Skip to main content Accessibility help

Effect of space allowance and floor type on performance, welfare and physiological measurements of finishing beef heifers

  • M. P. Keane (a1) (a2), M. McGee (a3), E. G. O’Riordan (a3), A. K. Kelly (a2) and B. Earley (a1)...


Accommodating cattle indoors during the winter is widely practiced throughout Europe. There is currently no legislation surrounding the space allowance and floor type that should be provided to cattle during this time, however, concerns have been raised regarding the type of housing systems currently in use. The objective of the study was to investigate the effect of space allowance and floor type on performance and welfare of finishing beef heifers. Continental crossbred heifers (n=240: mean initial live; weight, 504 (SD 35.8) kg) were blocked by breed, weight and age and randomly assigned to one of four treatments; (i) 3.0 m2, (ii) 4.5 m2 and (iii) 6.0 m2 space allowance per animal on a fully slatted concrete floor and (iv) 6.0 m2 space allowance per animal on a straw-bedded floor, for 105 days. Heifers were offered a total mixed ration ad libitum. Dry matter intake was recorded on a pen basis and refusals were weighed back twice weekly. Heifers were weighed, dirt scored and blood sampled every 3 weeks. Whole blood was analysed for complete cell counts and serum samples were assayed for metabolite concentrations. Behaviour was recorded continuously using IR cameras from days 70 to 87. Heifers’ hooves were inspected for lesions at the start of the study and again after slaughter. Post-slaughter, carcass weight, conformation and fat scores and hide weight were recorded. Heifers housed at 4.5 m2 had a greater average daily live weight gain (ADG) than those on both of the other concrete slat treatments; however, space allowance had no effect on carcass weight. Heifers accommodated on straw had a greater ADG (0.15 kg) (P<0.05), hide weight (P<0.01) better feed conversion ratio (P<0.05) and had greater dirt scores (P<0.05) at slaughter than heifers accommodated on concrete slats at 6.0 m2. The number of heifers lying at any one time was greater (P<0.001) on straw than on concrete slats. Space allowance and floor type had no effect on the number of hoof lesions gained or on any of the haematological or metabolic variables measured. It was concluded that increasing space allowance above 3.0 m2/animal on concrete slats was of no benefit to animal performance but it did improve animal cleanliness. Housing heifers on straw instead of concrete slats improved ADG and increased lying time; however carcass weight was not affected.


Corresponding author


Hide All
Absmanner, E, Rouha-Mülleder, C, Scharl, T, Leisch, F and Troxler, J 2009. Effects of different housing systems on the behaviour of beef bulls – an on-farm assessment on Austrian farms. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 118, 1219.
Brscic, M, Gottardo, F, Tessitore, E, Guzzo, L, Ricci, R and Cozzi, G 2015. Assessment of welfare of finishing beef cattle kept on different types of floor after short- or long-term housing. Animal 9, 10531058.
Buckham Sporer, KR, Weber, PS, Burton, JL, Earley, B and Crowe, MA 2008. Transportation of young beef bulls alters circulating physiological parameters that may be effective biomarkers of stress. Journal of Animal Science 86, 13251334.
Burton, JL, Madsen, SA, Chang, LC, Weber, PS, Buckham, KR, van Dorp, R, Hickey, MC and Earley, B 2005. Gene expression signatures in neutrophils exposed to glucocorticoids: a new paradigm to help explain ‘neutrophil dysfunction’ in parturient dairy cows. Veterinary Immunology and Immunopathology 105, 197219.
Earley, B, McDonnell, B and O’Riordan, E 2015. Effect of floor type on the performance, physiological and behavioural responses of finishing beef steers. Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica 57, 111.
EC 2006. Council Regulation (EC) No 1183/2006 of 24 July 2006 concerning the community scale for the classification of carcasses of adult bovine animals Offical. Journal of the European Union 214, 16.
Eicher, SD, Lay, DC Jr, Arthington, JD and Schutz, MM 2013. Effect of rubber flooring during the first 2 lactations on production, locomotion, hoof health, immune function and stress. Journal of Dairy Science 96, 36393651.
Fayed, RH 1997. Effect of housing systems on behaviour and lameness in dairy cows. Veterinary Medical Journal Giza 45, 101110.
Fisher, AD, Crowe, MA, O’Kiely, P and Enright, WJ 1997. Growth, behaviour, adrenal and immune responses of finishing beef heifers housed on slatted floors at 1.5, 2.0, 2.5 or 3.0 m2 space allowance. Livestock Production Science 51, 245254.
Fregonesi, JA and Leaver, JD 2001. Behaviour, performance and health indicators of welfare for dairy cows housed in strawyard or cubicle systems. Livestock Production Science 68, 205216.
Fregonesi, JA and Leaver, JD 2002. Influence of space allowance and milk yield level on behaviour, performance and health of dairy cows housed in strawyard and cubicle systems. Livestock Production Science 78, 245257.
Fregonesi, JA, Tucker, CB, Weary, DM, Flower, FC and Vittie, T 2004. Effect of rubber flooring in front of the feed bunk on the time budgets of dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 87, 12031207.
Gottardo, F, Ricc, R, Fregolent, G, Ravarotto, L and Cozzi, G 2003. Welfare and meat quality of beef cattle housed on two types of floors with the same space allowance. Italian Journal of Animal Science 2, 243253.
Greenough, PR and Vermunt, JJ 1991. Evaluation of subclinical laminitis in a dairy herd and observations on associated nutritional and management factors. The Veterinary Record 128, 1117.
Gupta, S, Earley, B and Crowe, MA 2007. Pituitary, adrenal, immune and performance responses of mature Holstein x Friesian bulls housed on slatted floors at various space allowances. The Veterinary Journal 173, 594604.
Gygax, L, Siegwart, R and Wechsler, B 2007. Effects of space allowance on the behaviour and cleanliness of finishing bulls kept in pens with fully slatted rubber coated flooring. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 107, 112.
Haley, DB, Rushen, J and de Passillé, AM 2000. Behavioural indicators of cow comfort: activity and resting behaviour of dairy cows in two types of housing. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 80, 257263.
Hickey, MC, Earley, B and Fisher, AD 2003. The effect of floor type and space allowance on welfare indicators of finishing steers. Irish Journal of Agricultural and Food Research 42, 89100.
Ingvartsen, KL and Andersen, HR 1993. Space allowance and type of housing for growing cattle: a review of performance and possible relation to neuroendocrine function. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section A – Animal Science 43, 6580.
Jones, ML and Allison, RW 2007. Evaluation of the ruminant complete blood cell count. Veterinary Clinics of North America: Food Animal Practice 23, 377402.
Keane, M, McGee, M, O’Riordan, E, Kelly, A and Earley, B 2015. Effect of floor type on hoof lesions, dirt scores, immune response and production of beef bulls. Livestock science 180, 220225.
Leonard, FC, O’Connell, JM and O’Farrell, KJ 1996. Effect of overcrowding on claw health in first-calved Friesian heifers. British Veterinary Journal 152, 459472.
Lowe, DE, Steen, RWJ, Beattie, VE and Moss, BW 2001. The effects of floor type systems on the performance, cleanliness, carcass composition and meat quality of housed finishing beef cattle. Livestock Production Science 69, 3342.
Maton, A, Daelemans, J and Lambrecht, J 2012. Housing of animals: Construction and equipment of animal houses. Elsevier Science Publishers, B.V., Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Nagaraja, TG and Titgemeyer, EC 2007. Ruminal acidosis in beef cattle: the current microbiological and nutritional outlook 1, 2. Journal of Dairy Science 90 (suppl. 1), E17E38.
Owens, D, McGee, M, Boland, T and O’Kiely, P 2008. Intake, rumen fermentation and nutrient flow to the omasum in beef cattle fed grass silage fortified with sucrose and/or supplemented with concentrate. Animal Feed Science and Technology 144, 2343.
Phillips, CJC, Beerda, B, Knierim, U, Waiblinger, S, Lidfords, L, Krohn, CC, Canali, E, Valk, H, Veissier, I and Hopster, H 2013. A review of the impact of housing on dairy cow behaviour, health and welfare. In Livestock housing: modern management to ensure optimal health and welfare of farm animals (ed. A Aland and T Banhazi), pp. 3754. Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen, the Netherlands.
Platz, S, Ahrens, F, Bendel, J, Meyer, HHD and Erhard, MH 2008. What happens with cow behavior when replacing concrete slatted floor by rubber coating: a case study. Journal of Dairy Science 91, 9991004.
Scientific Committee on Animal Health and Animal Welfare 2001. The welfare of cattle kept for beef production (SANCO.C.2/AH/R22/2000. European Commission, Health & Consumer Protection Directorate-General, Brussels, Belgium.
Scott, GB and Kelly, M 1989. Cattle cleanliness in different housing systems. Farm Building Progress 95, 2124.
Sutherland, MA, Worth, GM and Steward, M 2014. The effect of rearing substrate and space allowance on the behaviour and physiology of dairy calves. Journal of Dairy Science 97, 44554463.
Thio, T, Gygax, L, Friedli, K, Mayer, C and Ossent, P 2005. Einfluss von gummimodifizierten Spaltenböden auf die Klauengesundheit von Mastbullen. Tierärztliche Praxis Großtiere 33, 7784.
Wechsler, B 2011. Floor quality and space allowance in intensive beef production: a review. Animal Welfare 20, 497503.
Welfare Quality® 2009. Welfare Quality ® assessment protocol for cattle. Welfare Quality ® Consortium, Lelystad, the Netherlands.
Williamson, M 1998. Straw in Europe. Chalcombe publications, Southampton, UK.


Effect of space allowance and floor type on performance, welfare and physiological measurements of finishing beef heifers

  • M. P. Keane (a1) (a2), M. McGee (a3), E. G. O’Riordan (a3), A. K. Kelly (a2) and B. Earley (a1)...


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed