Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-cjp7w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-25T14:06:03.487Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Nationalization and Partisan Realignment in Congressional Elections

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

Sadafumi Kawato
Sadafumi Kawato*
Affiliation:
Hokkaido University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The relationship between nationalization of the U.S. electorate and partisan realignment is explored. Concepts and measurement of nationalization are examined, as well as definitions of electoral change. The British concept of swing is utilized as an appropriate measure of electoral change. Examination of long-term trends in the variances of the congressional vote and swing from 1842 to 1980 shows they are related to the electoral dynamics of realignment. Analysis utilizing a variance-components model shows there has never been a nationalization in terms of configuration of the electorate. But nationalization in the movement of the electorate has taken place cyclically, corresponding to the partisan realignments of the 1890s and the 1930s, rather than monotonically, as suggested by previous research.

Type
Articles
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 81 , Issue 4 , December 1987 , pp. 1235 - 1250
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Benson, Lee, Silbey, Joel H., and Field, Phyllis F.. 1978. Toward the Theory of Stability and Change in American Voting Patterns: New York State, 1792–1970. In The History of American Electoral Behavior, ed. Silbey, Joel H., Bogue, Alan G., and Flanigan, William H.. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Brady, David W. 1985. A Reevaluation of Realignments in American Politics: Evidence from the House of Representatives. American Political Science Review 79:28–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burnham, Walter Dean. 1970. Critical Elections and the Mainsprings of American Politics. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Burnham, Walter Dean. 1975a. American Politics in the 1970s: Beyond Party? In The American Party Systems: Stages of Political Development, 2d ed., ed. Chambers, William Nisbet and Burnham, Walter Dean. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Burnham, Walter Dean. 1975b. Insulation and Responsiveness in Congressional Elections. Political Science Quarterly 90:411–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burnham, Walter Dean. 1978. The 1976 Election: Has the Crisis Been Adjourned? In American Politics and Public Policy, ed. Burnham, Walter Dean and Weinberg, Martha Wagner. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Burnham, Walter Dean. 1981a. The 1980 Earthquake: Realignment, Reaction, or What? In The Hidden Election, ed. Ferguson, Thomas and Rogers, Joel. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
Burnham, Walter Dean. 1981b. The System of 1896: An Analysis. In The Evolution of American Electoral Systems, ed. Kleppner, Paul, Burnham, Walter Dean, Formisano, Ronald P., Hays, Samuel P., Jensen, Richard, and Shade, William G.. Westport, CT: Greenwood.Google Scholar
Burnham, Walter Dean, Clubb, Jerome M., and Flanigan, William H.. 1978. Partisan Realignment: A Systemic Perspective. In The History of American Electoral Behavior, ed. Silbey, Joel H., Bogue, Allan G., and Flanigan, William H.. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Butler, David E. 1951. An Examination of the Results. In The British General Election of 1950, ed. Nicholas, H. G.. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Cain, Bruce E., Ferejohn, John A., and Fiorina, Morris P.. 1984. The Constituency Service Basis of the Personal Vote for U.S. Representatives and British Members of Parliament. American Political Science Review 78:110–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Claggett, William, Flanigan, William, and Zingale, Nancy. 1984. Nationalization of the American Electorate. American Political Science Review 78:77–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clubb, Jerome M., Flanigan, William H., and Zingale, Nancy H.. 1980. Partisan Realignment: Voters, Parties, and Government in American History. Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
David, Paul T. 1972. Party Strength in the United States, 1872–1970. Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia.Google Scholar
Ferejohn, John A. 1977. On the Decline of Competition in Congressional Elections. American Political Science Review 71:166–76.Google Scholar
Fiorina, Morris P. 1977a. The Case of the Vanishing Marginals: The Bureaucracy Did It. American Political Science Review 71:177–81.Google Scholar
Fiorina, Morris P. 1977b. Congress: Keystone of the Washington Establishment. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Flanigan, William H., and Zingale, Nancy H.. 1974. The Measurement of Electoral Change. Political Methodology 1:49–82.Google Scholar
Graybill, Franklin A. 1961. An Introduction to Linear Statistical Models. Vol. 1. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Hinckley, Barbara. 1981. Congressional Elections. Washington: Congressional Quarterly.Google Scholar
Jacobson, Gary C. 1983. The Politics of Congressional Elections. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Katz, Richard S. 1973. The Attribution of Variance in Electoral Returns. American Political Science Review 67:817–28.Google Scholar
Kendall, Maurice G., and Stuart, Alan. 1966. The Advanced Theory of Statistics. Vol. 3. New York: Hafner.Google Scholar
Key, V. O. Jr. 1955. A Theory of Critical Elections. Journal of Politics 17:3–18.Google Scholar
Kleppner, Paul. 1981. Critical Realignments and Electoral Systems. In The Evolution of American Electoral Systems, ed. Kleppner, Paulet al.Westport, CT: Greenwood.Google Scholar
Ladd, Everett Carll Jr., and Hadley, Charles D.. 1978. Transformations of the American Party System. 2d ed. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Mayhew, David R. 1974. Congressional Elections: The Case of the Vanishing Marginals. Polity 6:295–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Niemi, Richard G., and Weisberg, Herbert F.. 1976. Has Voting Changed Historically? In Controversies in American Voting Behavior, ed. Niemi, Richard G. and Weisberg, Herbert F.. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.Google Scholar
Steed, Michael. An Analysis of the Results. 1965. In The British General Election of 1964, ed. Butler, David E. and King, Anthony. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Stokes, Donald. 1965. A Variance Components Model of Political Effects. In Mathematical Applications in Political Science, ed. Claunch, John M.. Dallas: Arnold Foundation.Google Scholar
Stokes, Donald. 1967. Parties and the Nationalization of Electoral Forces. In The American Party Systems: Stages of Political Development, ed. Chambers, William Nisbet and Burnham, Walter Dean. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sundquist, James L. 1983. Dynamics of the Party System: Alignment and Dealignment of Political Parties in the United States. Rev. ed. Washington: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Tufte, Edward E. 1973. The Relationship Between Seats and Votes in Two-Party Systems. American Political Science Review 67:540–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.