Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-xm8r8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-24T07:04:54.705Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Muddied Waters of Columbus, New Mexico

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 December 2015

E. Bruce White
E. Bruce White*
Affiliation:
Sterling College, Sterling, Kansas
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

There is neither lake nor river in Columbus, New Mexico, now nor was there on March 9, 1916, when it was raided by Mexican bandits. The muddied waters are those of history as the events that took place over 59 years ago are almost as cloudy today as the day they occurred. Many questions about the raid remain unanswered: Was Pancho Villa at Columbus? If so, did he enter the town? How many Mexicans took part in the raid? However, the question that has concerned the amateur and professional historian of Mexico, the United States, and Germany is why did the raid take place? What was the greater importance of the raid? Most of these questions cannot be adequately answered without an examination of the political and military career of Francisco Villa, the recent and contemporary American viewpoint of Villa, and some salient events that preceded March 9, 1916.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Americas , Volume 32 , Issue 1 , July 1975 , pp. 72 - 98
Copyright
Copyright © Academy of American Franciscan History 1975

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Clendenen, Clarence C., The United States and Pancho Villa: A Study In Unconventional Diplomacy (Ithaca, N. Y.: Cornell University Press, 1961), pp. 11–32.Google Scholar

2 Brandt, Nancy, “Pancho Villa: The Making Of A Modern Legend,” The Americas, XXI (October, 1964), 146–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

3 Ibid., 148.

4 Ibid., 149.

5 Mason, Gregory, “With Villa In Chihuahua,” Outlook, May 2, 1914, p. 75.Google Scholar

6 Ibid., 78.

7 Ibid.

8 “Our Debt To Villa,” Literary Digest, May 16, 1914, pp. 1166–67. It found the Omaha World Herald (Ind.) as generally favorable to Villa but at the same time taking a wait-and-see attitude because of Villa’s reputation of brutality, cruelty, robbery, and murder. The New York Globe (Rep.) saw Villa as a stout friend of this country and a champion of civilization and order. Other newspapers that were generally favorable to Villa included the New York World (Dem.), New York Press (Prog.), St. Louis Republic (Dem.), Columbus Dispatch (Ind.), Buffalo Enquirer (Dem.), Oklahoma City Oklahoman (Dem.), Winston-Salem Journal (Dem.), Memphis Commercial Appeal (Dem.), Phoenix Arizona Republican (Prog.), Atlanta Journal (Dem.), and the Baltimore Sun (Ind.). Those newspapers generally unfavorable to Villa included the Boston Herald (Ind.), the Philadelphia Inquirer (Rep.), the Philadelphia Press (Rep.) and Telegraph (Rep.), New York American (Ind.), Washington Post (Ind.), Kansas City Journal (Rep.), Macon Telegraph (Dem.), Detroit Free Press, Charleston Post (Dem.), Houston Chronicle (Ind.), and Cleveland Leader (Rep.).

9 Herman Whitaker, “Villa—Bandit-Patriot,” Independent, June 8, 1914, p. 452.

10 Ibid.

11 “Villa’s Style Of War,” Literary Digest, June 27, 1914, p. 1537.

12 Elbert Price, “Villa Enters Mexico City,” Harper’s Weekly, January 16, 1915, p. 57.

13 Thomas A. Bailey, A Diplomatic History of the American People (8th ed., New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1964), pp. 555–58.

14 Quirk, Robert E., The Mexican Revolution 1914–1915. The Convention of Aguascalientes, The Norton Library (New York: W. W. Norton and Company, Inc., 1960), p. 101.Google Scholar

15 Ibid., pp. 200–225.

16 Clendenen, U. S. and Villa, pp. 210–11.

17 U. S., Foreign Relations 1915 (Washington: Government Printing Office, 1924), pp. 780–81.

18 Clendenen, U. S. and Villa, pp. 210–11.

19 Ibid., p. 214.

20 U. S., Foreign Relations 1915 (Washington: Government Printing Office, 1924), pp. 777–79.

21 U. S., Foreign Relations 1916 (Washington: Government Printing Office, 1925), p. 652.

22 Ibid., p. 653.

23 Ibid., p. 465.

* Appendix I, map, Herbert Molloy Mason, Jr., The Great Pursuit, (New York: Random House, 1970), pp. 10–11.

* Appendix II, map, Clarence C. Clendenen, Blood on the Border: The United States Army And The Mexican Irregulars (New York: The Macmillan Company, 1969), p. 197.

24 U. S., National Archives Microfilm Publication, Records of the Department of State relating to internal affairs of Mexico, 1910–1929, micro-copy M274, Roll No. 52, document 812:00/17592.

25 Herrera, Celia, Francisco Villa Ante La Historia (segunda edicion; Mexico, D. F., 1964), p. 177.Google Scholar

26 Link, Arthur S., Wilson: confusions and crises, 1915-1916 (Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1964), p. 205.Google Scholar

27 Rocky Mountain News (Denver), March 10, 1916, p. 1; Colorado Springs Gazette, March 10, 1916, p. 1; Boulder Daily Camera, March 9, 1916, p. 1; Denver Times, March 9, 1916, p. 1; San Francisco Chronicle, March 10, 1916, p. 1; and Santa Fe New Mexican, March 9, 1916, p. 1.

28 “Villa’s Invasion,” Literary Digest, March 18, 1916, p. 700; and “Our Punitive Expedition Into Mexico And Its Possible Consequences,” Current Opinion, April, 1916, p. 229.

29 Mahoney, Tom, “The Columbus Raid,” Southwest Review, XVII (Spring, 1932), 165 Google Scholar; Munch, Francis J., “Villa’s Columbus Raid: Practical Politics Or German Design?,” New Mexico Historical Review, XLIV No. 3 (July, 1969), 198 Google Scholar; Mahoney, Tom, “When Villa raided New Mexico,” American Legion Magazine, September, 1964, p. 10 Google Scholar; Braddy, Haldeen, Pancho Villa At Columbus The Raid of 1916 Restudied (El Paso: Texas Western College Press, 1965), p. 15 Google Scholar; Douglas Lansford, William, Pancho Villa (Los Angeles: Sherbourne Press, Inc., 1965), p. 247 Google Scholar; Edward Haley, P., Revolution and Intervention: The Diplomacy of Taft and Wilson with Mexico, 1910–1917 (Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press, 1970), p. 188 Google Scholar; Fabela, Isidro, ed., Documentos Históricos de la Revolución XIII (Mexico, 1968), p. 93 Google Scholar; and Atkin, Ronald, Revolution! Mexico 1910–20 (New York: John Day Company, Inc., 1969), p. 274.Google Scholar

30 James A. Sandos, “German Involvement in Northern Mexico, 1915–1916: A New Look at the Columbus Raid,” Hispanic American Historical Review, L (February, 1970), 77.

31 Foreign Relations 1916, pp. 478–482.

32 Ibid., pp. 481–83.

33 National Archives Microfilm, document 812:00/17592.

34 King, Frank M., Pioneer Western Empire Builders (Pasadena, California: Trail’s End Publishing Co., 1946), p. 204.Google Scholar

35 Lansford, Pancho Villa, p. 247.

36 Braddy, Villa at Columbus, p. 30 and Clendenen, U. S. and Villa, pp. 243–44.

37 Sandos, “German Involvement,” 80.

38 U. S., Senate Documents, Investigation of Mexican Affairs, Vol. I, 66th Congress, 2nd Session, 1919–1920, p. 1621.

39 Denver Times, March 9, 1916, p. 2 and Rocky Mountain News, March 10, 1916, p. 2.

40 Senate Documents, Mexican Affairs, pp. 1622–23.

41 Ibid., p. 1602.

42 Rocky Mountain News, March 14, 1916, p. 3.

43 Hopper, James, “What happened in Columbus,” Colliers Magazine, April 15, 1916, pp. 36–7.Google Scholar

44 Mahoney, “Columbus Raid,”, p. 164 and “When Villa Raided,”, pp. 10–1.

45 Clendenen, U. S. and Villa, pp. 208–09.

46 James Hopper, “Pancho Villa,” Colliers Magazine, April 29, 1916, p. 46.

47 “Villa’s Invasion,” Literary Digest, March 18, 1916, p. 700.

* Appendix III, U. S., National Archives Microfilm Publication, Records of the Department of State relating to internal affairs of Mexico, 1910–1929, micro-copy M274, Roll No. 52, document 812:00/17697.

48 Rocky Mountain News, March 15, 1916, p. 2. and Denver Post, March 15, 1916, p. 3.

49 Colorado Springs Gazette, March 10, 1916, p. 4; Denver Post, March 9, 1916, p. 1; Rocky Mountain News, March 11, 1916, p. 3; and Santa Fe New Mexican, March 10, 1916, p. 1.

50 Senate Documents, Mexican Affairs, p. 1781.

51 Denver Post, March 11, 1916, p. 1; Santa Fe New Mexican, San Francisco Chronicle, March 11, 1916, p. 2; and Times (New York), March 11, 1916, p. 3.

52 Times, March 11, 1916, p. 3.

53 Senate Documents, Mexican Affairs, p. 810.

54 Foreign Relations 1915, p. 775.

55 William Carey Brown Papers, Western History Collection, University of Colorado, letter, file No. 7–10, April 18, 1927.

56 Herbert Molloy Mason, Jr., The Great Pursuit, p. 259; Tompkins, Frank, Chasing Villa; The Story Behind the Story of Pershing’s Expedition Into Mexico (Harrisburg, Pennsylvania: Military Service Publishing Company, 1934), p. 36 Google Scholar; Link, Arthur S., Wilson: confusions and crises, 1915–1916, p. 206 Google Scholar; William Douglas Lansford, Pancho Villa, p. 247; P. Edward Haley, Revolution and Intervention: The Diplomacy of Taft and Wilson with Mexico, 1910–1917, p. 189; Clarence C. Clendenen, Blood on the Border: The United States Army And The Mexican Irregulars, p. 204; Celia Herrera, Francisco Villa Ante La Historia, p. 178; Nellie Campobello, Apuntes Sobre la Vida Militar de Francisco Villa, p. 124; Isidro Fabela, ed., Documentos Históricos de la Revolución Mexicana XIII, p. 93; and Edwin Lieuwen, Mexican Militarism The Political Rise And Fall Of The Revolutionary Army, 1910–1940, p. 34.

57 Herbert Molloy Mason, Jr., The Great Pursuit, p. 259 and Arthur S. Link, Wilson: confusions and crises, 1915–1916, p. 206.

58 Mason, The Great Pursuit, p. 259.

59 Link, Wilson 1915–1916, pp. 220–21.

60 “Villa’s ‘American Allies’,” Literary Digest, April 8,1916, pp. 951–54.

61 U. S., Congress, House, Representative London speaking against a military appropriations bill, 64th Cong., 1st sess., March 28,1916, Congressional Record, LIII, 5021.

62 Braddy, Villa at Columbus, p. 34.

63 Munch, “Villa’s Raid: German Design?,” 199.

64 Atkin, Revolution!, p. 279.

65 Katz, Friedrich, “Alemania Y Francisco Villa,” Historia Mexicana, XII (Julio, 1962) 95–101.Google Scholar

66 Meyer, Michael C., “The Mexican-German Conspiracy of 1915,” The Americas, XXIII (July, 1966) 88.Google Scholar

67 Ibid.

68 Sandos, “German Involvement,” p. 71.

69 Ibid., p.72.

70 Ibid., p. 71–73.

71 Ibid., p. 88.

72 National Archives Microfilm, M274 Roll 40, document 812:00/13232.

73 National Archives Microfilm, M274 Roll 36, document 812:00/11515.

74 National Archives Microfilm, M274 Roll 51, document 812:00/17467.

75 Goltz, Horst von der, My Adventures As A German Secret Agent (New York: Robert M. McBride and Company, 1917), pp. 125–26.Google Scholar

76 Bill McGaw, “Was Pancho Villa Paid $80,000 For Making a Raid on Columbus?,” Southvxsterner, May, 1964, pp. 1–5.

77 Alberto Calzadiaz Barrera, Villa Contra Todo Y Contra Todos (Editores Mexicanos Unidos, 1965), pp. 14–22.

78 Braddy, Villa at Columbus, p. 24.

79 Clendenen, U. S. and Villa, p. 246.

80 Roy E. Stivison with Delia McDonnell, “When Villa Raided Columbus,” New Mexico Magazine, December, 1950, p. 41.

81 Senate Documents, Mexican Affairs, pp. 1601–02.

82 Barrera, Villa Contra Todo, p. 41.

83 Irving, and Kull, Nell, A Short Chronology of American History 1492–1950 (New Jersey: Rutgers University Press, 1952), p. 118.Google Scholar

84 “Our Unpreparedness Revealed By Villa,” Literary Digest, April 1, 1916, pp. 883–86.

85 “Villa’s Lesson,” World’s Work, May, 1916, p. 18.

86 “Our Unprepared Militia,” Literary Digest, June 3,1916, p. 1617.

87 “Lessons From Villa’s Raid on National Defense,” Current Opinion, April, 1916, p. 231.