Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-n9wrp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-19T13:30:34.690Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Patricians, Professionals, and Political Science

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2006

MICHAEL PARENTI
MICHAEL PARENTI
Affiliation:
Berkeley, California
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This essay sketches the strictures put on political scholarship from the early days of patrician amateurs to modern academic professionals, with special attention given to the emergence of political science and the methodological and ideological issues that developed within that discipline. It is argued herein that although some degree of ethno-class variety was eventually achieved in academia, there has been a lag in ideological diversity. Political heterodoxy often has been discouraged and suppressed. Nevertheless some modest democratic advances have been made in academia in the last half-century.

Type
“THE EVOLUTION OF POLITICAL SCIENCE” ESSAYS
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 100 , Issue 4 , November 2006 , pp. 499 - 505
Copyright
© 2006 by the American Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Cicero Marcus Tullius. 1967. Letters to Atticus. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cicero Marcus Tullius. 1989. Cicero's Letters to His Friends. American Philological Association Classical Resources Series, Scholars Press edition.
Diamond Sigmund. 1992. Compromised Campus: The Collaboration of Universities with the Intelligence Community, 1945–1955. New York: Oxford University Press.
Gibbon Edward. 1984. Memoirs of My Life. London/New York: Penguin Books.
Gilbert Felix. 1990. History: Politics or Culture, Reflections on Ranke and Burckhardt. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Hamerow Theodore S. 1987. Reflections on History and Historians. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
Hill Kim Quaile. 2004. “Myths About the Physical Sciences and Their Implications for Teaching Political Science.” PS: Political Science & Politics 37 (July): 467– 471.Google Scholar
Hill Kim Quaile. 2005. “Science and Political Science Redux.” PS: Political Science & Politics 38 (January): 6– 7.Google Scholar
Hofstadter Richard, and Wilson Smith. 1961. American Higher Education, vol. 2. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Holt Stull W. 1967. Historical Scholarship in the United States and Other Essays. Seattle: University of Washington Press.
Horowitz David. 2006. The Professors. Washington, DC: Regnery.
Iggers Geog, and Konrad von Moltke. 1973. Introduction to Leopold von Ranke. The Theory and Practice of History. Indianapolis and New York: Bobbs-Merrill.
Josephus. 1960. The Jewish War. London/New York: Penguin 1960.
Josephus. 1966. The Life. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press/London: William Heineman.
Kirkpatrick Evron M. 1981. “The Public Side of Political Science.” PS: Political Science & Politics 14 (Summer): 597– 602.Google Scholar
LaPalombara Joseph. 1982. “Assessing the Political Environment for Business: A New Role for Political Scientists?” PS, Political Science (Spring): 180– 86.Google Scholar
Lerner Max, ed. 1948. The Portable Veblen. New York: Viking Press.
Lindblom Charles. 1982. “Another State of Mind.” American Political Science Review 76 (March): 9– 21.Google Scholar
McCoy Charles A., and John Playford, eds. 1967. Apolitical Politics: A Critique of Behavioralism. New York: Thomas Y. Crowell.
Meranto Oneida. 2005. “The Third Wave of McCarthyism: Co-opting the Language of Inclusivity.” New Political Science 27 (June): 215– 32.Google Scholar
Meranto Philip, Oneida Meranto, and Matthew R. Lippman. 1985. Guarding the Ivory Tower: Repression and Rebellion in Higher Education. Denver: Lucha Press.
Nearing Scott. 1972. The Making of an American Radical. New York: Harper & Row.
Novick Peter. 1988. That Noble Dream: The “Objectivity Question” and the American Historical Profession. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Ollman Bertell. 2004. “Marx, Markets and Meatgrinders.” Political Affairs (March): 32– 36.Google Scholar
Ozminkowski Mariusz. 2005. “A Reply to ‘Myths About the Physical Sciences and Their Implications for Teaching Political Science’” PS: Political Science & Politics 38 (January): 3– 5.Google Scholar
Parenti Michael. 1983. “The State of the Discipline: One Interpretation of Everyone's Favorite Controversy.” PS, Political Science (Spring): 189– 96.Google Scholar
Parenti Michael. 1995. Against Empire. San Francisco: City Lights Books.
Parenti Michael. 1996. “Struggles in Academia: A Personal Account.” His Dirty Truths: Reflections on Politics, Media, Ideology, Conspiracy, Ethnic Life and Class Power. San Francisco: City Lights Books.
Parenti Michael. 2003. The Assassination of Julius Caesar: A People's History of Ancient Rome. New York/London: The New Press.
Ranke Leopold von. 1973. The Theory and Practice of History. Introduction by Geog Iggers and Konrad von Moltke. Indianapolis and New York: Bobbs-Merrill. xxviii– xxix and xxx– xxxv
Samuel Raphael. 1981. “People's History.” People's History and Socialist Theory, ed. Raphael Samuel. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Schrecker Ellen. 1986. No Ivy Tower: McCarthyism and the Universities. New York: Oxford University Press.
Seretan L. Glen. 1979. Daniel De Leon: The Odyssey of an American Marxist. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Soley Lawrence. 1997. Leasing the Ivory Tower: The Corporate Takeover of Academia. Boston: South End Press.
Stone I. F. 1988. The Trial of Socrates. Boston/Toronto: Little, Brown.
Strakes Jason. 2005. “In Response to ‘Myths About the Physical Sciences and Their Implications for Teaching Political Science’” PS: Political Science & Politics 38 (January): 5.Google Scholar
White Geoffry with Flannery Hauck, eds. 2000. Campus Inc.: Corporate Power in the Ivory Tower. Amherst, NY: Prometheus.
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.