Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-m9pkr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-11T07:35:20.495Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Civic Engagement and Mass–Elite Policy Agenda Agreement in American Communities

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 June 2005

KIM QUAILE HILL  and
TETSUYA MATSUBAYASHI
KIM QUAILE HILL
Affiliation:
Texas A&M University
TETSUYA MATSUBAYASHI
Affiliation:
Texas A&M University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We test propositions about how different forms of civic engagement are related to democratic representation in American communities. Our data are for the samples of communities, their citizens, and their leaders originally examined by Verba and Nie in Participation in America (1972). Our analyses of those data indicate that membership in bridging social–capital civic associations is unrelated to democratic responsiveness of leaders to the mass public but that bonding social–capital membership is negatively associated with such responsiveness. We also demonstrate that bonding social–capital civic engagement weakens the democratic linkage processes inherent in elections.

Type
ARTICLES
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 99 , Issue 2 , May 2005 , pp. 215 - 224
Copyright
© 2005 by the American Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Berry Jeffrey M., Kent E. Portney, and Ken Thomson. 1993. The Rebirth of Urban Democracy. Washington, DC: Brookings.
Brehm John, and Wendy Rahn. 1997. “Individual-Level Evidence for the Causes and Consequences of Social Capital.” American Journal of Political Science 41 (July): 999– 1023.Google Scholar
Dahl Robert A. 1971. Polyarchy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Dahl Robert A., and Edward R. Tufte. 1973. Size and Democracy. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Dubnick Melvin J. 2003. “Nurturing Civic Lives: Developmental Perspectives on Civic Education—Introduction.” PS: Political Science & Politics XXXVI (April): 253– 55.Google Scholar
Fiorina Morris P. 1999. “Extreme Voices: A Dark Side of Civic Engagement.” In Civic Engagement in American Democracy, ed. Theda Skocpol and Morris P. Fiorina. Washington, DC: Brookings.
Friedrich Robert J.. 1982. “In Defense of Multiplicative Terms in Multiple Regression Equations.” American Journal of Political Science 26 (November): 797– 833.Google Scholar
Fukuyama Francis. 1995. Trust. New York: Free Press.
Granovetter Mark S. 1973. “The Strength of Weak Ties.” American Journal of Sociology 78 (May): 1360– 80.Google Scholar
Hansen Susan Blackall. 1972. “Concurrence in American Communities: The Response of Local Leaders to the Community Political Agenda.” Ph.D. diss. Stanford University.
Hansen Susan Blackall. 1975. “Participation, Political Structure, and Concurrence.” American Political Science Review LXIX (December): 1181– 99.Google Scholar
Hero Rodney E. 2003. “Social Capital and Racial Inequality in America.” Perspectives on Politics 1 (March): 113– 22.Google Scholar
Hill Kim Quaile. 2004. “Reconstructing the 64-Community Data Set for Verba and Nie's” Participation in America. Texas A&M University. Typescript.
Hurley Patricia A., and Kim Quaile Hill. 2003. “Beyond the Demand-Input Model: A Theory of Representational Linkages.” Journal of Politics 65 (May): 304– 26.Google Scholar
Kirlin John J., and Mary K. Kirlin. 2002. “Strengthening Effective Government–Citizen Connections through Greater Civic Engagement.” Public Administration Review 62 (September): 80– 85.Google Scholar
Knack Stephen 2002. “Social Capital and the Quality of Government: Evidence from the States.” American Journal of Political Science 46 (October): 772– 85.Google Scholar
Levi Margaret. 1996. “Social and Unsocial Capital: A Review Essay of Robert Putnam's Making Democracy Work.” Politics & Society 24 (March): 45– 55.Google Scholar
Mettler Suzanne. 2002. “Bringing the State Back In to Civic Engagement: Policy Feedback Effects of the G.I. Bill for World War II Veterans.” American Political Science Review 96 (June): 351– 65.Google Scholar
Miller Warren E., and Donald E. Stokes. 1963. “Constituency Influence in Congress.” American Political Science Review 57 (March): 45– 56.Google Scholar
Oliver J. Eric. 2001. Democracy in Suburbia. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Pattie Charles, Patrick Seyd, and Paul Whiteley. 2003. “Citizenship and Civic Engagement: Attitudes and Behavior in Britain.” Political Studies 51 (October): 443– 68.Google Scholar
Powell G. Bingham. 2000. Elections as Instruments of Democracy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Putnam Robert D. 1993. Making Democracy Work. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Putnam Robert D. 2000. Bowling Alone. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Stimson James A., Michael B. MacKuen, and Robert S. Erikson. 1995. “Dynamic Representation.” American Political Science Review 89 (September): 543– 65.Google Scholar
Swain David. 2001. “Linking Civic Engagement and Community Improvement: A Practitioner Perspective on the Communities Movement.” National Civic Review 90 (Winter): 319– 33.Google Scholar
U.S. Bureau of the Census. 1973. Census of Population: 1970. Characteristics of the Population. Washington, DC: USBC.
Uslaner Eric M. 2002. The Moral Foundations of Trust. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Uslaner Eric M., and Richard S. Conley. 2003. “Civic Engagement and Particularized Trust: The Ties That Bind People to Their Ethnic Communities.” American Politics Research 31 (July): 331– 60.Google Scholar
Verba Sidney, and Norman H. Nie. 1972. Participation in America. New York: Harper & Row.
Verba Sidney, Kay Lehman Schlozman, and Henry E. Brady. 1995. Voice and Equality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.