Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pjpqr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-24T00:15:46.553Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Analysis of genetic correlations between beef traits in young bulls and primiparous cows belonging to the dual-purpose Rendena breed

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 August 2018

N. Guzzo Open the ORCID record for N. Guzzo [Opens in a new window] ,
C. Sartori Open the ORCID record for C. Sartori [Opens in a new window]  and
R. Mantovani
N. Guzzo*
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, Food, Natural Resources, Animals and Environment, University of Padua, Viale dell’Universita’, 16-35020 Legnaro, Padua, Italy
C. Sartori
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, Food, Natural Resources, Animals and Environment, University of Padua, Viale dell’Universita’, 16-35020 Legnaro, Padua, Italy
R. Mantovani
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, Food, Natural Resources, Animals and Environment, University of Padua, Viale dell’Universita’, 16-35020 Legnaro, Padua, Italy
*
†E-mail: nadia.guzzo@studenti.unipd.it
Get access

Abstract

Selection for beef traits in Italian dual-purpose breeds is often carried out using growth and in vivo conformation recorded on young, performance tested bulls and muscularity traits scored during routinely linear type evaluation on primiparous cows. In this context, the knowledge of the genetic structure of traits obtained in different sexes and at different times is necessary for a proper selection plan. This study aimed to estimate, in the local dual-purpose Rendena breed, the genetic relationships between muscularity linear type traits from primiparous cows, the same traits scored on candidate young bulls, and the performance test traits recorded in candidate young bulls. Type traits included: front (chest and shoulder), back (loins and rump); thigh, buttocks side and rear views (two traits). Performance test traits were: average daily gain; EUROP fleshiness evaluation; and dressing percentage. Muscularity linear type traits were recorded on 11 992 first parity cows, and the muscularity type traits were scored on 957 candidate young bulls. Heritability estimates obtained for muscularity traits were moderate in young bulls (on average 0.326), about 16% higher than in primiparous cows. The average heritability for performance test traits in young bulls resulted 0.342. Moderate to strong genetic correlations were found between performance test and muscularity type traits collected in young bulls (from 0.500 between front (chest and shoulder) and average daily gain to 0.955 between thigh, buttocks side view and in vivo dressing percentage). The genetic relationships obtained between muscularity linear type traits of primiparous cows and performance traits of young bulls were variable (from a null correlation between front (chest and shoulder) and average daily gain to 0.822 between thigh, buttocks rear view and dressing percentage), with an average genetic correlation of 0.532. Generally, the traits measured during performance testing in young bulls were favourably correlated with muscularity traits evaluated on primiparous cows, indicating a common selection pathway.

Keywords

local breedcattletype traitsperformance testgenetic parameters
Type
Research Article
Information
animal , Volume 13 , Issue 4 , April 2019 , pp. 694 - 701
Copyright
© The Animal Consortium 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aass, L 1996. Variation in carcass and meat quality traits and their relations to growth in dual purpose cattle. Livestock Production Science 46, 1–12.Google Scholar
Albera, A, Mantovani, R, Bittante, G, Groen, AF and Carnier, P 2001. Genetic parameters for daily live-weight gain, live fleshiness and bone thinness in station-tested Piemontese young bulls. Animal Science 72, 449–456.Google Scholar
Andersen, BB, De Baerdemaeker, A, Bittante, G, Bonaiti, B, Colleau, JJ, Fimland, E, Jansen, J, Lewis, WHE, Politiek, RD, Seeland, G, Teehan, TJ and Werkmeister, F 1981. Performance testing of bulls in AI: report of a working group of the commission on cattle. Livestock Production Science 8, 101–119.Google Scholar
Bonfatti, V, Albera, A and Carnier, P 2013. Genetic associations between daily BW gain and live fleshiness of station-tested young bulls and carcass and meat quality traits of commercial intact males in Piemontese cattle. Journal of Animal Science 91, 2057–2066.Google Scholar
Bouquet, A, Fouilloux, MN, Renand, G and Phocas, F 2010. Genetic parameters for growth, muscularity, feed efficiency and carcass traits of young beef bulls. Livestock Science 129, 38–48.Google Scholar
Bouška, J, Štípková, M, Frelich, J, Zedníková, J and Bartoň, L 2003. Genetic parameters of the traits recorded in the performance test of dual-purpose bulls. Czech Journal of Animal Science 48, 413–418.Google Scholar
Crews, DH and Kemp, RA 2001. Genetic parameters for ultrasound and carcass measures of yield and quality among replacement and slaughter beef cattle. Journal of Animal Science 79, 3008–3020.Google Scholar
Croué, I, Fouilloux, MN, Saintilan, R and Ducrocq, V 2017. Carcass traits of young bulls in dual-purpose cattle: genetic parameters and genetic correlations with veal calf, type and production traits. Animal 11, 929–937.Google Scholar
Crowley, JJ, Evans, RD, Mc Hugh, N, Pabiou, T, Kenny, DA, McGee, M, Crews, DH Jr and Berry, DP 2011. Genetic associations between feed efficiency measured in a performance test station and performance of growing cattle in commercial beef herds. Journal of Animal Science 89, 3382–3393.Google Scholar
Crowley, JJ, McGee, M, Kenny, DA, Crews, DH, Evans, RD and Berry, DP 2010. Phenotypic and genetic parameters for different measures of feed efficiency in different breeds of Irish performance-tested beef bulls. Journal of Animal Science 88, 885–894.Google Scholar
de Haas, Y, Janss, LLG and Kadarmideen, HN 2007. Genetic and phenotypic parameters for conformation and yield traits in three Swiss dairy cattle breeds. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics 124, 12–19.Google Scholar
Forabosco, F, Bozzi, R, Boettcher, P, Filippini, F, Bijma, P and Van Arendonk, JA 2005. Relationship between profitability and type traits and derivation of economic values for reproduction and survival traits in Chianina beef cows. Journal of Animal Science 83, 2043–2051.Google Scholar
Forabosco, F and Mantovani, R 2011. European and indigenous cattle breeds in Italy. Schiel & Denver Publishing Limited, Houston, TX, USA.Google Scholar
Fouilloux, MN, Renand, G, Gaillard, J and Ménissier, F 1999. Genetic parameters of beef traits of Limousin and Charolais progeny-tested AI sires. Genetics Selection Evolution 31, 465–489.Google Scholar
Fouilloux, MN, Renand, G, Gaillard, J and Ménissier, F 2000. Genetic correlation estimations between artificial insemination sire performances and their progeny beef traits both measured in test stations. Genetics Selection Evolution 32, 483–499.Google Scholar
Frigo, E, Samorè, AB, Vicario, D, Bagnato, A and Pedron, O 2013. Heritabilities and genetic correlations of body condition score and muscularity with productive traits and their trend functions in Italian Simmental cattle. Italian Journal of Animal Science 12, e40.Google Scholar
Fuerst-Waltl, B, Fuerst, C, Obritzhauser, W and Egger-Danner, C 2016. Sustainable breeding objectives and possible selection response: finding the balance between economics and breeders’ preferences. Journal of Dairy Science 99, 9796–9809.Google Scholar
Gandini, GC and Villa, E 2003. Analysis of the cultural value of local livestock breeds: a methodology. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics 120, 1–11.Google Scholar
Hickey, JM, Keane, MG, Kenny, DA, Cromie, AR and Veerkamp, RF 2007. Genetic parameters for EUROP carcass traits within different groups of cattle in Ireland. Journal of Animal Science 85, 314–321.Google Scholar
Mantovani, R, Cassandro, M, Contiero, B, Albera, A and Bittante, G 2010. Genetic evaluation of type traits in hypertrophic Piemontese cows. Journal of Animal Science 88, 3504–3512.Google Scholar
Mantovani, R, Contiero, B, Gallo, L, Carnier, P, Cassandro, M and Bittante, G 1999. The effect of herd of origin on selection of Chianina, Marchigiana and Romagnola performance tested young bulls. Zootecnica e Nutrizione Animale 25, 109–121.Google Scholar
Mantovani, R, Gallo, L, Carnier, P, Cassandro, M and Bittante, G 1997. The use of a juvenile selection scheme for genetic improvement of small population: the example of Rendena breed. In 48th Annual Meeting of the European Association of Animal Production, 25–28 August 1997, Vienna, Austria, pp. 5..Google Scholar
Mazza, S, Guzzo, N, Sartori, C, Berry, DP and Mantovani, R 2014. Genetic parameters for linear type traits in the Rendena dual purpose breed. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics 13, 27–35.Google Scholar
Mazza, S, Guzzo, N, Sartori, C and Mantovani, R 2016. Factor analysis for genetic evaluation of linear type traits in dual-purpose autochthonous breeds. Animal 10, 372–380.Google Scholar
Mazza, S, Sartori, C and Mantovani, R 2015. Genetic parameters of type traits in two strains of dual purpose autochthonous Valdostana cattle. Livestock Science 178, 35–42.Google Scholar
Misztal, I 2008. Reliable computing in estimation of variance components. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics 125, 363–370.Google Scholar
Přibyl, J, Krejčová, H, Přibylová, J, Misztal, I, Bohmanová, J and Štípková, M 2007. Trajectory of body weight of performance tested dual-purpose bulls. Czech Journal Animal Science 52, 315–324.Google Scholar
Rios Utrera, A and Van Vleck, LD 2004. Heritability estimates for carcass traits of cattle: a review. Genetics & Molecular Research 3, 380–394.Google Scholar
Sartori, C, Guzzo, N, Mazza, S and Mantovani, R 2018. Genetic correlations among milk yield, morphology, performance test traits and somatic cells in dual-purpose Rendena breed. Animal 12, 906–914.Google Scholar
Sbarra, F, Dal Zotto, R and Mantovani, R 2009aA survey on cattle performance testing centres in Italy. Italian Journal of Animal Science 8 (suppl. 2), 153–155.Google Scholar
Sbarra, F, Mantovani, R and Bittante, G 2009bHeritability of performance test traits in Chianina, Marchigiana and Romagnola breeds. Italian Journal of Animal Science 8 (suppl. 3), 107–109.Google Scholar
Sbarra, F, Mantovani, R, Quaglia, A and Bittante, G 2013. Genetics of slaughter precocity, carcass weight, and carcass weight gain in Chianina, Marchigiana, and Romagnola young bulls under protected geographical indication. Journal of Animal Science 91, 2596–2604.Google Scholar
Sölkner, J, Miesenberger, J, Willam, A, Fürst, C and Baumung, R 2000. Total merit indices in dual purpose cattle. Archiv fur Tierzucht 43, 597–608.Google Scholar