Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-9pm4c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T05:41:19.524Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of castration and weaning conducted concurrently or consecutively on behaviour, blood traits and performance in beef calves

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 August 2014

C. Lambertz ,
A. Farke-Röver ,
E. Moors  and
M. Gauly
C. Lambertz*
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Sciences, Georg-August-University, Albrecht-Thaer-Weg 3, 37075 Göttingen, Germany
A. Farke-Röver
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Sciences, Georg-August-University, Albrecht-Thaer-Weg 3, 37075 Göttingen, Germany
E. Moors
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Sciences, Georg-August-University, Albrecht-Thaer-Weg 3, 37075 Göttingen, Germany
M. Gauly
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Sciences, Georg-August-University, Albrecht-Thaer-Weg 3, 37075 Göttingen, Germany
*
†E-mail: clamber2@gwdg.de
Get access

Abstract

The objectives of this study were to evaluate the effects of Burdizzo castration and abrupt weaning on the behaviour, blood traits and performance of beef calves when weaning was conducted concurrently or consecutively to castration. In total, 64 male beef calves aged between 6 and 7 months were assigned to a 2×2 factorial design with the following treatment groups (n=16 animals per treatment): (1) castrated and concurrently weaned in week 0 (CAS-WEA); (2) castrated in week 0 and weaned in week 4 (CAS-CON); (3) bulls weaned in week 0 (BUL-WEA); and (4) bulls weaned in week 4 (BUL-CON). The behaviour of the calves was observed for 3 days following weaning. Blood was collected weekly from weeks 0 to 5 and analysed for the acute-phase protein haptoglobin, and neutrophil and lymphocyte percentages. BW was recorded weekly from weeks 0 to 7. Animals were slaughtered at 17 months and weight, dressing percentage and carcass classifications were recorded. On day 1 after weaning, the number of vocalizations (calls/10 min) was higher in BUL-WEA (7.2) and CAS-WEA (5.4) than in calves of CAS-CON (2.8) and BUL-CON (2.9) groups (P<0.05). From days 1 to 3 vocalizations decreased in all groups. CAS-CON and BUL-CON animals spent 20% lying on day 1 after weaning compared with 40% in CAS-WEA and BUL-WEA calves (P<0.05). The haptoglobin concentration decreased during the first 5 weeks after weaning in all groups independent of the castration, weaning group or its interaction (P>0.05). WEA groups showed an increased average daily gain (ADG) during weeks 0 to 3 and a reduced ADG during 4 to 7 weeks in comparison with CON animals. At slaughter, bulls were about 80 kg heavier than castrates and had a superior dressing percentage and carcass classification (P>0.05). In conclusion, weaning had a greater effect on the number of vocalizations, standing/walking and lying behaviour and ADG compared with Burdizzo castration. In comparison with undertaking the procedures separately, concurrent castration and weaning neither affected behaviour and haematological parameters nor impaired performance. There was no evidence that the concurrent application of both treatments markedly increased the stress response compared with their application at intervals of a few weeks.

Keywords

abrupt weaningbeef calvesbehaviourblood traitsburdizzo castration
Type
Research Article
Information
animal , Volume 9 , Issue 1 , January 2015 , pp. 122 - 129
Copyright
© The Animal Consortium 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arthington, JD, Eicher, SD, Kunkle, WE and Martin, FG 2003. Effect of transportation and commingling on the acute-phase protein response, growth, and feed intake of newly weaned beef calves. Journal of Animal Science 81, 1120–1125.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blanco, M, Casasús, I and Palacio, J 2009. Effect of age at weaning on the physiological stress response and temperament of two beef cattle breeds. Animal 3, 108–117.Google Scholar
Boesch, D, Seiner, A and Stauffacher, M 2006. Castration of calves: a survey among Swiss suckler beef farmers. Schweizer Archiv für Tierheilkunde 148, 238–244.Google Scholar
Boland, HT, Scaglia, G, Swecker, WS and Burke, NC 2008. Effects of alternate weaning methods on behavior, blood metabolites and performance of beef calves. The Professional Animal Scientist 24, 539–551.Google Scholar
Booker, CW, Abutarbush, SM, Schunicht, OC, Pollock, CM, Perrett, T, Wildman, BK, Hannon, SJ, Pittman, TJ, Jones, CW, Jim, GK and Morley, PS 2007. Effect of castration timing, technique, and pain management on health and performance of young feedlot bulls in Alberta. Bovine Practitioner 43, 1– 11.Google Scholar
Coetzee, JF, Nutsch, AL, Barbur, LA and Bradburn, RM 2010. A survey of castration methods and associated livestock management practices performed by bovine veterinarians in the United States. BMC Veterinary Research 6, 12.Google Scholar
Coetzee, JF, Lubbers, BV, Toerber, SE, Gehring, R, Thomson, DU, White, BJ and Apley, MD 2008. Plasma concentration of substance P and cortisol in beef calves after castration or simulated castration. American Journal of Veterinary Research 69, 751–762.Google Scholar
Currah, JM, Hendrick, SH and Stookey, JM 2009. The behavioural assessment and alleviation of pain associated with castration in beef calves treated with flunixin meglumine and caudal lidocaine epidural anestesia with epinephrine. Canadian Veterinary Journal 50, 375–382.Google Scholar
Enríquez, DH, Ungerfeld, R, Quintans, G, Guidoni, AL and Hötzel, MJ 2010. The effects of alternative weaning methods on behavior in beef calves. Livestock Science 128, 20–27.Google Scholar
Haley, DB, Bailey, DW and Stookey, JM 2005. The effects of weaning beef calves in two stages on their behavior and growth rate. Journal of Animal Science 83, 2205–2214.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hickey, MC, Drennan, M, Early, B 2003. The effect of abrupt weaning of suckler calves on the plasma concentrations of cortisol, catecholamines, leukocytes, acute-phase proteins and in vitro interferon-gamma production. Journal of Animal Science 81, 2847–2855.Google Scholar
Keane, MG and Allen, P 1998. Effects of production system intensity on performance, carcass composition and meat quality of beef cattle. Livestock Production Science 56, 203–214.Google Scholar
Kirkland, RM, Keady, TWJ, Patterson, DC, Kilpatrick, DJ and Steen, RWJ 2006. The effect of slaughter weight and sexual status on the performance characteristics of male Holstein-Friesian cattle offered a cereal-based diet. Animal Science 82, 397–404.Google Scholar
Lefcourt, AM and Elsasser, TH 1995. Adrenal responses of Angus × Hereford cattle to the stress of weaning. Journal of Animal Science 73, 2669–2676.Google Scholar
Lynch, EM, Earley, B, McGee, M and Doyle, S 2010. Effect of abrupt weaning at housing on leukocyte distribution, functional activity of neutrophils, and acute phase protein response of beef calves. BMC Veterinary Research 6, 39.Google Scholar
Mach, N, Bach, A, Realini, CE, Font, I, Furnols, M, Velarde, A and Devant, M 2009. Burdizzo pre-pubertal castration effects on performance, behaviour, carcass characteristics, and meat quality of Holstein bulls fed high-concentrate diets. Meat Science 81, 329–334.Google Scholar
Marti, S, Velarde, A, de la Torre, JL, Bach, A, Aris, A, Serrano, A, Manteca, X and Devant, M 2010. Effects of ring castration with local anesthesia and analgesia in Holstein calves at 3 months of age on welfare indicators. Journal of Animal Science 88, 2789–2796.Google Scholar
Molony, V, Kent, JE and Robertson, IS 1995. Assessment of acute and chronic pain of different methods of castration of calves. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 46, 33–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orro, T, Jacobsen, S, LePage, J, Niewold, T, Alasuutari, S and Soveri, T 2008. Temporal changes in serum concentrations of acute phase proteins in newborn dairy calves. Veterinary Journal 176, 182–187.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pang, WY, Earley, B, Gath, V and Crowe, MA 2008. Effect of banding or Burdizzo castration on plasma testosterone, acute-phase proteins, scrotal circumference, growth, and health of bulls. Livestock Science 117, 79–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pang, WY, Earley, B, Sweeney, T, Pirani, S, Gath, V and Crowe, MA 2009. Effects of banding or Burdizzo castration of bulls on neutrophil phagocytosis and respiratory burst, CD62-L expression, and serum interleukin-8 concentration. Journal of Animal Science 87, 3187–3195.Google Scholar
Price, EO, Harris, JE, Borgwardt, RE, Sween, ML and Connor, JM 2003. Fenceline contact of beef calves with their dams at weaning reduces the negative effects of separation on behavior and growth rate. Journal of Animal Science 81, 116–121.Google Scholar
Schichowski, C, Moors, E and Gauly, M 2008. Effects of weaning lambs in two stages or by abrupt separation on their behavior and growth rate. Journal of Animal Science 86, 220–225.Google Scholar
Smith, DL, Wiggers, DL, Wilson, LL, Comerford, JW, Harpster, HW and Cash, EH 2003. Postweaning behavior and growth performance of early and conventionally weaned beef calves. The Professional Animal Scientist 19, 23–29.Google Scholar
Stafford, K 2007. Alleviating the pain caused by castration of cattle. Veterinary Journal 173, 245–247.Google Scholar
Stafford, KJ and Mellor, DJ 2005. The welfare significance of the castration of cattle: a review. New Zealand Veterinary Journal 53, 271–278.Google Scholar
Stafford, KJ, Mellor, DJ and McMeekan, CM 2000. A survey of the methods used by farmers to castrate calves in New Zealand. New Zealand Veterinary Journal 48, 16–19.Google Scholar
Stafford, KJ, Mellor, DJ, Todd, SE, Bruce, RA and Ward, RN 2002. Effects of local anaestesia or local anaesthesia plus a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug on the acute cortisol response of calves to five different methods of castration. Research in Veterinary Science 73, 61–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stookey, JM, Schwartzkopf-Genswein, KS, Waltz, CS and Watts, JM 1997. Effects of remote and contact weaning on behaviour and weight gain of beef calves. Journal of Animal Science 75, 157.Google Scholar
Ting, STL, Earley, B, Hughes, JML and Crowe, MA 2003. Effect of ketoprofen, lidocaine local anesthesia, and combined xylazine and lidocaine caudal epidural anesthesia during castration of beef cattle on stress responses, immunity, growth, and behaviour. Journal of Animal Science 81, 1281–1293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ting, STL, Earley, B, Veissier, I, Gupta, S and Crowe, MA 2005. Effects of age of Holstein-Friesian calves on plasma cortisol, acute-phase proteins, immunological function, scrotal measurements and growth in response to Burdizzo castration. Animal Science 80, 377–386.Google Scholar
Veissier, I and Le Neindre, P 1989. Weaning in calves: its effects on social organization. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 24, 43–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warnock, TM, Thrift, TA, Irsik, M, Herson, MJ, Yelich, JV, Maddock, TD, Lamb, GC and Arthington, JD 2012. Effect of castration technique on beef calf performance, feed efficiency, and inflammatory response. Journal of Animal Science 90, 2345–2352.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Watts, JM and Stookey, JM 2000. Vocal behavior in cattle: the animal’ s commentary on its biological process and welfare. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 67, 15–33.Google Scholar
Watts, JM, Stookey, JM, Schmutz, SM and Waltz, CS 2001. Variability in vocal and behavioural responses to visual isolation between full-sibling families of beef calves. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 70, 255–273.Google Scholar