Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nr4z6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-01T16:37:47.804Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Reorganization of State Government in Kansas1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2013

C. A. Dykstra
Affiliation:
University of Kansas

Extract

During March of 1913 Governor George H. Hodges of Kansas was the most talked-of and written-about governor in the United States. His message of March 11 to the Kansas legislature was probably the most quoted message of the year. To students of state government this message presented nothing new. It probably would be just as true to say that much of this message presented little that was new to the great majority of intelligent voters. It certainly suggested nothing unfamiliar to most thinking legislators in Kansas. Nevertheless it was a unique message and it merited all the publicity it received. That this should be true is one of the paradoxes of American politics.

For years editors, students, and legislators themselves have been making the same criticism of our American methods of lawmaking that Governor Hodges makes. And from many quarters had come practically the same proposal for reform that the governor advocates. One of our American States had attempted the year before by direct popular action, to adopt a much more thorough going scheme of state reorganization. But we are a conservative people, and for some reason or another, we are but slightly stirred by criticism or suggestion for change in our governmental machinery unless it comes from an official source. Let congress suddenly discover that there is an insidious lobby at Washington and we all demand immediate house cleaning.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1915

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

2 After the adjournment of the Legislature of 1915 this paper came out in favor of a one-house body.

3 This resolution was introduced but it received scant consideration.

4 Introduced and defeated in the 1915 session.

5 This attack on the primary finally failed.

6 The legislature of 1915 showed itself extremely conservative.