No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Cleveland's Street Railway Settlement
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 02 September 2013
Abstract
![Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'](https://static.cambridge.org/content/id/urn%3Acambridge.org%3Aid%3Aarticle%3AS0003055400005499/resource/name/firstPage-S0003055400005499a.jpg)
- Type
- News and Notes
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © American Political Science Association 1910
References
1 Annual Report for the Year Ending Dec. 31, 1908, of the Public Service Commission of New York, for the First District, vol. 1, pp. 177 et seq.
2 Mayor Johnson says “there are four vital defects in the street railway settlement:
The first is, the maximum fare is too high.
The second is, the valuation is too high.
The third is, the city's control by arbitration is too weak.
The fourth is, a friendly council can relieve the company of all the people's safeguards without a referendum vote.”
Comments
No Comments have been published for this article.