Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-cjp7w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-30T20:00:39.390Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Longitudinal gait development and variability of growing pigs reared on three different floor types

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 December 2013

S. Stavrakakis ,
J. H. Guy ,
O. M. E. Warlow ,
G. R. Johnson  and
S. A. Edwards
S. Stavrakakis*
Affiliation:
Integrative Animal Science Group, School of Agriculture, Food and Rural Development, Newcastle University, Claremont Road, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 7RU, UK Bioengineering Research Group, School of Mechanical and Systems Engineering, Newcastle University, Claremont Road, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 7RU, UK
J. H. Guy
Affiliation:
Integrative Animal Science Group, School of Agriculture, Food and Rural Development, Newcastle University, Claremont Road, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 7RU, UK
O. M. E. Warlow
Affiliation:
Bioengineering Research Group, School of Mechanical and Systems Engineering, Newcastle University, Claremont Road, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 7RU, UK
G. R. Johnson
Affiliation:
Bioengineering Research Group, School of Mechanical and Systems Engineering, Newcastle University, Claremont Road, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 7RU, UK
S. A. Edwards
Affiliation:
Integrative Animal Science Group, School of Agriculture, Food and Rural Development, Newcastle University, Claremont Road, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 7RU, UK
*
E-mail: s.stavrakakis@ncl.ac.uk
Get access

Abstract

Biomechanical investigation into locomotor pathology in commercial pigs is lacking despite this being a major concern for the industry. Different floor types are used in modern, intensive pig production systems at different stages of the pigs’ production cycle. The general perception holds that slatted and/or hard solid concrete surfaces are inferior to soft straw-covered floors regarding healthy musculoskeletal development. Previous studies have compared pigs housed on different floor types using clinical, subjective assessment of leg weakness and lameness. However, reliability studies generally report a low repeatability of clinical lameness scoring. The objective of this study was to quantitatively assess the long-term effect of pen floors, reflected in the biomechanical gait characteristics and associated welfare of the pigs. A cohort of 24 pigs housed on one of three different floor types was followed from 37 to 90 kg average liveweight, with gait analysis (motion capture) starting at 63 kg. The three floor types were fully slatted concrete, partly slatted concrete and deep straw-bedded surfaces, all located within the same building. Pigs underwent five repeated camera-based motion captures, 7 to 10 days apart, during which 3D coordinate data of reflective skin markers attached to leg anatomical landmarks were collected. Pigs walked on the same solid concrete walkway during captures. One-way ANOVA and repeated measures ANOVA were used to analyse the gait data. Results revealed changes over time in the spatiotemporal gait pattern which were similar in magnitude and direction for the pigs from different floor types. Significant increases in elbow joint flexion with age were observed in all pigs (P⩽0.050; +6°). There were few differences between floor groups, except for the step-to-stride ratio in the hind legs being more irregular in pigs housed on partly slatted floors (P=0.012; 3.6 times higher s.d.) compared with those on 5 to 10 cm straw-bedding in all pen areas. As the level of clinical problems was generally low in this cohort, it may be that floors elicit problems only when there is a primary predisposing factor increasing weakness in susceptible tissues.

Keywords

pigfloorgait analysisvariabilitydevelopment
Type
Full Paper
Information
animal , Volume 8 , Issue 2 , February 2014 , pp. 338 - 346
Copyright
© 2013 The Animal Consortium 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Back, W, Barneveld, A, Schamhardt, HC, Bruin, G and Hartman, W 1994. Longitudinal development of the kinematics of 4-, 10-, 18- and 26-month-old Dutch Warmblood horses. Equine Veterinary Journal 26, 3–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biewener, AA 2005. Biomechanical consequences of scaling. Journal of Experimental Biology 208, 1665–1676.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bockstahler, BA, Henninger, W, Muller, M, Mayrhofer, E, Peham, C and Podbregar, I 2007. Influence of borderline hip dysplasia on joint kinematics of clinically sound Belgian Shepherd dogs. American Journal of Veterinary Research 68, 271–276.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
BPEX 2012. Prices, facts, figures. Retrieved 10 June 2013, from http://www.bpex.org.uk/prices-facts-figures/industry-structure/UKpigbreedingherd.aspx Google Scholar
Busch, ME and Wachmann, H 2011. Osteochondrosis of the elbow joint in finishing pigs from three herds: associations among different types of joint changes and between osteochondrosis and growth rate. The Veterinary Journal 188, 197–203.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clarke, KA and Still, J 2001. Development and consistency of gait in the mouse. Physiology and Behavior 73, 159–164.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Correa, JA, Faucitano, L, Laforest, JP, Rivest, J, Marcoux, M and Gariépy, C 2006. Effects of slaughter weight on carcass composition and meat quality in pigs of two different growth rates. Meat Science 72, 91–99.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dalmau, A, Geverink, NA, Van Nuffel, A, van Steenbergen, L, Van Reenen, K, Hautekiet, V, Vermeulen, K, Velarde, A and Tuyttens, FAM 2010. Repeatability of lameness, fear and slipping scores to assess animal welfare upon arrival in pig slaughterhouses. Animal 4, 804–809.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fan, B, Onteru, SK, Mote, BE, Serenius, T, Stalder, KJ and Rothschild, MF 2009. Large-scale association study for structural soundness and leg locomotion traits in the pig. Genetics Selection Evolution 41, 14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Flower, FC, Sanderson, DJ and Weary, DM 2005. Hoof pathologies influence kinematic measures of dairy cow gait. Journal of Dairy Science 88, 3166–3173.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grégoire, J, Bergeron, R, D’Allaire, S, Meunier-Salaun, MC and Devillers, N 2013. Assessment of lameness in sows using gait, footprints, postural behaviour and foot lesion analysis. Animal 7, 1163–1173.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hausdorff, JM, Zemany, L, Peng, CK and Goldberger, AL 1999. Maturation of gait dynamics: stride-to-stride variability and its temporal organization in children. Journal of Applied Physiology 86, 1040–1047.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jensen, TB, Bonde, MK, Kongsted, AG, Toft, N and Sorensen, JT 2010. The interrelationships between clinical signs and their effect on involuntary culling among pregnant sows in group-housing systems. Animal 4, 1922–1928.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jørgensen, B 2003. Influence of floor type and stocking density on leg weakness, osteochondrosis and claw disorders in slaughter pigs. Animal Science 77, 439–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jørgensen, B and Andersen, S 2000. Genetic parameters for osteochondrosis in Danish Landrace and Yorkshire boars and correlations with leg weakness and production traits. Animal Science 71, 427–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keegan, KG 2007. Evidence-based lameness detection and quantification. Veterinary Clinics of North America: Equine Practice 23, 403–423.Google ScholarPubMed
KilBride, A, Gillman, C, Ossent, P and Green, L 2009. Impact of flooring on the health and welfare of pigs. In Practice 31, 390–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Main, DCJ, Clegg, J, Spatz, A and Green, LE 2000. Repeatability of a lameness scoring system for finishing pigs. Veterinary Record 147, 574–576.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maynard, V, Bakheit, AMO, Oldham, J and Freeman, J 2003. Intra-rater and inter-rater reliability of gait measurements with CODA mpx30 motion analysis system. Gait and Posture 17, 59–67.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mouttotou, N, Hatchell, FM and Green, LE 1999. Prevalence and risk factors associated with adventitious bursitis in live growing and finishing pigs in south-west England. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 39, 39–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nielsen, EO, Nielsen, NC and Friis, NF 2001. Mycoplasma hyosynoviae arthritis in grower-finisher pigs. Journal of Veterinary Medicine Series a-Physiology Pathology Clinical Medicine 48, 475–486.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Petersen, HH, Enøe, C and Nielsen, EO 2004. Observer agreement on pen level prevalence of clinical signs in finishing pigs. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 64, 147–156.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Quinn, MM, Keuler, NS, Lu, YAN, Faria, MLE, Muir, P and Markel, MD 2007. Evaluation of agreement between numerical rating scales, visual analogue scoring scales, and force plate gait analysis in dogs. Veterinary Surgery 36, 360–367.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Robilliard, JJ, Pfau, T and Wilson, AM 2007. Gait characterisation and classification in horses. Journal of Experimental Biology 210, 187–197.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scott, K, Chennells, DJ, Campbell, FM, Hunt, B, Armstrong, D, Taylor, L, Gill, BP and Edwards, SA 2006. The welfare of finishing pigs in two contrasting housing systems: fully-slatted versus straw-bedded accommodation. Livestock Science 103, 104–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simonsen, HB 1993. PST treatment and leg disorders in growing swine: a welfare hazard? Livestock Production Science 36, 67–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stavrakakis, S, Guy, JH, Warlow, O, Johnson, GR and Edwards, SA 2013a. Intra-operator repeatability of skin marker derived segment measures and gait kinematics in healthy pigs. Biosystems Engineering (in press).Google Scholar
Stavrakakis, S, Guy, JH, Johnson, GR and Edwards, SA 2013b. Seeking the most characteristic quantitative movement changes in lame pigs – potential for automatic herd-lameness tracking on farms. In Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the British Society of Animal Science and the Association of Veterinary Teaching and Research Work, 16-17 April 2013, Nottingham, UK (Abstract) p. 3.Google Scholar
Stern, S, Lundeheim, N, Johansson, K and Andersson, K 1995. Osteochondrosis and leg weakness in pigs selected for lean tissue-growth rate. Livestock Production Science 44, 45–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Straw, BE, Zimmermann, JJ, DʼAllaire, S, Taylor, DJ (ed.) 2006. Diseases of the nervous and locomotor systems. In Diseases of swine, pp. 87–113. Blackwell Science, Oxford, UK.Google Scholar
Sutherland, D 1997. The development of mature gait. Gait and Posture 6 (2), 163–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thorup, VM, Laursen, B and Jensen, BR 2008. Net joint kinetics in the limbs of pigs walking on concrete floor in dry and contaminated conditions. Journal of Animal Science 86, 992–998.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Torres, BT, Punke, JP, Fu, Y-C, Navik, JA, Speas, AL, Sornborger, A and Budsberg, SC 2010. Comparison of canine stifle kinematic data collected with three different targeting models. Veterinary Surgery 39, 504–512.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
van Grevenhof, EM, Heuven, HCM, van Weeren, PR and Bijma, P 2012. The relationship between growth and osteochondrosis in specific joints in pigs. Livestock Science 143, 85–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Steenbergen, EJ 1989. Description and evaluation of a linear scoring system for exterior traits in pigs. Livestock Production Science 23, 163–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Weeren, PR, van den Bogert, AJ and Barneveld, A 1992. Correction models for skin displacement in equine kinematics gait analysis. Journal of Equine Veterinary Science 12, 178–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
von Wachenfelt, H, Pinzke, S and Nilsson, C 2009. Gait and force analysis of provoked pig gait on clean and fouled concrete surfaces. Biosystems Engineering 104, 534–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, AM, Pfau, T, Channon, A and Wilson, A 2010. Assessment of dairy cow locomotion in a commercial farm setting: the effects of walking speed on ground reaction forces and temporal and linear stride characteristics. Research in Veterinary Science 88, 179–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waxman, AS, Robinson, DA, Evans, RB, Hulse, DA, Innes, JF and Conzemius, MG 2008. Relationship between objective and subjective assessment of limb function in normal dogs with an experimentally induced lameness. Veterinary Surgery 37, 241–246.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weller, R, Pfau, T, Verheyen, K, May, SA and Wilson, AM 2006. The effect of conformation on orthopaedic health and performance in a cohort of national hunt racehorses: preliminary results. Equine Veterinary Journal 38, 622–627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whittle, MW 2003. Gait analysis-an introduction. Butterworth-Heinemann, New York, USA. p. 62.Google Scholar
Willgert, K 2011. The economic and welfare impact of lameness in sows in England. Retrieved 10 June 2013, from http://www.bpex.org.uk/R-and-D/R-andD/Lameness.aspx Google Scholar
Ytrehus, B, Carlson, CS and Ekman, S 2007. Etiology and pathogenesis of osteochondrosis. Veterinary Pathology 44, 429–444.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed