Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-v5vhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-30T23:54:09.519Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Power and the Monopoly of Information

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 March 1985

Philip E. Converse
Philip E. Converse*
Affiliation:
The University of Michigan
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Other
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 79 , Issue 1 , March 1985 , pp. 1 - 9
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Amnesty International. Torture in the eighties. New York: Amnesty International, 1984.Google Scholar
Bollen, K. A. Issues in the comparative measurement of political democracy. American Sociological Review, 1980, 45, 370–390.10.2307/2095172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Sola Pool, I. Technologies of freedom: On free speech in an electronic age. Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Press, 1983.10.4159/9780674042216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geddes, B., & Zaller, J. Sources of popular support for the authoritarian regime in Brazil. Working Paper No. 64, Survey Research Center, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Green, J. F. The United Nations and human rights. Washington, D.C.: The Brookings Institution, 1956.Google Scholar
Hulteng, J. L., & Nelson, R. P. The fourth estate: An informal appraisal of the news and opinion media. New York: Harper and Row, 1971.Google Scholar
Huntington, S. P. Political order in changing societies. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 1968.Google Scholar
Lasswell, H. D. The language of power. In Lasswell, H. D., Leites, N., et al. Language of politics: studies in quantitative semantics. New York: G. W. Stewart, 1949.Google Scholar
Orwell, G. Nineteen eighty-four: A novel. New York: Harcourt Brace and World, 1949.Google Scholar
Pagels, E. The Gnostic Gospels. New York: Random House, 1981.Google Scholar
Pastecka, J. Official censorship in the Polish People's Republic. Translated from parts of Czarna ksiega cenzury PRL (Black Book of Polish Censorship), I. London: ANEKS, 1977.Google Scholar
Shannon, C. E., & Weaver, W. The mathematical theory of communication. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1949.Google Scholar
Sussman, L. R. Testimony in U.S. Withdrawal from UNESCO: Hearings before the Subcommittee on Human Rights and on International Operations of the Committee on Foreign Affairs, House of Representatives, April 25 and 26 and May 2, 1984, pp. 204–229.Google Scholar
Taylor, C. L., & Jodice, D. A. World handbook of political and social indicators (3rd ed.). New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 1983.Google Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.