Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-xfwgj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-23T22:41:02.748Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

State Supervision of Local Fiscal Officers in Virginia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

James E. Pate*
Affiliation:
College of William and Mary

Extract

One of the achievements of the brilliant administration of Harry F. Byrd was the segregation of the sources of revenue. The governor was quite sincere and enthusiastic in his support of this principle, believing, it seemed, that it was the panacea for a great many of our tax troubles. His exuberant enthusiasm caused him to make an error, many believe, when he had written into the rather inflexible constitution of the commonwealth the provision that no state tax shall be levied on real estate and tangible personal property. The state, therefore, no longer has any interest in this kind of property, and its supervision over local fiscal officers extends only so far as they are agents of the state, assessing and collecting the state's revenue.

Each county and city has a local commissioner of the revenue, elected by the people, who assesses for the state intangible personal property, individual incomes, and money and capital, and who assesses for the local government tangible personal property, machinery and tools, and merchants' capital. The state tax commissioner has forms printed and sent to each local commissioner on which all the items mentioned above are supposed to be listed at their fair market value by the taxpayer. Mr. Morrissett, the present state tax commissioner, has inaugurated a plan of holding annual conventions of commissioners of the revenue where the problem of assessment and the complications of the state tax code are discussed.

Type
Rural Local Government
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1931

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 The reorganization act of 1927 set up a department of taxation, with a state tax commissioner appointed by the governor as executive head of the department. The act also established a department of finance with four divisions; namely, accounts and control, treasury, purchasing and printing, and motor vehicles, each division head being responsible to the governor.

2 The general practice of undervaluing property for the purpose of taxation has resulted in inequality of taxation, and also seriously handicaps some communities in carrying out needed improvements, because the state constitution limits the borrowing power of the city and towns to eighteen per cent of the assessed value of taxable real estate.

3 The state finance board, composed of the comptroller, the state treasurer, and the governor, select these depositories. The state's money is distributed among one hundred ninety banks scattered over the commonwealth. Prior to the reorganization act of 1927, there were forty-eight collecting and disbursing agencies with their own accounts.

4 Sec. 366 gives the governor power to suspend the treasurer of any county on city for failure to perform duties required by law with reference to collection of the revenues of the state or of the county or city. The General Assembly, by joint resolution, can restore to office.

Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.