Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-tj2md Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T05:14:24.567Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Reciprocal Effects of Policy Preferences, Party Loyalties and the Vote

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

Benjamin I. Page  and
Calvin C. Jones
Benjamin I. Page
Affiliation:
University of Chicago
Calvin C. Jones
Affiliation:
National Opinion Research Center
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Past studies have offered diverse estimates of the role of policy preferences, party loyalties, candidate personalities and other factors in voting decisions. Most have postulated recursive (that is, one-way) causal relationships among the central variables.

This study specifies a non-recursive simultaneous equation model and estimates its parameters for the 1972 and 1976 elections using CPS data. The estimates differ markedly from those of simple recursive models. Policy preferences appear to have much more influence on voting decisions, and party attachments much less, than was previously thought. Candidate evaluations strongly affect voters' perceptions of closeness to candidates on policy issues. Party identification may be influenced by short-term factors. Differences between 1972 and 1976 reflect the issue-oriented McGovern candidacy.

Simultaneous equation models offer no cure-all; in the absence of accepted theory many specifications are open to controversy. But future research must take account of reciprocal causal paths.

Type
Articles
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 73 , Issue 4 , December 1979 , pp. 1071 - 1089
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1979

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Achen, Christopher H. (1976). “Issue Voting in the 1950's.” Unpublished, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Aldrich, John H. (1975). “Candidate Support Functions in the 1968 Election: An Empirical Application of the Spatial Model.” Public Choice 22: 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aldrich, John H. and McKelvey, Richard D. (1977). “A Method of Scaling with Applications to the 1968 and 1972 Presidential Elections.” American Political Science Review 71: 111–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berelson, Bernard R., Lazarsfeld, Paul F., and McPhee, William N. (1954). Voting. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Boyd, Richard W. (1972). “Popular Control of Public Policy: A Normal Vote Analysis of the 1968 Election.” American Political Science Review 66: 429–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brody, Richard A. (1977). “Stability and Change in Party Identification: Presidential to Off-Years.” Presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association.Google Scholar
Brody, Richard A., and Page, Benjamin I. (1972). “Comment: The Assessment of Policy Voting.” American Political Science Review 66: 450–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brody, Richard A., and Page, Benjamin I. (1973). “Indifference, Alienation, and Rational Decisions: The Effects of Candidate Evaluations on Turnout and the Vote.” Public Choice 15: 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, Angus, Converse, Philip E., Miller, Warren E., and Stokes, Donald E. (1960). The American Voter. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Davis, Otto A., Hinich, Melvin J. and Ordeshook, Peter C. (1970). “An Expository Development of a Mathematical Model of the Electoral Process.” American Political Science Review 64: 426–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Downs, Anthony (1957). An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Duncan, Otis Dudley (1975). Introduction to Structural Equation Models. New York: Academic.Google Scholar
Fisher, Franklin (1966). The Identification Problem in Economics. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Goldberg, Arthur S. (1966). “Discerning a Causal Pattern Among Data on Voting Behavior.” American Political Science Review 60: 913–22.Google Scholar
Hanushek, Eric A., and Jackson, John E. (1977). Statistical Methods for Social Scientists. New York: Academic.Google Scholar
Hotelling, Harold (1929). “Stability in Competition.” Economic Journal 39: 41–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, John E. (1975). “Issues, Party Choices, and Presidential Votes.” American Journal of Political Science 19: 161–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jennings, M. Kent, and Niemi, Richard G. (1968). “The Transmission of Political Values from Parent to Child.” American Political Science Review 62: 169–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnston, J. (1972). Econometric Methods, 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Kagay, Michael R., and Caldeira, Greg A. (1975). “I Like the Looks of His Face: Elements of Electoral Choice, 1952–1972.” Presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association.Google Scholar
Kelley, Stanley Jr., and Mirer, Thad W. (1974). “The Simple Act of Voting.” American Political Science Review 68: 572–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kessel, John H. (1972). “Comment: The Issues in Issue Voting.” American Political Science Review 66: 459–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Markus, Gregory B. (1976). “Candidates, Parties and Issues: A Feedback Model of the Voting Decision.” Unpublished, Center for Political Studies, University of Michigan.Google Scholar
Miller, Arthur H., Miller, Warren E., Raine, Alden S., and Brown, Thad A. (1976). “A Majority Party in Disarray: Policy Polarization in the 1972 Election.” American Political Science Review 70: 753–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nie, Norman H., Verba, Sidney and Petrocik, John R. (1976). The Changing American Voter. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Page, Benjamin I. (1978). Choices and Echoes in Presidential Elections: Rational Man and Electoral Democracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Page, Benjamin I. and Brody, Richard A. (1972). “Policy Voting and the Electoral Process: The Vietnam War Issue.” American Political Science Review 66: 389–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pomper, Gerald M. (1975). Voters' Choice: Varieties of American Electoral Behavior. New York: Dodd, Mead.Google Scholar
Popkin, Samuel, Gorman, John W., Phillips, Charles, and Smith, Jeffrey A. (1976). “Comment: What Have You Done for Me Lately? Toward an Investment Theory of Voting.” American Political Science Review 70: 779–805.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Repass, David E. (1971). “Issue Salience and Party Choice.” American Political Science Review 65: 389–400.Google Scholar
Repass, David E. (1976). “Comment: Political Methodologies in Disarray: Some Alternative Interpretations of the 1972 Election.” American Political Science Review 70: 814–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapiro, Michael J. (1969). “Rational Political Man: A Synthesis of Economic and Social Psychological Perspectives.” American Political Science Review 63: 1106–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stokes, Donald E. (1966). “Some Dynamic Elements in Contests for the Presidency.” American Political Science Review 60: 19–28.Google Scholar
Theil, Henri (1971). Principles of Econometrics. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar