Skip to main content Accessibility help

Feed intake, milk production and composition of crossbred cows fed with insect-protected Bollgard II® cottonseed containing Cry1Ac and Cry2Ab proteins

  • K. K. Singhal (a1), A. K. Tyagi (a1), Y. S. Rajput (a1), M. Singh (a1), H. Kaur (a1), T. Perez (a2) and G. F. Hartnell (a2)...


Twenty crossbred lactating multiparous cows were used in a 28-day study to compare dry matter intake (DMI), milk yield, milk composition and Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) protein concentrations in plasma when fed diets containing Bollgard II® cottonseed (BGII) or a control non-genetically modified isogenic cottonseed (CON). Bollgard II cottonseed contains the Cry1Ac and Cry2Ab insecticidal proteins that protect cotton plants from feeding damage caused by certain lepidopteran insects. Cows were assigned randomly to the BGII or CON treatments after a 2-week adjustment period. Cows consumed a concentrate containing 40% crushed cottonseed according to milk yield and green maize forage ad libitum. All cows received the same diet but with different crushed cottonseed sources. Cottonseed was included to provide approximately 2.9 kg per cow daily (dry matter basis). The ingredient composition of the concentrate was 40% crushed cottonseed, 15% groundnut cake, 20% corn, 22% wheat bran, 1% salt and 2% mineral mixture. Milk and blood plasma were analyzed for Cry1Ac and Cry2Ab proteins. DMI, BW, milk yield and milk components did not differ between cows on the BGII and CON treatments. Although milk yield and milk fat percentage were not affected by treatment, 4% fat-corrected milk (FCM) production and FCM/kg DMI for cows on the BGII treatment (14.0 kg/cow per day, 1.12 kg/kg) were significantly improved compared with cows on the CON treatment (12.1 kg/cow per day, 0.97 kg/kg). Gossypol contents in BGII cottonseed and conventional cottonseed were similar. Cry1Ac and Cry2Ab2 proteins in Bollgard II cottonseed were 5.53 and 150.8 μg/g, respectively, and were not detected in the milk or plasma samples. The findings suggested that Bollgard II cottonseed can replace conventional cottonseed in dairy cattle diets with no adverse effects on performance and milk composition.


Corresponding author


Hide All
Association of Official and Analytical Chemists (AOAC) 1990. Official methods of analysis, 15th edition. AOAC, Arlington, VA, USA.
Bates, SL, Zhao, JZ, Roush, RT, Shelton, AM 2005. Insect resistance management in GM crops: past, present and future. Nature Biotechnology 23, 5762.
Betz, FS, Hammond, BG, Fuchs, RL 2000. Safety and advantages of Bacillus thuringiensis-protected plants to control insect pests. Toxicology and Pharmacology 32, 156173.
Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS) 1975. Specifications for compounded feed for cattle. IS: 7874, part I, Indian Standard Institute, Mank Bhavan, New Delhi, India.
Castillo, AR, Gallardo, MR, Maciel, JM, Giordano, GA, Conti, MC, Gaggiotti, O, Quaino, CG, Hartnell, GF 2004. Effects of feeding rations with genetically modified whole cottonseed to lactating dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 87, 17781785.
Goering, HK, Van Soest, PJ 1967. Forage fibre analyses: apparatus, reagents, procedures, and some applications, Agriculture handbook no. 379. ARS-USDA, Washington, DC, USA.
Indian Standards Institution (ISI) 1958. IS: 1224. Determination of fat in whole milk, evaporated milk, separated milk, skim milk, butter milk and cream by Gerber method. I.S.I., Manak Bhawan, New Delhi, India.
James, C 2008. Global status of commercialised biotech/GM crops. ISAAA Brief 39. ISAAA, Ithaca, New York, USA.
Mertens, DR 1985. Effect of fibre on feed quality for dairy cows. Proceedings of the 46th Minnesota Nutrition Conference, St. Paul, University of Minnesota, USA, pp. 209–224.
Mohanta, RK, Singhal, KK, Tyagi, AK, Rajput, YS, Prashad, S 2009. Nutritional evaluation of transgenic cottonseed in the ration of lactating dairy cows. Tropical Animal Health and Production 42, 431438.
Mujahid, AM, Abdullah, AR, Barque, K, Gilani, AH 2000. Nutritional value of cottonseeds and its derived products. II Free gossypol, available lysine and in vitro protein degradability. Asian Australasian Journal of Animal Science 13, 348355.
Nazem, AM, Zab, MH, Tahlaury, MR, Mohmoud, MR 1998. Detection of apparently normal milking screening and confirmatory method. VIII Scientific Congress (15–17 November), Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Assikt University, pp. 1–12.
National Research Council (NRC) 2001. Nutrient requirements of dairy cattle NRC, 7th revised edition. National Academy Press, Washington, DC.
SAS 1985. SAS user's guide: statistics, 5th edition. SAS Institute Incorporation, Cary, NC, USA.
Sen, KC, Ray, SN 1977. Nutritive value of Indian cattle feeds and feeding of animals. ICAR, Krishi Bhavan, New Delhi, India.
Senthil, K, Singhal, KK 2004. Chemical composition and nutritional evaluation of transgenic cottonseed for ruminants. Indian Journal of Animal Science 74, 868871.
Singh, M, Ludri, RS 2001. Somatic cell count in Murrah buffaloes during different stages of lactation, parity and season. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Science 14, 189192.
Singhal, KK, Kumar, S, Tyagi, AK, Rajput, YS 2006. Evaluation of Bt cottonseed as a protein supplement in the ration of lactating dairy cows. Indian Journal of Animal Science 76, 532537.
Smith, FH 1968. Estimation of free gossypol in cottonseed meal and cottonseed meats: modified method. Journal of American Oil Chemical Society 45, 903.


Feed intake, milk production and composition of crossbred cows fed with insect-protected Bollgard II® cottonseed containing Cry1Ac and Cry2Ab proteins

  • K. K. Singhal (a1), A. K. Tyagi (a1), Y. S. Rajput (a1), M. Singh (a1), H. Kaur (a1), T. Perez (a2) and G. F. Hartnell (a2)...


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed