Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c47g7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-20T08:33:18.564Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of plane of nutrition of 1- and 2-year-old ewes in early and mid-pregnancy on ewe reproduction and offspring performance up to weaning

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

C. Muñoz ,
A. F. Carson ,
M. A. McCoy ,
L. E. R. Dawson ,
N. E. O’Connell  and
A. W. Gordon
C. Muñoz*
Affiliation:
Queen’s University Belfast, University Road, Belfast BT7 1NN, Northern Ireland, UK
A. F. Carson
Affiliation:
Agri-Food and Biosciences Institute (AFBI) Agriculture Branch, Hillsborough, Co., Down BT26 6DR, Northern Ireland, UK
M. A. McCoy
Affiliation:
AFBI Veterinary Sciences Division, Stoney Road, Belfast BT4 3SD, Northern Ireland, UK
L. E. R. Dawson
Affiliation:
Agri-Food and Biosciences Institute (AFBI) Agriculture Branch, Hillsborough, Co., Down BT26 6DR, Northern Ireland, UK
N. E. O’Connell
Affiliation:
Agri-Food and Biosciences Institute (AFBI) Agriculture Branch, Hillsborough, Co., Down BT26 6DR, Northern Ireland, UK
A. W. Gordon
Affiliation:
AFBI Biometrics Department, Newforge Lane, Belfast BT9 5PX, Northern Ireland, UK
*
E-mail: camila.munoz@afbini.gov.uk
Get access

Abstract

The objective of the present study was to determine the effect of plane of nutrition in early pregnancy (EP) and mid-pregnancy (MP), on the productive performance of 1- and 2-year-old ewes and their offspring. Over 2 successive years, between days 0 and 39 after synchronized mating (EP), 1- (n = 117) and 2- (n = 52) year-old ewes were allowed 60% (low, L-EP), 100% (medium, M-EP) or 200% (high, H-EP) of requirements for maintenance (M). Between days 40 and 90 (MP), 1-year-old ewes were allowed 140% (M-MP) or 200% (H-MP), while 2-year-old ewes were allowed 80% (M-MP) or 140% (H-MP) of their M requirement. After day 90, all ewes were fed to meet requirements for late pregnancy. Increasing the plane of nutrition between days 0 and 39 resulted in increases in live weight (LW) (P < 0.001) and body condition score (BCS) (P < 0.001) during the EP period (H-EP > M-EP > L-EP), differences that in 1-year-old ewes were sustained to lambing (P < 0.05). On day 42 of gestation H-EP ewes had lower plasma progesterone concentrations than L-EP or M-EP ewes in 1- (P < 0.01) and 2- (P < 0.001) year olds. This was concomitant with diet H-EP tending to reduce the number of lambs born per ewe in both age groups (P = 0.06 and 0.07, respectively). Foetuses from 1-year-old L-EP ewes had smaller cranial (P < 0.01) and abdominal (P < 0.05) diameters at day 53 of gestation, with H-EP lambs tending to be heaviest at birth (P = 0.07). Similar findings were recorded for 2-year-old ewes. One-year-old ewes offered diet L-EP presented negative maternal behaviours more frequently (P < 0.05), while the incidence of lamb mortality at 6 weeks tended to be greater for L-EP lambs (P = 0.07). In MP, 1-year-old ewes offered diet M-MP were associated with foetuses with bigger abdominal diameters at day 78 (P < 0.05). However, there were no differences in lamb weight or size at term (P > 0.05). These ewes exhibited more positive maternal behaviours (e.g. increased grooming frequency and duration; P < 0.05) than ewes offered diet H-MP, and their offspring were more successful in suckling (P < 0.05). Results suggest that in young ewes, a temporary nutrient restriction in EP resulted in increased prolificacy. However, ewes and their offspring were lighter at birth and ewe maternal behaviour was poorer, resulting in increased lamb mortality. In MP, a medium plane of nutrition offered to 1-year-old ewes led to improved maternal and offspring behaviour.

Keywords

foetal developmentmaternal behaviournutritionpregnancysheep
Type
Full Paper
Information
animal , Volume 3 , Issue 5 , May 2009 , pp. 657 - 669
Copyright
Copyright © The Animal Consortium 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agriculture and Food Research Council 1993. Energy and protein requirements of ruminants. CAB International, Wallingford, USA.Google Scholar
Amemiya, T 1973. Regression analysis when the dependent variable is truncated normal. Econometrica 41, 997–1016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Annett, RW 2004. Studies on the effects of the nutrition of ewes during pregnancy on neonatal lamb survival and lamb output at weaning. Queen’s University of Belfast, Belfast, UK.Google Scholar
Annett, RW, Carson, AF 2006. Effects of plane of nutrition during the first month of pregnancy on conception rate, foetal development and lamb output of mature and adolescent ewes. Animal Science 82, 947–954.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashworth, CJ 1995. Maternal and conceptus factors affecting histotrophic nutrition and survival of embryos. Livestock Production Science 44, 99–105.Google Scholar
Clarke, L, Yakubu, DP, Symonds, ME 1997. Influence of maternal bodyweight on size, conformation and survival of newborn lambs. Reproduction Fertility and Development 9, 509–514.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dwyer, CM, Lawrence, AB 1998. Variability in the expression of maternal behaviour in primiparous sheep: effects of genotype and litter size. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 58, 311–330.Google Scholar
Dwyer, CM, Lawrence, AB, Brown, HE, Simm, G 1996. Effect of ewe and lamb genotype on gestation length, lambing ease and neonatal behaviour of lambs. Reproduction, Fertility and Development 8, 1123–1129.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dwyer, CM, Lawrence, AB, Bishop, SC, Lewis, M 2003. Ewe-lamb bonding behaviours at birth are affected by maternal undernutrition in pregnancy. British Journal of Nutrition 89, 123–136.Google Scholar
Godfrey, K, Robinson, S 1998. Maternal nutrition, placental growth and fetal programming. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 57, 105–111.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grommers, FJ, Elving, L, Vaneldik, P 1985. Parturition difficulties in sheep. Animal Reproduction Science 9, 365–374.Google Scholar
Heasman, L, Clarke, L, Stephenson, TJ, Symonds, ME 1999. The influence of maternal nutrient restriction in early to mid-pregnancy on placental and fetal development in sheep. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 58, 283–288.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hinch, GN, Lynch, JJ, Nolan, JV, Leng, RA, Bindon, BM, Piper, LR 1996. Supplementation of high fecundity Border Leicester × Merino ewes with a high protein feed: its effect on lamb survival. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 36, 129–136.Google Scholar
Holst, PJ, Killeen, ID, Cullis, BR 1986. Nutrition of the pregnant ewe and its effects on gestation length, lamb birth-weight and lamb survival. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 37, 647–655.Google Scholar
Kelly, RW 1992. Nutrition and placental development. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society of Australia 17, 203–211.Google Scholar
Kelly, RW, Newnham, JP, Johnson, T, Speijers, EJ 1987. An ultrasound technique to measure placental growth in ewes. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 38, 757–764.Google Scholar
Kleemann, DO, Walker, SK, Seamark, RF 1994. Enhanced fetal growth in sheep administered progesterone during the first three days of pregnancy. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility 102, 411–417.Google Scholar
McEwan, AD, Fisher, EW, Selman, IE, Penhale, WJ 1970. A turbidity test for the estimation of immune globulin levels in neonatal calf serum. Clinica Chimica Acta 27, 155–163.Google Scholar
McSporran, KD, Wyburn, RS 1979. Studies on dystocia in sheep. 1. Technique for radiographic pelvimetry in the ewe. New Zealand Veterinary Journal 27, 64–66.Google Scholar
Mellor, DJ 1987. Nutritional effects on the fetus and mammary-gland during pregnancy. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 46, 249–257.Google Scholar
Muñoz, C, Carson, AF, McCoy, MA, Dawson, LER, O’Connell, NE, Gordon, AW 2008a. Nutritional status of adult ewes during early and mid-pregnancy. 1. Effects of plane of nutrition on ewe reproduction and offspring performance to weaning. Animal 2, 52–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Muñoz, C, Carson, AF, McCoy, MA, Dawson, LER, O’Connell, NE, Gordon, AW 2008b. Nutritional status of adult ewes during early and mid-pregnancy. 2. Effects of supplementation with selenised yeast on ewe reproduction and offspring performance to weaning. Animal 2, 64–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
National Research Council 2007. Nutrient requirements of small ruminants: sheep, goats, cervids, and new world camelids. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC, USA.Google Scholar
Nowak, R 1996. Neonatal survival: contributions from behavioural studies in sheep. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 49, 61–72.Google Scholar
Nowak, R, Porter, RH, Levy, F, Orgeur, P, Schaal, B 2000. Role of mother–young interactions in the survival of offspring in domestic mammals. Reviews of Reproduction 5, 153–163.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
O’Connor, CE, Lawrence, AB, Woodgush, DGM 1992. Influence of litter size and parity on maternal-behaviour at parturition in Scottish blackface sheep. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 33, 345–355.Google Scholar
Parr, RA, Davis, IF, Fairclough, RJ, Miles, MA 1987. Overfeeding during early-pregnancy reduced peripheral progesterone concentration and pregnancy rate in sheep. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility 80, 317–320.Google Scholar
Parr, RA, Davis, IF, Miles, MA, Squires, TJ 1993. Liver blood-flow and metabolic-clearance rate of progesterone in sheep. Research in Veterinary Science 55, 311–316.Google Scholar
Pharr, JW, Rowell, JE, Flood, PF 1994. Fetal growth in muskoxen determined by transabdominal ultrasonography. Canadian Journal of Veterinary Research-Revue Canadienne de Recherche Veterinaire 58, 167–172.Google Scholar
Redmer, DA, Wallace, JM, Reynolds, LP 2004. Effect of nutrient intake during pregnancy on fetal and placental growth and vascular development. Domestic Animal Endocrinology 27, 199–217.Google Scholar
Robinson, JJ, Sinclair, KD, McEvoy, TG 1999. Nutritional effects on foetal growth. Animal Science 68, 315–331.Google Scholar
Robinson, JJ, Rooke, JA, McEvoy, TG 2002. Nutrition for conception and pregnancy. In Sheep nutrition (ed. M Freer and H Dove), pp. 189–211. CAB International, Wallingford, USA.Google Scholar
Russel, AJF, Doney, JM, Gunn, RG 1969. Subjective assessment of body fat in live sheep. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 72, 451–454.Google Scholar
Sawalha, RM, Conington, J, Brotherstone, S, Villanueva, B 2007. Analyses of lamb survival of Scottish Blackface sheep. Animal 1, 151–157.Google Scholar
Schneider, H 1996. Ontogenic changes in the nutritive function of the placenta. Placenta 17, 15–26.Google Scholar
Vincent, IC, Williams, HL, Hill, R 1985. The influence of a low-nutrient intake after mating on gestation and perinatal survival of lambs. British Veterinary Journal 141, 611–617.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Walker, SK, Hartwich, KM, Seamark, RF 1996. The production of unusually large offspring following embryo manipulation: concepts and challenges. Theriogenology 45, 111–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallace, JM, Bourke, DA, Aitken, RP, Cruickshank, MA 1999. Switching maternal dietary intake at the end of the first trimester has profound effects on placental development and fetal growth in adolescent ewes carrying singleton fetuses. Biology of Reproduction 61, 101–110.Google Scholar
Wallace, JM, Luther, JS, Milne, JS, Aitken, RP, Redmer, DA, Reynolds, LP, Hay, WW 2006. Nutritional modulation of adolescent pregnancy outcome – a review. Placenta 27, S61–S68.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed