Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-sjtt6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-23T23:08:02.157Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

County Managership Proposed in Texas

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

Wallace C. Murphy*
Affiliation:
University of Texas

Extract

The regular session of the Texas legislature which began in January of this year had before it a proposal for a constitutional amendment to permit counties to adopt the county manager plan of government. The resolution providing for submitting the question to the voters at the regular election in 1932 passed the House by the required two-thirds majority, but failed in the Senate by a single vote.

The amendment would have empowered counties having a population of over 60,000, on a favorable vote of their qualified voters, to draw up home-rule charters for themselves. On a two-thirds vote of each house of the legislature, all other counties were to have the same privilege. The amendment also carried a grant of power to cities and counties to consolidate the two governments. To carry out the latter provision, the rural and urban votes were to be counted separately; and a majority of the urban and a two-thirds majority of the rural votes were required. The larger majority required in the rural sections was a concession to the natural antipathy to a “one-man government” found among rural voters.

Type
Rural Local Government
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1931

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Senate Journal, Forty-second Legislature, May 21, 1931.

2 House Joint Resolution, No. 25 (1931).

3 General Laws, Forty-first Legislature, Fourth and Fifth Called Sessions, p. 30 (1930)Google Scholar.

Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.