Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-jbqgn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-21T16:11:03.392Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The association between plumage damage and feather-eating in free-range laying hens

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 December 2015

K. M. Hartcher ,
P. H. Hemsworth ,
S. J. Wilkinson ,
P. C. Thomson  and
G. M. Cronin
K. M. Hartcher*
Affiliation:
Poultry Research Foundation, Faculty of Veterinary Science, The University of Sydney, Camden NSW 2570, Australia Poultry CRC, PO Box U242, University of New England, Armidale NSW 2351, Australia
P. H. Hemsworth
Affiliation:
Animal Welfare Science Centre, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia
S. J. Wilkinson
Affiliation:
Poultry Research Foundation, Faculty of Veterinary Science, The University of Sydney, Camden NSW 2570, Australia
P. C. Thomson
Affiliation:
Poultry Research Foundation, Faculty of Veterinary Science, The University of Sydney, Camden NSW 2570, Australia
G. M. Cronin
Affiliation:
Poultry Research Foundation, Faculty of Veterinary Science, The University of Sydney, Camden NSW 2570, Australia
*
†E-mail: kate.hartcher@sydney.edu.au
Get access

Abstract

Severe feather-pecking (SFP) persists as a highly prevalent and detrimental behavioural problem in laying hens (Gallus gallus domesticus) worldwide. The present experiment investigated the association between feather-eating and plumage damage, a consequence of SFP, in groups of free-range, ISA Brown laying hens. Single feathers were placed on the floor of the home pens. Feathers were sourced from seven different birds. A total of 50 birds in six pens with extensive plumage damage were compared with birds in six control pens with little plumage damage at 41 to 43 weeks of age (n=12 pens, 600 hens). Birds in pens with extensive plumage damage ingested more feathers (F=8.1, DF=1, 8, P=0.02), and also showed shorter latencies to peck at (χ2=54.5, DF=1, P<0.001), and ingest feathers (χ2=55.6, DF=1, P<0.001). Birds ingested feathers from a bird in the free-range facility, in which the testing took place, more quickly than from a bird housed in a separate cage facility (χ2 = 39.0, DF=6, P<0.001). A second experiment investigated the predictive relationship between feather-eating and plumage damage. Feathers were presented to 16 pens of 50 pullets prior to the development of plumage damage, at 15 weeks of age, and then to the same hens after plumage damage had become prominent, at 40 weeks of age. Birds had a higher probability of ingesting feathers (F=142.0, DF=1, 231, P<0.001), pecked feathers more times (F=11.24, DF=1, 239, P<0.001), and also pecked (χ2 = 127.3, DF=1, P<0.001) and ingested (χ2=189.3, DF=1, P<0.001) the feathers more quickly at 40 than 15 weeks of age. There was a trend for an interaction, where birds pecked feathers from the rump more times than feathers from the back at 40 weeks of age (F=3.46, DF=1, 237, P=0.06). However, a lack of variability in plumage damage between pens in this experiment precluded investigation of the predictive relationship. The results from the present study confirm the association between feather-eating and plumage damage, and suggest that birds may prefer feathers from particular body areas and from particular hens. Future experiments should focus on elucidating whether feather-eating may act as a predictor of SFP.

Keywords

feather-peckingfeather-eatinglaying henbehaviourplumage damage
Type
Research Article
Information
animal , Volume 10 , Issue 5 , May 2016 , pp. 854 - 862
Copyright
© The Animal Consortium 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Albentosa, MJ, Kjaer, JB and Nicol, CJ 2003. Strain and age differences in behaviour, fear response and pecking tendency in laying hens. British Poultry Science 44, 333–344.Google Scholar
Bessei, AW and Kjaer, JB 2015. Feather pecking in layers – state of research and implications. In Proceedings of 26th Annual Australian Poultry Science Symposium, 9–11 February, Sydney, Australia, pp. 214–221.Google Scholar
Bestman, M, Koene, P and Wagenaar, JP 2009. Influence of farm factors on the occurrence of feather pecking in organic reared hens and their predictability for feather pecking in the laying period. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 121, 120–125.Google Scholar
Bilcik, B and Keeling, LJ 1999. Changes in feather condition in relation to feather pecking and aggressive behaviour in laying hens. British Poultry Science 40, 444–451.Google Scholar
Blokhuis, HJ 1986. Feather-pecking in poultry – its relation with ground-pecking. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 16, 63–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blokhuis, HJ and Arkes, JG 1984. Some observations on the development of feather-pecking in poultry. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 12, 145–157.Google Scholar
Bolliger, A and Varga, D 1961. Feather lipids. Nature 190, 1125.Google Scholar
Brunberg, E, Jensen, P, Isaksson, A and Keeling, L 2011. Feather pecking behavior in laying hens: hypothalamic gene expression in birds performing and receiving pecks. Poultry Science 90, 1145–1152.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
De Haas, EN, Bolhuis, JE, de Jong, IC, Kemp, B, Janczak, AM and Rodenburg, TB 2014b. Predicting feather damage in laying hens during the layingperiod. Is it the past or is it the present? Applied Animal Behaviour Science 160, 75–85.Google Scholar
De Haas, EN, Bolhuis, JE, Kemp, B, Groothuis, TGG and Rodenburg, TB 2014a. Parents and early life environment affect behavioral development of laying hen chickens. PLoS One 9, e90577.Google Scholar
De Haas, EN, Nielsen, BL, Buitenhuis, AJ and Rodenburg, TB 2010. Selection on feather pecking affects response to novelty and foraging behaviour in laying hens. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 124, 90–96.Google Scholar
Dixon, LM, Duncan, IJH and Mason, G 2008. What’s in a peck? Using fixed action pattern morphology to identify the motivational basis of abnormal feather-pecking behaviour. Animal Behaviour 76, 1035–1042.Google Scholar
Forkman, B, Boissy, A, Meunier-Salaün, M-C, Canali, E and Jones, RB 2007. A critical review of fear tests used on cattle, pigs, sheep, poultry and horses. Physiology & Behavior 92, 340–374.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gunnarsson, S, Keeling, LJ and Svedberg, J 1999. Effect of rearing factors on the prevalence of floor eggs, cloacal cannibalism and feather pecking in commercial flocks of single housed laying hens. British Poultry Science 40, 12–18.Google Scholar
Harlander-Matauschek, A, Baes, C and Bessei, W 2006. The demand of laying hens for feathers and wood shavings. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 101, 102–110.Google Scholar
Harlander-Matauschek, A, Benda, I, Lavetti, C, Djukic, M and Bessei, W 2007b. The relative preferences for wood shavings or feathers in high and low feather pecking birds. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 107, 78–87.Google Scholar
Harlander-Matauschek, A and Bessei, W 2005. Feather eating and crop filling in laying hens. Archiv fur Geflügelkunde 69, 241–244.Google Scholar
Harlander-Matauschek, A and Häusler, K 2009. Understanding feather eating behaviour in laying hens. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 117, 35–41.Google Scholar
Harlander-Matauschek, A, Häusler, K and Bessei, W 2007a. A note on the relative preferences of laying hens for feathers from different body parts. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 108, 186–190.Google Scholar
Harlander-Matauschek, A and Rodenburg, TB 2011. Applying chemical stimuli on feathers to reduce feather pecking in laying hens. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 132, 146–151.Google Scholar
Hartcher, KM, Tran, KTN, Wilkinson, SJ, Hemsworth, PH, Thomson, PC and Cronin, GM 2015. The effects of environmental enrichment and beak-trimming during the rearing period on subsequent feather damage due to feather-pecking in laying hens. Poultry Science 94, 852–859.Google Scholar
Huber-Eicher, B and Wechsler, B 1998. The effect of quality and availability of foraging materials on feather pecking in laying hen chicks. Animal Behaviour 55, 861–873.Google Scholar
Hughes, BO and Duncan, IJH 1972. Influence of strain and environmental factors upon feather pecking and cannibalism in fowls. British Poultry Science 13, 525–547.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jacob, J and Ziswiler, V 1982. The uropygial gland. Avian Biology 6, 199–324.Google Scholar
Jensen, P, Keeling, L, Schutz, K, Andersson, L, Mormede, P, Brandstrom, H, Forkman, B, Kerje, S, Fredriksson, R, Ohlsson, C, Larsson, S, Mallmin, H and Kindmark, A 2005. Feather pecking in chickens is genetically related to behavioural and developmental traits. Physiology & Behavior 86, 52–60.Google Scholar
Kjaer, JB 2009. Feather pecking in domestic fowl is genetically related to locomotor activity levels, Implications for a hyperactivity disorder model of feather pecking. Behavior Genetics 39, 564–570.Google Scholar
Kriegseis, I, Bessei, W, Meyer, B, Zentek, J, Wurbel, H and Harlander-Matauschek, A 2012. Feather-pecking response of laying hens to feather and cellulose-based rations fed during rearing. Poultry Science 91, 1514–1521.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McKeegan, DEF and Savory, CJ 1999. Feather eating in layer pullets and its possible role in the aetiology of feather pecking damage. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 65, 73–85.Google Scholar
McKeegan, DEF and Savory, CJ 2001. Feather eating in individually caged hens which differ in their propensity to feather peck. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 73, 131–140.Google Scholar
Meyer, B, Bessei, W, Vahjen, W, Zentek, J and Harlander-Matauschek, A 2012. Dietary inclusion of feathers affects intestinal microbiota and microbial metabolites in growing Leghorn-type chickens. Poultry Science 91, 1506–1513.Google Scholar
National Health and Medical Research Council 2004. Australian Government National Health and Medical Research Council. Retrieved January 9, 2012, from https://www.nhmrc.gov.au/guidelines-publications.Google Scholar
Newberry, RC, Keeling, LJ, Estevez, I and Bilcik, B 2007. Behaviour when young as a predictor of severe feather pecking in adult laying hens: the redirected foraging hypothesis revisited. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 107, 262–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicol, CJ, Caplen, G, Edgar, J and Browne, WJ 2009. Associations between welfare indicators and environmental choice in laying hens. Animal Behaviour 78, 413–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramadan, SGA and Von Borell, E 2008. Role of single feathers on the development of feather pecking in laying hens. British Poultry Science 49, 250–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rault, JL, Van De Wouw, A and Hemsworth, PH 2013. Fly the coop! Vertical structures influence the distribution and behaviour of laying hens in an outdoor range. Australian Veterinary Journal 91, 423–426.Google Scholar
Rodenburg, TB and Koene, P 2003. Comparison of individual and social feather pecking tests in two lines of laying hens at ten different ages. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 81, 133–148.Google Scholar
Rodenburg, TB, van Krimpen, MM, de Jong, IC, de Haas, EN, Kops, MS, Riedstra, BJ, Nordquist, RE, Wagenaar, JP, Bestman, M and Nicol, CJ 2013. The prevention and control of feather pecking in laying hens: identifying the underlying principles. World’s Poultry Science Journal 69, 361–373.Google Scholar
Savory, CJ 1995. Feather pecking and cannibalism. World’s Poultry Science Journal 51, 215–219.Google Scholar
Tauson, R, Kjaer, J, Maria, G, Cepero, R and Holm, KE 2005. Applied scoring of integument and health in laying hens. Animal Science Papers and Reports 23, 153–159.Google Scholar
Van Krimpen, M, Veldkamp, T, Binnendijk, G and de Veer, R 2011. Effect of four processed animal proteins in the diet on behavior in laying hens. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 132, 138–145.Google Scholar
Wysocki, M, Bessei, W, Kjaer, JB and Bennewitz, J 2010. Genetic and physiological factors influencing feather pecking in chickens. World’s Poultry Science Journal 66, 659–672.Google Scholar
Yamak, US and Sarica, M 2012. Relationships between feather score and egg production and feed consumption of different layer hybrids kept in conventional cages. Archiv fur Geflügelkunde 76, 31–37.Google Scholar