Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-45l2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T11:08:48.268Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

“Multi-Level Analysis in State Politics”

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

William Lyons
Affiliation:
University of Tennessee
David R. Morgan
Affiliation:
University of Oklahoma

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Communications
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1976

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Rose, Douglas D., “National and Local Forces in State Politics: The Implications of Multi-Level Policy Analysis,” American Political Science Review, 67 (12, 1973), 11621173 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

2 Sharkansky, Ira, Spending in the American States (Chicago: Rand McNally, 1968), pp. 6066 Google Scholar; Bahl, Roy W., Metropolitan City Expenditures (Lexington: University of Kentucky Press, 1969)Google Scholar; and Campbell, Alan K. and Sacks, Seymour, Metropolitan America: Fiscal Patterns and Governmental Systems (New York: Free Press, 1967)Google Scholar.

3 Stephens, G. Ross, “State Centralization and the Erosion of Local Autonomy”, Journal of Politics, 36 (02, 1974), 4476 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

4 Sharkansky, Ira, “Regionalism, Economic Status and the Public Policies of American States,” Social Science Quarterly, 49 (06, 1968), 926 Google Scholar.

5 Walker, Jack L., “The Diffusion of Innovations Among the American States,” American Political Science Review, 63 (09, 1969), 880899 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

6 Bertrand, Alvin L., “Comments by a Regional Sociologist,” Social Science Quarterly, 49 (06, 1968), 36 Google Scholar.

7 Lineberry, Robert L. and Fowler, Edmund P., “Reformism and Public Policies in American Cities,” American Political Science Review, 61 (09, 1967), 701716 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

8 Rose, , “National and Local Forces,” p. 1164 Google Scholar.

9 Blalock, Hubert M. Jr., Social Statistics, 2nd ed. (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1972), pp. 354355 Google Scholar. The correlation ratio E2 involves taking the ratio of the explained to the total sum of squares:

10 Rose, , “National and Local Forces in State Politics,” p. 1166 Google Scholar.

11 These data from the County and City Data Book 1972, are on tape and were made available through the Inter-University Consortium for Political Research, University of Michigan. We would like to thank Sam Kirkpatrick for assisting us with data interpretation.