walking and vocalizing. Our results corroborate those previously shown for cows nursing older calves, and indicate that step weaning can reduce the behavioural stress response of cows at weaning, even when the calf is weaned shortly after birth, when the bond between the cow and calf is still very strong.

Keywords

animal welfarebeef cattleBos tauruspacingsucking
Type
Research Article
Information
animal , Volume 10 , Issue 11 , November 2016 , pp. 1871 - 1876
Copyright
© The Animal Consortium 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alvez, P, Quintans, G, Hötzel, MJ and Ungerfeld, R 2016. Two-step weaning in beef calves: permanence of nose flaps for 7 or 21 days does not influence the behaviour response. Animal Production Science 56, 866–870.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arthington, JD and Kaimbacher, AS 2003. Effect of early weaning on the performance of three-year-old, first-calf beef heifers and calves reared in the subtropics. Journal of Animal Science 81, 1136–1141.Google Scholar
Blanco, M, Casasus, I and Palacio, J 2009. Effect of age at weaning on the physiological stress response and temperament of two beef cattle breeds. Animal 3, 108–117.Google Scholar
de Castro, T, Ibarra, D, Rodriguez, M, Valdez, L, Benquet, N and Rubianes, E 2011. Resumption of postpartum ovarian cyclicity after different suckling manipulation treatments in primiparous beef cows. Animal Production Science 51, 111–114.Google Scholar
de Castro, T, Ibarra, D, Valdez, L, Rodriguez, M, Benquet, N, Lagos, FG and Rubianes, E 2006. Effects of early weaning and progesterone-estradiol treatments on postpartum reproductive efficiency of grazing anestrous beef cows. Animal Reproduction 3, 396–402.Google Scholar
Enríquez, D, Hötzel, MJ and Ungerfeld, R 2011. Minimising the stress of weaning of beef calves: a review. Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica 53, 28.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Enríquez, DH, Ungerfeld, R, Quintans, G, Guidoni, AL and Hötzel, MJ 2010. The effects of alternative weaning methods on behaviour in beef calves. Livestock Science 128, 20–27.Google Scholar
Haley, D 2006. The behavioural response of cattle (Bos taurus) to artificial weaning in two stages. University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada.Google Scholar
Haley, DB, Bailey, DW and Stookey, JM 2005. The effects of weaning beef calves in two stages on their behavior and growth rate. Journal of Animal Science 83, 2205–2214.Google Scholar
Hötzel, MJ, Quintans, G and Ungerfeld, R 2012. Behaviour response to two-step weaning is diminished in beef calves previously submitted to temporary weaning with nose flaps. Livestock Science 149, 88–95.Google Scholar
Lefcourt, AM and Elsasser, TH 1995. Adrenal responses of Angus×Hereford cattle to the stress of weaning. Journal of Animal Science 73, 2669–2676.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lehner, PN 1996. Handbook of ethological methods, 2nd edition. Cambridge University Press, UK, 672p.Google Scholar
Lynch, EM, Earley, B, McGee, M and Doyle, S 2010a. Characterisation of physiological and immunological responses in beef cows to abrupt weaning and subsequent housing. BMC Veterinary Research 6, 37–37.Google Scholar
Lynch, EM, Earley, B, McGee, M and Doyle, S 2010b. Effect of abrupt weaning at housing on leukocyte distribution, functional activity of neutrophils, and acute phase protein response of beef calves. Bmc Veterinary Research 6, 39.Google Scholar
Lynch, EM, McGee, M, Doyle, S and Earley, B 2012. Effect of pre-weaning concentrate supplementation on peripheral distribution of leukocytes, functional activity of neutrophils, acute phase protein and behavioural responses of abruptly weaned and housed beef calves. BMC Veterinary Research 8, 1.Google Scholar
Martin, GB, Milton, JTB, Davidson, RH, Hunzicker, GEB, Lindsay, DR and Blache, D 2004. Natural methods for increasing reproductive efficiency in small ruminants. Animal Reproduction Science 82–3, 231–246.Google Scholar
Newberry, RC and Swanson, JC 2008. Implications of breaking mother–young social bonds. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 110, 3–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parfet, JR, Marvin, CA, Allrich, RD, Diekman, MA and Moss, GE 1986. Anterior pituitary concentrations of gonadotropins, GnRH-receptors and ovarian characteristics following early weaning in beef cows. Journal of Animal Science 62, 717–722.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Quintans, G, Banchero, G, Carriquiry, M, Lopez-Mazz, C and Baldi, F 2010. Effect of body condition and suckling restriction with and without presence of the calf on cow and calf performance. Animal Production Science 50, 931–938.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quintans, G, Vazquez, AI and Weigel, KA 2009. Effect of suckling restriction with nose plates and premature weaning on postpartum anestrous interval in primiparous cows under range conditions. Animal Reproduction Science 116, 10–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Short, RE, Bellows, RA, Staigmiller, RB, Berardinelli, JG and Custer, EE 1990. Physiological mechanisms controlling anestrous and infertility in postpartum beef cattle. Journal of Animal Science 68, 799–816.Google Scholar
Stookey, JM and Watts, JM 2007. Low stress-restraint, handling and weaning of cattle. In Livestock handling and transport (ed. T Grandin), pp. 65–75. CABI International, Oxfordshire, UK.Google Scholar
Ungerfeld, R, Hötzel, MJ and Quintans, G 2015. Changes in behaviour, milk production and bodyweight in beef cows subjected to two-step or abrupt weaning. Animal Production Science 55, 1281–1288.Google Scholar
Ungerfeld, R, Hötzel, MJ, Scarsi, A and Quintans, G 2011. Behavioral and physiological changes in early-weaned multiparous and primiparous beef cows. Animal 5, 1270–1275.Google Scholar
Vaz, RZ and Lobato, JFP 2010. Effects of the weaning age of calves on somatic development and on reproductive performance of beef cows. Revista Brasileira De Zootecnia-Brazilian Journal of Animal Science 39, 1058–1067.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vizcarra, JÁ, Ibañez, W and Orcasberro, R 1986. Repetibilidad y reproductibilidad de dos escalas para estimar la condición corporal en vacas Hereford. Investigaciones Agronómicas 7, 45–47.Google Scholar
Watts, JM and Stookey, JM 2000. Vocal behaviour in cattle: the animal’s commentary on its biological processes and welfare. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 67, 15–33.Google Scholar
Weary, DM, Jasper, J and Hötzel, MJ 2008. Understanding weaning distress. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 110, 24–41.Google Scholar
Williams, GL 1990. Suckling as a regulator of postpartum rebreeding in cattle: a review. Journal of Animal Science 68, 831–852.Google Scholar