Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-mwx4w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-22T21:47:59.444Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effects of dam breed and dietary source of n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids on the growth and carcass characteristics of lambs sourced from hill sheep flocks

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 February 2011

R. W. Annett*
Affiliation:
Agriculture Branch, Agri-food and Biosciences Institute (AFBI), Large Park, Hillsborough, Co. Down, Northern Ireland BT26 6DR, UK
A. F. Carson
Affiliation:
Agriculture Branch, Agri-food and Biosciences Institute (AFBI), Large Park, Hillsborough, Co. Down, Northern Ireland BT26 6DR, UK
L. E. R. Dawson
Affiliation:
Agriculture Branch, Agri-food and Biosciences Institute (AFBI), Large Park, Hillsborough, Co. Down, Northern Ireland BT26 6DR, UK
D. J. Kilpatrick
Affiliation:
AFBI Biometrics Division, Newforge Lane, Belfast, BT9 5PX, UK
Get access

Abstract

The objectives of this study were to investigate the effect of dietary lipid source on the growth and carcass characteristics of lambs sourced from a range of crossbred hill ewes. Over a 2-year period, 466 lambs representing the progeny of Scottish Blackface (BF × BF), Swaledale (SW) × BF, North Country Cheviot (CH) × BF, Lleyn (LL) × BF and Texel (T) × BF ewes were sourced from six commercial hill flocks and finished on one of four diets: grass pellets (GP), cereal-based concentrate (CC), CC enriched with oilseed rape (CR) and CC enriched with fish oil (CF). Dry matter intake (DMI) was highest (P < 0.001) in lambs offered GP; however, carcass weight gain (CWG) and feed conversion efficiency were higher (P < 0.001) in lambs fed concentrate-based diets. For lambs offered concentrate-based diets, DMI and live weight gain were lower (P < 0.001) for CF than CC or CR. Lambs with T × BF dams achieved a higher (P < 0.05) daily CWG and CWG/kg DMI than BF × BF, SW × BF or LL × BF dams. When lambs were slaughtered at fat score 3, CH × BF, LL × BF and T × BF dams increased carcass weight by 0.8 to 1.4 kg (P < 0.001) and conformation score (CS) by 0.2 to 0.4 units (P < 0.001) compared with BF × BF or SW × BF dams. However, breed effects on carcass conformation were reduced by 50% when lambs were slaughtered at a constant carcass weight. Diets CC and CR increased carcass weight by 0.8 to 1.6 kg (P < 0.001) and CS by 0.1 to 0.3 units (P < 0.001) compared with GP and CF. Both, dam breed and dietary effects on carcass conformation were associated with an increase (P < 0.001) in shoulder width of the lambs. Lambs fed CF and slaughtered at a constant carcass weight had more subcutaneous fat over the Longissumusdorsi (P < 0.05), Iliocostalisthoracis (P < 0.001) and Obliquus internusabdominis (P < 0.001) compared with those fed CC. However, these effects were removed when lambs were slaughtered at a constant fat score. At both endpoints, lambs from T × BF dams contained less (P < 0.05) perinephric and retroperitoneal fat than SW × BF or LL × BF dams fed GP or CC, respectively. The results from this study show that using crossbred ewes sired by CH, LL or T sires will increase carcass weight and improve carcass conformation of lambs sourced from hill flocks. Inclusion of oilseed rape in lamb finishing diets had only minor effects on performance compared with a standard CC but feeding fish oil or GP impacted negatively on lamb growth and carcass quality.

Type
Full Paper
Copyright
Copyright © The Animal Consortium 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Afolayan, RA, Fogarty, NM, Ingham, VM, Gilmour, AR, Gaunt, GM, Cummins, LJ, Pollard, T 2007. Genetic evaluation of crossbred lamb production. 3. Growth and carcass performance of second-cross lambs. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 58, 457466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agricultural and Food Research Council (AFRC) 1993. Energy and protein requirements of ruminants. CAB International, Wallingford, UK.Google Scholar
Annett, RW, Carson, AF, Dawson, LER 2008. Effects of digestible undegradable protein (DUP) supply and fish oil supplementation of ewes during late pregnancy on colostrum production and lamb output. Animal Feed Science and Technology 146, 270288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Annett, RW, Dawson, LER, Edgar, H, Carson, AF 2009. Effects of source and level of fish oil supplementation in late pregnancy on feed intake, colostrum production and lamb output of ewes. Animal Feed Science and Technology 154, 169182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Annett, RW, Carson, AF, Dawson, LER, Irwin, D, Kilpatrick, DJ 2011. Effects of sire genotype and age on the performance of hill ewes sourced from Scottish Blackface dams. Animal 5, 356366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Black, JL 1983. Growth and development of lambs. In Sheep production (ed. W Haresign), pp. 2158. Butterworths, London, UK.Google Scholar
Blaxter, KL, Clapperton, JL 1965. Prediction of the amount of methane produced by ruminants. British Journal of NutritionCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Capper, JL, Wilkinson, RG, MacKenzie, AM, Sinclair, LA 2006. Polyunsaturated fatty acid supplementation during pregnancy alters neonatal behaviour in sheep. Journal of Nutrition 136, 397403.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Capper, JL, Wilkinson, RG, MacKenzie, AM, Sinclair, LA 2007. The effect of fish oil supplementation of pregnant and lactating ewes on milk production and lamb performance. Animal 1, 889898.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carson, AF, Irwin, D, Kilpatrick, DJ 2001a. A comparison of Scottish Blackface and Cheviot ewes and five sire breeds in terms of lamb output at weaning in hill sheep systems. The Journal of Agricultural Science 137, 221233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carson, AF, Moss, BW, Dawson, LER, Kilpatrick, DJ 2001b. Effects of genotype and dietary forage to concentrate ratio during the finishing period on carcass characteristics and meat quality of lambs from hill sheep systems. The Journal of Agricultural Science 137, 205220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chestnutt, DMB 1989. The effect of contrasting silages offered in mid and late pregnancy on the performance of breeding ewes. Animal Production 49, 435441.Google Scholar
Commission Regulation (EC) No. 1249/2008 of 10 December 2008. Laying down detailed rules on the implementation of the Community scales for the classification of beef, pig and sheep carcases and the reporting of prices thereof. Official Journal of the European Union L337.Google Scholar
Dawson, LER, Carson, AF 2002. Effects of crossbred ewe genotype and ram genotype on lamb carcass characteristics from the lowland sheep flock. The Journal of Agricultural Science 139, 183194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dawson, LER, Carson, AF, McClinton, LOW, Kilpatrick, DJ, Moss, BW 2003. Comparison of the carcass characteristics and meat quality of lambs produced from Texel and Rouge de l'Ouest ewes and their crosses. Animal Science 77, 5765.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Demirel, G, Wachira, AM, Sinclair, LA, Wilkinson, RG, Wood, JD, Enser, M 2004. Effects of dietary n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids, breed and dietary vitamin E on the fatty acids of lamb muscle, liver and adipose tissue. British Journal of Nutrition 91, 551565.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Department of Health 1994. Report on health and social subjects 46. Nutritional aspects of cardiovascular disease. Report of the Cardiovascular Review Group Committee on Medical Aspects of Food Policy, HMSO, London.Google Scholar
Enser, M, Hallet, K, Hewitt, B, Fursey, GAJ, Wood, JD 1996. Fatty acid content and composition of English beef, lamb and pork at retail. Meat Science 42, 443456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Etheridge, MO, Stockdale, CR, Cranwell, PD 1993. Influence of method of conservation of lucerne and factors associated with voluntary intake in sheep. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 33, 417423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
European Commission 2006. Study on environmental consequences of sheep and goat farming and of the sheep and goat premium system. Final report prepared for the European Commission Directorate-General for Agriculture and Rural Development, July 2006.Google Scholar
Fisher, AV, de Boer, H 1994. The EAAP standard method of sheep carcass assessment. Carcass measurements and dissection procedures. Report of the EAAP Working Group on Carcass Evaluation, in cooperation with the CHIEM Instituto Agronomico Mediterraneo of Zaragoza and the CEC Directorate General for Agriculture in Brussels. Livestock Production Science 38, 149159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fogarty, NM, Hopkins, DL, van de Ven, R 2000. Lamb production from diverse genotypes. 2. Carcass characteristics. Journal of Animal Science 70, 147156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Genstat 2009. Release 12.1. Lawes Agricultural Trust, Rothamsted Experimental Station, Harpenden, Hertfordshire, UK.Google Scholar
Kempster, AJ, Jones, DW, Wolf, BT 1986. A comparison of alternative methods for predicting the carcass composition of crossbred lambs of different breeds and crosses. Meat Science 18, 89110.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kitessa, SM, Peake, D, Bencini, R, Williams, AJ 2003. Fish oil metabolism in ruminants. III. Transfer of n-3 polyunsaturated acids (PUFA) from tuna oil into sheep's milk. Animal Feed Science and Technology 108, 114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitessa, SM, Gulati, SK, Ashes, JR, Fleck, E, Scott, TW, Nichols, PD 2001. Utilisation of fish oil in ruminants I. Fish oil metabolism in sheep. Animal Feed Science and Technology 89, 189199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, GJ 1984. A comparison of carcass traits in Scottish Blackface and Welsh Mountain lambs and their crosses. Animal Production 39, 433440.Google Scholar
McClinton, LOW, Carson, AF 2000. Growth and carcass characteristics of three lamb genotypes finished on the same level of feeding. Animal Science 70, 5161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLean, BML, Davies, OD, Evans, DE, Wolf, BT 2006. Comparison of crossbred lamb performance from four breeds of sire mated to Welsh Mountain ewes in the hill environment. Proceedings of the British Society of Animal Science Annual Conference, York, March 2006, p. 38.Google Scholar
Morrison, WR, Smith, LM 1964. Preparation of fatty acid methyl esters and dimethyl acetals from lipids with boron trifluoride-methanol. Journal of Lipid Research 5, 600608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pollott, GE, Stone, DG 2006. The breeding structure of the British sheep industry 2003. A report prepared for the Department of Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA) for the review of the National Scrapie Plan, 2004.Google Scholar
Sanderson, P 1986. A new method of analysis of feeding stuffs for the determination of crude oils and fats. In Recent advances in animal nutrition (ed. W Haresign and DJA Cole), pp. 7780. Butterworths, London, UK.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Speijers, MHM, Carson, AF, Dawson, LER, Gordon, AW 2009. Effects of genotype and plane of nutrition on growth and carcass characteristics of lambs from hill sheep systems. Animal 3, 12321245.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Steen, RWJ 1986. The effects of plane of nutrition and type of diet offered to yearling Friesian steers during a winter store period on subsequent performance. Animal Production 42, 2937.Google Scholar
United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) 1996. Institutional meat purchase specifications for fresh lamb and mutton. AMS, USDA, Washington DC, USA.Google Scholar
van Heelsum, AM, Lewis, RM, Davis, MH, Haresign, W 2003. Growth and carcass characteristics in wether lambs of a crossbred dam line. Animal Science 76, 4353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wachira, AM, Sinclair, LA, Wilkinson, RG, Hallett, K, Enser, M, Wood, JD 2000. Rumen biohydrogenation of n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids and their effects on microbial efficiency and nutrient digestibility in sheep. The Journal of Agricultural Science 135, 419428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wachira, AM, Sinclair, LA, Wilkinson, RG, Enser, M, Wood, JD, Fisher, AV 2002. Effects of dietary fat source and breed on the carcass composition, n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid and conjugated linoleic acid content of sheep meat and adipose tissue. British Journal of Nutrition 88, 697709.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed