Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-jbqgn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-23T22:24:28.395Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Passing of Alien Suffrage

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

Leon E. Aylsworth
Leon E. Aylsworth*
Affiliation:
University of Nebraska
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Legislative Notes and Reviews
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 25 , Issue 1 , February 1931 , pp. 114 - 116
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1931

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 The vote in Texas was 57,622 to 53,910; in Missouri, 175,580 to 152,713.

2 This is no doubt the reason why all the latest and most authoritative works on our government continue to state that Arkansas permits aliens to vote. The resurrection of the amendment after the lapse of years is so unique that it is small wonder that it has escaped the attention of careful writers and investigators.

3 Hildreth v. Taylor, 117 Ark. 465; 175 S. W. 40.

4 Brickhouse v. Hill, 116 Ark. 513; 268 S. W. 865.

5 Combs v. Gray, 281 S. W. 918.

6 Biennial Report of the Secretary of State, 1925-1926, pp. 226-227.

Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.