Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-ws8qp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-19T03:51:11.164Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Measurement of spatial gait parameters from footprints of dairy cows

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 August 2009

E. Telezhenko*
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Environment and Health, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, PO Box 234, SE-532 23 Skara, Sweden
Get access

Abstract

The variability in dairy cow gait characteristics, determined by measurements of footprints (trackway measurements), was analysed. Seven gait parameters were determined from 32 non-lame dairy cows during free-speed walking on a slatted concrete walkway. The footprints were revealed by application of a thin lime powder-slurry layer to the walkway surface. The cows were observed on two test occasions with a 3-week interval, with measurements from four consecutive strides used within each test session. The variance components for cow, test and cow–test interaction were estimated by a residual (restricted) maximum likelihood method. The percentage of each variance component was calculated to assess the relative impact of each factor on total variance. Between-test variation was generally low, suggesting that cows maintain the same average gait pattern, at least over a 3-week period. The proportion of within-test variation was considerable for most trackway measurements. Stride length, step angle, step width and tracking (overlap) showed low to moderate within-test variation (12% to 27%), whereas for mediolateral displacement of rear feet and step length it was rather high (54% and 62%, respectively). Within-test variation in step asymmetry was very high (77%), suggesting the occurrence of natural, non-systematic changes in inter-limb coordination in non-lame cows. For better understanding the gait pattern in non-lame cows, linear associations between the trackway measurements and with body size were assessed. It was concluded that trackway measurements were able to describe the gait pattern in walking cows under dairy farm conditions. However, considering the relatively high within-test variation in gait, several strides should be used to obtain a representative gait pattern.

Type
Full Paper
Copyright
Copyright © The Animal Consortium 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alexander, RM 1985. Mechanics of posture and gait of some large dinosaurs. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 83, 125.Google Scholar
Alexander, RM 2003. Principles of animal locomotion. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
Bicalho, RC, Cheong, SH, Cramer, G, Guard, CL 2007. Association between a visual and an automated locomotion score in lactating Holstein cows. Journal of Dairy Science 90, 32943300.Google Scholar
Bland, JM, Altman, DG 1995. Calculating correlation coefficients with repeated observations: Part 1 – Correlation within subjects. British Medical Journal 310, 446.Google Scholar
Buchner, HHF 2001. Gait adaptation in lameness. In Equine locomotion (ed. W Back and HM Clayton), pp. 251279. WB Saunders, London, UK.Google Scholar
Clayton, HM, Schamhardt, HC 2001. Measurement techniques for gait analysis. In Equine locomotion (ed. W Back and HM Clayton), pp. 5576. WB Saunders, London, UK.Google Scholar
Drevemo, S, Dalin, G, Fredricson, I, Bjorne, K 1980a. Equine locomotion: 1. The analysis of linear and temporal stride characteristics of trotting Standardbreds. Equine Veterinary Journal 12, 6065.Google Scholar
Drevemo, S, Dalin, G, Fredricson, I, Bjorne, K 1980b. Equine locomotion: 2. The analysis of coordination between limbs of trotting Standardbreds. Equine Veterinary Journal 12, 6670.Google Scholar
Drevemo, S, Dalin, G, Fredricson, I, Bjorne, K 1980c. Equine locomotion: 3. The reproducibility of gait in Standardbred trotters. Equine Veterinary Journal 12, 7173.Google Scholar
Flower, FC, de Passillé, AM, Weary, DM, Sanderson, DJ, Rushen, J 2007. Softer, higher-friction flooring improves gait of cows with and without sole ulcers. Journal of Dairy Science 90, 12351242.Google Scholar
Flower, FC, Sanderson, DJ, Weary, DM 2005. Hoof pathologies influence kinematic measures of dairy cow gait. Journal of Dairy Science 88, 31663173.Google Scholar
Flower, FC, Weary, DM 2006. Effect of hoof pathologies on subjective assessments of dairy cow gait. Journal of Dairy Science 89, 139146.Google Scholar
Gaudet, G, Goodman, R, Landry, M, Russell, G, Wall, JC 1990. Measurement of step length and step width: a comparison of videotape and direct measurements. Physiotherapy Canada 42, 1215.Google Scholar
Herlin, AH, Drevemo, S 1997. Investigating locomotion of dairy cows by use of high-speed cinematography. Equine Veterinary Journal 23 (suppl.), 106109.Google Scholar
Hitchcock, EH 1836. Ornithichnology? Description of the footmarks of birds (Ornithichnites) on New Red Sandstone in Massachusetts. American Journal of Science 29, 307340.Google Scholar
Kadaba, MP, Ramakrishnan, HK, Wootten, ME, Gainey, J, Gorton, G, Cochran, GV 1989. Repeatability of kinematic, kinetic, and electromyographic data in normal adult gait. Journal of Orthopaedic Research 7, 849860.Google Scholar
Keegan, KG, Wilson, DA, Wilson, DJ, Smith, B, Gaughan, EM, Pleasant, RS 1998. Evaluation of mild lameness in horses trotting on a treadmill by clinicians and interns or residents and correlation of their assessments with kinematic gait analysis. American Journal of Veterinary Research 59, 13701377.Google Scholar
Kuban, G 1989. Elongate dinosaur tracks. In Dinosaur Tracks and Traces (ed. DD Gillette and MG Lockley), pp. 5772. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
McDonough, AL, Batavia, M, Chen, FC, Kwon, S, Ziai, J 2001. The validity and reliability of the GAITRite system’s measurements: a preliminary evaluation. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 82, 419425.Google Scholar
Moe-Nilssen, R 1998. Test–retest reliability of trunk accelerometry during standing and walking. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 79, 13771385.Google Scholar
Peham, C, Licka, T, Girtler, D, Scheidl, M 2001. The influence of lameness on equine stride length consistency. The Veterinary Journal 162, 153157.Google Scholar
Phillips, CJC, Morris, ID 2000. The locomotion of dairy cows on concrete floors that are dry, wet, or covered with a slurry of excreta. Journal of Dairy Science 83, 17671772.Google Scholar
Phillips, CJC, Morris, ID 2001. The locomotion of dairy cows on floor surfaces with different frictional properties. Journal of Dairy Science 84, 623628.Google Scholar
Schmid, T, Weishaupt, MA, Meyer, SW, Waldern, N, Peinen, K, Nuss, K 2008. High-speed cinematographic evaluation of claw-ground contact pattern of lactating cows. The Veterinary Journal 181, 151157.Google Scholar
Sorsdahl, AB, Moe-Nilssen, R, Strand, LI 2008. Test–retest reliability of spatial and temporal gait parameters in children with cerebral palsy as measured by an electronic walkway. Gait and Posture 27, 4350.Google Scholar
Sprecher, DJ, Hostetler, DE, Kaneene, JB 1997. A lameness scoring system that uses posture and gait to predict dairy cattle reproductive performance. Theriogenology 47, 11791187.Google Scholar
Sukhanov, VB 1974. General system of symmetrical locomotion of terrestrial vertebrates and some features of movement of lower tetrapods. Amerind Publishing Co. Pvt. Ltd, New Delhi, India.Google Scholar
Telezhenko, E, Bergsten, C 2005. Influence of floor type on the locomotion of dairy cows. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 93, 183197.Google Scholar
Whay, HR 2002. Locomotion scoring and lameness detection in dairy cattle. In Practice 24, 444449.Google Scholar
Whay, HR, Main, DCJ 1999. ‘The way cattle walk’. Steps towards lameness management. Cattle Practice 7, 357364.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, MJ, Menz, HB, Raspovic, A 1995. The measurement of gait parameters from footprints. The Foot 5, 8490.Google Scholar