Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-22dnz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T10:43:44.332Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Republican Schoolmaster: The U.S. Supreme Court, Public Opinion, and Abortion

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

Charles H. Franklin  and
Liane C. Kosaki
Charles H. Franklin
Affiliation:
Washington University
Liane C. Kosaki
Affiliation:
Washington University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The United States Supreme Court has a historical role as a “republican schoolmaster,” inculcating virtues in the citizenry. The role as teacher to the republic also serves the interests of the Court. As the “weakest branch,” the Supreme Court needs public support if its decisions are to be effective. We investigate the Court's ability to win popular support for its rulings, specifically in the case of Roe v. Wade. The analysis shows that the Court's decision did affect public attitudes but not as previous work would predict. While support for abortions to protect health increased as a result of the Court's decision, the public became more polarized over “discretionary” abortions. The puzzle is what process can account for these disparate reactions. We develop a theory resting on interpersonal influences to explain these results, arguing that the social interpretation of events drives the differing outcomes. This theory is then tested against a purely psychological alternative. The closing discussion considers how these results can be extended to the general problem of public decisions and popular responses, including presidential actions and the influence of the media.

Type
Articles
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 83 , Issue 3 , September 1989 , pp. 751 - 771
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adamany, David. 1973. “Legitimacy, Realigning Elections, and the Supreme Court.” Wisconsin Law Review 1973:790–846.Google Scholar
Bickel, Alexander M. 1962. The Least Dangerous Branch: The Supreme Court at the Bar of Politics. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar
Birkby, Robert H. 1966. “The Supreme Court and the Bible Belt: Tennessee Reaction to the Schempp Decision.” Midwest Journal of Political Science 10:304–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blake, Judith. 1977. “The Abortion Decisions: Judicial Review and Public Opinion.” In Abortion: New Directions for Policy Studies, ed. Manier, Edward, Liu, William, and Solomon, David. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Caldeira, Gregory C. 1987. “Public Opinion and the U.S. Supreme Court: FDR's Court-packing Plan.” American Political Science Review 81:1139–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Casey, Gregory. 1974. “The Supreme Court and Myth: An Empirical Investigation.” Law and Society Review 8:385–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clogg, Clifford C., and Sawyer, Darwin O.. 1981. “A Comparison of Alternative Models for Analyzing the Scalability of Response Patterns.” In Sociological Methodology 1981, ed. Leinhardt, Samuel. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Combs, Michael W., and Welch, Susan. 1982. “Blacks, Whites, and Attitudes toward Abortion.” Public Opinion Quarterly 46:510–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dahl, Robert. 1957. “Decision Making in a Democracy: The Supreme Court As a National Policy Maker.” Journal of Public Law 6:279–95.Google Scholar
Dolbeare, Kenneth M., and Hammond, Phillip E.. 1970. “Inertia in Midway: Supreme Court Decisions and Local Response.” Journal of Legal Education 23:106–22.Google Scholar
Granberg, Donald, and Granberg, Beth Williams. 1980. “Abortion Attitudes, 1965–1980: Trends and Determinants.” Family Planning Perspectives 12:250–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Iyengar, Shanto, and Kinder, Donald R.. 1987. News That Matters. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Jackson, John E., and Vinovskis, Maris A.. 1983. “Public Opinion, Elections, and the ‘Single Issue’ Issue.” In The Abortion Dispute and the American System, ed. Steiner, Gilbert Y.. Washington: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Johnson, Charles A., and Canon, Bradley C.. 1984. Judicial Policies: Implementation and Impact. Washington: Congressional Quarterly.Google Scholar
Johnson, Richard M. 1967. The Dynamics of Compliance: Supreme Court Decision-Making from a New Perspective. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Johnston, John. 1984. Econometric Methods. 3d ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Kemp, Kathleen A., Carp, Robert A., and Brady, David W.. 1978. The Supreme Court and Social Change: The Case of Abortion.” Western Political Quarterly 31:19–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kessel, John. 1966. “Public Perceptions of the Supreme Court.” Midwest Journal of Political Science 10:167–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lerner, Ralph. 1967. “The Supreme Court as Republican Schoolmaster.” In 1967 Supreme Court Review, ed. Kurland, Philip B.. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Luker, Kristin. 1984. Abortion and the Politics of Motherhood. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
McKelvey, Richard D., and Zavoina, William. 1975. “A Statistical Model for the Analysis of Ordinal Level Dependent Variables.” Journal of Mathematical Sociology 4:103–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacKuen, Michael B. 1983. “Political Drama, Economic Conditions, and the Dynamics of Presidential Popularity.” American Journal of Political Science 27:165–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, Thomas. 1987. “The Supreme Court As an Opinion Leader.” American Politics Quarterly 15:147–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mohr, Lawrence B. 1988. Impact Analysis for Program Evaluation. Chicago: Dorsey.Google Scholar
Mueller, John. 1970. “Presidential Popularity from Truman to Johnson.” American Political Science Review 64:18–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, Walter F., and Tanenhaus, Joseph. 1969. “Public Opinion and the United States Supreme Court: A Preliminary Mapping of Some Prerequisites for Court Legitimation of Regime Changes.” In Frontiers of Judicial Research, ed. Grossman, Joel B. and Tanenhaus, Joseph. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Plutzer, Eric. 1986. Attitudes toward Abortion: A Study of the Social and Ideological Bases of Public Opinion. Ph.D. diss., Washington University.Google Scholar
Rodgers, Harrell, and Bullock, Charles III. 1972. Law and Social Change: Civil Rights Laws and Their Consequences. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Roe v. Wade. 1973. 410 U.S. 113.Google Scholar
Sprague, John. 1982. “Is There a Micro Theory Consistent with Contextual Analysis?” In Strategies of Political Inquiry, ed. Ostrom, Elinor. Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
Tocqueville, Alexis de. 1969. Democracy in America, ed. Mayer, J. P.. New York: Doubleday, Anchor.Google Scholar
Uslaner, Eric M., and Weber, Ronald E.. 1980. “Public Support for Pro-Choice Abortion Policies in the Nation and the States: Changes and Stability after the Roe and Doe Decisions.” In The Law and Politics of Abortion, ed. Schneider, Carl E. and Vinovskis, Maris A.. Lexington, MA: Lexington.Google Scholar