Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-8bbf57454-kwtxg Total loading time: 0.178 Render date: 2022-01-25T03:17:52.636Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

Article contents

Follicular development of sows at weaning in relation to estimated breeding value for within-litter variation in piglet birth weight

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 July 2018

N. G. J. Costermans*
Affiliation:
Human and Animal Physiology, Wageningen University and Research, De Elst 1, 6708WD Wageningen, The Netherlands Adaptation Physiology Group, Wageningen University and Research, De Elst 1, 6708WD Wageningen, The Netherlands
K. J. Teerds
Affiliation:
Human and Animal Physiology, Wageningen University and Research, De Elst 1, 6708WD Wageningen, The Netherlands
J. Keijer
Affiliation:
Human and Animal Physiology, Wageningen University and Research, De Elst 1, 6708WD Wageningen, The Netherlands
E. F. Knol
Affiliation:
Topigs Norsvin Research Center B. V., Schoenaker 6, 6641 SZ Beuningen, The Netherlands
R. E. Koopmanschap
Affiliation:
Adaptation Physiology Group, Wageningen University and Research, De Elst 1, 6708WD Wageningen, The Netherlands
B. Kemp
Affiliation:
Adaptation Physiology Group, Wageningen University and Research, De Elst 1, 6708WD Wageningen, The Netherlands
N. M. Soede
Affiliation:
Adaptation Physiology Group, Wageningen University and Research, De Elst 1, 6708WD Wageningen, The Netherlands
Get access

Abstract

In this study we aimed to identify possible causes of within-litter variation in piglet birth weight (birth weight variation) by studying follicular development of sows at weaning in relation to their estimated breeding value (EBV) for birth weight variation. In total, 29 multiparous sows (parity 3 to 5) were selected on their EBV for birth weight variation (SD in grams; High-EBV: 15.8±1.6, N=14 and Low-EBV: −24.7±1.5, N=15). The two groups of sows had similar litter sizes (15.7 v. 16.9). Within 24 h after parturition, piglets were cross-fostered to ensure 13 suckling piglets per sow. Sows weaned 12.8±1.0 and 12.7±1.0 piglets, respectively, at days 26.1±0.2 of lactation. Blood and ovaries were collected within 2 h after weaning. The right ovary was immediately frozen to assess average follicle size and percentage healthy follicles of the 15 largest follicles. The left ovary was used to assess the percentage morphologically healthy cumulus-oocyte complexes (COCs) of the 15 largest follicles. To assess the metabolic state of the sows, body condition and the circulating metabolic markers insulin, IGF1, non-esterified fatty acid, creatinine, leptin, urea and fibroblast growth factor 21 were analysed at weaning. No significant differences were found in any of the measured follicular or metabolic parameters between High-EBV and Low-EBV. A higher weight loss during lactation was related to a lower percentage healthy COCs (β= −0.65, P=0.02). Serum creatinine, a marker for protein breakdown, was negatively related to average follicle size (β= −0.60, P=0.05). Backfat loss during lactation was related to a higher backfat thickness at parturition and to a higher average follicle size (β=0.36, P<0.001) at weaning. In conclusion, we hypothesise that modern hybrid sows with more backfat at the start of lactation are able to mobilise more energy from backfat during lactation and could thereby spare protein reserves to support follicular development.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© The Animal Consortium 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alvarez, GM, Dalvit, GC, Achi, MV, Miguez, MS and Cetica, PD 2009. Immature oocyte quality and maturational competence of porcine cumulus-oocyte complexes subpopulations. Biocell 33, 167177.Google ScholarPubMed
Baidoo, SK, Aherne, FX, Kirkwood, RN and Foxcroft, GR 1992. Effect of feed intake during lactation and after weaning on sow reproductive performance. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 72, 911917.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergsma, R, Kanis, E, Verstegen, MWA, van der Peet–Schwering, CMC and Knol, EF 2009. Lactation efficiency as a result of body composition dynamics and feed intake in sows. Livestock Science 125, 208222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bidanel, JP 2011. Biology and genetics of reproduction. In The genetics of the pig 2nd edition (ed. M Rothschild and A Ruvinsky), pp. 218241. CAB International, Wallingford, Oxfordshire, UK.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clowes, EJ, Aherne, FX, Foxcroft, GR and Baracos, VE 2003a. Selective protein loss in lactating sows is associated with reduced litter growth and ovarian function. Journal of Animal Science 81, 753764.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clowes, EJ, Aherne, FX, Schaefer, AL, Foxcroft, GR and Baracos, VE 2003b. Parturition body size and body protein loss during lactation influence performance during lactation and ovarian function at weaning in first-parity sows. Journal of Animal Science 81, 15171528.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
da Silva, CLA, Laurenssen, BFA, Knol, EF, Kemp, B and Soede, NM 2016. Relationship between ovulation rate and litter characteristics at birth. Animal 10, 11921199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Rensis, F, Gherpelli, M, Superchi, P and Kirkwood, RN 2005. Relationships between backfat depth and plasma leptin during lactation and sow reproductive performance after weaning. Animal Reproduction Science 90, 95100.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ferguson, EM, Slevin, J, Edwards, SA, Hunter, MG and Ashworth, CJ 2006. Effect of alterations in the quantity and composition of the pre-mating diet on embryo survival and foetal growth in the pig. Animal Reproduction Science 96, 89103.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fisher, FM and Maratos-Flier, E 2016. Understanding the physiology of FGF21. Annual Review of Physiology 78, 223241.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fix, JS, Cassady, JP, Holl, JW, Herring, WO, Culbertson, MS and See, MT 2010. Effect of piglet birth weight on survival and quality of commercial market swine. Livestock Science 132, 98106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foxcroft, GR, Shaw, HJ, Hunter, MG, Booth, PJ and Lancaster, R 1987. Relationships between luteinizing hormone, follicle-stimulating hormone and prolactin secretion and ovarian follicular development in the weaned sow. Biology of Reproduction 36, 175191.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guthrie, H 2005. The follicular phase in pigs: follicle populations, circulating hormones, follicle factors and oocytes. Journal of Animal Science 83, 7989.Google Scholar
Lafontan, M and Langin, D 2009. Lipolysis and lipid mobilization in human adipose tissue. Progress in Lipid Research 48, 275297.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Milligan, BN, Fraser, D and Kramer, DL 2002. Within-litter birth weight variation in the domestic pig and its relation to pre-weaning survival, weight gain, and variation in weaning weights. Livestock Production Science 76, 181191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patterson, JL, Smit, MN, Novak, S, Wellen, AP and Foxcroft, GR 2011. Restricted feed intake in lactating primiparous sows. I. Effects on sow metabolic state and subsequent reproductive performance. Reproduction, Fertility and Development 23, 889898.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pope, W, Wilde, M and Xie, S 1988. Effect of electrocautery of nonovulated day 1 follicles on subsequent morphological variation among day 11 porcine embryos. Biology of Reproduction 39, 882887.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pope, W, Xie, S, Broermann, D and Nephew, K 1989. Causes and consequences of early embryonic diversity in pigs. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility Supplement 40, 251260.Google Scholar
Prunier, A and Quesnel, H 2000. Influence of the nutritional status on ovarian development in female pigs. Animal Reproduction Science 2, 185197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quesnel, H, Brossard, L, Valancogne, A and Quiniou, N 2008. Influence of some sow characteristics on within-litter variation of piglet birth weight. Animal 2, 18421849.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quesnel, H, Pasquier, A, Mounier, AM, Louveau, I and Prunier, A 1998b. Influence of feed restriction in primiparous lactating sows on body condition and metabolic parameters. Reproduction Nutrition Development 38, 261274.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Quesnel, H, Pasquier, A, Mounier, AM and Prunier, A 1998a. Influence of feed restriction during lactation on gonadotropic hormones and ovarian development in primiparous sows. Journal of Animal Science 76, 856863.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shaw, HJ and Foxcroft, GR 1985. Relationships between LH, FSH and prolactin secretion and reproductive activity in the weaned sow. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility 75, 1728.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Slot, KA, Voorendt, M, de Boer-Brouwer, M, van Vugt, HH and Teerds, KJ 2006. Estrous cycle dependent changes in expression and distribution of Fas, Fas ligand, Bcl-2, Bax, and pro-and active caspase-3 in the rat ovary. Journal of Endocrinology 188, 179192.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tuchscherer, M, Puppe, B, Tuchscherer, A and Tiemann, U 2000. Early identification of neonates at risk: traits of newborn piglets with respect to survival. Theriogenology 54, 371388.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van den Brand, H, Dieleman, SJ, Soede, NM and Kemp, B 2000. Dietary energy source at two feeding levels during lactation of primiparous sows: I. Effects on glucose, insulin, and luteinizing hormone and on follicle development, weaning-to-estrus interval, and ovulation rate. Journal of Animal Science 78, 396404.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van den Brand, H, Prunier, A, Soede, NM and Kemp, B 2001. In primiparous sows, plasma insulin-like growth factor-I can be affected by lactational feed intake and dietary energy source and is associated with luteinizing hormone. Reproduction Nutrition Development 41, 2739.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van den Brand, H, Soede, NM and Kemp, B 2006. Supplementation of dextrose to the diet during the weaning to estrus interval affects subsequent variation in within-litter piglet birth weight. Animal Reproduction Science 91, 353358.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van der Lende, T, Hazeleger, W and De Jager, D 1990. Weight distribution within litters at the early foetal stage and at birth in relation to embryonic mortality in the pig. Livestock Production Science 26, 5365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wientjes, JGM, Soede, NM, Knol, E, Van den Brand, H and Kemp, B 2013. Piglet birth weight and litter uniformity: effects of weaning-to-pregnancy interval and body condition changes in sows of different parities and crossbred lines. Journal of Animal Science 91, 20992107.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wientjes, JGM, Soede, NM, Van der Peet-Schwering, CMC, Van Den Brand, H and Kemp, B 2012. Piglet uniformity and mortality in large organic litters: effects of parity and pre-mating diet composition. Livestock Science 144, 218229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xie, S, Broermann, D, Nephew, K, Bishop, M and Pope, W 1990. Relationship between oocyte maturation and fertilization on zygotic diversity in swine. Journal of Animal Science 68, 20272033.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yang, H, Foxcroft, G, Pettigrew, JE, Johnston, LJ, Shurson, GC, Costa, AN and Zak, LJ 2000. Impact of dietary lysine intake during lactation on follicular development and oocyte maturation after weaning in primiparous sows. Journal of Animal Science 78, 9931000.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yang, Y, Heo, S, Jin, Z, Yun, J, Choi, J, Yoon, S, Park, M, Yang, B and Chae, B 2009. Effects of lysine intake during late gestation and lactation on blood metabolites, hormones, milk composition and reproductive performance in primiparous and multiparous sows. Animal Reproduction Science 112, 199214.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zak, LJ, Xu, X, Hardin, RT and Foxcroft, GR 1997. Impact of different patterns of feed intake during lactation in the primiparous sow on follicular development and oocyte maturation. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility 110, 99106.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Supplementary material: File

Costermans et al. supplementary material

Tables S1-S3 and Figures S1-S2

Download Costermans et al. supplementary material(File)
File 2 MB

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Follicular development of sows at weaning in relation to estimated breeding value for within-litter variation in piglet birth weight
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Follicular development of sows at weaning in relation to estimated breeding value for within-litter variation in piglet birth weight
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Follicular development of sows at weaning in relation to estimated breeding value for within-litter variation in piglet birth weight
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *