Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-9pm4c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T10:33:32.554Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Is the anthelmintic effect of heather supplementation to grazing goats always accompanied by anti-nutritional effects?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 October 2008

P. Frutos ,
J. Moreno-Gonzalo ,
G. Hervás ,
U. García ,
L. M. M. Ferreira ,
R. Celaya ,
P. G. Toral ,
L. M. Ortega-Mora ,
I. Ferre  and
K. Osoro
P. Frutos*
Affiliation:
Estación Agrícola Experimental, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC), Finca Marzanas, 24346 León, Spain
J. Moreno-Gonzalo
Affiliation:
SALUVET, Animal Health Department, Faculty of Veterinary Sciences, Complutense University of Madrid, Ciudad Universitaria s/n, 28040 Madrid, Spain
G. Hervás
Affiliation:
Estación Agrícola Experimental, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC), Finca Marzanas, 24346 León, Spain
U. García
Affiliation:
Servicio Regional de Investigación y Desarrollo Agroalimentario (SERIDA), Área de Sistemas de Producción Animal, Consejería de Medio Ambiente y Desarrollo Rural, Principado de Asturias, 33300 Villaviciosa, Spain
L. M. M. Ferreira
Affiliation:
CECAV, Departamento de Zootecnia, Universidade de Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro, PO Box 1013, 5000-911 Vila Real, Portugal
R. Celaya
Affiliation:
Servicio Regional de Investigación y Desarrollo Agroalimentario (SERIDA), Área de Sistemas de Producción Animal, Consejería de Medio Ambiente y Desarrollo Rural, Principado de Asturias, 33300 Villaviciosa, Spain
P. G. Toral
Affiliation:
Estación Agrícola Experimental, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC), Finca Marzanas, 24346 León, Spain
L. M. Ortega-Mora
Affiliation:
SALUVET, Animal Health Department, Faculty of Veterinary Sciences, Complutense University of Madrid, Ciudad Universitaria s/n, 28040 Madrid, Spain
I. Ferre
Affiliation:
SALUVET, Animal Health Department, Faculty of Veterinary Sciences, Complutense University of Madrid, Ciudad Universitaria s/n, 28040 Madrid, Spain
K. Osoro
Affiliation:
Servicio Regional de Investigación y Desarrollo Agroalimentario (SERIDA), Área de Sistemas de Producción Animal, Consejería de Medio Ambiente y Desarrollo Rural, Principado de Asturias, 33300 Villaviciosa, Spain
*
E-mail: p.frutos@eae.csic.es
Get access

Abstract

To test the hypothesis that the beneficial anthelmintic effect of consuming moderate amounts of tannins may not always be accompanied by anti-nutritional effects in goats, two experiments were conducted. In the first, 48 Cashmere goats were randomly assigned to two treatments: supplementation with tannin-containing heather (6.4% total tannins) and non-supplementation. All goats grazed continuously from May to September under farm conditions in a mountainous area of northern Spain. The mean percentage of heather incorporated into the diet of the supplemented animals was 29.1%. Supplementation reduced the mean number of nematode eggs in faeces (P < 0.001) and the goat mortality rate (P < 0.05). The rumen ammonia concentration was markedly reduced in the goats receiving the heather supplement (160 v. 209 mg/l; P < 0.01), while volatile fatty acid (VFA) concentrations were significantly greater (63.0 v. 53.6 mmol total VFA/l; P < 0.05). The heather-supplemented goats also showed a lower loss of live weight (P < 0.01) and body condition score (P < 0.001). In the second experiment, batch cultures of rumen microorganisms with rumen fluid from nine goats whose diet included 29% heather – or not, were used to incubate three substrates (pasture, pasture + heather and pasture + heather + polyethylene glycol) to investigate in vitro ruminal fermentation. Differences (P < 0.01) among substrates were observed in terms of dry matter disappearance (DMD), in vitro true substrate digestibility (ivTSD), gas production and ammonia concentration, the greatest values always associated with the pasture substrate. Cultures involving rumen inoculum derived from goats receiving the heather-containing diet showed slightly lower DMD (46.9 v. 48.5 g/100 g; P < 0.05), ivTSD (64.6 v. 65.9 g/100 g; P < 0.10) and gas production (105 v. 118 ml/g; P < 0.001) values, but much greater total VFA concentrations (48.5 v. 39.3 mmol/l; P < 0.05), and suggest that the efficiency of ruminal fermentation in these animals was probably improved. Together, the results support the absence of a clear nutritional cost counteracting the beneficial anthelmintic effect of supplementing the diet of grazing goats with tannin-containing heather.

Keywords

body weightgastrointestinal nematoderumen fermentationtannin
Type
Full Paper
Information
animal , Volume 2 , Issue 10 , October 2008 , pp. 1449 - 1456
Copyright
Copyright © The Animal Consortium 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Álvarez del Pino, MC, Hervás, G, Mantecón, AR, Giráldez, FJ, Frutos, P 2005. Comparison of biological and chemical methods, and internal and external standards, for assaying tannins in Spanish shrub species. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 85, 583–590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barry, TN, McNabb, WC 1999. The implications of condensed tannins on the nutritive value of temperate forages fed to ruminants. British Journal of Nutrition 81, 263–272.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barthram GT 1986. Experimental techniques: the HFRO swardstick. The Hill Farming Research Organisation Biennial Report 1984–85, pp. 29–30. HFRO, Bush Estate, Penicuik, Midlothian, UK.Google Scholar
Ben Salem, H, Ben Salem, I, Nefzaoui, A, Ben Saïd, MS 2003. Effect of PEG and olive cake feed blocks supply on feed intake, digestion, and health of goats given kermes oak (Quercus coccifera L.) foliage. Animal Feed Science and Technology 110, 45–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butter, NL, Dawson, JM, Wakelin, D, Buttery, PJ 2000. Effect of dietary tannin and protein concentration on nematode infection (Trichostrongylus colubriformis) in lambs. Journal of Agricultural Science 134, 89–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coop, RL, Kyriazakis, I 2001. Influence of host nutrition on the development and consequences of nematode parasitism in ruminants. Trends in Parasitology 17, 325–330.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ferreira, LMM, Oliván, M, García, U, Rodrigues, MAM, Osoro, K 2005. Validation of the alkane technique to estimate diet selection of goats grazing heather-gorse vegetation communities. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 85, 1636–1646.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frutos, P, Hervás, G, Giráldez, FJ, Fernández, M, Mantecón, AR 2000. Digestive utilization of quebracho-treated soya bean meal in sheep. Journal of Agricultural Science 134, 101–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frutos, P, Hervás, G, Giráldez, FJ, Mantecón, AR 2004. An in vitro study on the ability of polyethylene glycol to inhibit the effect of quebracho tannins and tannic acid on rumen fermentation in sheep, goats, cows and deer. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 55, 1125–1132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Githiori, JB, Athanasiadou, S, Thamsborg, SM 2006. Use of plants in novel approaches for control of gastrointestinal helminths in livestock with emphasis on small ruminants. Veterinary Parasitology 139, 308–320.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goering, MK, Van Soest, PJ 1970. Forage fiber analysis (apparatus, reagents, procedures and some applications). Agricultural handbook no. 379. ARS-USDA, Washington, DC, USA.Google Scholar
Grant, SA 1981. Sward components. In Sward measurement handbook (ed. J Hodgson, RD Baker, A Davies, AS Laidlaw and JD Leaver), pp. 71–92. British Grassland Society, Hurley, Maidenhead, Berkshire, UK.Google Scholar
Hervás, G, Frutos, P, Giráldez, FJ, Mantecón, AR, Álvarez del Pino, MC 2003. Effect of different doses of quebracho tannins extract on rumen fermentation in ewes. Animal Feed Science and Technology 109, 65–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hervás, G, Frutos, P, Giráldez, FJ, Mora, MJ, Fernández, B, Mantecón, AR 2005. Effect of preservation on fermentative activity of rumen fluid inoculum for in vitro gas production techniques. Animal Feed Science and Technology 123–124, 107–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoste, H, Jackson, F, Athanasiadou, S, Thamsborg, SM, Hoskin, SO 2006. The effects of tannin-rich plants on parasitic nematodes in ruminants. Trends in Parasitology 22, 253–261.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Houdijk JGM and Athanasiadou S 2003. Direct and indirect effects of host nutrition on ruminant gastrointestinal nematodes. In Matching herbivore nutrition to ecosystems biodiversity. VI International Symposium on Nutrition of Herbivores (ed. L ‘t Mannetje, L Ramírez, C Sandoval-Castro and JC Ku-Vera), pp. 213–236. Univ. Aut. Yucatán, Mérida, México.Google Scholar
MAFF 1978. Manual of veterinary parasitological techniques. Technical bulletin no. 18. Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, London, UK.Google Scholar
Makkar, HPS 2003. Quantification of tannins in tree and shrub foliage. A laboratory manual. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Makkar, HPS, Becker, K, Abel, H, Szegletti, C 1995. Degradation of condensed tannins by rumen microbes exposed to quebracho tannins (QT) in rumen simulation technique (RUSITEC) and effects of QT on fermentative processes in the RUSITEC. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 69, 495–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merchant, M, Riach, DJ 1994. The intake and performance of Cashmere goats grazing sown swards. Grass and Forage Science 49, 429–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Min, BR, Hart, SP, Miller, D, Tomita, GM, Loetz, E, Sahlu, T 2005. The effect of grazing forage containing condensed tannins on gastro-intestinal parasite infection and milk composition in Angora does. Veterinary Parasitology 130, 105–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mueller-Harvey, I 2006. Unravelling the conundrum of tannins in animal nutrition and health. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 86, 2010–2037.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Niezen, JH, Charleston, WAG, Hodgson, J, Miller, CM, Waghorn, TS, Robertson, HA 1998. Effect of plant species on the larvae of gastrointestinal nematodes which parasitise sheep. International Journal for Parasitology 28, 791–803.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Osoro, K, Benito-Peña, A, Frutos, P, García, U, Ortega-Mora, LM, Celaya, R, Ferre, I 2007a. The effect of heather supplementation on gastrointestinal nematode infections and performance in Cashmere and local Celtiberic goats on pasture. Small Ruminant Research 67, 184–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osoro, K, Mateos-Sanz, A, Frutos, P, García, U, Ortega-Mora, LM, Ferreira, LMM, Celaya, R, Ferre, I 2007b. Anthelmintic and nutritional effects of heather supplementation on Cashmere goats grazing perennial ryegrass–white clover pastures. Journal of Animal Science 85, 861–870.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Paolini, V, De La Farge, F, Prevot, F, Dorchies, Ph, Hoste, H 2005. Effects of the repeated distribution of sainfoin hay on the resistance and the resilience of goats naturally infected with gastrointestinal nematodes. Veterinary Parasitology 127, 277–283.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Russel, AJF 1990. Body condition scoring of goats. Scottish Cashmere Producers Association Newsletter 10, 3.Google Scholar
SAS 1999. SAS OnlineDoc®, version 8. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA.Google Scholar
Silanikove, N, Gilboa, N, Nitsan, Z 1997. Interactions among tannins, supplementation and polyethylene glycol in goats given oak leaves: effects on digestion and food intake. Animal Science 64, 479–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, HA, Zoetendal, E, Mackie, RI 2005. Bacterial mechanisms to overcome inhibitory effects of dietary tannins. Microbial Ecology 50, 197–205.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stromberg, BE 1997. Environmental factors influencing transmission. Veterinary Parasitology 72, 247–264.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tavendale, MH, Meagher, LP, Pacheco, D, Walker, N, Attwood, GT, Sivakumaran, S 2005. Methane production from in vitro rumen incubations with Lotus pedunculatus and Medicago sativa, and effects of extractable condensed tannin fractions on methanogenesis. Animal Feed Science and Technology 123–124, 403–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Theodorou, MK, Williams, BA, Dhanoa, MS, McAllan, AB, France, J 1994. A simple gas production method using a pressure transducer to determine the fermentation kinetics of ruminant feeds. Animal Feed Science and Technology 48, 185–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Houtert, MFJ, Sykes, AR 1996. Implications of nutrition for the ability of ruminants to withstand gastrointestinal nematode infections. International Journal of Parasitology 26, 1151–1167.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van Soest, PJ, Robertson, JB, Lewis, BA 1991. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science 74, 3583–3597.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van Wyk, JA, Cabaret, J, Michael, LM 2004. Morphological identification of nematode larvae of small ruminants and cattle simplified. Veterinary Parasitology 119, 277–306.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed