Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-9pm4c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T15:43:50.286Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Do Bills of Rights Matter? The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

Charles R. Epp
Charles R. Epp*
Affiliation:
University of Kansas
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Although constitutional protection for rights is increasingly popular, there is little systematic research on the extent to which bills of rights affect the process of government. This article examines the effects a bill of rights may be expected to produce, and then uses a quasi-experimental design to analyze the effects of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms on the Canadian Supreme Court's agenda. The data suggest that the Charter indeed has influenced the Court's agenda, although the effects are more limited than generally recognized. More important, the data suggest that a number of the influences often attributed to the Charter likely resulted instead from the growth of what I call the support structure for legal mobilization, consisting of various resources that enable litigants to pursue rights-claims in court. The political significance of a bill of rights, then, depends on factors in civil society that are independent of constitutional structure.

Type
Articles
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 90 , Issue 4 , December 1996 , pp. 765 - 779
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Abel, Richard L., and Lewis, Phillip S. C., eds. 1988. Lawyers in Society, Volume I: The Common Law World. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Atiyah, P. S., and Summers, Robert S.. 1987. Form and Substance in Anglo-American Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Atkins, Burton M. 1991. “Party Capability Theory as an Explanation for Intervention Behavior in the English Court of Appeal.” American Journal of Political Science 35 (11):881–903.Google Scholar
Atkins, Burton M., and Glick, Henry R.. 1976. “Environmental and Structural Variables as Determinants of Issues in State Courts of Last Resort.” American Journal of Political Science 20 (02): 97–115.Google Scholar
Banting, Keith, and Simeon, Richard, eds. 1983. And No One Cheered: Federalism, Democracy, and the Constitution Act. Toronto: Methuen.Google Scholar
Barnum, David G. 1988. “Article 21 and Policy Making Role of Courts in India: An American Perspective.” Journal of the Indian Law Institute 30 (1):19–44.Google Scholar
Bogart, W. A. 1994. Courts and Country: The Limits of Litigation and the Social and Political Life of Canada. Toronto: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Brennan, Geoffrey, and Hamlin, Alan. 1994. “A Revisionist View of the Separation of Powers.” Journal of Theoretical Politics 6 (07):345–68.Google Scholar
Brenner, Saul, and Krol, John. 1989. “Strategies in Certiorari Voting on the United States Supreme Court.” Journal of Politics 51 (11):828–40.Google Scholar
Brodie, Ian Ross. 1992. “Interest Groups and the Charter of Rights and Freedoms: Interveners at the Supreme Court of Canada.” M.A. thesis, University of Calgary.Google Scholar
Brodie, Ian Ross. 1995. “Charting the Rise of Interest Group Activity in the Supreme Court of Canada.” Presented at the annual meeting of the Law and Society Association, Toronto.Google Scholar
Brodie, Ian, and Nevitte, Neil. 1993. “Evaluating the Citizens' Constitution Theory.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 26 (06):235–59.Google Scholar
Brown v. Board of Education. 1954. 347 U.S. 483.Google Scholar
Bushnell, Ian. 1982. “Leave to Appeal Applications to the Supreme Court of Canada: A Matter of Public Importance.” Supreme Court Law Review 3:479–558.Google Scholar
Bushnell, Ian. 1986. “Leave to Appeal Applications: The 1984–1985 Term.” Supreme Court Law Review 8:383–404.Google Scholar
Bushnell, Ian. 1992. The Captive Court: A Study of the Supreme Court of Canada. Montreal: McGill-Queen's University Press.Google Scholar
Cairns, Alan C. 1991. Disruptions: Constitutional Struggles from the Charter to Meech Lake, ed. Williams, Douglas E.. Toronto: McClelland and Stewart.Google Scholar
Cairns, Alan C. 1992. Charter versus Federalism: The Dilemmas of Constitutional Reform. Montreal: McGill-Queen's University Press.Google Scholar
Caldeira, Gregory A., and Wright, John R.. 1988. “Organized Interests and Agenda Setting in the U.S. Supreme Court.” American Political Science Review 82 (12):1109–27.Google Scholar
Casper, Gerhard, and Posner, Richard A.. 1976. The Workload of the Supreme Court. Chicago: American Bar Foundation.Google Scholar
Court Challenges Program. 1992. Court Challenges Program Annual Report, 1991–1992. Ottawa: Court Challenges Program.Google Scholar
Devins, Reva. 1993. “A Perspective from the Ontario Human Rights Commission.” In The Impact of the Charter on the Public Policy Process, ed. Monahan, Patrick and Finkelstein, Marie. North York, Ont.: York University Centre for Public Law and Public Policy.Google Scholar
Elster, Jon. 1988. “Introduction.” In Constitutionalism and Democracy, ed. Elster, Jon and Slagstad, Rune. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Epp, Charles R. 1995. “Constitutional Courts and the Rights Agenda in Comparative Perspective, 1960–1990.” Ph.D. diss., University of Wisconsin-Madison.Google Scholar
Epstein, Lee, and Kobylka, Joseph F.. 1992. The Supreme Court and Legal Change: Abortion and the Death Penalty. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Epstein, Lee, and Rowland, C. K.. 1991. “Debunking the Myth of Interest Group Invincibility in the Courts.” American Political Science Review 85 (03):205–17.Google Scholar
Frankfurter, Felix, and Landis, James M.. 1927. The Business of the Supreme Court: A Study in the Federal Judicial System. New York: MacMillan.Google Scholar
Frideres, James S. 1993. Native Peoples in Canada. Scarborough, Ont.: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Galanter, Marc. 1974. “Why the Haves Come Out Ahead: Speculations on the Limits of Social Change.” Law & Society Review 9 (Fall):95–160.Google Scholar
Galanter, Marc, and Palay, Thomas. 1991. Tournament of Lawyers: The Transformation of the Big Law Firm. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Greenberg, Douglas, Katz, Stanley N., Oliviero, Melanie Beth, and Wheatley, Steven C.. 1993. Constitutionalism and Democracy: Transitions in the Contemporary World. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hart, Vivien. 1994. Bound by Our Constitution: Women, Workers, and the Minimum Wage. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Hartog, Hendrik. 1987. “The Constitution of Aspiration and ‘The Rights that Belong to Us All.’ ” Journal of American History 74 (12):1013–34.Google Scholar
Heard, Andrew D. 1991. “The Charter in the Supreme Court of Canada: The Importance of Which Judges Hear an Appeal.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 24 (06):289–307.Google Scholar
Holland, Kenneth M., ed. 1991. Judicial Activism in Comparative Perspective. New York: St. Martin's.Google Scholar
Holmes, Stephen. 1995. Passions and Constraint: On the Theory of Liberal Democracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Jick, Todd D. 1979. “Mixing Qualitative and Quantitative Methods: Triangulation in Action.” Administrative Science Quarterly 24 (12): 602–41.Google Scholar
Kagan, Robert A. 1994. “Do Lawyers Cause Adversarial Legalism? A Preliminary Inquiry.” Law & Social Inquiry 19 (Winter):1–62.Google Scholar
Kagan, Robert A., Cartwright, Bliss, Friedman, Lawrence M., and Wheeler, Stanton. 1977. “The Business of State Supreme Courts, 1870–1970.” Stanford Law Review 30 (11): 121–56.Google Scholar
Kammen, Michael. 1986. A Machine that Would Go of Itself: The Constitution in American Culture. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
King, Gary, Keohane, Robert O., and Verba, Sidney. 1994. Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kluger, Richard. 1977. Simple Justice: the History of Brown v. Board of Education and Black America's Struggle for Equality. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
Knopff, Rainer. 1990. Human Rights and Social Technology: The New War on Discrimination. Ottawa: Carleton University Press.Google Scholar
Knopff, Rainer, and Morton, F. L.. 1985. “Nation Building and the Charter.” In Constitutionalism, Citizenship and Society in Canada, ed. Cairns, Alan and Williams, Cynthia. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Knopff, Rainer, and Morton, F. L.. 1992. Charter Politics. Scarborough, Ont: Nelson Canada.Google Scholar
Kome, Penney. 1983. The Taking of Twenty-Eight: Women Challenge the Constitution. Toronto: Women's Press.Google Scholar
Laskin, Bora. 1951. “The Supreme Court of Canada: A Final Court of and for Canadians.” Canadian Bar Review 29 (12):1038–79.Google Scholar
Lawrence, Susan E. 1990. The Poor in Court: The Legal Services Program and Supreme Court Decision Making. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Lowell, James Russell. 1888. “The Place of the Independent in Politics.” In Political Essays. Boston: Houghton, Mifflin.Google Scholar
Madison, James. [1787–1790] 1977, 1979. The Papers of James Madison.Google Scholar
Madison, James. [1787–1790] 1977, 1979. The Papers of James Madison. Vol. 10. 1977. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Madison, James. [1787–1790] 1977, 1979. The Papers of James Madison. Vol. 11. 1977. Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia.Google Scholar
Madison, James. [1787–1790] 1977, 1979. The Papers of James Madison. Vol. 12. 1979. Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia.Google Scholar
Mandel, Michael. 1989. The Charter of Rights and the Legalisation of Politics in Canada. Toronto: Thompson.Google Scholar
Manfredi, Christopher P. 1993. Judicial Power and the Charter: Canada and the Paradox of Liberal Constitutionalism. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar
March, James G., and Olsen, Johan P.. 1989. Rediscovering Institutions: The Organizational Basis of Politics. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
McCann, Michael W. 1994. Rights at Work: Pay Equity Reform and the Politics of Legal Mobilization. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
McCormick, Peter. 1993. “Party Capability Theory and Appellate Success in the Supreme Court of Canada, 1949–1992.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 26 (09):523–40.Google Scholar
McGuire, Kevin T. 1993. The Supreme Court Bar: Legal Elites in the Washington Community. Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia.Google Scholar
Milligan and Company. 1989. “Evaluation of the Test Case Funding Program.” Report prepared for Department of Indian Affairs and Northern Development. Ottawa.Google Scholar
Monahan, Patrick. 1987. Politics and the Constitution: The Charter, Federalism and the Supreme Court of Canada. Toronto: Carswell.Google Scholar
Morton, F. L. 1987. “The Political Impact of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 20 (03):31–55.Google Scholar
Morton, F. L. 1993. “The Charter Revolution and the Court Party.” In The Impact of the Charter on the Public Policy Process, ed. Monahan, Patrick and Finkelstein, Marie. North York, Ont.: York University Centre for Public Law and Public Policy.Google Scholar
Morton, F. L., and Knopff, Rainer. 1993. “The Supreme Court as the Vanguard of the Intelligentsia: The Charter Movement as Post-Materialist Politics.” In Two Hundred Years of Canadian Constitutionalism, ed. Ajzenstat, Janet. Ottawa: Canadian Study of Parliament Group.Google Scholar
Morton, F. L., Russell, Peter H., and Riddell, Troy. 1995. “The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms: A Descriptive Analysis of the First Decade, 1982–1992.” National Journal of Constitutional Law 5:1–60.Google Scholar
Morton, F. L., Russell, Peter H., and Withey, Michael J.. 1989. “The Supreme Court's First One Hundred Charter of Rights Decisions: A Statistical Analysis.” Osgoode Hall Law Journal 30 (Spring):1–56.Google Scholar
National Legal Aid Research Centre. 1981. Justice Information Report: Legal Services in Canada 1979/80. Ottawa: Implementation Work Group.Google Scholar
Norberg v. Wynrib. 1992. 92 D.L.R. 4th 449.Google Scholar
O'Connor, Karen. 1980. Women's Organizations' Use of the Courts. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Olson, Susan. 1990. “Interest-Group Litigation in Federal District Court: Beyond the Political Disadvantage Theory.” Journal of Politics 52 (08):854–82.Google Scholar
Ordeshook, Peter C. 1992. “Constitutional Stability.” Constitutional Political Economy 3 (2):137–75.Google Scholar
Oscapella, E. L., and Associates. 1988. “Legal Liaison and Support Study: Test Case Funding Program.” Report prepared for the Department of Indian Affairs and Northern Development, Ottawa.Google Scholar
Pacelle, Richard L. Jr. 1991. The Transformation of the Supreme Court's Agenda: From the New Deal to the Reagan Administration. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Pal, Leslie. 1993. Interests of State: The Politics of Language, Multiculturalism, and Feminism in Canada. Montreal: McGill-Queen's University Press.Google Scholar
Pal, Leslie, and Morton, F. L.. 1986. “ Bliss v. The Attorney General of Canada: From Legal Defeat to Political Victory.” Osgoode Hall Law Journal 24 (Spring):141–60.Google Scholar
Paltiel, Khayyam Z. 1982. “The Changing Environment and Role of Special Interest Groups.” Canadian Public Administration 25 (Spring):198–210.Google Scholar
Perry, H. W. Jr. 1991. Deciding to Decide: Agenda Setting in the United States Supreme Court. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Presthus, Robert. 1974. Elites in the Policy Process. Toronto: MacMiilan.Google Scholar
Pross, Paul, ed. 1975. Pressure Group Behaviour in Canadian Politics. Toronto: McGraw-Hill, Ryerson.Google Scholar
Rakove, Jack N. 1991. “Parchment Barriers and the Politics of Rights.” In A Culture of Rights: The Bill of Rights in Philosophy, Politics, and Law—1791 and 1991, ed. Lacey, Michael J. and Haakonssen, Knud. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Razack, Sherene. 1991. Canadian Feminism and the Law: The Women's Legal Education and Action Fund and the Pursuit of Equality. Toronto: Second Story Press.Google Scholar
Romanow, Roy, Whyte, John, and Leeson, Howard. 1984. Canada Notwithstanding: The Making of the Constitution 1976–1982. Toronto: Carswell/Methuen.Google Scholar
Russell, Peter. 1985. “The Supreme Court and Federal-Provincial Relations: The Political Use of Legal Resources.” Canadian Public Policy 11 (03):161–70.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, Gerald N. 1991. The Hollow Hope: Can Courts Bring About Social Change? Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Sartori, Giovanni. 1994. Comparative Constitutional Engineering: An Inquiry into Structures, Incentives, and Outcomes. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Segal, Jeffrey A., and Spaeth, Harold J.. 1993. The Supreme Court and the Attitudinal Model. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sheehan, Reginald S., Mishler, William, and Songer, Donald S.. 1992. “Ideology, Status, and the Differential Success of Direct Parties before the Supreme Court.” American Political Science Review 86 (06):464–71.Google Scholar
Singh v. Minister of Employment and Immigration. 1985. 1 S.C.R. 177.Google Scholar
Snell, James G., and Vaughan, Frederick. 1985. The Supreme Court of Canada: History of the Institution. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Songer, Donald R., and Sheehan, Reginald S.. 1992. “Who Wins on Appeal? Upperdogs and Underdogs in the United States Courts of Appeals.” American Journal of Political Science 36 (06):235–58.Google Scholar
Sorauf, Frank J. 1976. The Wall of Separation: The Constitutional Politics of Church and State. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Stager, David A. A., and Arthurs, Harry W.. 1990. Lawyers in Canada. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Sunstein, Cass R. 1995. “Rights after Communism.” East European Constitutional Review 4 (Winter):61–2.Google Scholar
Tarnopolsky, Walter S. 1982. Discrimination and the Law in Canada. Toronto: Richard de Boo.Google Scholar
Tate, C. Neal, and Sittiwong, Panu. 1989. “Decision Making in the Canadian Supreme Court: Extending the Personal Attributes Model Across Nations.” Journal of Politics 51 (11):900–16.Google Scholar
Tate, C. Neal, and Vallinder, Torbjorn, eds. 1995. The Global Expansion of Judicial Power. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Vose, Clement E. 1959. Caucasians Only: The Supreme Court, the NAACP, and the Restrictive Covenant Cases. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Walker, Samuel. 1990. In Defense of American Liberties: A History of the ACLU. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wasby, Stephen. 1995. Race Relations Litigation in an Age of Complexity. Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia.Google Scholar
Webb, Eugene J., Campbell, Donald T., Schwartz, Richard D., Sechrest, Lee, and Grove, Janet Belew. 1981. Unobtrusive Measures: Nonreactive Research in the Social Sciences. 2d ed. Chicago: Rand McNally.Google Scholar
Weingast, Barry R. 1993. “Constitutions as Governance Structures: The Political Foundations of Secure Markets.” Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics 149 (1):286–311.Google Scholar
Zemans, Frances Kahn. 1983. “Legal Mobilization: The Neglected Role of the Law in the Political System.” American Political Science Review 77 (09):690–703.Google Scholar
Zemans, Frederick. 1978. “Legal Aid and Advice in Canada.” Osgoode Hall Law Journal 16 (11):663–93.Google Scholar