Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-cjp7w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-20T14:03:21.987Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effect of oat hay provision method on growth performance, rumen fermentation and blood metabolites of dairy calves during preweaning and postweaning periods

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 April 2020

M. Gasiorek
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Nutrition, Poznań University of Life Sciences, 33 Wołyńska Street, 60-637Poznań, Poland
B. Stefanska*
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Nutrition, Poznań University of Life Sciences, 33 Wołyńska Street, 60-637Poznań, Poland
E. Pruszynska-Oszmalek
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Physiology and Biochemistry, Poznań University of Life Sciences, 35 Wołyńska Street, 60-637Poznań, Poland
M. Taciak
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Nutrition, The Kielanowski Institute of Animal Physiology and Nutrition, Polish Academy of Sciences, 3 Instytucka Street, 05-110Jabłonna, Poland
J. Komisarek
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Breeding and Product Quality Assessment, Poznań University of Life Sciences, Złotniki, 1 Słoneczna Street, 62-002Suchy Las, Poland
W. Nowak
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Nutrition, Poznań University of Life Sciences, 33 Wołyńska Street, 60-637Poznań, Poland
Get access

Abstract

The comparison of the effects of all forage offering methods would be particularly useful information in modeling growth performance and rumen fermentation of dairy calves. Therefore, this study attempted to evaluate the effects of methods of oat hay provision on growth performance, rumen fermentation and biochemical blood indices of dairy calves during preweaning and postweaning periods. At birth, 40 female Polish Holstein-Friesian calves (3 days of age; 39.6 ± 0.39 kg BW) were randomly assigned to four treatment groups differing in the access to chopped oat hay: CON (control, starter without oat hay), OH (starter feed containing 10% DM basis oat hay), OH-FC (starter feed containing 10% DM basis oat hay and oat hay fed as free-choice provision in different buckets) and FC (starter feed and oat hay fed as free-choice provision in different buckets). The calves were weaned on day 56, and then the study continued until day 84. Intakes of starter feed and oat hay were recorded daily, whereas BW and hip height (HH) on day 3 and then every 14 days. Samples of blood were collected on the initiation of experiment and then every 14 days, and rumen contents on day 28, 56 and 84. No treatment effects were found for starter, starch, CP, total DM intake, average daily gain, feeding efficiency, change in HH, ruminal fluid pH, concentrations of ruminal propionate and NH3-N, concentrations of urea nitrogen and non-esterified fatty acids in the blood. There were differences between treatments in terms of ruminal total volatile fatty acids and molar concentrations of acetate, butyrate and acetate to propionate ratio; highest in OH and OH-FC groups, especially during the postweaning period. On the other hand, lower concentrations of iso-valerate were found in OH and OH-FC groups on day 56 and 84. The concentrations of IGF-I throughout the experiment and β-hydroxybutyrate during the postweaning period in the blood were influenced by treatment, with the greatest values observed in OH and OH-FC calves. Results of this study indicate that starter feed containing chopped oat hay improves rumen fermentation parameters, which might allow successful transition from preruminant to mature ruminant state. Also, providing chopped oat hay with pelleted starter feed seems to be a better method than free-choice supplementation.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© The Animal Consortium 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Association of Official Analytical Chemists (AOAC) 2010. Official methods of analysis, volume 2, 18th edition. AOAC, Arlington, VA, USA.Google Scholar
Barszcz, M, Taciak, M, and Skomiał, J 2011. A dose-response effects of tannic acid and protein on growth performance, caecal fermentation, colon morphology, and β-glucuronides activity of rats. Journal of Animal Feed Science 20, 613625.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castells, L, Bach, A, Aris, A, and Terre, M 2013. Effects of forage provision to young calves on rumen fermentation and development of the gastrointestinal tract. Journal of Dairy Science 96, 52265236.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Coverdale, JA, Tyler, HD, Quigley, JD, and Brumm, JA. 2004. Effect of various levels of forage and form of diet on rumen development and growth in calves. Journal of Dairy Science 87, 25542562.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dijkstra, J, Boer, H, Van Bruchem, J, Bruining, M, and Tamminga, S 1993. Absorption of volatile fatty acids from the rumen of lactating dairy cows as influenced by volatile fatty acid concentration, pH and rumen liquid volume. British Journal of Nutrition 69, 385396.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
EbnAli, A, Khorvash, M, Ghorbani, GR, Mahdavi, AH, Malekkhahi, M, Mirzaei, M, Pezeshki, A, and Ghaffari, MH 2016. Effects of forage offering method on performance, rumen fermentation, nutrient digestibility and nutritional behaviour in Holstein dairy calves. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition 100, 820827.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frieten, D, Gerbert, C, Koch, C, Dusel, G, Eder, K, Hoeflich, A, Mielenz, B, and Hammon, HM 2018. Influence of adlibitum milk replacer feeding and butyrate supplementation on the systemic and hepatic insulin-like growth factor I and its binding proteins in Holstein calves. Journal of Dairy Science 101, 16611672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, MB 2001. Neutral detergent-soluble carbohydrates nutritional relevance and analysis (A laboratory manual). University of Florida Extension Bulletin, Gainesville, FL, USAGoogle Scholar
Hill, TM, Bateman, HG, Aldrich, JM, and Schlotterbeck, RL 2009. Roughage for diets fed to weaned dairy calves. The Professional Animal Scientist 25, 283288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, JI, and Clemmons, DR 1995. Insulin-like growth factors and their binding proteins: biological actions. Endocrine Reviews 16, 334.Google ScholarPubMed
Khan, MA, Bach, A, Weary, DM and von Keyserlingk, MAG 2016. Invited review: transitioning from milk to solid feed in dairy heifers. Journal of Dairy Science 99, 885902.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Khan, MA, Lee, HJ, Lee, WS, Kim, HS, Kim, SB, Park, SB, Baek, KS, Ha, JK, and Choi, YJ 2008. Starch source evaluation in calf starter: II. Ruminal parameters, rumen development, nutrient digestibilities, and nitrogen utilization in Holstein calves. Journal of Dairy Science 91, 11401149.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Laarman, AH, and Oba, M 2011. Short communication: effect of calf starter on rumen pH of Holstein dairy calves at weaning. Journal of Dairy Science 94, 56615664.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meale, SJ, Chaucheyras-Durand, F, Berends, H, Guan, LL, and Steele, MA 2017. From pre- to postweaning: Transformation of the young calf’s gastrointestinal tract. Journal of Dairy Science 100, 59845995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mirzaei, M, Khorvash, M, Ghorbani, GR, Kazemi-Bonchenari, M, and Ghaffari, MH 2017. Growth performance, feeding behavior, and selected blood metabolites of Holstein dairy calves fed restricted amounts of milk: no interactions between sources of finely ground grain and forage provision. Journal of Dairy Science 100, 10861094.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mojahedi, S, Khorvash, M, Ghorbani, GR, Ghasemi, E, Mirzaei, M, and Hashemzadeh-Cigari, F 2018. Performance, nutritional behavior, and metabolic responses of calves supplemented with forage depend on starch fermentability. Journal of Dairy Science 101, 70617072.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Movahedi, B, Foroozandeh, AD, and Shakeri, P 2017. Effects of different forage sources as a free-choice provision on the performance, nutrient digestibility, selected blood metabolites and structural growth of Holstein dairy calves. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition 101, 293301.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nocek, JE, and Kesler, EM 1980. Growth and rumen characteristics of Holstein steers fed pelleted or conventional diets. Journal of Dairy Science 63, 249254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Research Council (NRC) 2001. Nutrient Requirements of Dairy Cattle. 7th revised edition. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, USA.Google Scholar
Quigley, JD, Steen, TM, and Boehms, SI 1992. Postprandial changes of selected blood and ruminal metabolites in ruminating calves fed diets with or without hay. Journal of Dairy Science 75, 228235.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Statistical Analysis Software Institute (SAS) 2014. Statistical Analysis Software User’s Guide. 9.4. version Statistical Analysis Software Institute, Cary, NC, USA.Google Scholar
Stefańska, B, Komisarek, J, Stanisławski, D, Gąsiorek, M, Kasprowicz-Potocka, M, Frankiewicz, A, and Nowak, W 2018. The effect of Yarrowia lipolytica culture on growth performance, ruminal fermentation and blood parameters of dairy calves. Animal Feed Science and Technology 243, 7279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tamate, H, McGilliard, AD, Jacobson, NL, and Getty, R 1962. Effect of various dietaries on the anatomical development of the stomach in the calf. Journal of Dairy Science 45, 408420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Terre, M, Pedrals, E, Dalmau, A, and Bach, A 2013. What do preweaned and weaned calves need in the diet: a high fiber content or a forage source? Journal of Dairy Science 96, 52175225.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van Ackeren, C, Steingaß, H, Hartung, K, Funk, R, and Drochner, W 2009. Effect of roughage level in a total mixed ration on feed intake, ruminal fermentation patterns and chewing activity of early-weaned calves with adlibitum access to grass hay. Animal Feed Science and Technology 153, 4859.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Soest, PJ, Robertson, JB, and Lewis, BA 1991. Methods for dietary fibre, neutral detergent fibre, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science 74, 35833597.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Supplementary material: File

Gasiorek et al. supplementary material

Gasiorek et al. supplementary material

Download Gasiorek et al. supplementary material(File)
File 91.6 KB