Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-tn8tq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-02T20:34:32.119Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Diplomatic Affairs and International Law, 1913

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2013

Alfred L. P. Dennis
Affiliation:
University of Wisconsin

Extract

War has marked the year 1913; and charges and countercharges as to alleged atrocities by belligerents have been rife. Treaties were drawn to be promptly torn up; and solemn declarations of intention and policy often proved futile. The existence of internal disorder and the outbreak of domestic revolutions in several countries have also exerted disturbing influences on international relations. The result was economic loss and diplomatic tension even well beyond the field of military operations. And these conditions have led to renewed activity in the struggle for concessions and investment in renascent communities. Racial and religious sentiments have also aroused bitter feeling; while political leaders in several countries compel renewed consideration of the weight of individuals in the determination of the world's affairs.

In large part the problems of 1913 were historic; but in part they were affected by apparently impending changes which we cannot as yet define. Thus the influence of socialism and of various forms of radical thought on international relations is a factor. The adoption of oil as a naval fuel, the opening of the Panama Canal, the plans for administrative reorganization of Turkey, and its capitalistic development, the renewed debate as to the Monroe doctrine, and the problem of China are all matters whose future significance scarcely concern us here; but their influence in the past year has been unquestionably great. We cannot estimate as yet the true value of many recommendations touching various fields of international coöperation; and the value of delay in international action still remains in dispute. So on the whole the year 1913 has apparently been the year of the cynic.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1914

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Russia, 75,000; Austria-Hungary, 58,505; France, 183,715 (voted) Germany, 38,372 and 136,000 (voted).

2 For comparative purposes these figures are not entirely satisfactory because of the three different financial years of Great Britain, France, and the United States, because of varied minor charges included in some naval budgets and because it has been necessary to take amounts voted for new construction etc. and not amounts expended in a given year in order to secure a common basis. The figures are given in millions of dollars for a financial year starting in 1913.

(a) Figures not available. In any case the budget of the Italian army was omitted because Italy had been at war and was still naturally in an abnormal condition. All of the other powers were at peace.

Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.