Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-c654p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-28T22:49:27.022Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Vote Trading and the Voting Paradox: Rejoinder

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

David H. Koehler
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Vote Trading and the Voting Paradox: A Proof of Logical Equivalence
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 69 , Issue 3 , September 1975 , pp. 967 - 969
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1975

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Ferejohn, John A., Sour Notes on the Theory of Vote Trading, Social Science Working Paper, California Institute of Technology, 41 (06, 1974), 8 Google Scholar.

2 Sen, Amartya K., “A Possibility Theorem on Minority Decisions,” Econometrica, 34 (04, 1966), 492 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

3 Riker, William H. and Ordeshook, Peter C., An Introduction to Positive Political Theory (Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1973), p. 112 Google Scholar.

4 Ferejohn, pp. 10–11.

5 Downs, Anthony, An Economic Theory of Democracy (New York: Harper and Row Publishers, Inc., 1957), pp. 54–60 Google Scholar.

Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.