¹ The work has been carried out by the Archaeological Unit of Northampton Development Corporation since 1970. The author is grateful to all past and present members of staff, excavators, and specialists for their contribution to the work; also to the Department of the Environment for generous financial assistance; and to J. Campbell and M. Biddle for discussion of various topics. Recent summaries of present views are contained in Williams, J. and Bamford, H., Northampton – the First 6000 Years (Northampton, 1979)Google Scholar, and Williams, J. H., Saxon and Medieval Northampton (Northampton, 1982)Google Scholar. The final excavation reports for the following sites have been referred to as relevant in footnotes: St Peter's Street (see below, n. 6), Marefair (see below, n. 6), Chalk Lane (see below, n. 6) and the Horsemarket kiln (see below, n. 71). The ‘palace’ structures (excavated by the author and M. Shaw) will be published as a Northampton Development Corporation monograph; Black Lion Hill (excavated by M. Shaw) and Gregory Street (excavated by the author, F. Williams and T. Yates) will probably be published in forthcoming volumes of Northamptonshire Archaeology, where reports on much of the Unit's other work are to be found. In addition to the other general articles cited in the footnotes, Northampton's rôle in relation to town development is also discussed in Williams, J. H., ‘A Review of some Aspects of Late Saxon Urban Origins and Development’, Late Saxon Settlement, ed. Faull, M. and Rowley, T. (Oxford, forthcoming).Google Scholar

² Hawkes, S. C. and Dunning, G. C., ‘Soldiers and Settlers in Britain, Fourth to Fifth Century’, MA 5 (1961), 1–70, at 50 and 52.Google Scholar

³ George, T. J., ‘Excursion of the Archaeological Section to the Anglo-Saxon Cemetery at Duston’, Jnl of the Northamptonshire Nat. Hist. Soc. and Field Club 12 (1903–1904), 280–1Google Scholar, and ‘The Invasions of the Saxons and Angles and the Part Northamptonshire Played in Them’, Jnl of the Northamptonshire Nat. Hist. Soc. and Field Club 20 (1919), 35–44.Google Scholar

⁴ Meaney, A., A Gazetteer of Early Anglo-Saxon Burial Sites (London, 1964), p. 193Google Scholar, and Kennett, D. H., ‘Anglo-Saxon Finds from St Andrew's Hospital, Northampton’, Jnl of the Northampton Museums and Art Gallery 10 (1974), 13–17.Google Scholar

⁵ Royal Commission on Historical Monuments, An Inventory of the Historical Monuments in the County of Northampton, V: Archaeological Sites and Churches in Northampton (forthcoming).

⁶ Williams, J. H., St Peter's Street, Northampton, Excavations 1973–76 (Northampton, 1979), pp. 139–40, 153–6 and 225–6Google Scholar; Williams, F., ‘Excavations on Marefair, Northampton, 1979’, Northamptonshire Archaeol. 14 (1979), 38–79Google Scholar and fiche, at 43–6, 61, 63 and fiche; Williams, J. H. and Shaw, M., ‘Excavations in Chalk Lane, Northampton, 1975–1978’, Northamptonshire Archaeol. 16 (1981), 87–135Google Scholar and fiche, at 94–6, 108–10 and fiche; and Gryspeerdt, M., ‘Early-Middle Saxon Pottery in Northampton: a Review of the Evidence’, Med. Ceramics 5 (1981), 27–34.Google Scholar

⁷ Williams, , St Peter's St, pp. 248–50.Google Scholar

⁸ Williams and Shaw, ‘Chalk Lane’, pp. 95–6 and 122. The following standard conventions are used for the radio-carbon dates. The date following ad is an ‘uncorrected’ radio-carbon date followed by a variance measure of a single standard deviation. A ‘corrected’ date relating to real calendar years is prefixed by ad and calculated from reference to Damon, P. E., Long, A. and Wallick, E. I. ‘Dendrochronological Calibration of the Carbon–14 Time Scale,’ Proceedings of the 8th International Radiocarbon Conference, Lower Hutt, New Zealand (1972), pp. 45–59Google Scholar. As yet unpublished dates are given their Harwell (HAR) reference number.

⁹ Hope-Taylor, B., Yeavering: an Anglo-British Centre of Early Northumbria (London, 1977), pp. 46–51, 55–8 and 141–6.Google Scholar

¹⁰ St Joseph, J. K. S., ‘Air Reconnaissance: Recent Results, 39’, Antiquity 49 (1975), 293–5.Google Scholar

¹¹ Hampton, J. N., ‘The Evidence of Air Photography: Elementary Comparative Studies Applied to Sites at Mount Down, Hants., and near Malmesbury, Wilts.’, AntJ 61 (1981), 316–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

¹² Williams, , St Peter's St, pp. 25–8.Google Scholar

¹³ Ibid. pp. 110–14.

¹⁴ Ibid. pp. 118–33.

¹⁵ Williams, ‘Marefair’, pp. 43–7.

¹⁶ Williams, , St Peter's St, pp. 139–40 and 247.Google Scholar

¹⁷ Type: diademed bust/‘standard’, BMC 3A (var), Rigold secondary series G, early-eighth-century. Identification by Miss M. Archibald.

¹⁸ HAR 4390; Har 4810; HAR 4809.

¹⁹ Serjeantson, R. M., A History of the Church of St Peter, Northampton (Northampton, 1904)Google Scholar, passim. See also Williams, J. H., ‘Northampton's Medieval Parishes’, Northamptonshire Archaeology 17 (1982), 74–84.Google Scholar

²⁰ Cam, H. M., Liberties and Communities in Medieval England, rev. ed. (London, 1963), pp. 67 and 69.Google Scholar

²¹ Gover, J. E. B., Mawer, A. and Stenton, F. M., The Place-Names of Northamptonshire, EPNS 10 (Cambridge, 1933), xvii–xviii.Google Scholar

²² See Appendix, below, pp. 135–6.

²³ Brooks, N., ‘The Development of Military Obligations in Eighth- and Ninth-Century England’, England Before the Conquest, ed. Clemoes, P. and Hughes, K. (Cambridge, 1971), pp. 69–84.Google Scholar

²⁴ Jones, G. R. J., ‘Continuity Despite Calamity: the Heritage of Celtic Territorial Organisation in England’, Jnl of Celtic Stud. 3 (1981), 1–30, at 5–7.Google Scholar See also Jones, G. R. J., ‘Multiple Estates and Early Settlement’, English Medieval Settlement, ed. Sawyer, P. H. (London, 1979), pp. 9–34, at 12.Google Scholar

²⁵ Mann, A., ‘L'Architecture carolingienne, Pfalzen’, Charlemagne, oeuvre, rayonnement et survivances, Conseil de l'Europe (Aachen, 1965), pp. 385–90Google Scholar, and Hugot, L., ‘Die Königshalle Karls des Grossen in Aachen’, Aachener Kunstblätter 30 (1965), 38–48.Google Scholar

²⁶ Rauch, C., Die Ausgrabungen in der Königspfalz Ingelheim 1909–1914 (Mainz, 1976)Google Scholar.

²⁷ Vogt, E., Der Lindenhof in Zurich (Zurich, 1948), pp. 100–1Google Scholar, and Weise, G., Zwei fränkische Konigspfalzen (Tübingen, 1923), pp. 60–82.Google Scholar

²⁸ Vogt, , Lindenhof, pp. 100–1Google Scholar, and Weise, , Zwei fränkische Königspfalzen, pp. 5–59 and plan 1.Google Scholar

²⁹ Vogt, , Lindenhof, pp. 66–104.Google Scholar

³⁰ Stamm, O., ‘Zur karolingischen Königspfalz in Frankfurt am Main’, Germania 33 (1955), 391–401Google Scholar, and Hundt, H. J. and Fischer, U., ‘Die Grabungen in der Altstadt von Frankfurt am Main 1953–1957,’ Neue Ausgrabungen in Deutschland (Berlin, 1958), pp. 391–408, at 402–8.Google Scholar

³¹ Winkelmann, W., ‘Est locus insignis quo Pat$$$a et Lippa fluentant’, Château Gaillard 5 (1972), 203–216.Google Scholar

³² Grimm, P., ‘The Royal Palace at Tilleda, Kr. Sangerhausen, D.D.R.: Excavations from 1935–1966’, MA 12 (1968), 83–100, at 90–2.Google Scholar

³³ Poulík, J., ‘Mikulčice: Capital of the Lords of Greater Moravia’, Recent Excavations in Europe, ed. Bruce-Mitford, R. (London, 1975), pp. 1–31, at 21.Google Scholar

³⁴ Haupt, A., ‘Die spanisch–westgotische Halle zu Naranco und die nordischen Königshallen’, Monatshefte für die Kunstwissenschaft 9 (1916), 242–63Google Scholar; Bevan, B., History of Spanish Architecture (London, 1938), pp. 19–20Google Scholar; and Mann, A., ‘L'Architecture carolingienne’, p. 390.Google Scholar

³⁵ Cf., e.g., Thordeman, B., ‘Die karolingische Palastanlage zu Aachen’, Acta Archaeologica (Copenhagen) 35 (1964), 171–87, at 186.Google Scholar

³⁶ Rahtz, P., The Saxon and Medieval Palaces at Cheddar, BAR Brit. ser. 65 (Oxford, 1979), 374–5 and 384–6.Google Scholar

³⁷ Printed (from Dublin, Trinity College B. 2. 7 (172), pp. 226–30) by Horstmann, C., Nova Legenda Anglie (Oxford, 1901), pp. 727–31Google Scholar. See also Serjeantson, R. M., ‘A Medieval Legend of St Peter's, Northampton’, Associated Architectural Societies Reports and Papers 19 (1907), 113–20.Google Scholar

³⁸ The Chronicle of Hugh Candidus, ed. Mellows, W. T. (London, 1949), p. 60Google Scholar. The various lists of saints’ resting-places are fully discussed in Rollason, D. W., ‘Lists of Saints’ Resting-Places in Anglo-Saxon England,’ ASE 7 (1978), 61–93Google Scholar; for the list contained in Hugh Candidus, see esp. pp. 69–72. Another cult associated with Edmund's family and even further from East Anglia was based on the alleged presence of the body of Edmund's brother at Cerne in Dorset (Mellows, , Hugh Candidus, p. 61Google Scholar).

³⁹ Serjeantson, R. M. and Longden, H. I., ‘The Parish Churches and Religious Houses of Northamptonshire: their Dedications, Altars, Images and Lights’, ArchJ 70 (1913), 217–452, at 381.Google Scholar A St Eregaiar's Chapel within St Peter's in 1535 (ibid.) presumably refers to the same saint. Hervey, F. (Corolla Sancti Eadmundi (London, 1907), p. xli)Google Scholar relates that in a fifteenth-century Northampton will there is an allusion to the altar of St Ereginar, but whether this is the above or an additional reference is unknown.

⁴⁰ Williams, , St. Peter's St, p. 244Google Scholar; Williams, , ‘Marefair’, p. 69Google Scholar; Williams, and Shaw, , ‘Chalk Lane’, pp. 102, 118 and ficheGoogle Scholar; and Rigold, S. E., ‘Finds of St Edmund Memorial and Other Anglo-Saxon Coins from Excavations at Thetford’, BNJ 29 (1959), 189–90.Google Scholar

⁴¹ See below.

⁴² Stenton, F. M., Anglo-Saxon England, 3rd ed. (Oxford, 1971), pp. 42–3Google Scholar. See also Hart, C., ‘The Kingdom of Mercia’, Mercian Studies, ed. Dornier, A. (Leicester, 1977), pp. 43–61.Google Scholar

⁴³ Stenton, , Anglo-Saxon England, pp. 231–2.Google Scholar

⁴⁴ Darby, H. C., ‘The Fenland Frontier in Anglo-Saxon England’, Antiquity 7 (1934), 185–201, at 190–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar, and Two of the Saxon Chronicles Parallel, ed. Plummer, Charles (Oxford, 1892–1899) 11, 122.Google Scholar

⁴⁵ Smith, D. M., Guide to Bishop's Registers of England and Wales (London, 1981), p. 150.Google Scholar

⁴⁶ Thacker, A. T., ‘Chester and Gloucester: Early Ecclesiastical Organisation in Two Mercian Burhs’, NH 18 (1982), 199–211, at 207–11.Google Scholar

⁴⁷ Brühl, C. R., ‘The Town as a Political Centre: General Survey’, European Towns, ed. Barley, M. W. (London, 1977), pp. 419–30, at 425–6Google Scholar, and Brühl, C. R., Palatium und Civitas I: Gallien (Cologne, 1975).Google Scholar

⁴⁸ Campbell, J., ‘The Church in Anglo-Saxon Towns’, The Church in Town and Countryside, ed. Baker, D., Stud. in Church Hist. 16 (Oxford, 1979), 119–35, at 121Google Scholar, and Lobel, M. D., ‘Some Reflections on the Topographical Development of the Pre-Industrial Town in England’, Tribute to an Antiquary, ed. Emmison, F. and Stephens, R. (London, 1976), pp. 141–63, at 143.Google Scholar

⁴⁹ Biddle, M., ‘Towns’, The Archaeology of Anglo-Saxon England, ed. Wilson, D. M. (London, 1976), pp. 99–150, at 116.Google Scholar

⁵⁰ Addyman, P. V., ‘York and Canterbury as Ecclesiastical Centres’, European Towns, ed. Barley, , pp. 499–509, at 500.Google Scholar

⁵¹ Bede, , Historia Ecclesiastica 11.16.Google Scholar

⁵² Biddle, ‘Towns’, p. 110.

⁵³ Biddle, M., ‘Winchester: the Development of an Early Capital’, Vor- und Frühformen der europäischen Stadt im Mittelalter, ed. Jankuhn, H., Schlesinger, W. and Steuer, H. (Göttingen, 1972), pp. 229–61, at 237–41.Google Scholar

⁵⁴ Biddle, , ‘Towns’, pp. 120–2Google Scholar, and Lobel, M. D., ‘Hereford’, Historic Towns I, ed. Lobel, M. D. (London and Oxford, 1969), pp. 1–2.Google Scholar

⁵⁵ C. A. R. Radford, ‘The Historical Context of the Burials’, Barker, P. A., Cubberley, A. L. et al. , ‘Two Burials under the Refectory of Worcester Cathedral’, MA 18 (1974), 146–51, at 149–51.Google Scholar

⁵⁶ Lobel, M. D., ‘Gloucester’, Historic Towns I, p. 2Google Scholar, and Heighway, C. M., ‘Excavations at Gloucester. Fifth Interim Report: St Oswald's Priory 1977–8’, AntJ 60 (1980), 207–26, at 217–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

⁵⁷ Thacker, , ‘Chester and Gloucester’, pp. 199–206.Google Scholar

⁵⁸ Biddle, M. and Hudson, D. with Heighway, C., The Future of London's Past (Worcester, 1973), p. 20Google Scholar, and Dyson, T. and Schofield, J., ‘Excavations in the City of London. Second Interim Report: 1974–1978’, Trans. of the London and Middlesex Archaeol. Soc. 32 (1981), 24–85, at 61–3.Google Scholar

⁵⁹ Biddle, , ‘Towns’, p. 106.Google Scholar

⁶⁰ Colyer, C. and Gilmour, B., ‘St Paul-in-the-Bail Lincoln’, CA 63 (1978), 102–5Google Scholar, and Rodwell, W., The Archaeology of the English Church (London, 1981), p. 144.Google Scholar

⁶¹ ‘York Minster’, CA 17 (1969), 162–6.Google Scholar

⁶² Kenyon, K., Excavations at the Jewry Wall Site, Leicester (London, 1948), pp. 37–8 and pl. XXVIIGoogle Scholar, and Liddle, P., Leicestershire Archaeology – The Present State of Knowledge, II: Anglo-Saxon and Medieval Periods (Leicester, 1982), pp. 4 and 9.Google Scholar No evidence for the continued use of the baths after the fourth century was found because of the extensive later disturbance over the whole of the site (Kenyon, , Jewry Wall, pp. 37–8 and plates XXXI–XXXIIIGoogle Scholar).

⁶³ Hall, R. A., ‘The Pre-Conquest Burgh of Derby’, Derbyshire Archaeol. Jnl 94 (1974), 16–23.Google Scholar

⁶⁴ Brown, A. E., Key, T. R. and Orr, C., ‘Some Anglo-Saxon Estates and their Boundaries in South-West Northamptonshire’, Northamptonshire Archaeol. 12 (1977), 155–76, at 175–6Google Scholar, and Brown, A. E., Key, T. R., Orr, C. and Woodfield, C. T. P., ‘The Stowe Charter – a Revision and some Implications’, Northamptonshire Archaeol. 16 (1981), 136–47, at 138–9.Google Scholar

⁶⁵ Baker, G., The History and Antiquities of the County of Northampton (London, 1822–1830) 1, 692 and 696Google Scholar, and Domesday Book, ed. Morris, J., 21: Northamptonshire, ed. F., and Thorn, C. (Chichester, 1979), 1.8, 2.6 and 11, 17.3, 18.37, 61, 62 and 63, 22.6 and 23.11.Google Scholar

⁶⁶ Domesday Book: Northamptonshire, 1.15 and 32.

⁶⁷ Rahtz, Cheddar.

⁶⁸ Williams, , St Peter's St, pp. 25, 140 and 247.Google Scholar

⁶⁹ Ibid. pp. 15, 141 and 244.

⁷⁰ The Anglo-Saxon Chronicle: a Revised Translation, ed. Whitelock, D. et al. (London, 1961; corrected imp. 1965), pp. 62 and 66.Google Scholar

⁷¹ A kiln was excavated in Horsemarket in 1971 (Williams, J. H., ‘A Saxo-Norman Kiln Group from Northampton’, Northamptonshire Archaeol. 9 (1974), 46–56).Google Scholar

⁷² Williams, , St Peter's St, pp. 63–7, 92–5 and 140–1, plus one found in 1982.Google Scholar

⁷³ Williams, , Saxon and Medieval Northampton, pp. 22–5.Google Scholar

⁷⁴ Williams, , ‘Marefair’, pp. 46–8.Google Scholar

⁷⁵ Williams and Shaw, ‘Chalk Lane’, passim.

⁷⁶ See above, n. 40.

⁷⁷ Hall, R. A., ‘The Topography of Anglo-Scandinavian York’, Viking Age York and the North (London, 1978), pp. 31–6.Google Scholar

⁷⁸ Perring, D., Early Medieval Occupation at Flaxengate, Lincoln (London, 1981), p. 36.Google Scholar

⁷⁹ Campbell, J., ‘Norwich’, Atlas of Historic Towns, II, ed. Lobel, M. D. (London, 1975), p. 5Google Scholar; Carter, A., ‘The Anglo-Saxon Origins of Norwich: the Problems and Approaches’, ASE 7 (1978), 175–204Google Scholar; and Recent Archaeological Research in English Towns, ed. Schofield, J. and Palliser, D., with C. Harding (London, 1981), p. 77.Google Scholar

⁸⁰ Lee, F., ‘A New Theory on the Origins and Early Growth of Northampton’, ArchJ 100 (1954), 164–74Google Scholar, and Williams, , Saxon and Medieval Northampton, pp. 9 and 27.Google Scholar

⁸¹ Biddle, M. and Hill, D., ‘Late Saxon Planned Towns’, AntJ (1971), 70–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

⁸² Davison, B. K., ‘The Late Saxon Town of Thetford: an Interim Report on the 1964–6 Excavations’, MA 11 (1967), 189–207.Google Scholar

⁸³ The economic factors affecting town growth have recently been extensively surveyed in Hodges, R., Dark Age Economics (London, 1982).Google Scholar

⁸⁴ Postscript (October 1984). Analysis of the radiocarbon dating evidence available at the time of going to press suggests that the timber and stone palaces both fell within the period ad 750–850.

^{page 135 note 1} For the Roman period, see Williams, , St Peter's St, pp. 118–19.Google Scholar

^{page 135 note 2} Gutscher, D. B., ‘Mechanische Mörtelmischer’, Zeitschrift für schweizeriscbe Archäologie und Kunstgeschicbte 38 (1981), 178–88.Google Scholar

^{page 135 note 3} Cramp, R., ‘Excavations at the Saxon Monastic Sites of Wearmouth and Jarrow, Co. Durham: an Interim Report’, MA 13 (1969), 21–66, at 32–6Google Scholar and plate 3. Here a largely destroyed mixer was interpreted as a mausoleum or oratory (building A).

^{page 136 note 4} Gutscher, ‘Mörtelmischer’, p. 187.

^{page 136 note 5} Ibid. pp. 180–2, for Gutscher's revised dating, but see Vogt, Lindenhof, pp. 64–6, for the excavator's view and in particular Taf. 16.4. Here it would appear that the mixer in trench 18 is possibly cut by the construction trench for a pre-Carolingian wall. In any case the proximity of the wall to the mixer and the surviving height of the wall make it almost impossible for the mixer to have functioned after the construction of the wall. The St Vitus Minster example, however, on the evidence of Pingsdorf sherds is unlikely to date from before the tenth century; see Borger, H., Das Münster S. Vitus zu Mönchen-Gladbach, Die Kunstdenkmäler des Rheinlands 6 (Essen, 1958), 51–2 and 211.Google Scholar

^{page 136 note 6} Bede, Historia Abbatum, ch. 5; and Bede, Historia Ecclesiastica v.21.

^{page 136 note 7} Ennen, E., The Medieval Town (Oxford, 1979), p. 27.Google Scholar For general Merovingian influence in Britain, see Fletcher, E., ‘The Influence of Merovingian Gaul on Northumbria in the Seventh Century’, MA 24 (1980), 69–86, esp. 82–4.Google Scholar