Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-tn8tq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-23T22:14:46.806Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Feetham Report: A New Plan for Shanghai

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

William C. Johnstone Jr.*
Affiliation:
George Washington University

Extract

Shall the International Settlement of Shanghai be returned to China to become the prey of Chinese politics and civil disruption, or shall it be held in trust through a plan of Sino-foreign partnership until such time as China shall be able to preserve and protect its wealth and trade? This is the question now brought to the attention of Chinese and foreigners by the recently published report of Judge Richard Feetham, of South Africa, after eighteen months of intensive study of the problem. The report represents the most significant step yet taken toward solving the question of the future status of the International Settlement, the most important of all foreign concessions and settlements in China. For the first time in the history of the Settlement, China and the foreign powers have before them an adequate study of its development, and a definite plan upon which to base an agreement for future action.

The International Settlement is a foreign controlled and governed area on Chinese soil, located on the Whangpoo River and serving as the chief center for the vast trade and commerce of the Yangtze valley. Together with the French Settlement and the Chinese Municipality, it forms a part of the modern city of Shanghai. The International Settlement is an outgrowth of the British Settlement established in 1843 when Shanghai was first opened to foreign trade. Other foreigners were admitted to the original British area, and in 1863 the British and Americans pooled their interests after the French had set up a separate settlement of their own. The amalgamated British and American Settlement, extended in 1899, became the International Settlement of today, containing some eight and three-fourths square miles of land on which reside over one million people. In population, the Settlement is truly international. Although the Chinese comprise over ninety-five per cent of the total, more than forty different nationalities are to be found among the foreign residents. For seventy-three years, however, the Settlement was governed wholly by foreigners in spite of its over-whelming majority of Chinese residents, and it is only since 1928 that the Chinese have had any official voice in Settlement affairs.

Type
International Affairs
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1931

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 See Tyler Dennett, Americans in Eastern Asia, Chap. X; Morse, H.B., International Relations of the Chinese Empire, Vol. II, pp. 113125Google Scholar; G. Lalling and S. Couling, The History of Shanghai, Chap. XXXVI.

2 Of this number, about 30,000 are foreigners; the rest are Chinese.

3 U. S. House Ex. Doc. 123, 33rd Cong., 1st Sess., 1853-54.

4 U. S. Sen. Ex Doc., 35th Cong., 2nd Sess., pp. 125-158.

5 Shanghai Municipal Council, Land Regulations and By-Laws (Shanghai, 1927)Google Scholar.

6 See Shanghai Municipal Council, Annual Reports, 19261927Google Scholar.

7 These demands were made at the Peace Conference of 1919, and have been voiced intermittently since then.

8 See Institute of Pacific Relations, Proceedings of Third Conference (Chicago, 1930)Google Scholar, Report of Bound Table Discussions.

9 Report of the Hon. Mr. Justice Feetham to the Shanghai Municipal Council (Shanghai, 1931), Vol. I, p. 5Google Scholar.

10 Ibid., Vol. I, pp. 1-2.

11 Feetham Report, Vol. II, p. 152Google Scholar.

12 Ibid., Vol. II, p. 134.

13 Ibid., p. 139.

14 Feetham Report, Vol. III, p. 32Google Scholar.

15 Feetham Report, Vol. II, p. 238.Google Scholar

16 E.g., the adoption of measures to facilitate the entrance of more Chinese into the municipal service and the creation of a board of education with Chinese and foreign members to carry out a definite plan of Chinese education.

Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.